the safety grind
play

The Safety Grind Guidelines For Safer Skate Parks 1 2019 Safety - PDF document

The Safety Grind Guidelines For Safer Skate Parks 1 2019 Safety Grind Project 2 2 City of Casey Introduction The purpose of this project is to provide a basis for local government to create and strengthen their overall city-wide skate


  1. The Safety Grind Guidelines For Safer Skate Parks 1 2019 Safety Grind Project

  2. 2 2 City of Casey

  3. Introduction The purpose of this project is to provide a basis for local government to create and strengthen their overall city-wide skate strategy. The guidelines work towards an integrated approach to skate parks by including four pillars, (1) needs assessment, (2) design, (3) operation and (4) management for local government. While the City of Casey has taken the lead in this project, the guidelines are aimed to assist all Local Government Authority’s to develop their skate strategy or open space planning. The main aims are to engage key stakeholders in the needs assessment, planning, implementation and management stages of skate parks. Additionally, to align guidelines with other council, community, neighbourhood, parks, open space and child youth and family strategies. Research was done to arrive at the fjnal guidelines, including; Literature review, YMCA Local Government planner surveys, 2019 Casey Summer Skate Park Audit, user surveys and an open forum. Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Pillar 4 Needs Design Operations Management Assessment & & & Location Activations Coordination The Safety Grind forum was held at Bunjil City of Casey departments; City design Place in June to present the four above pillars and construction, City and asset planning, and receive feedback from relevant people Safer communities, Active communities and from Victoria Police, YMCA, Department Child, Youth and Family. A total of 30 people of Justice and Community Safety, skaters, attended and discussed the pillars in fjve and representatives from the following diverse groups. 3 2019 Safety Grind Project

  4. General Hierarchy Alignment of Council Plans - Indicative example Council Plan Strategy Ensure all suburbs are proactively planned, including the physical infrastructure, the supporting services and community activities. Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan Design safe and inclusive public facilities and spaces to reduce intentional and accidental injury. Children, Young Community Safety Open Space Leisure Facilities Sports Development People & Families* Strategy* Strategy* Development Plan & Physical Activity Policy* Plan* Provide spaces, Introduce Maximise Increase the Committed to services, programs programmed opportunities for participation of young working with key and events where activities in selected broader community people in sports and stakeholders to children, young parks to increase use of recreation recreation. identify and respond people and families activation of these reserves by to crime, fear of feel safe, welcome, spaces. incorporating passive crime and anti-social respected and leisure facilities. behaviour issues. supported throughout their lifespan. Skate Strategy* Management plans and new maintenance regimes need to be developed for all facilities. Safety Grind Project 2019 Guidelines for safer skate parks. * Indicative hierarchy only. Local Government Authority’s may have similar plans that target the same areas. 4 City of Casey

  5. Pillar 1 Needs Assessment “What do we need to provide and why?” Considerations Key points Why it is important • Alignment to vision and policies It is important to align the planning of the skate park to Overall municipal other council policies and visions. Outline how multiple • Structure for cross departmental planning departments come together in the planning, design, skate park strategy operations and management of the asset. / Plan • Framework for development, management & evaluation • Population -present & future A high-level demographic analysis can show if the area is a good use for a skatepark. It can predict if people will still Demographic • User profjles -existing & potential be using it in 10 years. Benchmarking similar demographic analysis areas to see what has been successful is valuable. • Neighbouring council / benchmarking (sub regional & regional only) • Current trends -design, users The park should be heavily based on research and Research and evidence of a variety of factors; users, design trends, area • Alignment with other council polices e.g. needs and stakeholder input. This will assist in achieving evidence Open Space the aims of linked policies. • Data observations -safety, user traffjc • Community consultation and engagement It is important for the community to be engaged and Community needs support the facility, this allows for their expectations • Specifjc needs; sport, social or and concerns to be managed, through design, build, combination management and activation. • Users, non-users & other stakeholders • Active and passive Our aim is to ensure the facilities are for the whole Diversity of users community not just select or existing user groups. We can • New and existing build attractions and amenities that service the broader community and skill levels not just select user groups. • Multi-platform & multi-dimensional engagement • Research & evidence Like any public space, people that use them should feel Crime Prevention safe. A good skate park is activated by CPTED principles • Assess needed features for safety (shade, Through and thus need to be embedded into planning. water, lighting) changes depending on park Environmental type Design (CPTED) • Marginalised and disability group engagement (CALD communities) 5 2019 Safety Grind Project

  6. Pillar 2 Design and location “What to put where and for how long?” Considerations Key points Why it is important • Needs assessment outcome Skate parks have thousands of difgerent combinations of Park type skate-able infrastructure and design. This means we can • Consideration of type ensure it is relevant and dynamic to existing user groups as well as every member of the community. • Budget considerations over lifecycle of asset • Co-design process The co-design process is vital as it can establish a sense Community of ownership and respect for the space. There may be engagement • Commit to ownership difgerences in what established users want and what is needed to align with Council policies and goals. This may • Needs v wants and managing expectations mean the skatepark needs to be designed with strategic intent more so than what existing user groups want. Balance is key. • Community access, egress and sight lines We need to ensure skate parks are safe and have a Location positive relationship to other facilities and amenities. This • Relationship to nearby businesses and other includes egress and sightlines, access to pathways, local facilities (toilets, medical) shops and public transport. Doing this will better facilitate access and ensure the park is well-used for longer periods • Neighbouring council / benchmarking (sub of time. regional & regional only) • Variety of parks in municipality: users and A skatepark with diverse features will attract all members Diversity size of the community ensuring greater usage levels. It is important to make the park accessible and inviting for non- • Integrated or multi-use facility traditional users as well. In addition, all skateparks in one area should be diverse from each other to provide variety. • Engaging traditional non-users (females, inactive people) • Consideration of type Access to necessary amenities will give users the ability to Amenities attend the facility for longer periods of time as they do not • Essential: water, shade, bins, seating need to leave for basic things. In turn, this increases the activation of the park as more users remain present. • Budget allocations • Street or park design focus (social or Recreation facility A focus on the sports (physical activity) or cultural aspects physical) of community can both attract unique cross sections from or youth space within the skate community. • Civic integration or precinct use (incidental skate-able infrastructure or purpose built) • Consideration of target market/group within hierarchy • Qualitative & Quantitative measures Evaluation and Have we been successful? Does the community value the skate park or is the council spending money maintaining an review • Clear KPI’s asset that nobody uses or wants. • Process of measurement (correspondence) • Design to Australian standards Crime Prevention Like any public space, people that use it should feel safe. A good skate park is activated by CPTED principles and this Through • Location within open/commercial space: need to be embedded into planning. Environmental sight lines, lighting Design (CPTED) • Community stewardship 6 City of Casey

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend