Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in - - PDF document

using landmarks to support
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in - - PDF document

Using Landmarks to Support Talk Structure Older People in Navigation Older people and navigation Landmarks Design of a navigation aid Joy Goodman Evaluation Phil Gray Results Stephen Brewster Conclusions Kartik


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 1

Using Landmarks to Support Older People in Navigation

Joy Goodman Phil Gray Stephen Brewster Kartik Khammampad University of Glasgow

2 2

  • Older people and navigation
  • Landmarks
  • Design of a navigation aid
  • Evaluation
  • Results
  • Conclusions

Talk Structure

3 3

Older People

2.5 m 1912 2025

0-19 20-39 40-59 60+

Increasing numbers of older people In fact: those over 60 in the UK already

  • utnumber

those under 16

4 4

Older People

  • Large potential market
  • Large amounts of disposable income
  • Opportunities for using technology to

support older people

  • Challenges for making technology usable
  • interesting research questions

5 5

Navigation

  • an important mobile

activity

  • key for maintaining

independence and quality of life

  • often more difficult

for older people

6 6

  • A key part of navigation
  • Not often used in

current navigation aids

Landmarks

Requirements gathering found: Participants appreciated information about landmarks, esp. visual information

slide-2
SLIDE 2

7 7

Our Aim

To develop:

  • A pedestrian navigation aid
  • Basing navigation assistance around

information about landmarks

  • Easy to use by older people

8 8

Design

  • Uses a series of landmarks
  • Information is given through

photographs, text and speech

  • Handheld computer

(Compaq iPAQ) Prototype

9 9

Design

10 10

Design

11 11

Design

12 12

Design

slide-3
SLIDE 3

13 13

Design

14 14

Considering Older Users In Design

15 15

Field experiment

  • observe actual behaviour
  • in a real-world setting
  • obtain some quantitative data

Evaluation

Within subjects 2 conditions - device and a paper map 2 routes – both on the university campus

16 16

Participants

To determine age differences in navigation:

  • 16 older participants (aged 63-77)
  • 16 younger participants (aged 19-34)

17 17

Results

18 18

Results – time taken

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Younger Older Age Group Mean Time Taken (Minutes) Map Device

Significant effect of:

  • age
  • method

Significant interaction effect:

  • Only older people benefit significantly

from the device

  • With the device, older and younger perform

comparably

slide-4
SLIDE 4

19 19

Results

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Mental Demand Physical Demand Temporal Demand Effort Performance Frustration Level Subjective Rating

Map Device

Subjective workload - TLX

20 20

Results

5 10 15 20 Strongly Prefer Map Prefer Map Indifferent Prefer Device Strongly Prefer Device Which method did you find more useful? Number of responses

Preference

21 21

Results

Difficulties (challenges for further work):

  • more accustomed to maps
  • interface details
  • maps give a better overall

picture of the route and area

22 22

  • Landmarks can be used effectively

within pedestrian navigation aids

  • Older people can use such a device

without difficulty

  • Older people derive substantially

more benefit from it than younger people

Conclusions