The In The In Situ Situ Stress Field of the West Tuna Area, Stress Field of the West Tuna Area, Gippsland Gippsland Basin: Basin: Implications for Natural Fracture Implications for Natural Fracture-
- Enhanced Permeability
The In Situ Situ Stress Field of the West Tuna Area, Stress Field - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The In Situ Situ Stress Field of the West Tuna Area, Stress Field of the West Tuna Area, Gippsland Gippsland Basin: Basin: The In Implications for Natural Fracture- -Enhanced Permeability Enhanced Permeability Implications for Natural
av from checkshot
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pressure (MPa) Depth (m)
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 4000
Pressure (MPa) Depth (m)
c
Compression Tension
DITF Breakout Compressive rock strength Tensile rock strength
360 180 1 metre
180 360 1 metre West Tuna 8
S SHmax
Hmax Ori
Ori = 138° N = 138° N S Sv
v
= 21 MPa = 21 MPa P PP
P
= 9.8 MPa = 9.8 MPa S Shmin
hmin
= 21 MPa = 21 MPa S SHmax
Hmax
= 38 MPa = 38 MPa Depth Depth = 1000 m = 1000 m
Electrically conductive fractures in cemented sandstones
Shear Stress (MPa) Normal Stress (MPa)
Conductive fractures are optimally oriented to be hydraulically conductive in the far conductive in the far-
field
Conductive fractures are restricted to cemented sandstones with low matrix permeability low matrix permeability
Conductive fractures may be important to reservoir connectivity
Azimuth with Respect to Maximum Horizontal Stress Circumferential Stress (MPa)
θθmin min = 3
h -
H -
w -
θθmax max = 3
H -
h -
w -
Material Properties
E= 40 GPa υ =0.25 E = 8.5 GPa υ =0.35 ‘Sandstone’ ‘Shale’ ‘Sandstone’
Circumferential Stress SHALE Azimuth with Respect to Maximum Horizontal Stress Circumferential Stress (MPa)
40.7 MPa 17.1 MPa
SANDSTONE Azimuth with Respect to Maximum Horizontal Stress Circumferential Stress (MPa)
21.1 MPa 133 MPa
Compressive strength Compressive strength