SLIDE 1 Two Dimensional Triangular Mott Hubbard Insulators in Real Life: Sn/Si(111), Sn/Ge(111) and Si/SiC(0001)surfaces
- G. Profeta (L'Aquila, Italy)
E.Tosatti (Trieste, Italy)
- Phys. Rev Letters 98, 086401 (2007)
Hvar, 28 September 2008
SLIDE 3
STRONG CORRELATIONS IN 2D
SLIDE 4
SLIDE 5
Sn1/3/Ge(111) Si1/3/SiC(0001) Sn1/3/Si(111)
Carpinelli, et al (96) Johansson, et al (96) Uhrberg, et al(2000) Modesti, et al (2007) Figure from Plummer et al
SLIDE 6
Sn/Ge(111)
W ~ 0.35 eV
SLIDE 7 SURFACE STATE “WANNIER FUNCTION” SUGGESTS STRONG CORRELATIONS
Sn Sn Sn
7.35 A
Ueff ~ 0.5 eV V<~ 0.25 eV W~ 0.35 eV !
SLIDE 8 2D TRIANGULAR LATTICE, HALF FILLING
- - NARROW BANDS
- - EL-PH COUPLING
- - STRONG EL-EL INTERACTIONS
- - CDWs, BAND JT, MIXED VALENCE,
2D SUPERCONDUCTIVITY?
- - MAGNETISM, SDWs?
- - 2D MOTT HUBBARD AFM INSULATOR?
( OR RVB SPIN LIQUID STATE)
SLIDE 9
U>Uc: MOTT INSULATOR U t MOTT TRANSITION: HUBBARD MODEL U < Uc: METAL
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11 LATTICE MODEL
- - NARROW 2D BAND, W~0.35 eV,
DEGENERACY d =1
- - ON-SITE COULOMB REPULSION U~2W
- - SOME N. N. REPULSION V < W
- - EL.-PHONON COUPLING g
SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
SLIDE 12
SLIDE 13 LANDAU THEORY
3x3 DENSITY MOD 3x3 MAGNETIZ. MOD UNIFORM MAGNETIZ.
SLIDE 14
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR A: ρK=m=0, SK#0, Mott insulator. D: ρK#0, m=SK= 0, CDW metal 77K SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999) undist. metal
SLIDE 15
300 K 100 K
Sn/Ge(111)
E.W. PLUMMER et al, (1996,++) “CDW”
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17 M.C. ASENSIO et al
R.G. UHRBERG et al .......................
SLIDE 18
PEREZ+ al (1999): LDA GROUND STATE IS 3x3 UP_DOWN DISTORTED (-10 meV) TEMPERATURE: CAUSES ORDER-DISORDER TRANSITION (“dynam. fluctuation” model) STRONG CORRELATIONS IRRELEVANT (!!!???)
Sn/Ge(111): LDA .
UP DOWN
SLIDE 19
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR D: ρK#0, m=SK= 0, CDW metal 77K 300K undist. metal SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Sn/Ge(111) T-DEPENDENCE: PHASE TRANSITION
SLIDE 20 Si/SiC(0001)
L.I. JOHANSSON et al (96)
J.E. NORTHRUP,
G.E.SANTORO et al (98,99)
OSTENDORF et al
LDA
SLIDE 21
MOTT INSULATING
L.I. JOHANSSON et al (96)
SLIDE 22
Si-SiC(0001)
MOTT-HUBBARD INSULATOR!
SLIDE 23
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR A: ρK=m=0, SK#0, Mott insulator. SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Si/SiC(0001)
SLIDE 24
Sn/Si(111)
W ~ 0.45 eV
SLIDE 25
UHRBERG et al (2000)
Sn/Si(111)
UNDISTORTED 2D METAL...
SLIDE 26
Sn/Si(111) DFT : UNDISTORTED 2D METAL (BUT CLOSE TO 3x3 DISTORTION)
PEREZ et al (2001)
SLIDE 27
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR undist. metal SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Sn/Si(111)
SLIDE 28
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR A: ρK=m=0, SK#0, undistorted Mott insulator. D: ρK#0, m=SK= 0, “CDW” distorted metal undistorted metal SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Si/SiC(0001) Sn/Ge(111) Sn/Si(111)
SLIDE 29
S n / S i AT LOW T, SOME EVIDENCE OF 3X3 BAND FOLDING! UHRBERG et al (2000)
Sn/Si(111) BUT....
SLIDE 30
SLIDE 31
SLIDE 32 “ab initio” L(S)DA +U CALCULATIONS H = H0+ U Σi niσni-σ
= H0+ (U/2) Σiσ niσ(1 - niσ )
ANISIMOV et al, 1990's (LMTO)
- M. COCOCCIONI, S. DE GIRONCOLI 2002 (PWSCF)
MOTT HUBBARD INSULATOR here appears as MAGNETIC (AF) BAND INSULATOR
SLIDE 33 U=0 U(Sn)=4 eV
∆
Sn/Ge(111)
LSDA+U:
U=4 eV
Correlations may turn Sn/Ge(111) into a MAGNETIC and UNDISTORTED NARROW GAP INSULATOR!
PRL 98, 086401 (2007) U REMOVES DISTORTION!!
SLIDE 34
SLIDE 35
EVOLUTION OF Sn/Ge(111) 10K 77K 300K
SLIDE 36 Sn/Si(111) LSDA+U:
- G. PROFETA, E.T., PRL 98,
086401 (2007) EF
MAGNETIC INSULATOR GROUND STATE NO DISTORTION ∆E ~ - 10 meV/adat
SLIDE 37
Sn/Si Sn/Ge insulating gap Sn magn. moment Sn adatom heigth exchange splitting
SLIDE 38 Sn/Si(111) STM/STS data
PRL (2007)
SLIDE 39
SLIDE 40
SLIDE 41
EVOLUTION OF Sn/Si(111) 50K 300K
SLIDE 42
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR A: ρK=m=0, SK#0, Mott insulator. SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Si/SiC(0001) Sn/Ge(111) Sn/Si(111)
SLIDE 45
SLIDE 46
SPINS ½ ON TRIANG. LATTICE ESTIMATE OF AF COUPLINGS
Si/SiC (0001) J ~ 30 K Sn/Si(111) J ~ 100 K Sn/Ge(111) J~ 150 K ∆EFE-FI ~ 3J
SLIDE 47
T U PSEUDOGAP METAL (PM) MOTT INSULATOR (AF) d-WAVE SUPER COND. Sn/Si(111) SPECULATIVE PHASE DIAG.
SLIDE 48
Sn/Si(111) t ~ 350 K T = 0.2t ~ 70 K!
SLIDE 49 EXPERIMENTAL CHALLENGES
- - DETECT SPIN ½ ON Si ADATOM
IN Si/SiC(0001), AND ON Sn ADATOM IN Sn/Si(111), Sn/Ge(111)
- - UNDERSTAND SPIN ORDER
- - MAYBE CREATE “2D Hi-Tc “
SUPERCONDUCTOR BY DOPING ANY OF THESE SURFACES AWAY FROM HALF FILLING
SLIDE 50 CONCLUSIONS
- - GENUINE 2D MOTT HUBBARD
INSULATORS IN SEMICONDUCTOR SURFACE STATES
DISPROPORTIONATION) RESTORED BY TEMPERATURE IN Sn/Ge(111)
- - PROBABLE T-INDUCED METALLIZATION
IN Sn/Si(111)
- - d-WAVE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY BY DOPING?
SLIDE 51 THE END
- G. Profeta, E.T., Phys. Rev Letters 98, 086401 (2007)
- S. Modesti et al, Phys. Rev Letters 98, 126401 (2007)
SLIDE 52
SPIN ORBIT INTERACTION: WEAK ANISOTROPY
SLIDE 53
SLIDE 54 Si/SiC(0001) LSDA+U (3x3 FERRIMAGNETIC)
Anisimov et al,
1752 (2000)
SLIDE 55
Sn/Ge(111)
W ~ 0.35 eV
SLIDE 56 Sn/Si(111)
n(EF )
SLIDE 57
SLIDE 58 “AB-INITIO” : DENSITY FUNCTIONAL CALCULATIONS
- - ACCURATE FOR GEOMETRY, BOND
LENGTHS
- - Sn/Ge(111) 3x3 DISTORTED, METAL
- - Sn/Si(111) sqrt3xsqrt3 UNDISTORTED
METAL
- - Si/SiC(0001) AF INSULATOR,
BUT GAP TOO SMALL
SLIDE 59
(4H)-SiC(0001)
SLIDE 60
IS B PHASE REALIZED ANYWHERE??
SLIDE 61
C1/3/Ge(111)
C
SLIDE 62
SLIDE 63 The Mott-Hubbard Transition
U
±
(ONE BAND MODEL)
energy Z
SLIDE 64 LSDA+U calculations ELDAU[nr]=ELDA[nr]EHub[nm
I]−EDC[n I]
EHub−EDC=EU=U/2∑I∑m, {nm,m
I −∑m' nm,m' I
nm' ,m
I }
- -- Slab geometry with three Ge (Si) bilayers, 18 atoms each in 3x3 cell
3 Sn adatoms in T4 position and 9 H atoms saturating bottom surface
- - PWSCF code (www.pwscf.org)
Plane Wave cutoff energy 12 Ry Monkhorst-Pack k-points up to 36 in IBZ, 0.002 Ry of gaussian smearing Gradient corrected LDA (PBE)
- -- Total energy curves calculated by constrained optimization
- G. PROFETA
SLIDE 65 SPIN: FERROMAGNETIC STATE
Si Si
ADATOM
∆E = 9J/4
SLIDE 66 SPIN: FERRIMAGNETIC STATE
Si Si
ADATOM
∆E = - 3J/4
SLIDE 67 20 100-200 T (K) Mott Insul.
Metal Undist.(Fluct.) Metal Sn/Ge(111) ? ?
SLIDE 68 Sn/Si(111)
EXPT.: UNDISTORTED METAL
(CLOSE TO 3x3 DISTORTION)
PEREZ et al (2001)
SLIDE 69
Sn/Ge(111)
UP Sn ADATOM DOWN Sn ADATOMS PEREZ et al (1999) DE GIRONCOLI et al(2000) BALLABIO et al (2002)
LDA
∆E ~ 9 meV/adatom
“CDW” “Band JT effect” “Bond Density Wave” “Disproportionation”
SLIDE 70
SLIDE 71
SLIDE 72
ON MOST SEMICONDUCTOR SURFACES: NO MOTT INSULATORS, NO CDW/SDW, NO SC STATES....
IN REALITY: WHY? CHEMICAL PASSIVATION OF “DANGLING BONDS”
SLIDE 73
20K-100K=3x3 T>100K=root3xroot3 Si(111)7x7
SLIDE 74
”
SEMICONDUCTOR SURFACES
“DANGLING BONDS”
SLIDE 75
IDEAL Si SURFACES:BAND STRUCTURE
HALF FILLED SURFACE STATES (=2D METALS)
SURFACE RECONSTRUCTIONS!
EF
SLIDE 76
NEED SURFACE DANGLING BOND STATES THAT WILL NOT SPONTANEOUSLY PASSIVATE!
SLIDE 77
HARTREE FOCK PHASE DIAG. COLLINEAR A: ρK=m=0, SK#0, Mott insulator. D: ρK#0, m=SK= 0, CDW metal 77K 300K undist. metal SANTORO et al PRB 59, 1891(1999)
Si/SiC(0001) Sn/Ge(111) Sn/Si(111)
SLIDE 78
SLIDE 79 Sn/Si(111)
Expt.: metallic, does not distort down to 5 K
Si Si
SLIDE 80