UK Power Networks Methods of detection current & future Alan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

uk power networks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UK Power Networks Methods of detection current & future Alan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UK Power Networks Methods of detection current & future Alan Croucher ENA 16 th May 2018 So how do we find cable leaks? Currently we have 3 primary leak location methods: Cable Freeze Capenhurst hydraulic method


slide-1
SLIDE 1

UK Power Networks

Methods of detection – current & future Alan Croucher ENA 16th May 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

So how do we find cable leaks?

  • Currently we have 3 primary leak

location methods:

– Cable Freeze – Capenhurst hydraulic method – Perfluorocarbon Tracer Leak Location (PFT)

  • Future (in development)

– Smart Heat – Active pressure control

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cable Freezes

  • Cable freezes have been the mainstay for leak

detection for many years.

  • This method freezes the fluid in the cable, and

by monitoring the pressure drop (or flow) at each end of the circuit, an indication can be given of the leak direction.

  • There are limitations to this method

– The cable needs to be de-energised – Unable to detect smaller leaks – Multiple excavations required – Disruption to the public and highways – Cost – Time – Leaks can stop when a cable is taken out of service – Cable freezes can lead to future leaks

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Capenhurst Hydraulic Method

  • This leak location technology measures

the flow of fluid through the cable, and by knowing the length and hydraulic resistance of the cable an estimation of the leak position can be found.

  • The limitations with this method are:

– The cable needs to be de-energised – Unable to find smaller leaks – Accuracy of the results – Cannot find multiple leaks on one cable – Again, leaks can stop when a cable is taken out of service

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PFT Leak Location System

  • PFT Leak Location system operates by

detecting a Perfluorocarbon tracer that evaporates, when it leaks from a suitable tagged leaking cable section at the point of leak.

  • The limitations of this method are:

– The Cable needs to be “tagged” with a PFT, which then needs to reach the point of leak.

  • Some of the many benefits of this

method are: – The circuit does not need to be de- energised for the location to be undertaken. – Small leaks are detectable (<40L/m).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tagging Methods: “Regular Pumping”

This method of tagging only requires that the cable fluid pumped into the circuit to replenish fluid lost to the leak is tagged. The limitation of this method is that it can take some time for the tagged fluid to reach the leak, and the leak to become detectable, for example: If the circuit is leaking 100L per week and is 2km long, and it contains 1000L of “free” fluid, it could potentially take 10 weeks for the cable to be fully tagged

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Future developments Smart Heat

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Smart Heat

  • For this method, rather than freezing

the cable, we heat it

  • A heater jacket is placed around the

cable, as the fluid moves in the direction of the leak the heat is drawn in that direction.

  • This method is limited by the leak

rate of the cable which needs to be above 400 litres per month to work.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

132kV 3 Core leaking ~200L/week

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Future developments Active Pressure Control

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Active Pressure Control

  • Fluid Filled Cables operate over a varying pressure

range depending on where the cables are installed.

  • Each cable has a operating pressure range and a

lowest possible operating pressure (Alarm Pressure)

  • If we can operate the cables closer to this alarm

pressure, leaks may be minimised and less stress put on cable sheaths and joints.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cable Pressure Trend 365 days

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Porous Lead Sheath

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Active Pressure Control Unit

slide-15
SLIDE 15

APCU Pressure Trend

slide-16
SLIDE 16

APCU Pressure Trend

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you