using landmarks to support
play

Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in - PDF document

Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in Navigation Older people and navigation Landmarks Design of a navigation aid Joy Goodman Evaluation Phil Gray Results Stephen Brewster Conclusions Kartik


  1. Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in Navigation • Older people and navigation • Landmarks • Design of a navigation aid Joy Goodman • Evaluation Phil Gray • Results Stephen Brewster • Conclusions Kartik Khammampad University of Glasgow 1 1 2 2 Older People Older People Increasing numbers of older people • Large potential market 2.5 m In fact: • Large amounts of disposable income those over • Opportunities for using technology to 60 in the UK support older people already • Challenges for making technology usable outnumber 0 - interesting research questions 1912 2025 those under 16 0-19 20-39 40-59 60+ 3 3 4 4 Navigation Landmarks • an important mobile • A key part of navigation activity • Not often used in • key for maintaining current navigation aids independence and quality of life Requirements gathering found: • often more difficult Participants appreciated information about for older people landmarks, esp. visual information 5 5 6 6

  2. Our Aim Design Prototype To develop: • Uses a series of landmarks • A pedestrian navigation aid • Information is given through • Basing navigation assistance around photographs, text and speech information about landmarks • Handheld computer • Easy to use by older people (Compaq iPAQ) 7 7 8 8 Design Design 9 9 10 10 Design Design 11 11 12 12

  3. Design Considering Older Users In Design 13 13 14 14 Evaluation Participants Field experiment To determine age differences • observe actual behaviour in navigation: • in a real-world setting • 16 older participants (aged 63-77) • obtain some quantitative data • 16 younger participants (aged 19-34) Within subjects 2 conditions - device and a paper map 2 routes – both on the university campus 15 15 16 16 Results Results – time taken Mean Time Taken 35 Map Device 30 25 (Minutes) 20 Significant 15 effect of: 10 5 0 • age Younger Older • method Age Group Significant interaction effect: • Only older people benefit significantly from the device • With the device, older and younger perform comparably 17 17 18 18

  4. Results Results Subjective workload - TLX Preference 5 Number of responses 20 4.5 Map 15 4 Device Subjective Rating 10 3.5 3 5 2.5 0 2 Strongly Prefer Map Indifferent Prefer Strongly 1.5 Prefer Map Device Prefer 1 Device 0.5 0 Which method did you find more useful? Mental Physical Temporal Effort Performance Frustration Demand Demand Demand Level 19 19 20 20 Results Conclusions Difficulties • Landmarks can be used effectively (challenges for further work): within pedestrian navigation aids • more accustomed to maps • Older people can use such a device • interface details without difficulty • maps give a better overall • Older people derive substantially picture of the route and area more benefit from it than younger people 21 21 22 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend