The Way Forward Mike Kordosky (W&M) Kam-Biu Luk (UC Berkeley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the way forward
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Way Forward Mike Kordosky (W&M) Kam-Biu Luk (UC Berkeley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DUNE ND The Way Forward Mike Kordosky (W&M) Kam-Biu Luk (UC Berkeley & LBL) Steve Manly (Rochester) (Oxford & STFC/RAL) Alfons Weber 21-Sep-2017 Agenda Where we are Where to go and how to get there Suggested way


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DUNE ND The Way Forward

Mike Kordosky (W&M) Kam-Biu Luk (UC Berkeley & LBL) Steve Manly (Rochester) Alfons Weber (Oxford & STFC/RAL) 21-Sep-2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Where we are
  • Where to go and how to get there
  • Suggested way forward
  • Timeline

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Where we are

  • General agreement
  • LAr with Pixel readout
  • Maybe with side muon detectors
  • Followed by downstream low-density tracker
  • Low density tracker
  • In magnetic field (dipole or solenoid)
  • HPTPC or STT
  • Possible extensions
  • Add scintillator active target
  • Make the detector(s) movable

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ArgonCube

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

HP GAr TPC

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 5

Magnet (0.5T) LAr TPChpg EM Cal (20Xo) Steel (4lo) Magnet is this model is 6.5m diameter and 7 m long Maximize acceptance for m from LAr Coil could become pressure vessel LAr: with 2 X 2 m FV ~ 7 Xo annulus

~ 1.25 lo annulus

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Straw Tube Tracker

  • Function
  • Use as spectrometer for LAr
  • LAr provides in-situ check of STT

prediction

  • Two independent neutrino electron

measurements

  • Statements
  • 3.5 x 3.5 m2 is absolute minimal

transverse dimension

  • 4.5 m is minimum length

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Magnets

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Magnet Question

  • Dipole or Solenoid
  • Both are possible
  • Advantages & disadvantages
  • Both: cost
  • Dipole better fit to square detector
  • Solenoid better fit to cylindrical detector
  • Offer:
  • “free” KLOE magnet may save a lot of money
  • Is it suitable?
  • Can we do the physics?

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

KLOE Solenoid

  • Study by Tom Hamernik: dune-doc-5060
  • Additional costs (TPC in M$)
  • Increase shaft diameter

4.0

  • Helium Liquefier system

5.6

  • Increased size of service building

2.6

  • Total

12.2

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Way forward

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Way Forward

Concentrate on a limited number of options

  • Evaluate physics
  • Express interest to built

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 11

Option 1

  • Dipole magnet
  • STT
  • 1m 3D scintillator

Option 2

  • Dipole magnet
  • HP GAr TPC
  • 1m 3D scintillator

Friendly amendment

  • Move detector ala DUNEPRISM (2 or 3 positions)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hybrid

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 12

magnetized Muon system ECAL STT or TPC (Nuclear targets) 3D Scint

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Evaluate the Physics

  • Need to implement geometries in general package (BNL/SB)
  • General physics/performance questions
  • have been discussed in the past
  • Details will be presented next week (MK talk at last CM)
  • Also questions for pixel LAr

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Timeline

  • Sep 2017
  • define a limited set of detector options to be taken forward
  • task the proponents to answer a specific set of questions
  • Nov 2017, CERN ND workshop
  • Initial review of progress across the detector options, identify addition needs for

studies

  • Jan 2018, Collaboration meeting
  • midterm review of progress
  • Mar 2018, ND workshop
  • review all findings, decide on tracking technology
  • identify collaborators to take detector choice forward
  • identify R&D needs
  • May 2018, Collaboration meeting
  • Propose ND concept and team to collaboration

21-Sep-2017 ND WG Meeting 14