Turkana, Marsabit, Mandera, Wajir April 2014 Overview Context: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Turkana, Marsabit, Mandera, Wajir

NDMA April 2014

THE HUNGER SAFETY NET PROGRAMME (HSNP) HUMANITARIAN PARTNERSHIP CONFERENCE, NAIROBI, 15TH TO 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2014 SUNYA ORRE, DIRECTOR TECHNICAL SERVICES NDMA KENYA

Overview

1.

Context: ASALs

2.

Objectives of HSNP

3.

Phase 1: 2008-12/13

4.

Results from Phase 1

5.

Lessons on targeting

6.

Phase 2: 2013-17

7.

Expected results

8.

Role of NDMA

9.

Links to NSNP

10.

Key issues going forwards

11.

Questions?

Context: ASALs

1.

ASALs: 84% of land mass; 36% of the population.

2.

Chronic poverty, drought prone & historically marginalised.

3.

Low scores against national development indicators.

4.

Integrated and dynamic challenges.

Objectives of HSNP

 HSNP is an unconditional cash transfer

programme, geographically focused in the ASALs.

 Aim: To reduce poverty, food insecurity

and malnutrition, and promote asset retention and accumulation in poor HHs.

 Uses biometric smart card to make payments via a

private sector payment provider (Equity Phase 1).

 Operated under Ministry of State for the

Development of Northern Kenya and Other Arid Lands.

 Financial support from DFID & AusAID.

4 counties: Turkana, Marsabit, Mandera and Wajir

Phase 1: 2008-12/13 (£40.5m)

 Targets: 69,000 of the poorest HH or 496,800

• f the poorest people in the 4 counties.

 Beneficiaries receive regular, predictable cash

transfers:

 Currently Ksh 1,750 (approx. £13) per HH, per

month (Ksh 3,500 every payment cycle).

 HSNP 1: primarily a safety net for the

chronically poor: with ability to scale up in emergencies (it increased payment value in the 2011 drought).

Phase 1: How implemented?

 National and county coordination via the HSNP

Secretariat under the Ministry of State for Northern Kenya and other Arid Lands.

 5 components:

• 1. Administration: identification & registration of

beneficiaries;

• 2. Management Information System: database of

beneficiaries;

• 3. Payments: transfer of cash to beneficiaries;
• 4. M&E: monitoring & evaluation of results; and
• 5. Grievance procedures: feedback system for

beneficiaries.

Enhanced drought coping capacities Increased food consumption & dietary diversity Increased asset retention Coping with disability Improving child welfare Increased financial inclusion in the ASALs: Starting a business

How it makes a difference…

Economic empowerment for women Dignity for PWDs Help in old age (1) Women as leaders Support to HIV + people Help in old age (2)

Reaching vulnerable groups…

Independently evaluated impacts

KEY MESSAGE:

 HSNP is helping families to: be more food secure; hold onto their assets during shocks;

and spend more on health. It is even enabling children to perform better in school. HSNP is successfully acting as safety net. It slows the slide into poverty, particularly in crisis years (e.g. drought 2011).

 Mixed methods; Randomised Control Trials (2009-12)



Increased poverty reduction for HSNP HHs, compared to control group:

 HSNP HHs are 10% less likely to fall into the poorest decile nationally.  Control HHs are 7% poorer on average than HSNP HHs.  The severity of poverty for control HHs is also more pronounced, to the tune of 7%.



Primary impacts: Poverty/consumption; Food security; Asset retention.



Secondary impacts: Increased health & education expenditure; Livelihoods opportunities; increased saving, borrowing, credit; reduced vulnerability to shocks; Empowerment of women; improved well-being of children and old persons.



Unintended impacts: Dependency (labour participation); Prices; Informal transfers; Social tensions; Mobility patterns.

Results after two years

Household poverty rates at baseline and follow-up 2 by treatment status

HSNP: Lessons on targeting

 Phase 1: piloted 3 approaches:

 Community Based Targeting (CBT)  Social Pensions (SP)  Dependency Ratio (DR)  Findings : CBT best…but not perfect!  Proxy Means Test (PMT) more useful but not perfect!

 Phase 2: will combine CBT & PMT and evaluate

the effectiveness of this approach.

HSNP: Phase 1 Key Challenges



GoK: Insecurity in ASALs; poor infrastructure network; lack of MoU; lack of a single registry across CT programmes.



Beneficiaries: Mobile populations; missed payments; lack of ID cards; Sharing of the benefit reducing its impact.



Administration (NGOs): Coordination of implementing partners and roles and responsibilities in the field.



MIS: QA of data in and out; capacity to use and analyse.



Payments: Timeliness of payments; technology and technical skills of agents and beneficiaries.



M&E: Ethical issues on use of controls.



Grievance and redressal: Channels to direct complaints; scope of issues raised; and sustainability

• f rights committees.



Donors: Coordination of components and partners; QA and ownership of data; QA of partner communications.

Phase 2 : 2013/14-17 (£85.59m)

 Builds on and expands Phase 1:

 CHRONIC: Safety net for the chronically poor: By EoP

, cash transfers for up to 100,000HH (720,000 people) of approx. Ksh 2,700 or £19 a month paid (5,400 per cycle) into beneficiaries bank account.

 Women: approx. 52% women beneficiaries with 66% of beneficiary HHs

women headed.

 ACUTE: Scalable safety net in response to crisis: 375,000 HH (reaching

• approx. 2.1m people) will be carded and provided with bank accounts and

can be reached with emergency payments.

 Impact: Reduce poverty, hunger and vulnerability for the poor in

Kenya’s Arid, Semi-Arid lands.

 Outcome: Create better and more sustainable safety nets for poor

and vulnerable households, particularly for households in the ASALs.

Phase 2 : Expected results

 Outputs:

 GoK supports cash transfers for chronic and acute responses in the arid and semi-

arid lands, which are integrated within the wider National Safety Net Programme; and

 HSNP households receive timely, predictable electronic cash transfers for both

chronic and acute responses.

 Key results by 2016/17:  Sustainability  Coverage and women beneficiaries  Poverty impact  Scalable safety nets for early crisis response

Relationship to NSNP

 HSNP key to the delivery of NSNP results:

 GoK funds HSNP in line with EDE MTP.  Targeting and expansion plans.  Strengthening MIS.  100% payments use 2 factor authentication.  Grievance & redressal mechanisms.  M&E.  Scalability.

ISSUES RAISED: NDMA

 Lists of beneficiaries to receive accounts in the field  Operations manual update:

 General HSNP 2  Scalability component  Complaints & Grievances Procedures

 Categorisation by county/ type  Reporting procedures & processes  Resolution procedures & processes (county/ central)  Clarifying R&R of diff stakeholders in the above  Reporting and M&E of on complaints received & resolved online  Training of NDMA staff

 MIS use & analysis  C&G procedures  M&E  Scalability component

ISSUES RAISED: HAI

 Contract discussions:

 Beneficiary lists for working in the field – Sct approved list

(PISP diff list?)

 Staffing and capacity (HQ and field)  Support to the county technical working group/ NDMA in the

field

 R&G moving from paperbased MIS to electronic  Tracking and reporting on complaint resolution  ID issues and their resolution  Budget  Transition to the KHRC/ ombudsman role  Fiduciary risks with IPRS

ISSUES RAISED: FSD/ EB

 Mop up of the group 1 pending accounts

 List by sub-location & village by end of the week  Working with NDMA & HAI to mobilise  Will not be charged & accounts ongoing

 Accounts opened cards in pocket 10%  Coordination of work plans  Communication  Complaints  IDs  275K HHs

Lessons learned

 Explaining the targeting methodology  Verification of the final lists  Distribution of accurate beneficiary lists with EB

account holders

 Beneficiary mobilisation  Route planning

HSNP2

2014-2017

Presented by:

HSNP2- PHASE 2 : 2013/14-17 BUDGET: KSH.15BILLION.

 Builds on and expands Phase 1:



CHRONIC: Safety net for the chronically poor: By EoP, cash transfers for up to 100,000HH (720,000 people) of approx. Ksh 2,700 or £19 a month paid (5,400 per cycle) into beneficiaries bank accounts.



Women: approx. 52% women beneficiaries with 66% of beneficiary HHs women headed.



ACUTE: Scalable safety net in response to crisis: 375,000 HH (reaching approx. 2.7m people) will be carded and provided with bank accounts and can be reached with emergency payments.

 Impact: Reduce poverty, hunger and vulnerability for

the poor in Kenya’s Arid, Semi-Arid lands.

 Outcome: Create better and more sustainable safety

nets for poor and vulnerable households, particularly for households in the ASALs.

HSNP2: EXPECTED RESULTS

Outputs:

 GoK supports cash transfers for chronic and acute

responses in the arid and semi-arid lands, which are integrated within the wider National Safety Net Programme; and

 HSNP households receive timely, predictable electronic

cash transfers for both chronic and acute responses.

Key results by 2016/17:

 Sustainability  Coverage and women beneficiaries  Poverty impact  Scalable safety nets for early crisis response

THE IMPLEMENTING STRUCTURE- PILU

 An internationally procured Project Implementation and

Learning Unit (PILU) within the National Drought Management Authority (NDMA) and Accountable to CEO NDMA and appropriately staffed with NDMA civil servants and PILU TA team counterparts.

OBJECTIVES:

 To ensure the effective management of HSNP 2 in

conjunction with the National Drought Management Authority (NDMA).

 To build capacity in GoK (NDMA) to implement HSNP 2

within its own structure by 2017

HSNP2 WITHIN THE NDMA

Board of Directors CEO Policy, Planning & Research Resource Mobilisation & Advocacy Technical Services HSNP2 Support Services

HUNGER SAFETY NET PROGRAMME

NDMA

Programme Implementation & Learning Unit (HNSP)

County Drought Coordinators (NDMA) County Coordinators & Sub- County Coordinators (HSNP) Rights (HelpAge) Mobilisation, Rights & Grievances

Payment Service Manager (FSD)

Payment Service Provider

Independent Evaluation

HSNP NATIONAL COORDINATION

Steering Committee

Quarterly Chaired by NDMA CEO Membership: NDMA, DFID, PILU, FSD, HAI, NSNP, WB, DFAT

Technical Coordination Group

Weekly Chaired by PILU Monthly Chaired by Drought Response Manager Membership: NDMA, PILU, FSD, EB, HAI Plus DFID

HSNP COUNTY COORDINATION COUNTY COORDINATION

County Steering Group

Quarterly Chaired by NDMA CDC NDMA, EB, SPR/HAI, other development partners

County Technical Coordination Group

Weekly Chaired by CDC

HSNP County Coordinator NDMA Drought Response Officer (DRO) NDMA Drought Information (as needed) SPR Partner County Coordinator Equity Bank HSNP Supervisor/Branch Manager

PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION & LEARNING UNIT PILU

Team Leader

Operations Manager MIS Specialist Monitoring Specialist Coordinator Communications Specialist Finance Manager Finance Officer Project Administrator

ROLES OF PILU

 Management and Monitoring of HSNP2,

sourcing and procurement of short term Technical

• Assistance. This includes Working with GoK,

DFID, in the oversight of Payment Component run by the Financial Sector Deepening (FSD) Trust in Kenya.

 Evaluation Component: Oversight of an

independently and internationally procured and independently governed evaluation.

 Rights and Grievances Component:

Implemented by Help Age International (HAI)

TORS OF HSNP PILU STAFF

 Team Leader oversees the PILU;  HSNP Coordinator provides liaison with NDMA and

• ther GoK agencies,

 HSNP Operations Manager is responsible for

• verseeing and managing core operational tasks at the

National level and manages HSNP County and Sub- County Coordinators;

 MIS Specialist manages the programme MIS and

provide technical support to the MIS across the programme;

 Monitoring Specialist oversees the monitoring of the

HSNP and is responsible for overseeing the evaluation of the programme, which will be undertaken by a separate Managing Contractor;

PILU TORS CONT’D

 Communications Specialist oversees both internal

communications within the programme to HSNP2 target audience, to developing and implementing an externally focused communications strategy;

 Finance and Administration Team that provides

all necessary logistical and financial support to the PILU;

 Four County Coordinators who are responsible for

the implementation and coordination of the HSNP at the County level- Turkana, Wajir, Marsabit and Mandera.

 Twelve Sub-County Coordinators will be

recruited across the four Programme Counties

ROLE OF THE NDMA

 Oversight of implementation of HSNP &

PILU in NDMA

 Ensuring GoK financing to HSNP (in line with

NSNP and EDE MTP)

 Scalable safety net responses (HSNP and

National Drought Contingency Fund)

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TOTAL GoK contribution to HSNP (million Kshs) 312 624 1,248 2,496 4,680

NDMA ROLE CONT…

 Reaching targeted beneficiaries  Beneficiary mobilisation  Coordination (within & between County &

National)

 Directing complaints to R&G component  Monitoring Project implementation with PILU

Monitoring officer

 Financing (National and County)  Scalable safety net responses (HSNP & NDCF)  Communication

RELATIONSHIP WITH NSNP

HSNP key to the delivery of NSNP results:

• GoK funds HSNP in line with EDE MTP. HSNP works

closely with NSNP in achieving set indicators (DLIs) under the Programme 4 Results (P4R);

• Targeting and expansion plans must be in line with

NSPN’s.

• Strengthening MIS to improve fiduciary controls and
• monitoring. Single registry with programme MIS’s

interlinked and agreed standards for payroll controls – setting the NSNP benchmark.

• 100% of payments being made through 2 factor

authentication: bank card + biometrics.

• Grievance & redress: Functioning grievance and appeals

mechanisms: provided via NGO HelpAge Intl.

• Monitoring: Regular and comprehensive Monitoring and

reporting

• Scalability: Working to build scalable safety nets that can

respond effectively to crises

HSNP2: ACHIEVEMENTS

 Registration: 381,800HHs registered across the four Counties

• f Turkana, Marsabit, Mandera & Wajir. 374,806HH had

complete data by June 2013.

 Targeting: 100,000HHs already targeted across the four

Counties using modified CRA formula to distribute across the

• Counties. PMT and CBT was used to distribute within the

Counties by October 2013.

 Posting and notification of HHs already taken place across

the Counties by December 2013.

 IDs of targeted 100,000 HHs already take through the IPRS

for validation.

 Bank A/C opening began in January 2014. So far 64,258 accounts

have been opened in the four Counties. Target timeline of completion is December 2014.

 Payment of cycles 7: Bank A/Cs of 61,854 beneficiaries have

been credited with 7 cycle payments (arrears) totaling over Kshs. 2.011billion by 20th august 2014. Bi-monthly cash value increased from Kshs. 4,600 in 2013/14 to 4,900 in 2014/15.

HSNP2 ACHIEVEMENT CONT…

 Social Protection rights:

• Already recruited Rights Committees across all the

Counties;

• National ID registration strategy for HHs without

already in place, to work with NRB

• C&G resolution process developed and initiated

 Governance

• PILU staff both National and County recruited and

already working

• PILU office now housed at NDMA offices
• HSNP2 Operational Manual developed and training of

staff taking place.

• Communication strategy and implementation plan in

its final stage of completion

• Data Sharing Protocols developed and shared with

INGOs

Q&A!