Utilizing Non-Traditional Roles Of Your Actuary To Your Benefit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

utilizing non traditional roles of your actuary to your
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Utilizing Non-Traditional Roles Of Your Actuary To Your Benefit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Utilizing Non-Traditional Roles Of Your Actuary To Your Benefit Working With Your Actuary January 15, 2013 Richard C. Frese, FCAS, MAAA Agenda Introduction to an actuary The actuarial process and communication for optimal results


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Utilizing Non-Traditional Roles Of Your Actuary To Your Benefit “Working With Your Actuary”

January 15, 2013 Richard C. Frese, FCAS, MAAA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introduction to an actuary The actuarial process and communication for optimal results Hard market preparation with tune-up of self-insurance program Financial reporting compliance Best practices in working with an actuary

Agenda

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

What Is An Actuary?

An actuary is a person who passes as an expert

  • n the basis of a prolific ability to produce an

infinite variety of incomprehensive figures calculated with micrometric precision from the vaguest of assumptions based on debatable evidence from inconclusive data derived by persons of questionable reliability for the sole purpose of confusing an already hopelessly befuddled group of persons who never read the statistics anyway!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

When Should I Use An Actuary? (1)

Financial Reporting

– Loss Reserve Estimation for Accrual – Projection of Contributions / Budgeting – Captive Feasibility and Valuation – Statements of Actuarial Opinion

Insurance Decisions

– Selecting Retentions – Selecting Limits – Negotiating Excess Insurance Rates – Negotiating Collateral

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

When Should I Use An Actuary? (2)

Business Decisions

– Mergers and Acquisitions – Pricing of Products – Determination of Class Plans

Risk Management

– Allocation of Premium or Liabilities to Divisions / Entities – Enterprise Risk Management – Examining Loss Drivers and Safety Studies – Benchmarking

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

What Firm And What Actuary?

A firm with the reputation, experience and internal resources necessary to provide the needed study An actuary with credentials and training in the specific area of your needs (Fellow of CAS for P/C needs) An actuary who sees beyond the numbers An actuary and firm that have the respect and approval of the end user

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

The Actuarial Process And Communication For Optimal Results

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

What Are The Basic Loss Components?

PAID CASE RESERVES REPORTED (INCURRED) INCURRED BUT NOT REPORTED (IBNR) ULTIMATE INDEMNITY LOSSES LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES (LEGAL)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Ultimate Losses = Paid Losses + Case Reserves + IBNR Losses Liability = Case Reserves + IBNR Losses

Data is for demonstration purposes only

How Do Current Losses Become Ultimate Losses?

(Ultimate) Occurrence Paid Case Incurred IBNR End of Year Counts Losses Reserves Losses Losses Time 2007 75 2,340,000 2,340,000 ???? ???? 2008 80 2,500,000 70,000 2,570,000 ???? ???? 2009 70 2,700,000 180,000 2,880,000 ???? ???? 2010 60 2,300,000 300,000 2,600,000 ???? ???? 2011 40 2,200,000 760,000 2,960,000 ???? ???? 2012 25 280,000 1,000,000 1,280,000 ???? ???? Total 350 12,320,000 2,310,000 14,630,000 ???? ????

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Unknown loss events that are expected to become claims Known loss events that are expected to later be presented as claims Expected future case development on claims already reported

What Are Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Losses?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Multiple methods based on paid losses, case reserves and claim counts Actual loss emergence from previous (mature) years

Future is based on history How Is IBNR Calculated?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

INVESTIGATE EVALUATE NEGOTIATE OCCURS ACCIDENT CLAIM REPORTED CLAIM SETTLED

$

?

TIME

What Is The Life Of An Individual Claim?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Year 12 24 36 48 60 72 2007 1,010,000 2,090,000 2,220,000 2,310,000 2,330,000 2,340,000 2008 1,100,000 2,310,000 2,450,000 2,550,000 2,570,000 2009 1,190,000 2,550,000 2,760,000 2,880,000 2010 1,300,000 2,460,000 2,600,000 2011 1,470,000 2,960,000 2012 1,280,000 Months of Development

2,310,000 1,100,000 = 2.04 What if the 1,100,000 was 2,200,000 instead?

1,280,000 X 2.04 X 1.07 X 1.04 X 1.008X 1.004 = 2,940,000

What Is Loss Development?

What is your program’s loss development?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Where Does IBNR Get Reported?

(Ultimate) Occurrence Paid Case Incurred IBNR End of Year Counts Losses Reserves Losses Losses Time 2007 75 2,340,000 2,340,000 2,340,000 2008 80 2,500,000 70,000 2,570,000 10,000 2,580,000 2009 70 2,700,000 180,000 2,880,000 40,000 2,920,000 2010 60 2,300,000 300,000 2,600,000 140,000 2,740,000 2011 40 2,200,000 760,000 2,960,000 370,000 3,330,000 2012 25 280,000 1,000,000 1,280,000 1,660,000 2,940,000 Total 350 12,320,000 2,310,000 14,630,000 2,220,000 16,850,000

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Loss Development-WC

What Is Your Program’s Tail?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120

Months

%

  • f

U lt im a t e L

  • s

s

IBNR Case Reserv es Paid Loss

Sample development pattern

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Loss Development-GL

What Is Your Program’s Tail?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120

Months

%

  • f

U lt im a t e L

  • s

s

IBNR Case Reserv es Paid Loss

Sample development pattern

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Loss Development-PROP

What Is Your Program’s Tail?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120

Months

%

  • f

U lt im a t e L

  • s

s

IBNR Case Reserv es Paid Loss

Sample development pattern

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Cost Control

– Risk management – Proactive claims handling – “Skin in the game”

Communication!

– Discussions with actuary

How Do I Achieve Results?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Claim Handling Process

– What are the specific objectives and guidelines of the program in setting an unpaid case reserve?

  • Stair step
  • Reserve to ultimate
  • Inflation provision?

What Should I Discuss With My Actuary? (1)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Does My Reserving Make A Difference?

10 claims initially reserved at $100K apiece for a total of $1 million 9 claims closed at $100k; 1 claim closed at $1.1 million for a total of $2 million Should each claim have been reserved at $200k? 90% right or 100% wrong IBNR or case reserve

Consistency is the key!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Claim Trends

– Are there any specific trends?

  • Frequency/Severity increasing
  • Shifts in claim settling rate, reporting rate,

payments of legal expenses (ALAE)

  • Any future large settlement

Double whammy! (bigger losses x bigger LDFs)

What Should I Discuss With My Actuary? (2)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

How Does Risk Management Make A Difference?

Trend or less is good! Flat is great!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Program Changes

– Exposures – Retention – Excess/reinsurance premium

Anything different from the past?

Remember: Actuarial science is based on history!

What Should I Discuss With My Actuary? (3)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Hard Market Preparation With Tune-up Of Self-insurance Program

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Aggregated NAIC Schedule P Information

What Is Happening In The Market?

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Gross Loss Ratios Accident Year

Market Cycle

Med Mal‐‐CM WC CAL

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Appetite for risk Predictability of losses Cost considerations

Tactic 1 – Proper Retention

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Uses severity trend of 5.0% per year for all lines for demonstration purposes

What Is Your Working Layer?

Occurrence Report Indemnity Expense Total 2013 Trended Closing Date Date Paid Paid Paid Paid Cause Date 2003 2005 750,000 25,000 775,000 1,300,000 WC - Lifting 2008 2008 2008 500,000 20,000 520,000 700,000 Auto - Large Truck 2010 2009 2009 500,000 25,000 525,000 600,000 Auto - Large Truck 2010 2011 2011 350,000 10,000 360,000 400,000 WC - Lifting 2011 2011 2001 200,000 35,000 235,000 300,000 WC - Ankle 2011 2012 2012 175,000 15,000 190,000 200,000 Auto - Small Truck 2005

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Insurable exposures Availability in marketplace Structure

Tactic 2 – Feasibility

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Goals Exposure vs. losses

– Stability vs. responsiveness – Length of experience – Caps on losses

Advanced systems

Tactic 3 – Allocations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Identify loss drivers Analyze data interactions Prioritize actions

Tactic 4 – Safety Study

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Use of industry data Benchmarks Other factors Conversations with providers

Remember: Differentiation!

Tactic 5 – Ensuring Credit

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Financial Reporting Compliance

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Booking within a range Percentile Discounting

– Segregated assets return – Corporate bonds – Risk free rate

Gross-Net Presentation

What Are Auditor’s “Hot” Topics?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Best Practices For Risk Management In Working With An Actuary

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Confirm scope of analysis Have frequent conversations

– Before, during, after & interim – Meet in person

Request list of drivers and changes in results Understand analysis and assumptions Challenge the actuary and ask questions Utilize the actuary as a partner

What Are Tips For A Smooth Actuarial Process From Start To Finish?

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Questions?

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Richard C. Frese, FCAS, MAAA

  • Firm: Milliman, Inc.
  • Address: 71 S. Wacker Drive, 31st Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

  • Phone: 312-499-5648
  • Fax: 312-499-5690
  • Email: richard.frese@milliman.com

Contact Information