Its Not Just for Pension Actuaries What Every Actuary Should Know - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

it s not just for pension actuaries
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Its Not Just for Pension Actuaries What Every Actuary Should Know - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Its Not Just for Pension Actuaries What Every Actuary Should Know About Social What Every Actuary Should Know About Social Security Funding Session G-3 Tuesday, November 8, 2011 Janet M. Barr, ASA MAAA EA Stephen C Goss ASA MAAA Stephen C.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

It’s Not Just for Pension Actuaries

What Every Actuary Should Know About Social What Every Actuary Should Know About Social Security Funding

Session G-3 Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Janet M. Barr, ASA MAAA EA Stephen C Goss ASA MAAA Stephen C. Goss, ASA MAAA Steven G. Lehmann, FCAS MAAA FSA FCIA Thomas S. Terry, FSA MAAA FCA EA

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Long-term—Actuarial deficit increased from 1.92

g to 2.22 percent of payroll due primarily to new demographic data and methods

  • Combined OASI-DI Trust Fund exhausts 2036 (1 yr earlier)
  • Cost exceeds non-interest income permanently 2010+
  • Cost exceeds total income starting 2023 (2 years earlier)
  • Near-term—Slightly slower economic recovery

b l d l i f i l l but longer delay in recovery of earnings levels

  • DI trust fund exhaustion still projected for 2018

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Social Security Trust Fund Ratios

Assets as Percent of Annual Cost Trustees Report Intermediate Projections 400% 450%

OASDI 2011TR

Historical 300% 350%

OASDI 2011TR OASI 2011TR DI 2011TR OASDI 2010TR OASI 2010TR DI 2010TR

200% 250% OASI OASDI 50% 100% 150% DI

3 3

0% 50%

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Tax Rate Reallocation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

20% 25%

Cost: Scheduled and payable benefits Cost: Scheduled but not fully payable benefits

15%

payroll

5% 10%

Income

Payable benefits as percent

  • f scheduled benefits:

2011-35: 100%

Expenditures: Payable benefits = income after trust fund exhaustion in 2036

  • f taxable

0% 5% 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 2011-35: 100% 2036: 77% 2085: 74%

% o

4 4

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 Calendar year

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Reform options to protect the program’s solvency

include: include:

  • Raising the Social Security normal retirement age
  • Raising the taxable wage base
  • Changing the benefit formula
  • Full Unreduced Benefit for those newly eligible in 2011
  • 90% of first $749 of monthly average earnings (AIME)
  • 32% of AIME in excess of $749 and less than $4 517

32% of AIME in excess of $749 and less than $4,517

  • 15% of AIME in excess of $4,517
  • Changing the cost-of-living adjustments

5

g g g j

slide-6
SLIDE 6

U.S. Total Fertility Rate: With and Without Adjustment for Survival to Age 10 y j g

4 5 3 4

TFR AdjTFR

2

Ave TFR Ave AdjTFR

1875-1925 3.67 2.85

AdjTFR

1

1875 1925 3.67 2.85 1926-1965 2.84 2.69 1966-1990 1.99 1.95 1991-2003 2.01 1.99

6 6

1875 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3.3 workers per beneficiary since 1975; just 2 after 2030

Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary

9 10 6 7 8 9

Demographic Change

2 3 4 5

Low Cost Change Program

1 2 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080

High Cost Matures

7 7

1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080

slide-8
SLIDE 8

It’s All About Demographics

  • Average retiree benefit is about $1,000/month
  • 3.3 workers have been sharing cost of $300 each
  • But paid 13.6% over cost 1990-2008, $341 each
  • By 2030 just 2 workers for each beneficiary
  • Future benefits will already be reduced another 9%

F NRA d COLA f

  • For NRA and COLAs for more years

So ultimately-reduce benefits by another 25%, increase income 33%, or some combination!

8

,

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Period Life Expectancy at 65 p y

22 24 20

Female

16 18

2011TR2011TR 2011TR 2010TR 2009TR

14

2009TR 2008TR Male

9 9

12 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Aged Dependency Ratios, 2011 Social Security T t R t Trustees Report

Intermediate projection compared to no mortality improvement after 2010 0.40 0.45

Intermediate Projection

0.25 0.30 0.35 ency Ratio

No increase in Life expectancy after 2010

d d d i 0.15 0.20 A ged Depende Aged dependency ratio 0.00 0.05 0.10 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085

10 10

1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 Year

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Some believe that assumptions used to value

Some believe that assumptions used to value Social Security are too conservative

  • Low cost scenario assumes every assumption is

Low cost scenario assumes every assumption is most optimistic in range of realistic

  • Assumptions are compared against experience
  • Assumptions are compared against experience

every year and revised as appropriate

  • Panel of demographers statisticians actuaries is
  • Panel of demographers, statisticians, actuaries, is

convened every 4 years to review assumptions and ranges

11

and ranges

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OASDI Annual Balances 2011TR Intermediate Assumptions: T t F d (Off B d t) P ti T t l I i T t l C t Trust Fund (Off-Budget) Perspective: Total Income minus Total Cost Unified Budget Perspective: Non-Interest Income minus Cost

150

Total Income minus Cost Non-interest Income minus Cost

50 100

nt Dollars

  • 50

ns of Curren

  • 100
  • 50

Billion

13 13 13

  • 150

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Social Security Effect on Annual Budget Balance Measures 1957-2085

0.5 1.0

Unified-Budget Effect Equals OASDI Net Cash Flow

0.0 0.5

GDP

On-Budget Effect is Zero under Current Law

  • 0.5

Percent of G Under "Budget Scoring Convention" Benefits NOT

  • 1.0

Convention Benefits NOT Payable under Current Law Are Assumed to Add to Unified Budget Deficit

14 14

  • 1.5

1957 1967 1977 1987 1997 2007 2017 2027 2037 2047 2057 2067 2077

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SUSTAINABILITY: Cost as Percent of GDP rises from a 4.4 percent average 1990-2008, to a peak of 6.2 percent in 2035, then roughly stabilizes between 5.9 and 6 0 percent after 2050 and 6.0 percent after 2050.

10%

Historical Estimated

6% 8%

Historical Estimated

Cost

4% 6%

Non-interest Income

2%

15 15 15

0% 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080

Calendar year

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Scheduled Benefit Levels as Percent of Career-Average including Annual Scheduled Benefits in 2011 Earnings by Year of Retirement at age 65

60% 70% Low Earner ($19 583 in 2011; 25th $10,398 40% 50% Low Earner ($19,583 in 2011; 25th percentile) Medium Earner ($43,518 in 2011; 56th percentile) $17,134 20% 30% High Earner ($69,629 in 2011; 81st percentile) Max Earner ($106,800 in 2011; 100th til ) $22,717 $27,004 10% percentile) Source: 2011 OASDI Trustees Report 16 16 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Trust Fund

C i t tl f ll t l

  • Consists mostly of payroll taxes, plus revenue

from taxation of benefits

  • Accumulates with interest
  • Accumulates with interest
  • Legally can only be used to pay Social Security

benefits and administrative expenses p

  • Only source of money available to pay benefits
  • Invested in U.S. Government Securities
  • Creditor relationship is no different than other

creditor relationships

17 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

F l f P i S h

  • Formula for a Ponzi Scheme
  • Pyramid; exponentially increasing number of

participants is need to pay beneficiaries

  • Madoff; false high rates of return promised
  • Formula for a Pay-as-you-go System

E h i d i h i k h i

  • Each generation pays during their work years what is

needed for current beneficiaries

  • B x number of beneficiaries = C x number of workers
  • Social Security Equation of Balance
  • Cannot borrow! So cumulative income is always at

least cumulative expenditures

18

least cumulative expenditures

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • “Maximum Transition Cost” for Social Security

(like plan termination liability) is $17.4 trillion

  • (Irrelevant for a PAYGO System!)
  • Total US stock market is < $13 trillion
  • Would require government ownership of

private industry, and then some! p y,

19 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effect of Immigration

I d I i ti h l S i l S it

  • Increased Immigration helps Social Security

financing

  • OACT immigration assumptions and effect on deficit:

OACT immigration assumptions and effect on deficit:

Scenario Average Annual Net Immigration Deficit Low Cost 1,385,000

  • 2.01

Intermediate 1,075,000

  • 2.22

High Cost 785,000

  • 2.44
  • Higher birth rates for recent immigrants
  • Other than legal pay into Social Security and do

20

  • Other-than-legal pay into Social Security and do

not receive benefits.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

It’s Not Just for Pension Actuaries

Questions

22 22