Skateboard Science A Hands-on Exploration of the Physics of Motion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

skateboard science
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Skateboard Science A Hands-on Exploration of the Physics of Motion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Skateboard Science A Hands-on Exploration of the Physics of Motion Phase 1: Learning about Mechanics Working in design teams, students built and experimented with three dimensional models of skatepark equipment to explore the physics of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Skateboard Science

A Hands-on Exploration of the Physics of Motion

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Phase 1: Learning about Mechanics

Working in design teams, students built and experimented with three dimensional models of skatepark equipment to explore the physics of skateboarding. Students rotated roles as architect, accountant, engineer, and recorder. Teams earned Construction Cash for good cooperative work, sound scientific procedures, and clear explanations of the physics behind each of the obstacles.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Phase 2: Planning & Building the Skate Park Using what students learned about potential and kinetic energy, friction, and inertia, they designed and built a cardboard working skatepark.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Planning the Skate Park Design teams decided which obstacles to purchase with the construction cash they earned in Phase 1. Pictures of obstacles as well as their point value will be next to each skate park. Design plans required students to stay under budget and to decide on the order of the

  • bstacles within the park.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Tools & Materials

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Eshleman Design Teams

  • Star Skaters
  • Dinomite
  • Sk8er Cr8ers
  • Exotic Zebras
  • Infinities
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Star Skaters Eshleman Grades 2&3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dinomite Eshleman Grades 2&3

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Sk8er Cr8ers Eshleman Grade 4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Exotic Zebras Eshleman Grade 4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Infinities Eshleman Grades 5&6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pequea Design Teams

  • The Drasticools
  • Skatergirls
  • Skateboard Scientists
  • Cardboard Inc. (CBI)
  • The Hawks
slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Drasticools Pequea Grade 4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Skatergirls Pequea Grades 3&4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Skateboard Scientists Pequea Grades 5&6

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cardboard Inc. (CBI) Pequea Grades 5&6

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Hawks: Pequea 5&6

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Calculating Point Values

Teams calculated the maximum point value for their completed park as well as the average point value of 6 trial runs. Each obstacle has a point value based on the degree of difficulty for the marble-skater. To earn the maximum points, the marble-skater had to flow from one obstacle to the next without stopping and without injury. Injuries are when the marble-skater suffers a hard hit or flies out of the park. Obstacle values were multiplied to

  • btain the maximum point value.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Eshleman Point Values

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pequea Point Values

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Completed Parks

During testing teams observed variables that affected the outcome of the marble-skaters flow, causing them to think, then do. Again and again. After many hours (27 to be exact!) of planning, constructing, testing, and testing again, teams completed their parks. Let's take a look at the completed parks!

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pequea Parks

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The Drasticools

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Skatergirls

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Skateboard Scientists

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cardboard Inc.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The Hawks

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Eshleman Parks

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Star Skaters

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Dinomite

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Sk8er Cr8ers

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Infinities

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Phase 3: Skatepark Expo

  • Design Teams demonstrate their skatepark

models to an audience of "investors". They are competing to see which park model investors would build.

  • Investment Teams will spend 5 minutes at

each park completing a Score Sheet.

  • Each Investor will cast an individual vote as

to which park they want to see built!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

This Unit...

  • demanded action and generated activity and

ideas.

  • was a real-life engineering challenge in a

team environment.

  • increased brain work and hand work!
  • provided an opportunity to work with hands

in the third dimension.

  • allowed students to SHOW not tell what they

learned.

  • helped students resolve conflicts.
  • helped students see knowledge in another

context.