The NZSL Act 2006: Aspirations and Impacts Rachel McKee Language, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the nzsl act 2006 aspirations and impacts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The NZSL Act 2006: Aspirations and Impacts Rachel McKee Language, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The NZSL Act 2006: Aspirations and Impacts Rachel McKee Language, Education & Diversity Conference, Nov 22 2007 Why is language recognition needed? NZSL proscribed 1880 -1980. Marginalisation. Sign language is instrumentally


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The NZSL Act 2006: Aspirations and Impacts

Rachel McKee

Language, Education & Diversity Conference, Nov 22 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why is language recognition needed?

  • NZSL proscribed

1880 -1980. Marginalisation.

  • Sign language is

instrumentally & culturally vital to Deaf social participation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Expectations of NZSL recognition

  • Consultation with

Deaf community & 27 Govt agencies, + 293 submissions on the NZSL Bill

  • Identified community

issues re. NZSL use & govt ability to implement rights

Deaf concerns:

  • Status & awareness
  • Access rights
  • Maintenance, development
slide-4
SLIDE 4

NZSL Act 2006

Human rights (Individual) Language rights (Group) Disability rights (Social equity)

Hybrid basis of the NZSL Act 2006

“This Bill will provide

  • fficial recognition of

NZSL as a unique NZ language and will contribute to achieving the vision of the NZ disability strategy: a fully inclusive NZ society”.

Explanatory Note (p.2)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Purpose of the Act is “to promote and maintain NZSL” 1. NZSL declared an official (indigenous) language 2. Right to use NZSL in legal proceedings; empowers the making of regulations for interpreter competency standards. 3. Principles to guide government departments in promotion and use of NZSL

  • Reporting & monitoring via NZ Disability Strategy
  • Review of operation of the Act after 3 years

Provisions of the NZSL Act 2006

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Validates Deaf people as a language community, with a

marginalized cultural identity  Accords NZSL equal status with spoken languages  Formalizes right to use NZSL in legal proceedings  Moral imperative (& raised expectation) for language access rights in govt service sector

Impacts of the Act

slide-7
SLIDE 7

χ no structure or resources for promotion

and maintenance of NZSL (cf. Maori Language

Act - MLC functions & funding)

χ no new rights to use NZSL in other domains, eg:

  • education
  • employment
  • police
  • health
  • broadcasting

Limitations of the Act

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • ACC
  • consumer information in NZSL translation (DVD)
  • Workbridge

– video remote interpreting for clients

  • Statistics NZ

– developing policy on use of NZSL

  • Ministry of Education

– NZSL curriculum for mainstream schools

  • Health & Disability Commissioner

– NZSL clip on website: ‘Deaf face’

Examples of NZSL-related initiatives

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Types of planning adressed by NZSL Act

 SELECTION - the variety to be recognised and developed is chosen & given new status

? SECURING ACCEPTANCE - changing attitudes

(steps to enhance prestige, awareness of language)  CODIFICATION - linguistic features are documented, standardised, disseminated  ELABORATION - resources committed to extending the language (ie, to be capable of dealing with new usages - new concepts and contexts)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Consultations around NZSL Act & my research indicate that:

  • Lack of access to education in and through NZSL

remains a sigificant barrier for Deaf people of all ages.

  • In schools: teachers & anciliiary staff lack NZSL skills; ‘hearing’

learning environments; lack of interpreters, notetakers, Deaf/NZSL role-models

  • Families of Deaf children feel unable to make fully informed

choices about language; inadequate support to learn NZSL

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Impact of language status on Deaf aspirations & achievement

Sonia Pivac

  • 2nd generation Deaf -

native signer

  • Fulbright award 2004
  • to Gallaudet

University, USA

slide-12
SLIDE 12

From recognition to rights The moral basis of (minority language rights claims) is not, in itself, sufficient for the successful implementation of language rights …Thus, the advocates of language rights need to extend their arguments beyond the social justice and equity considerations that underpin language rights’ claims …in order to emphasise the practical advantages of implementing such rights within nation-states… Longstanding patterns of social, economic and educational disadvantage for minority language speakers can be addressed…”

(May 2005:326)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Implementing the NZSL Act requires:

  • A STRATEGY: coordinated planning to promote

NZSL rights (cf. Maori Language Strategy 2003)

  • Consultation on priorities

– Aligning ‘top-down’ (state) & ‘bottom-up’ (community) efforts – Balancing Deaf community development v public awareness

  • Resources $$ - eg. supporting transmission of NZSL

across generations, investing in interpreting services