transparency and trust towards the promise of open science
play

Transparency and Trust: Towards the Promise of Open Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transparency and Trust: Towards the Promise of Open Science Professor Liz Lyon School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh INCONECSS 2016, Berlin Agenda 1. In the Headlines 2. Unpacking Transparency 3. Towards Open Science


  1. Transparency and Trust: Towards the Promise of Open Science Professor Liz Lyon School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh INCONECSS 2016, Berlin

  2. Agenda 1. In the Headlines 2. Unpacking Transparency 3. Towards Open Science – Scholarship – Stewardship 4. Making it Happen – LIS Workforce Development – Re-engineering Research Data Service Models

  3. In the Headlines

  4. Tensions?

  5. Trusted product?

  6. Trusted service?

  7. Trusted data? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/11/09/scientist-falsified- data-for-cancer-research-once-described-as-holy-grail-feds-say /

  8. US institution X experience • Anil Potti paper in Nature Medicine 2006 • Independent audit of the research by Baggerly & Coombes (bio-statisticians) • IRB Inquiry & Report • Lessons learned include (Ince 2011): – Sloppiness in data curation & software storage – Institutional reviewers did not verify the provenance of the data – Institutional data was not released – Institutional report was not published

  9. Unpacking the concept: Transparency

  10. 2D Continuum of Openness Participation Citizen science Team science Lone scholar Closed Open Access Liz Lyon (2009) Open Science at Web Scale Report

  11. Towards a third dimension? Easterbrook Nature Geoscience (2014) NIST definitions of Repeatability & Reproducibility in Tech Note 1297 (1994)

  12. Open Science terms & definitions (1) • Open or Reproducible Research : Auditable research made openly available • Auditable Research : Sufficient records (including data and software) have been archived so that the research can be defended later if necessary or differences between independent confirmations resolved. Victoria Stodden et al Setting the Default to Reproducible Workshop Report (2013)

  13. Open Science: terms & definitions (2) Transparency : • The outcome of a suite of behaviours which characterise Reproducible Research • Facilitates enhanced Research Quality, Integrity and Trust Liz Lyon (2016) LIBER Q

  14. 3D Model of Open Science Participation Citizen science Transparency Team science Lone scholar Closed Open Access Liz Lyon (2016) LIBER Q

  15. 20 Terms: What Transparency is not! Clarity? Integrity? 1. Confusing 11. Not verified 2. Gray/grey 12. Not validated 3. Vague 13. Not auditable 4. Unclear 14. Not supported 5. Opaque 15. Not described 6. Ambiguous 16. Not documented 7. Obscured 17. Not recorded 8. Implicit 18. Not versioned 9. Hidden 19. Not tracked 10. Secret 20. No provenance

  16. What does this mean for Libraries? ….and for Librarians? https://www.flickr.com/photos/8885264 https://www.flickr.com/photos/claudia_l/5614406866/

  17. Context: Research Lifecycle Design Track Plan Publish, Collect, Find, Preserve, Acquire Archive Process, Prepare Visualize Analyze Store Adapted from ULS RDM WG Research Data Lifecycle

  18. Practice: Actions? Proposals Templates Re-use Drafts Ratings Design Credits DMPs Citations Blogs Track Plan Tweets Data Code Tracking Products Samples Publish, Identifiers Collect, Find, Reagents Preserve, Transparency Peer Reviews Materials Acquire Archive Versions Methods Instruments Tools Process, Subjects Prepare Visualize Analyze Metadata Store Workflow tools Annotations Formats & Standards Scripts & Software Files Graphics Cloud services Licenses Models & Field Notebooks Methods & Protocols Simulations ELN Results Collaboration spaces Liz Lyon Liber Q (2016)

  19. Open Science: terms & definitions (3) Transparency Actions : • Specific interventions as components of processes, protocols and practices • Applicable throughout the research lifecycle Liz Lyon (2016) LIBER Q

  20. Transparency research at Pitt iSchool • Pilot study 2015-16: explore awareness, attitudes and actions towards Transparency & Open Science • Aim: to inform LIS service development, tools, LIS education programs, professional skills • Methodology: focus groups with a) disciplinary researchers b) librarians • Research Lifecycle as the substrate

  21. Substrate: Research Lifecycle Design Track Plan Publish, Collect, Find, Preserve, Acquire Archive Process, Prepare Visualize Analyze Store Adapted from ULS RDM WG Research Data Lifecycle

  22. Q1 How are transparency actions reflected in open scholarship?

  23. “ Recommendation 6 As a condition of publication, scientific journals should enforce a requirement that the data on which the argument of the article depends should be accessible, assessable, usable and traceable through information in the article .” Science as an Open Enterprise Report, Royal Society, UK

  24. Journals changing (open) data policy…… • “Data deposition in a public repository is mandatory …” • A step towards Transparency ?

  25. This is accepted practice in some disciplines, but in others, not so much…. this leads to issues of trust……

  26. GigaScience and Publons Open peer review (CC-BY) Papers and datasets Get credit for your reviews! http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/06/26/gigascience-helping-reviewers-get-credit-through-publons/

  27. http://www.psycontent.com/content/311q281518161139/fulltext.pdf

  28. Reproducibility Project Psychology Results 2015 : only 39% held up

  29. Transparency & Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines • Center for Open Science 2015 • Science article June 2015 • Journal Policies and Practices • 8 Transparency Standards • Templates for 3 Levels of each Standard http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/348/6242/1422 .full.pdf?ijkey=ha1o5D9wvW4ZQ&keytype=ref&siteid=sci

  30. 8 Transparency Standards (TOP) 1. Citation 2. Data transparency 3. Analytic methods (code) transparency 4. Research materials transparency 5. Design & analysis transparency 6. Pre-registration of studies 7. Registration of analysis plans 8. Replication

  31. CISER Replication Service http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/IDCC16/54_Arguillas%20and%20Block%20-%20Poster%20IDCC%202016.pdf

  32. Reproducibility isn’t always easy… From peer reviewed ….. …to peer-reproduced? Gonzalez-Beltran, Li et al 2015 PLoS ONE

  33. Q2 How are transparency actions reflected in data stewardship?

  34. Laboratory notebooks: http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu / 3 role models http://darwin-online.org.uk / http://mss.sagepub.com/content/8/4/422.full.pdf+html

  35. All three role models • Recorded thoughts, observations, ideas, calculations • Demonstrated the provenance of their conclusions • Allowed other scientists to reuse their findings • Good practice from > 100 years ago!

  36. • Another step towards Transparency ? http://news.utoronto.ca/huntingtons-disease-university-toronto-researcher-first-share-lab-notes-real-time

  37. LIS data stewardship workflows to support transparency & trust?

  38. Certification….. Trusted • Data Seal of Approval for repository certification • Self-assessment approach with external peer review • DSA online tool to facilitate application process • DSA is based on 16 guidelines (Version 2 2013) http://datasealofapproval.org/en/

  39. Making it Happen

  40. Q3 How can workforce development catalyse transparency and trust?

  41. A family of new data science roles (Lyon & Brenner IJDC 2015)

  42. Linking data roles, skills & curriculum (Lyon et al 2016, Lyon & Mattern 2016) • Analysis of real-world positions for six data roles • Part 1: data librarian, data archivist, data steward • Part 2: data analyst, data engineer, data journalist • Map to current iSchool courses • Informing development of a Data Stewardship Pathway

  43. Methods: Data Collection Keyword searching and visual scanning Date Range for Job Postings: Part 1 January 2014-April 2015 Part 2 October 2015 Accessed 10 full job descriptions for each role (with IASSIST postings, more abbreviated job advertisements)

  44. Methods: Content Analysis Education: Academic qualifications Experience : direct, hands-on practice Knowledge : understanding Identified all requirements that appeared of/familiarity with in at least three of the positions studied topics/subjects/issues for each role and designated these as Skills : ability to do an action well “Key Requirements” Competencies : proficiency with specific tools/technologies/programming Chose not to distinguish between languages. “essential” and “desirable” requirements

  45. Data Librarian

  46. Data Steward / Curator

  47. Real World Job analysis Part 1 (Lyon et al iPres Proc 2016) Promote Transparency

  48. Open Science: terms & definitions (4) These new Data Science roles can act as Transparency Agents : • Promote, demonstrate and action specific behaviours and practices for Open Science

  49. Methods: Course Mapping Data Stewardship Pathway Requirement s

  50. Data Science Position (Data Librarian, Data Archivist, Data Curator / Steward, Data Analyst, Data Engineer, Data Journalist) Transparency & Trust Principles “Stepping stones” form Course a Course Pathway Course Course Course

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend