The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the infn projec t
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& Universit di Pisa Joint EPS-ECFA session @ EPS HEP 2011 Grenoble July 23,2011 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 1 Approved ! SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The INFN Project

Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& Università di Pisa

Joint EPS-ECFA session @ EPS HEP 2011 Grenoble July 23,2011

7/23/2011 1 M.A.Giorgi

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Approved !

SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan (December 2010). The national research plan has been endorsed by “CIPE” (the institution responsible for infrastructure long term plans) (April 2011). A financial allocation of 250 M€ in about five years has been approved for the “superb flavour factory”. At the end of 2010 an initial sum of 19 M€ has been allocated. A sum of the order of 50 M€ is expected in 2011 budget.

7/23/2011 2 M.A.Giorgi

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Priorities

The site choice The management plan The governance model The WBS Start Spending for: Integrating the team: enrollment of new people Civil engineering projects Preliminary site related works The transition from TDR to construction phase

7/23/2011 3 M.A.Giorgi

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Site

Requirements defined in a document by the collaboration and reviewed by an International Review Committee:

  • Size
  • Electric power supply
  • Water for cooling
  • Low ground vibrations.
  • Close to INFN and other research infrastructures.

Preferred: inside LNF or nearby .

7/23/2011 4 M.A.Giorgi

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Options considered

LNF but:

  • Need to go deep underground
  • Surface space strongly constrained
  • Half below the “Enea” lab
  • Strong limitations on possible light

source beamlines

  • More difficult evolution into an

international structure Other locations far from LNF :

  • Piemonte ( near Torino)
  • Sardinia
  • Campania
  • Puglia

7/23/2011 5 M.A.Giorgi

And in the Rome area: Private land (green field) The campus of Tor Vergata (one big University not a Green Field)

Enea INFN

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tor Vergata Choice

A letter from the Rector on May 28,2011 has made the site available The decision to move with this solution was taken by the May 29 INFN board of directors .

The site has been decided ! It is not a GREEN FIELD!

Site LNF About 4.5 Km

7/23/2011 6 M.A.Giorgi

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Organization & Structure : 3 Phases

1.

– INFN: the past and present phase – Consortium: as soon as possible as an independent legal entity

  • More flexibility in the organisation
  • Can directly associate foreign partners (EGO like)
  • An “intermediate solution”

– Initial partners: INFN, Tor Vergata and soon IIT – European consortium (ERIC): the final structure

7/23/2011 7 M.A.Giorgi

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Governance

Cern like organisation

– A director general and a directorate

  • Departments under director’s supervision

– Scientific evaluation committee

  • Science
  • Machine

– Finance evaluation committee

A known and working scheme!

7/23/2011 8 M.A.Giorgi

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Governance

Cern like organisation

– A director general and a directorate

  • Departments under director’s supervision

– Scientific evaluation committee

  • Science
  • Machine

– Finance evaluation committee

A known and working scheme!

7/23/2011 9 M.A.Giorgi

The Name of the Structure Cabibbo Lab

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Meanwhile

  • Moving towards the completion of TDR.
  • Machine parameters are stable.
  • Detector R&D is in an advanced status, of testing on beam the

prototypes

  • A well integrated group of theorists and experimentalists is

focusing on the program for discovery with a careful evaluation

  • f sensitivities and looking at interplay between different

measurements looking at complementarities of various flavor measurements.

7/23/2011 10 M.A.Giorgi

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Parameter Requirement Comment

Luminosity (top-up mode) 1036 cm-2s-1 @ U(4S) Baseline/Flexibility with headroom at

  • 4. 1036 cm-2s-1

Integrated luminosity 75 ab-1 Based on a “New Snowmass Year” of 1.5 x 107 seconds (PEP-II & KEKB experience-based) CM energy range  threshold to U (5S) For Charm special runs (still asymmetric……) Minimum boost bg ≈0.237 ~(4.18x6.7GeV) 1 cm beam pipe radius. First measured point at 1.5 cm e- Polarization Boost up to 0.9 in runs at low energy under evaluation for charm physics ≥80% Enables  CP and T violation studies, measurement of  g-2 and improves sensitivity to lepton flavor-violating

  • decays. Detailed simulation, needed

to ascertain a more precise requirement, are in progress.

REQUIREMENTS FROM PHYSICS

7/23/2011 11 M.A.Giorgi

slide-12
SLIDE 12

I.P. HER arc LER arc e- e+ RF FF FF l *~ 0.5m LER arc HER arc

HER Energy: 6.7 GeV LER Energy: 4.2 GeV Polarization 80% for e-

Collider Parameters are “stable”

7/23/2011 12 M.A.Giorgi

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Future Super B Factories ( goal is 75 ab-1 in 5 years)

Or Super KEKB Peak Luminosity >1036 0.8 x 1036 Integrated Luminosity 75 ab-1 50 ab-1 Site Tor Vergata Campus KEKB Laboratory Collisions mid 2016 2015 Polarization 80% electron beam No Low energy running 1035 @ charm threshold No Approval status Approved Approved

7/23/2011 13 M.A.Giorgi

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Benefit from polarised e− beam very precise with improved detector Statistically limited: Ang. analysis with >75ab-1 Right handed currents SuperB measures many more modes systematic error is main challenge control systematic error with data SuperB measures e mode well, LHCb does μ Clean NP search Theoretically clean b fragmentation limits interpretation

is then the tool for unique quality measurements

Experiment: No Result Moderate Precision Precise Very Precise Theory: Moderately clean Clean Need lattice Clean

Physics Group

7/23/2011 14 M.A.Giorgi

slide-15
SLIDE 15

END

7/23/2011 15 M.A.Giorgi

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SuperB Luminosity model

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00

Peak Luminosity (10^35)

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Integrated Luminosity(1/ab)

75 ab-1

7/23/2011 16 M.A.Giorgi