Transmission Line Citizen Advisory Group January 27, 2015 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transmission line
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Transmission Line Citizen Advisory Group January 27, 2015 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tillamook-Oceanside Transmission Line Citizen Advisory Group January 27, 2015 1 Overview Purpose and Need Why now? General Design High-level concepts What we have heard How does that impact design? Brief History 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tillamook-Oceanside Transmission Line Citizen Advisory Group

January 27, 2015

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Purpose and Need
  • Why now?
  • General Design
  • High-level concepts
  • What we have heard
  • How does that impact design?
  • Brief History

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose and Need

  • Keep the lights on
  • Enhance reliability for customers in

central Tillamook County

  • Allow for load growth
  • Increase capacity; transfer some load to

Oceanside substation

  • Replace aging equipment
  • Enhance reliability

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions

  • Capacity
  • Ability to serve customers
  • Highest loads occur on cold winter mornings
  • Reliability
  • Ability to keep the lights on
  • What increases reliability?
  • Multiple sources of adequate capacity
  • Good design and maintenance practices
  • Ability to respond and repair quickly

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Enhance Reliability

Single Substation—Radial System

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Reliability

Single Substation—Radial System

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Enhance Reliability

Two Substations—Loop System

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Enhanced Reliability

Two Substations—Loop System

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

January 2015

Tillamook PUD Substations

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Capacity

Wilson River Substation

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Capacity

Wilson River Substation

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tillamook PUD Substations

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Process for Siting Transmission Lines

  • Identify substation locations
  • Determines end points of transmission lines
  • Identify potential transmission line routes
  • Evaluate each route
  • Regulatory criteria
  • Utility criteria
  • Public input
  • Impacts
  • Avoid
  • Minimize
  • Mitigate

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Here’s What We’ve Heard… Addressing Visual Impacts

  • Fewer poles are better
  • Shorter poles preferred
  • Minimize equipment attached to poles
  • Locate poles as far as possible from Hwy 101
  • Remove existing distribution poles,

where possible

  • Consider undergrounding
  • Minimize impacts to vegetation

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Here’s What We’ve Heard… Addressing Impacts to Properties and Projects

  • Minimize:
  • Physical footprint of project on private properties
  • Width of easement on private properties
  • Redevelopment restrictions
  • Disruption to landowner operations
  • Maximize use of existing rights-of-way
  • Roads, streets, railroad
  • Minimize impacts to City and ODOT projects

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Brief History

  • Included in Long Range Plan – 1963
  • Trask to Whiskey Creek route sited – mid 1990’s
  • Included in Long Range Plan – 2005
  • Included in 4-Year Construction Work Plan – 2007
  • BPA changes source to Tillamook Substation – 2007
  • First meeting with Tillamook City staff – 2008
  • Public information meeting – August 2011
  • City Planning Commission approves CUP – January 2013
  • CUP appealed to Tillamook City Council – January 2013
  • LUBA upholds City’s denial of CUP – January 2014
  • Workshop with City Council and PUD Board – July 2014

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Section Break

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Route Evaluation Criteria

  • Must Have
  • Minimize
  • Maximize

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Evaluation Criteria - Must Have

  • Meets project purpose
  • Is siteable
  • City of Tillamook, Tillamook County, Federal and

State Requirements

  • Can be obtained
  • Is buildable
  • Must be able to operate and maintain in all but

the most severe conditions

  • Critical infrastructure

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Evaluation Criteria - Minimize

  • Visual impacts
  • Conflicts with existing land uses, structures, congestion
  • Environmental issues
  • Number of landowners and properties affected
  • Effects on existing vegetation
  • Need for special structures
  • Space requirements
  • Angle poles
  • Co-location of circuits serving same geographic area
  • Need for access roads

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Evaluation Criteria - Maximize

  • Co-location within existing linear corridors
  • Use of existing rights-of-way and pole locations
  • Constructability and accessibility for

maintenance during poor weather conditions

  • Distance from existing structures, residences,

etc.

  • Ability to obtain desired rights-of-way width
  • Length of straight sections

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Section Break

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Project Scope

23

Project Scope

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Evaluated Routes

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Evaluated Routes

25