Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Obstruction-flat asymptotically locally Euclidean metrics Jeff - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Obstruction-flat asymptotically locally Euclidean metrics Jeff - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues Obstruction-flat asymptotically locally Euclidean metrics Jeff Viaclovsky (joint work with Antonio Ach e) December 12, 2011 Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Obstruction tensor
(Mn, g) Riemannian Manifold, n ≥ 4, n even.
Question
When is g conformal to an Einstein metric? Ric(g) = Rg n g,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Theorem (Fefferman-Graham,1985)
If n ≥ 4 is even there exists a nontrivial 2-tensor O(g) satisfying
- O(u2g) = u2−nO(g)
- If g is locally conformally Einstein ⇒ O(g) = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Other properties of O
- O(g) is a local tensor invariant of g
- Trace-free
- Divergence-free (variational structure, Q- curvature).
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Origin
The Poincar´ e Metric gPoincar´
e =
4ds2 (1 − |y|2)2 Defined on Bn+1 = Unit Ball in Rn+1
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Cauchy problem
- 1-Parameter family of metrics {gr}r, with r ∈ [0, 1] defined in
M.
- Set g+ = r−2
dr2 + gr
- ,
Problem (C. Fefferman, R. Graham ’85)
Solve for {gr} at the level of power series satisfying Ric(g+) + ng+ = 0, Subject to
- g0 = g,
- gr even in r.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Theorem (Fefferman-Graham 1985)
- If n is odd there is a unique formal power series solution to
the Cauchy problem (up to diffeomorphims fixing M).
- If n is even, we can only prescribe g+ to solve
Ric(g+) + ng+ = O(rn−2), r → 0 the solution is unique up to diffeomorphisms fixing M and terms of order rn−2.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Question
What obstructs the existence of Poincar´ e metrics in even dimensions?
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Theorem (Graham-Hirachi, ’05)
Given (Mn, g) with n even, take a solution of Ric(g+) + ng+ = O(rn−2). Then O(g) is given by O(g) = tf
- r2−n [Ric(g+) + ng+]
- ,
where tf = “Trace-free part”.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Two types of results
- Decay improvement for Asymptotically Locally Euclidean
Metrics
- Singularity Removal Theorems for isolated orbifold
singularities
- In both cases: “Ellipticity” of the system O(g) = 0
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Spaces with coordinates at infinity
We are interested in spaces satisfying
- (M, g) complete Riemannian manifold,
- Non-compact
- Outside of a compact set M is “locally Euclidean”, i.e., there
exists a compact set K ⊂ M and a diffeomorphism ψ such that ψ : M/K → (Rn \ BR(0)) /Γ,
- Γ finite subgroup of SO(n),
- Γ acts freely on Rn/BR(0).
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Asymptotically locally Euclidean (ALE) metrics
A complete Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called asymptotically locally Euclidean or ALE of order τ > 0 if we can find coordinates at infinity as before such that g − gEuc = O(r−τ), r → ∞, r = “distance to some fixed base-point”.
- Decay in derivatives
∂αg = O(r−τ−|α|) as r → ∞, |α| ≥ 1.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Special case: ALE of order 0
(M, g) is ALE of order 0 if
- There exists a coordinate system as before
- g − gEuc has pointwise decay at infinity, i.e.,
g − gEuc = o(1) as r → ∞,
- ∂mg decays like
∂mg = o(r−m) as r → ∞, m ≥ 1.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Decay improvement theorem
Theorem (Ach´ e - V)
Let (Mn, g) (n even)
- g Obstruction-flat,
- Scalar-flat,
- ALE of order 0 then (M, g) is ALE of order 2.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Example
- (Mn, g) even-dimensional compact Einstein manifold with
positive scalar curvature,
- Gx the Green’s function of the conformal Laplacian at the
point x.
- ˆ
M = M \ {x}
- ˆ
g = G
4 n−2
x
g The manifold ( ˆ M, ˆ g) satisfies
- Asymptotically-flat
- Obstruction-flat (locally conformally Einstein) and scalar-flat
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Explicit formulas (Bach tensor)
Rm = W + A g, where
- W is the Weyl tensor ( conformally invariant),
- A is the Schouten tensor
A = 1 n − 2
- Ric −
R 2(n − 1)g
- Then the Bach tensor is given by
Bij = ∆gAij − ∇k∇iAkj + AklWikjl,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Properties of the Bach tensor
- B is the first variation of the functional
g →
- M
|W|2dvol,
- Conformally invariant in dimension 4,
- Schematically
B = ∆Ric + ∇2Rg + ∆gRgg + Rm ∗ Rm,
- In dimension 4, O = B.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Explicit formulas
- In dimension n > 4, B is not conformally invariant.
- In dimension n = 6
O =∆gBij − 2WkijlBkl − 4Ak
kBij
+ 8Akl∇lC(ij)k − 4Ckl
i Cljk + 2Ckl i Cjkl
+ 4∇lAk
kCl (ij) − 4WkijlAk mAml.
C is the Cotton tensor given by C = d▽A.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- In general there are no explicit formulas available.
- R. Graham and K. Hirachi proved the following
O = ∆
n 2 −2
g
Bg + l.o.t.
- The terms l.o.t., are quadratic and higher in Rm and its
derivatives
- More precisely
l.o.t. =
n/2
- j=2
- α1+...+αj=n−2j
∇α1Rm ∗ . . . ∗ ∇αjRm .
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
If g is scalar-flat, this system looks like ∆
n 2 −1
g
Ric = l.o.t. A more general theorem
Theorem (Ach´ e- V)
If (Mn, g) with n ≥ 4 (not necessarily even) is ALE of order 0, Scalar-flat and satisfies ∆kRic = l.o.t., for 1 ≤ k ≤ n
2 − 1, then (M, g) is ALE of order n − 2k. Also true
for k = 1 and n = 3.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Previous works
Theorem (J. Cheeger, G. Tian, ’94)
(Mn, g) n ≥ 3 ALE of order 0 and Ricci-flat then (M, g) is ALE of
- rder n,
- Gauge-fixing approach by means of the implicit function
theorem (divergence-free gauge),
- Three annulus lemma (L. Simon).
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Previous works
Theorem (G. Tian - V)
(M4, g) ALE of order 0, Scalar-flat and either
- 1. Self-dual or anti-self-dual
- 2. Harmonic curvature tensor
Then (M, g) is ALE of order τ for any τ < 2
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Previous works (higher order equations)
Theorem (J. Streets)
(M4, g) ALE of order 0, scalar-flat and Bach-flat. Then (M, g) is ALE of order 2.
- Bach-flat condition generalizes (anti)self-duality and Ricci-flat
conditions.
- Gauge-fixing approach (as in Cheeger-Tian)
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
The compact case
- Bρ(0) metric ball on a flat cone C(Sn−1/Γ), Γ ⊂ SO(n) is a
finite subgroup acting freely on Sn−1.
- g defined on Bρ(0) \ {0}.
- The origin is a C0-orbifold point for g. That is, there exists a
coordinate system around the origin such that g − gEuc = o(1) r → 0, and also, for any m ≥ 1 ∂mg = o(r−m) as r → 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Singularity removal
Theorem (Ach´ e-V)
If g defined on Bρ(0) \ {0} is
- Obstruction-flat,
- Constant scalar curvature
- If 0 is a C0-orbifold singularity for g, then g extends to a
smooth orbifold metric in Bρ(0). That is, after diffeomorphism, there is a smooth Γ-invariant metric ˜ g on the universal cover of Bρ(0) \ {0} such that ˜ g descends to g.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
General problem
Study the system O(g) = 0 as a Nonlinear PDE on g. Important Difficulties
- O(g) = 0 is a higher order system (at least fourth order),
- g → O(g) is not elliptic due to diffeomorphism invariance.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
If g is ALE of order 0 the difference g − gEuc has pointwise decay at infinity. Set h = g − gEuc O(gEuc + h) = 0, Linearize at the flat metric gEuc 0 = O(gEuc + h) = O′
gEuc(h) +
R(h)
Error term
.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- From scaling properties of O, if h is small in the right norm
then the error term R(h) should be “small” O′(h) = − R(h)
small
One gets useful information by looking at the linear system O′
gEuc(h) = 0
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Overview
- Study of the linearized equation at a flat metric.
- Estimate on the nonlinear terms.
- Use gauge invariance to “eliminate” the degeneracy of the
system.
- Detailed construction of the divergence-free gauge.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
The linearized equation
Linearization of O in the direction of h at gEuc O′
gEuc(h) := ∂
∂ǫO(gEuc + ǫh)|ǫ=0,
Idea
Before studying the non-linear equation, we study first the linear system O′
gEuc(h) = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Recall O(g) = ∆
n 2 −2B + l.o.t.
At a flat metric the terms l.o.t. linearize to zero. Therefore O′
gEuc(h) = ∆
n 2 −2B′
gEuc(h).
Schematically, we can write O′
gEuc(h) = −
1 2(n − 2)∆n/2h + L(∂n−1δh, ∂n−2∆tr(h)), here L(A, B) = Linear combination of A and B.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Idea
Prescribe h to be divergence-free and its trace to be harmonic. The linearized equation becomes ∆n/2h = 0, δh = 0, ∆tr(h) = 0. In that case, each component of h satisfies ∆
n 2 f = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Lemma
In Rn, let h satisfy ∆
n 2 h = 0,
δh = 0, h = O(r1−ǫ) as r → ∞. Then h has an expansion at infinity of the form h = A + O(r−2), where the components of A are constant.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Proof (outline)
Use separation of variables to study for ∆
n 2 f = 0
∆n/2(l(r)φj) = 0, φj = spherical harmonic of order j, Reduces to an ODE in fj(r)
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Expansion of solutions of ∆n/2f = 0. f =
∞
- j=1
f+
j (r)φj + c0 + c1 log(r) + ∞
- j=1
f−
j (r)φj,
f−
j φj = decay solutions,
f+
j φj = growth solutions.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- The least decaying homogeneous solution is f−
1 φ1, which has
the form f−
1 φ1 = u
x |x|2
- = O(r−1),
u = homogeneous linear polynomial
- The other decaying solutions
f+
j φj = O(r−j), j ≥ 2.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
For the system ∆n/2h = 0, δh = 0, a decaying solution has the form h = r−1h1 + O(r−2), the components of h1 are spherical harmonics of order 1.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Key observations
From the condition δh = 0 one can rule out
- The solution r−1h1 (least decaying),
- Any logarithmic solution,
A similar argument works for the other cases, i.e., for ∆k+1h = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Equation on the trace
The linearized equation subject to δh = 0 becomes − 1 2(n − 2)∆n/2h + L(∂n−2∆tr(h)) = 0,
Idea
Trace the equation and obtain an equation on tr(h).
Issue
The tensor O′
gEuc(h) is traceless for any h.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
We use the linearized scalar-flat equation R′(h)gEuc(h) = −∆tr(h) + δδh, O′
gEuc(h) = 0,
R′
gEuc(h) = 0,
δh = 0. Is equivalent to ∆n/2h = 0, δh = 0 ∆tr(h) = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Gauge-Fixing Approach
Use the diffeomorphism invariance of the system O(g) = 0, Rg = 0, to fix a gauge φ such that h = φ∗g − gEuc is divergence-free with respect to gEuc. φ∗g = gEuc + h,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
The obstruction-flat equation is now 0 = O(gEuc + h) = O′
gEuc(h) + R(h),
where R(h) = Remainder, Study O′
gEuc(h) = −R(h).
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Estimate on the remainder
∇φ∗g = ∇gEuc+h, ∇gEuc+hT = ∇gEucT + (gEuc + h)−1 ∗ ∇h ∗ T, Schematically Rm(gEuc + h) = ∇gEuc+hΓ(gEuc + h), B(gEuc + h) = ∇2
gEuc+hRm(gEuc + h)
Keep track of all error terms
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
|R(h)| ≤ C |h||∇nh| +
In
- j=2
- α1+...+αj=n
|∇α1h| . . . |∇αjh| , Under scalar-flat and divergence-free conditions ∆n/2h = −R(h), Fix a Gauge φ such that h = φ∗g − gEuc satisfies
- δh = 0
- h = O(r−β), β > 0
Then h = O(r−β) and ∆n/2h = O(r−2β−n).
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Weighted Sobolev spaces (Nirenberg-Walker)
Fix δ ∈ R hLp
δ =
- Rn |h|p|x|−δp−ndx
hW m,p
δ
=
m
- j=0
- |α|=j
∇αhLp
δ−j
In particular ∆n/2 : W m,p
δ
→ W m−n,p
δ−n
,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Important properties of W m,p
δ
- The weight δ measures the growth or decay at infinity.
- Exceptional values of ∆k+1
Ek = {growth rates of solutions of ∆k+1f = 0} e.g., if k + 1 = n/2, Ek = Z
- ∆k+1 : W m,p
δ
→ W m−2(k+1),p
δ−2(k+1)
is invertible with bounded inverse.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Decay improvement property
Suppose that we have the following improvement h = O(rδ), r → ∞ and, ∆n/2h = O(rδ−τ−n). Choose δ − τ < δ′ < δ non-exceptional. There exists h0 ∈ W n,p
δ′
such that h = h0 + pj + O(rj−1), where pj is homogeneous of degree j ≤ min{δ, δ′} and ∆n/2pj = 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Application to the obstruction-flat equation
Recall
- h = O(r−β), β > 0 as r → ∞,
- δh = 0,
- ∆n/2h = R(h) = O(r−2β−n), r → ∞
(Better than expected!) Write h = h′ + r−1h1 + O(r−2), where
- h′ is roughly O(r−2β) at infinity (Better decaying)
- The components of h1 are spherical harmonics of order 1
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Bootstrap to obtain h = r−1h1 + O(r−1−ǫ), r → ∞. From δh = 0 we conclude that δ(r−1h1) = 0 ⇒ r−1h1 ≡ 0. h = O(r−1−ǫ), use a bootstrap argument to conclude h = O(r−2), r → ∞.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Gauge fixing lemma for the compact case
Let g = gEuc + h be defined on Bρ(0)\{0} and suppose that
- g is Obstruction -flat
- Scalar-flat
- h = O(rβ), β > 0 as r → 0
- δh = 0
Then there exists a change of coordinates such that φ∗g − gEuc = O(r2), r → 0,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Consequences
- There are harmonic coordinates near 0
- We obtain a coupled system
∆n/2Ricg = l.o.t, Ricg = ∆g + Q(g, ∂g)
- Singularity Removal theorem can be proved by using standard
elliptic estimates
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Write the Obstruction-flat system as ∆n/2h = R(h), Since h = O(rβ), r → 0 then ∆n/2h = O(r2β−n) r → 0 Better than expected! There exists h′ ∈ W m,p
β′
with 0 < β < β′ < 2β non-exceptional such that h = h′ + h1 + O(r1+ǫ), and h1 is linear homogeneous .
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Bootstrap h = h1 + O(r2), r → ∞ This time we cannot rule h1 out. However h1 = LXgEuc, X quadratic.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Consider the flow of X, ∂tϕt
X = X(ϕt X),
ϕ0
X = id,
- ϕ1
X
∗ gEuc − gEuc − LXgEuc = O(r2) r → 0, Then
- ϕ1
−X
∗ g − gEuc = O(rmin{1+ǫ,2}), r → 0, Bootstrap to eventually obtain a diffeomorphism ϕ such that ϕ∗g − gEuc = O(r2), r → 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Delicate issues
- The ALE of order 0 condition does not give us any decay
improvement
- How to construct a divergence-free gauge?
- If φ∗g is divergnce-free, can we guarantee that
h = φ∗g − gEuc decays as r−β at infinity?
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Existence of divergence-free gauges
Implicit function theorem: Consider the nonlinear map φ → δgEuc
- φ∗
gg
- ,
In order to apply the implicit function theorem, we need to consider the linearized equation δgEucLXgEuc = −δEuch, i.e., δgEucLXgEuc = O(r−1) as r → 0.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- The map X → δgEucLXgEuc has kernel that makes the
implicit function theorem fail (linear kernel).
- If g is ALE of positive order, the implicit function theorem can
be applied and produce a δ-free gauge.
- One has to modify the gauge condition
δth = δh − tir−1 ∂
∂r , t = 0,
We try to prescribe δth = 0,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- Apply the implicit function theorem to
δtX = δtLXgEuc,
- The only linear kernel of t are forms which are dual to
Killing fields,
- On Rn \ Bρ(0), the operator t is invertible given that we fix
appropriate boundary conditions.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Theorem (Cheeger-Tian)
If g is ALE of order 0, there exists a a gauge φ such that for t = 0 small δt (φ∗g − gEuc) = 0, moreover, h = φ∗g − gEuc has pointwise decay at infinity.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Set h = φ∗g − gEuc, then O(gEuc + h) = 0, R(g + h) = 0 δh = tir−1 ∂
∂r h,
The obstruction-flat equation takes the form Pth + R(h) = 0, where Pt is a small perturbation of ∆n/2.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Using separation of variables, we can write solutions of Pth = 0 as a sum h = h+ + h− + h0 where h+ =
∞
- j=1
nj
- k=1
log(r)nkrα+
k Tj
(growth solution), h− =
∞
- j=1
nj
- k=1
log(r)nkrα−
k Tj
(decay solution), h0 =
∞
- j=1
nj
- k=1
log(r)nkrα0
kTj
(degenerate solution)
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Growth estimate
- Let β = inf{|Re(α±)|} > 0.
- Consider the weighted norm
|||h|||2
a,b =
b
a
- Sn−1 h2dVgSn−1r−1dr,
Fix 0 < β′ < β. Write a solution of Pth = 0 as h = h+ + h− + h0,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Growth estimate
For L > 0 large the growth solution satisfies Lβ
′
|||h+|||1,L ≤ |||h+|||L,L2 The decay solution satisfies |||h−|||L,L2 ≤ L−β
′
|||h−|||1,L
Proof.
Turan’s Lemma.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Three annulus lemma
Write a solution of Pth = 0 as h = h+ + h− + h0, and assume that h0 ≡ 0. If Lβ′|||h|||1,L ≤ |||h|||L,L2 then Lβ′|||h|||L,L2 ≤ |||h|||L2,L3 i.e., if h grows in A1,L(0), then it continues growing. (continued)
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
If |||h|||L2,L3 ≤ L−β′|||h|||L,L2, then |||h|||1,L2 ≤ L−β′|||h|||1,L. Moreover one of the two inequalities has to hold.
- It is crucial to rule out degenerate solutions.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Nonlinear three annulus theorem
Lemma
Let g = gEuc + h be obstruction-flat, scalar flat and δt-free on Rn \ Bρ(0). There exists χ > 0 such that if
- hCm,α < χ on Rn \ Bρ(0),
- Pth = 0 has no degenerate solutions.
Then h satisfies the Three Annulus Lemma.
Proof (Outline).
If the growth estimate in the Three Annulus Lemma is not satisfied, use a rescaling construction to produce a solution of the nonlinear system with the wrong behavior.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Proof of main theorem
- Prove there are no degenerate solutions for t = 0 small.
- From the Three Annulus Lemma and the ALE condition one
rules out growth solutions.
- Using standard elliptic estimates one obtains h = O(r−β′),
r → ∞.
- Fix a divergence-free gauge where g is ALE of positive order.
- Bootstrap argument from above.
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Degenerate solutions
Lemma
For t = 0 there are no degenerate solutions of the linear system satisfying δth = 0. All degenerate solutions in separated variables satisfy δh = O(r−γ−1) as r → 0, δh = O(rγ−1) as r → ∞, with 0 < γ < 1 small. Consider the map X = δgEucLXgEuc,
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
Using the theory of Nirenberg-Walker one solves for X satisfying X = O(r1+γ) r → ∞, X = O(r1−γ) r → 0, X = δh. It follows that h0 = h − LXgEuc satisfies δh0 = 0. We now prove that h has to be a Lie derivative
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues
- LXgEuc is a solution of the linearized system
- h0 is also a solution and hence ∆n/2h0 = 0
- h0 is O(r−γ) near zero and O(rγ) at infinity,
- The condition δgEuch0 = 0 rules out this behavior unless h0 is
constant
Origin Linearized Equation Gauge-fixing Approach Delicate Issues