UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 1
Øystein Haugen, Ericsson NorARC
UML 2.0 vs. SDL/MSC - Ericsson Position Statement
SDL and MSC Workshop Grenoble June 2000
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 2
UML 2.0 vs. SDL/MSC - Ericsson Position Statement SDL and MSC - - PDF document
UML 2.0 vs. SDL/MSC - Ericsson Position Statement SDL and MSC Workshop Grenoble June 2000 ystein Haugen, Ericsson NorARC UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 1 Ericssons approach to UML 2.0 in OMG We want UML to become better We want
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 1
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 2
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 3
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 4
Sequence Diagram Roadmaps with references and guards Proposals shall provide for an encapsulation mechanism for states and state machines, e.g., by defining an interface in terms of the entry or exit points of transitions, so that the internal details of a composite state can be defined independently of the use of it in the enclosing state Proposals shall support that the same composite state can appear in more than one state chart in order to allow reuse of behavior (the state may respond in the same manner to a set of events) across a number
A c: C b: B
AEp : Endpoint AAgt : UA Bagt : UA abracadabra : User Request Play Proceeding Request Play PlayingConfirmed Proceeding getstarted Invoke continue Playing Playing A :Player B :Player
decomposed as PA decomposed as PB
UML 2.0 Position Statement / Slide 5