TILLAMOOK TO OCEANSIDE TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FEBRUARY 8, 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
tillamook to oceanside transmission line project february
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TILLAMOOK TO OCEANSIDE TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FEBRUARY 8, 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 29, 2023 394 likes •717 views

TILLAMOOK TO OCEANSIDE TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FEBRUARY 8, 2018 PRESEN TA TIO N TO THE TILLA M O O K C O UN TY PLA N N IN G C O M M ISSIO N INTRODUCTION TOMMY BROOKS Pre se nte rs T o mmy Bro o ks Ca b le Husto n L L P, L e

slide-1
SLIDE 1

PRESEN TA TIO N TO THE TILLA M O O K C O UN TY PLA N N IN G C O M M ISSIO N

TILLAMOOK TO OCEANSIDE TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FEBRUARY 8, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INTRODUCTION

TOMMY BROOKS

  • Pre se nte rs
  • T
  • mmy Bro o ks – Ca b le Husto n L

L P, L e g a l Co unse l

  • K

C F a g e n – T illa mo o k PUD, E ng ine e ring Ma na g e r

  • Pa ul Se ilo –CH2M, E

nviro nme nta l a nd L a nd Use Pro je c t Ma na g e r

  • T
  • pic s
  • L

e g a l Co nte xt

  • Pro je c t Purpo se a nd Ne e d
  • L

a nd Use Crite ria

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LEGAL CONTEXT

  • T

hre e Co unty Applic a tio ns

  • T

ype I Ad ministra tive Re vie w – E F U, E stua ry Co nse rva tio n Zo ne

  • T

ype I I De ve lo pme nt Pe rmit – F lo o d Ha za rd Are a

  • T

ype I I I Co nd itio na l Use Pe rmit – F

  • re st Zo ne , Rura l

Re sid e ntia l/ Co mme rc ia l Zo ne s, a nd E stua ry Na tura l Zo ne

  • Othe r Pe rmitting Ag e nc ie s
  • Ore g o n Pub lic Utilitie s Co mmissio n – Ce rtific a te o f Ne e d
  • F

e d e ra l Ag e nc ie s – Cle a n Wa te r Ac t

  • Sta te / L
  • c a l Ag e nc ie s – DSL

, DE Q, ro a d jurisd ic tio ns, City fra nc hise

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LEGAL CONTEXT – FARM ZONE

  • T

ra nsmissio n L ine s a re a n Outrig ht Pe rmitte d Use – ORS 215.283(1)

  • Must b e Ne c e ssa ry to b e in the F

a rm Zo ne – ORS 215.275

  • T

e c hnic a l a nd e ng ine e ring fe a sib ility

  • Must c ro ss E

F U to a c hie ve a re a so na b ly dire c t ro ute o r to me e t uniq ue g e o g ra phic a l ne e ds

  • L

a c k o f a va ila b le urb a n a nd no n-re so urc e la nds

  • Ava ila b ility o f e xisting rig hts o f wa y
  • Pub lic he a lth a nd sa fe ty
  • Othe r re q uire me nts o f sta te o r fe de ra l a g e nc ie s

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LEGAL CONTEXT – FARM ZONE

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LEGAL CONTEXT – FARM ZONE

  • T

illa mo o k PUD c o mmissio ne d a re po rt b y CSA Pla nning L td re g a rding po te ntia l impa c ts to fa rm a nd fo re st pra c tic e s

“Ba se d upo n o ur re vie w o f the pro je c t a nd e xa mina tio n o f da iry fa r

m pr a c tic e s, the like lihood of sig nific a nt a dve r se impa c ts to a c c e pte d fa r m pr a c tic e s in the a r e a a ppe a r s none xiste nt. Our pro fe ssio na l o pinio n is tha t

the pro po se d 115K v Pro je c t will no t sig nific a ntly impa c t fa rm pra c tic e s in the a re a no r is it like ly to inc re a se the c o st o f suc h pra c tic e s.” “T he po te ntia l fo r impa c ts to fo re st use s in the a re a is ultima te ly ve ry sma ll. L a rg e timb e r ho lding c o mpa nie s o fte n ha ve e ne rg y tra nsmissio n fa c ilitie s tha t c ro ss the m. Ma na g ing ha rve sts a ro und the se fa c ilitie s is a c o mmo n a nd a c c e pte d fo re st pra c tic e a nd the re is no thing uniq ue ly c ha lle ng ing a b o ut a pplying tho se sta nda rd pra c tic e s he re . F

  • r this re a so n, no sig nific a nt fo re st

impa c ts a re a ntic ipa te d.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LEGAL CONTEXT – FARM ZONE

  • Ore g o n Pub lic Utility Co mmissio n ha s re vie we d the ne e d

fo r the line itse lf.

  • Sta ff finds tha t the pro po se d tra nsmissio n line is pra c tic a b le in

the pub lic inte re st.

  • T

he line is justifie d . . . b e c a use the pro po sa l sa tisfie s the ne e d to pro vide sa fe a nd re lia b le po we r a t the le a st c o st a nd impa c t to c usto me rs with minima l impa c t to the pub lic .

  • Sta ff a lso b e lie ve s the tra nsmissio n line wo uld impro ve the

sa fe ty a nd re lia b ility o f T illa mo o k PUD’ s o ve ra ll syste m. T illa mo o k PUD ha s ta ke n a ppro pria te ste ps a nd c o nside re d a lte rna tive ro ute s. Witho ut the Pro je c t, T illa mo o k PUD’ s c usto me rs will like ly b e e xpo se d to inc re a sing re lia b ility issue s a nd o uta g e s. T he re fo re , Sta ff c o nc lude s tha t the Pro je c t is ne c e ssa ry.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PURPOSE AND NEED

KC FAGEN

  • T
  • inc re a se the c a pa c ity o f the PUD syste m to

se rvic e e xisting e le c tric a l lo a ds a nd fo r o ng o ing e le c tric a l lo a d g ro wth.

  • T
  • impro ve re lia b ility o f the PUD’ s e le c tric a l syste m.
  • T
  • re pla c e a g ing infra struc ture .

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • Capac ity
  • Syste m Pe a k L
  • a d s fro m De c e mb e r

2009 = 133MW fro m Ja nua ry 2010 Bo a rd Re po rt.

  • 2009 pe a k lo a d s re fle c te d to 2016

syste m lo a d s fo r N-1 a na lysis.

  • Ne ta rts, Whiske y Cre e k, Oc e a nsid e

a ppro a c hing 11MW a b o ut 20% o f c e ntra l T illa mo o k va lle y lo a d .

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • Ca pa c ity o f

E xisting T ra nsfo rme rs.

  • Pro po se d

Oc e a nside Sub sta tio n will a dd 33.3 MVA, whe re 20MVA is a va ila b le to b a c k-fe e d the City o f T illa mo o k.

  • 1. Capac ity as spe c ifie d b y the manufac ture r.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 10

Substation (year built) Load (MVA) 131 MVA System Peak Reflective to 2016 Nameplate Capacity (MVA)1 Loading (%)

Garibaldi (1994)

22.7 25.0 91%

Wilson T1 (1971)

33.2 33.3 100%

Wilson T2 (2002)

0.0 0.0

Trask (1996)

35.3 36.9 96%

Totals

94.1 95.2 96%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • Re liability

E le c tric se rvic e to Ne ta rts a nd Oc e a nside is 2.8 time s wo rse the n the 2nd wo rst pe rfo rming fe e de r (whe n inc luding o uta g e dura tio n a nd the numb e r o f c usto me rs a ffe c te d).

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 11

F a c to r o f 2.8x g re a te r

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • Re plac ing Aging Infr

astr uc tur e T he tra nsmissio n line pro je c t pro vide s a se c o nd, inde pe nde nt po we r so urc e . Re pa irs a nd re b uilding c a n b e pe rfo rme d witho ut multiple pro lo ng e d o uta g e s to a ll 1700 c usto me rs. T he e xisting distrib utio n line c a n b e re b uilt in sho rte r se g me nts with disruptio ns o nly to fe w c usto me rs in the 2 mile line se c tio n fro m Ba yo c e a n Ro a d to Whiske y Cre e k (inc luding the se c tio n o f do ub le c irc uit line tha t must b e de -e ne rg ize d to b e wo rke d o n).

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

  • Ne tar

ts T r ansmission L ine – 2000’s

  • Ac q uire d o nly xx pe rc e nt o f the ne e de d e a se me nts (wo uld ne e d

e a se me nts fro m T ra sk sub sta tio n, o r the tra nsmissio n line s, to Hig hwa y 101, se g me nts fro m Hig hwa y 101 to Whiske y Cre e k a nd fro m Whiske y Cre e k to Oc e a nside – a ll o n fa rm a nd fo re st pro pe rtie s). As o f 2004, BPA is no lo ng e r c o nstruc ting a 230-115kV sub sta tio n a t Mc Co rmic k L

  • o p a nd E

a rl Ro a d, so wo uld ha ve to ta p T illa mo o k PUD e xisting 115kV line (o n BPA 230kV to we rs).

  • Airpo rt flig ht pa th limit po le he ig hts, whic h c a n b e a ddre sse d b ut

wo uld no t a llo w the tra nsmissio n line to b e c o nstruc te d o ve r the to p o f the e xisting distrib utio n line (ne e d line s do wn b o th side s o f Mc Co rmic k L

  • o p).
  • Re q uire s a switc hing sta tio n a t the ta p o ff o f T

illa mo o k PUD’ s e xisting 115kV line o f a b o ut 1 a c re – this wo uld b e o n fa rm pro pe rty.

  • Ro ute wo uld re q uire pa ssing c lo se r to mo re fa rm b uilding s a nd

re side ntia l ho me s.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

  • City Route – 2014
  • T

ra ve rse d fa r le ss fa rm la nd tha n the ro ute no w pro po se d.

  • Co -line a te d with City Stre e ts a nd Hig hwa y 131.
  • So me o f the sa me pro pe rty o wne rs did no t suppo rt the

ro ute .

  • So me o f the pro pe rty o wne rs who o ppo se the c urre nt ro ute

didn’ t ha ve a n issue with the City ro ute .

  • Wa s de nie d C.U.P. fro m the City a nd uphe ld b y L

UBA.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

  • Optiona l Route s Re vie we d
  • Option 1
  • Do no thing .
  • Option 2
  • Impro ve syste m to pro vide re dunda nt 26kV fe e de rs to Ne ta rts a nd

Oc e a nside .

  • Stre ng the n tie po ints b e twe e n Wilso n a nd T

ra sk sub sta tio ns.

  • Pe rfo rm impro ve me nts to re so lve vo lta g e a nd lo a ding issue s.
  • Option 3
  • Sa me impro ve me nts a s Optio n 2.
  • Re pla c e Wilso n T

1 with e q uiva le nt size o f Wilso n T 2 (44 MVA).

  • Option 4
  • Co nstruc t the T

illa mo o k to Oc e a nside tra nsmissio n line a nd a 33 MVA sub sta tio n.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4

Co st (Millio n) $0.8 $3.8 - $4.2 $5.5 – $6.0 $9-$10.5 Ca pa c ity Additio n 0 MVA 0 MVA 12 MVA 33 MVA $/ MVA 0.5 0.3 Re lia b ility No ne Go o d Go o d E xc e lle nt L

  • ng e vity

0 ye a rs 2 ye a rs 13 ye a rs 36 ye a rs

CONCL USION: T

he T illa mo o k to Oc e a nside tra nsmissio n line pro je c t pro vide s the lo we st c o st pe r unit o f c a pa c ity (MVA) a nd ha s the life e xpe c ta nc y o f 33 ye a rs (2.8 time s the no n-tra nsmissio n line o ptio n).

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ADDRESSING COMMUNITY CONCERNS

  • E

le c tro ma g ne tic Ma g ne tic F ie lds (E MF )

  • I

nduc e d Vo lta g e (Stra y)

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ADDRESSING COMMUNITY CONCERNS

  • E

le c tr

  • magne tic F

ie lds (E MF )

  • Ca n induc e vo lta g e o n ne a r-b y me ta l o b je c ts – kno wn

a s “induc e d vo lta g e ”. Mitig a tio n is stra ig ht fo rwa rd a nd a c c o mplishe d b y pro pe rly g ro unding me ta l b uilding s a nd fe nc e s. BPA ha s g uide line s whic h c a n b e fo und a t:

https:/ / www.bpa.gov/ ne ws/ pubs/ ge ne r alpublic ations/ lu si- living- and-wor king- safe ly- ar

  • und-high-voltage -

powe r

  • line s.pdf
  • Ma g ne tic fie lds fro m the T

illa mo o k to Oc e a nside tra nsmissio n line a re le ss tha n ma g ne tic fie lds fro m a typic a l distrib utio n line o r the e le c tric se rvic e to the a ve ra g e ho me .

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ADDRESSING COMMUNITY CONCERNS

  • Induc e d Volta g e
  • E

MF ’ s a re the c a use , induc e d vo lta g e s a re we a k in c o mpa riso n to stra y vo lta g e phe no me no n.

  • T

he 115kV tra nsmissio n line vo lta g e is c o nside r a t the lo we r e nd ra ng e o f tra nsmissio n line s, whic h is typic a lly 69kV to 500kV in the Pa c ific No rthwe st.

  • T

he E MF ra dia ting fro m the T illa mo o k to Oc e a nside T ra nsmissio n L ine (T OT L ) is c o nside re d sma ll in c o mpa riso n to typic a l tra nsmissio n line s. T OT L will a ve ra g e a ro und 5MVA (25A) a nd pe a king a ro und 11MVA (55A), whe re the BPA 230kV line tha t tra ve rse s fa rm a nd fo re st la nd to se rvic e T illa mo o k PUD a ve ra g e s 43MVA (108A) a nd pe a ks a ro und 141MVA (354A).

  • Gro und o f me ta l fe nc e s a nd b uilding s is sta nda rd mitig a tio n to

stra y vo lta g e s, se e BPA do c ume nt “L iving Sa fe ly a nd Wo rking Aro und Hig h-vo lta g e Po we r L ine s” re fe re nc e a b o ve .

Conc lusion: If the E

MF fro m ho me s, b a rns, milking pa rlo rs do n’ t c a use issue s, i.e . inte rfe re nc e with ra dio s, the n the E MF fro m the tra nsmissio n line will no t c a use issue s.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

COMPLIANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS

PAUL SEILO

  • Summa ry o f Pro je c t Co mplia nc e with g e ne ra l the me s

fo und thro ug ho ut T L CUO:

  • No pa th b e twe e n Pro je c t e nd po ints witho ut F

a rm a nd F

  • re st zo ne c ro ssing s.
  • No pa th b e twe e n Pro je c t e nd po ints witho ut c ro ssing

E stua ry zo ne s, We tla nds/ Wa te rs, Re g ula te d Ripa ria n Buffe rs.

  • T

illa mo o k PUD a tte mpte d to b a la nc e c ro ssing s a nd a sso c ia te d impa c ts to the se re so urc e s.

  • A prima ry PUD Pro je c t ro uting o b je c tive wa s c o llo c a tio n

with e xisting ROW (sha re rig ht-o f-wa y to minimize impa c ts):

  • Po rt o f T

illa mo o k Ba y Ra ilro a d.

  • Wilso n Rive r L
  • o p a nd Go o dspe e d ro a ds.
  • E

xisting a c c e ss ro a ds in the industria l fo re st.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FARM ZONE [EXCLUSIVE FARM USE (EFU)]

T CL UO Se c tion 3.002 F ar m Zone

  • Pro je c t c ro ssing inc lud e s 3.4 mile s.
  • “Utility fac ilitie s ne c e ssary fo r pub lic se rvic e ” re q uire Ad ministra tive Re vie w

a ppro va l in the F a rm Zo ne .

  • Use Sta nd a rd s und e r Se c tio n 3.002(4)(n), whic h mirro r Ore g o n Re vise d

Sta tute 215.275:

  • T
  • Pro vid e a re a so na b ly d ire c t ro ute b e twe e n the e xisting Wilso n Rive r

Sub sta tio n a nd the pro po se d Oc e a nsid e Sub sta tio n, it is ne c e ssa ry fo r the pro je c t to c ro ss the fa rm zo ne .

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FOREST ZONE

T CL UO Se c tion 3.004 F

  • r

e st Zone

  • Pro je c t c ro ssing inc lud e s 4.3 mile s o f ind ustria l fo re st in the F
  • re st Zo ne .
  • “Ne w e le c tric transmissio n line s with rig ht-o f-way widths o f up to 100 fe e t…”

a re Co nd itio na l Use s in the F

  • re st Zo ne .
  • Co nd itio na l Use Re vie w Crite ria und e r Se c tio n 3.004(8), whic h mirro rs

Ore g o n Ad ministra tive Rule 660-006-0025(5)(a -b ):

  • 1. T

he pro po se d use will no t fo rc e a sig nific ant c hang e in, o r sig nific antly inc re ase the c o st o f, ac c e pte d farming o r fo re st prac tic e s o n ag ric ulture o r fo re st lands.

  • 2. T

he pro po se d use will no t sig nific antly inc re ase fire hazard o r sig nific antly inc re ase fire suppre ssio n c o sts o r sig nific antly inc re ase risks to fire suppre ssio n pe rso nne l.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

RURAL RESIDENTIAL & RURAL COMMERCIAL ZONES

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.010 Rura l Re side ntia l (RR) Zo ne

  • Pro je c t c ro ssing inc lude s 0.05 mile s.
  • One pro po se d po le in RR Zo ne , lo c a te d in Wilso n Rive r L
  • o p

ROW.

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.020 Rura l Co mme rc ia l (RC) Zo ne

  • Pro je c t c ro ssing inc lude s 0.1 mile s.
  • T

wo pro po se d po le s in RC Zo ne , b o th o n T illa mo o k PUD pro pe rty a sso c ia te d with e xisting Wilso n Rive r Sub sta tio n.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ESTUARY NATURAL & ESTUARY CONSERVATION 1 ZONES

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.100 E stua ry Zo ne [E stua ry Na tura l (E N) & E stua ry Co nse rva tio n-1 (E C1)].

  • Pro je c t c ro ssing s: 0.2 mile s in E

N zo ne a nd 0.4 mile s in E C1 zo ne .

  • No Pro je c t fe a ture s pro po se d in e ithe r the E

N o r E C1 zo ne s e xc e pt fo r a e ria l c o nduc to r c ro ssing (no pe rma ne nt o r te mpo ra ry impa c ts).

  • Pro je c t no t liste d a s o ne o f the re g ula te d a c tivitie s unde r T

CL UO 3.120(2), e xc e pt a utho riza tio n fro m the U.S. Army Co rps o f E ng ine e rs (ACOE ) unde r Se c tio n 10 o f the Rive rs a nd Ha rb o rs Ac t o f 1899 = Pro je c t ha s re c e ive d ACOE Se c tio n 10 a utho riza tio n.

  • Pro je c t c o mplie s with the va rio us de ve lo pme nt sta nda rds fo r E

ne r gy F ac ilitie s and Utilitie s pe r Se c tio n 3.140(6) – ma jo rity o f the se sta nda rds

do no t a pply sinc e o nly the a e ria l c o nduc to r c ro sse s e stua ry.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY ZONE

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.510 F lo o d Ha za rd Ove rla y Zo ne .

  • T
  • pro te c t pub lic he a lth/ sa fe ty a nd minimize lo sse s o r da ma g e s due to

flo o d c o nditio ns.

  • 23 po le s pro po se d within the re g ula to ry F

e de ra l E me rg e nc y Ma na g e me nt Ag e nc y (F E MA) F lo o dwa y.

  • T

illa mo o k PUD re q ue sts a De ve lo pme nt Pe rmit fo r this c ro ssing .

  • Unde r F

E MA re g ula tio ns, a ny de ve lo pme nt in F lo o dwa y must no t c a use a rise in the b a se (100-ye a r) flo o d.

  • No rthwe st Hydra ulic Co nsulta nts (firm tha t c o nduc te d flo o d mo de ling fo r

the So uthe rn F lo w Co rrido r) pre pa re d a ze ro -rise a na lysis to sho w the Pro je c t will no t c a use a rise in the b a se flo o d e le va tio n.

  • T

he ze ro -rise c e rtific a tio n sho ws the Pro je c t c o mplie s with Re vie w Crite ria in Se c tio n 3.510(13)(b ).

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY ZONES (CONTINUED)

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.545 Sho re la nd Ove rla y Zo ne

  • Pro je c t c ro sse s o nly sho re la nds c la ssifie d a s Rura l Sho re la nds.
  • E

ne rg y F a c ilitie s a nd Utilitie s a re a llo we d in Rura l Sho re la nds pe r T illa mo o k Co unty Co mpre he nsive Pla n po lic y 8.6c (c ).

8.6c E ne rg y F ac ilitie s and Utilitie s in Rural Sho re lands T illamo o k Co unty finds that: c . T

he r e is a ne e d to pr

  • vide fo r

no r mal do me stic e ne r gy fac ilitie s and utility se r vic e within r ur al sho r e lands and to pro vide fo r e ne rg y so urc e s suc h as WE

  • CS. T

his ne e d c anno t b e me t o n upland lo c atio ns o r in urb an o r urb anizab le are as.

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 3.550 F re shwa te r We tla nds Ove rla y Zo ne

  • Ore g o n De pa rtme nt o f Sta te L

a nds (ODSL ) c o nc urre d with We tla nd De line a tio n.

  • We tla nds/ Wa te rs Impa c ts a nd Mitig a tio n Pe rmit a pplic a tio ns

sub mitte d to U.S. Army Co rps o f E ng ine e rs (ACOE ) (Se c tio ns 404/ 10 Pe rmit) a nd ODSL (Re mo va l-F ill Pe rmit).

  • ACOE

issue d Pro je c t Pe rmit Autho riza tio n o n De c e mb e r 13, 2017.

  • ODSL

Re mo va l-F ill Pe rmit a ntic ipa te d Ma rc h 12, 2018.

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 4.130 De ve lo pme nt Re q uire me nts fo r Ge o lo g ic Ha za rds

  • Ge o te c hnic a l E

ng ine e r e xa mine d the ro ute a nd the va rio us so urc e s fo r g e o lo g ic a l ha za rd info rma tio n ide ntifie d in the Se c tio n 4.130.

  • Pro je c t c ro sse s o ne a re a o f L

a ndslide T

  • po g ra phy (19+ pe rc e nt slo pe ) fo r

a ppro xima te ly 600 fe e t just we st o f Ba yo c e a n Ro a d.

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 4.140 Re q uire me nts fo r Pro te c tio n o f Wa te r Qua lity a nd Stre a mb a nk Sta b iliza tio n

  • Pro je c t re sults in 6 po le s in the re g ula te d ripa ria n b uffe r a nd c utting o f

ma ture tre e s.

  • Ore g o n De pa rtme nt o f F

ish a nd Wildlife (ODF W) re vie we d Pro je c t pla n fo r impa c ts to the re g ula te d ripa ria n b uffe r a nd c o nc lude d it c o mplie s with the T CL UO with 2:1 tre e pla nting mitig a tio n.

  • ODF

W te rre stria l/ wildlife b io lo g ist re vie we d the o ve ra ll Bio lo g ic a l Re so urc e s Surve y Re po rt fo r the Pro je c t a nd ha d no c o mme nts.

  • T

CL UO Se c tio n 4.160 Pro te c tio n o f Arc ha e o lo g ic a l Site s

  • T

he Ore g o n Sta te Histo ric Pre se rva tio n Offic e sa id, “…the pro je c t will like ly have no e ffe c t o n any sig nific ant arc hae o lo g ic al o b je c ts o r site s…additio nal arc hae o lo g ic al re se arc h is no t antic ipate d fo r this pro je c t.”

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Q UESTIO NS

THANK YOU!

T illa mo o k to Oc e a nsid e T ra nsmissio n L ine Pro je c t 31

Visit o ur we b site fo r mo re info rma tio n www.tpud .o rg