Title Ron Abileah abileah@j O m egaK.com ASPRS 2 0 0 6 Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

title
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Title Ron Abileah abileah@j O m egaK.com ASPRS 2 0 0 6 Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MAPPI NG SHALLOW W ATER DEPTH FROM SATELLI TE Title Ron Abileah abileah@j O m egaK.com ASPRS 2 0 0 6 Annual Conference Ron Abileah Reno, Nevada May 5 , 2 0 0 6 May 1 -5 , 2 0 0 6 Ron Abileah May 5 , 2 0 0 6 Shoaling waves display four


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ron Abileah May 5 , 2 0 0 6

Title

MAPPI NG SHALLOW W ATER DEPTH FROM SATELLI TE

ASPRS 2 0 0 6 Annual Conference Reno, Nevada May 1 -5 , 2 0 0 6

Ron Abileah abileah@jOm egaK.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ron Abileah May 5 , 2 0 0 6 Shoaling waves display four depth- related physical changes 1. Steepening breaking

  • 2. Wavenumber transformation

3. Refraction

  • 4. Change in phase velocity

Remote sensing bathymetry using ocean waves kinematics (WK)

}

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

W ave spectrum phase

Fourier Transform (FT)

“Tile”

( ))

( , ) ( , )

j k x y x t t y

S k k S k k e

Ω −

=

Ocean surface current Depth

'

( ) ( tanh( ) , ,

x y x y

j k j g k k d U U k k ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = +

⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ Ω

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

W K ( Phase Velocity) Depth Estim ation

( ))

( , ) ( , )

j k x y x t t y

S k k S k k e

Ω −

=

Ocean surface current Depth Wavenumber spectrum at time t

'

( ) ( tanh( ) , ,

x y x y

j k j g k k d U U k k ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = +

⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ Ω

FT FT FT Solve for U and d (minimum 2 images)

1 t

S

tn

S

2 t

S

Tile from image 1 at t1 Image 2 at t2 Image n at tn …

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

2 0 Year History

8 5 9 0 9 5 0 0 0 5

Van Halsema et al. TNO, Netherlands Marine radar Caruthers et al., NORDA Aerial photos Faber, Arete IR video Dugan, Arete AROSS video Abileah Satellite imagery Senet et al. GKSS, Germany Marine radar

Gotwols and Irani, “Optical determination of the phase velocity of short gravity waves,” JHU/ APL, 1980

Large array CCD cameras

Young, Rosenthal, Ziemer, “A three dimensional analysis of marine radar… ,” 1985

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Caruthers et al.

200 400 600 800 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 200 400 600 800 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

2 0 Year History

8 5 9 0 9 5 0 0 0 5

Van Halsema et al. TNO, Netherlands Marine radar Caruthers et al., NORDA Aerial photos Faber, Arete IR video Dugan, Arete AROSS video Abileah Satellite imagery Senet et al. GKSS, Germany Marine radar

Gotwols and Irani, “Optical determination of the phase velocity of short gravity waves,” JHU/ APL, 1980

Large array CCD cameras

Young, Rosenthal, Ziemer, “A three dimensional analysis of marine radar… ,” 1985

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Dugan

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

2 0 Year History

8 5 9 0 9 5 0 0 0 5

Van Halsema et al. TNO, Netherlands Marine radar Caruthers et al., NORDA Aerial photos Faber, Arete IR video Dugan, Arete AROSS video Satellite imagery Senet et al. GKSS, Germany Marine radar

Gotwols and Irani, “Optical determination of the phase velocity of short gravity waves,” JHU/ APL, 1980

Large array CCD cameras

Theory & simulation Test

Young, Rosenthal, Ziemer, “A three dimensional analysis of marine radar… ,” 1985

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Satellite im age collection

AOI

etc P3 Sun 5 - 15 s 5 - 15 s 5 - 15 s P2 P1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

I KONOS San Diego Set

Footprints Image IDs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

I KONOS San Diego I m ages

1

SpaceImaging CARTERRA

3 4 7 8 11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

San Diego I nlet

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

San Diego I nlet

Multi-beam ship survey

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

W K w ith 2 im ages

W K depths 1 2 8 m tiles, 2 im ages Fugro m ultibeam ship survey

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

2 vs 4 im ages

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Com parison to USGS Chart

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Com parison of Satellite-Based Methods

Method Type of satellite Depth accuracy Horizontal resolution

  • Est. cost

$ / km -2 Turbid w aters W K Hi Res Pan or Multispectral 5 - 1 0 % 5 0 - 2 0 0 m 5 0 Yes W ave refraction SAR 3 0 % 1 km < 1 0 Yes Photo- bathym etry Hi Resolution Multispectral 5 % but biased 1 0 -3 0 m 5 0 No Currents interaction SAR 5 % 5 m 1 0 Yes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Gaps in W K Solutions

No waves Too deep For 128 m tiles Waves blocked by jetty Wind waves damped by kelp forest (outside figure)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Sum m ary

  • W K bathym etry resolution – depth accuracy

Resolution Depth @ 1 0 m accuracy 250 m 4 % 125 m 6 % 50 m 10 %

  • resolution proportional to depth
  • accuracy also depends on num ber of im ages
  • Special considerations
  • requires w ind w aves
  • no solution w here w aves are blocked or dam ped out
  • currents, turbidity are not issues
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Extra Slides and Backups

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Current

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

W K com pared w ith m ultibeam

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Reconnaissance Aircraft Photos - Movie

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Phase Velocity

2 2 0 1 0 5

Depth ( m ) Phase velocity vs w avelength and depth

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

W avelength-Depth-Speed Relationship

2 m 2 0 m 1 0 m 5 m

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

San Diego Area

Depth Contours in m, 10 m increments to 200m

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Multispectral im ages for photobathym etry