The goal this research is to investigate the use RTK heave as a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The goal this research is to investigate the use RTK heave as a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The goal this research is to investigate the use RTK heave as a replacement of MRU heave Heave is a major contributor to errors in depth measurements. Heave is a major contributor to errors in depth measurements. In the past, manual or automatic
The goal this research is to investigate the use RTK heave as a replacement of MRU heave
Heave is a major contributor to errors in depth measurements.
Heave is a major contributor to errors in depth measurements.
In the past, manual or automatic smoothing of the data was the only practical way of partially correcting wave-induced errors.
The MRU accuracy in Heave is : +/- 5 cm
Rover Base The RTK vertical accuracy: +/- 1 cm
MRU heave may suffer from drift due to turn or acceleration
Why
Testing the new method of measuring heave
sampling rate of MRU is higher than RTK RTK may suffer from outage due to bad communication, could be overcome by PPK
Remember
R2Snoic MBES project
R2Snoic MBES project: Three surveying lines Total length of 2 km Average depth: 15 m
applying
correction s
reading parameters raw data review (Phase I) swath-based editing (Phase II) area-based editing (Phase III)
Two ways of processing:
Heave MRU Tide RTK Heave RTK Tide RTK
Two ways of processing:
Heave MRU Tide RTK
Two ways of processing:
Heave RTK Tide RTK
applying corrections reading parameters raw data review (Phase I) swath-based editing (Phase II) area-based editing (Phase III)
Heave based comparison Area based comparison
Hm and Hr plot for the first survey line of R2Sonic project
Hm and Hr plot for the second survey line of R2Sonic project
Hm and Hr plot for the third survey line of R2Sonic project
Hm and Hr correlation for the first survey line of R2Sonic project
Hm and Hr correlation for the second survey line of R2Sonic project
Hm and Hr correlation for the third survey line of R2Sonic project
Standard Deviation between Hm and Hr for the three lines
Line Standard Deviation (m) 1 0.02 2 0.03 3 0.02
applying corrections reading parameters raw data review (Phase I) swath-based editing (Phase II) area-based editing (Phase III)
Area based comparison
Soundings profile for two surfaces Sm and Sr
0.006 and the standard deviation is 0.218
there are high correlation between both Hm and Hr . In other words RTK heave could be used as a replacement of MRU heave
Appling the same test on single beam echo sounder Appling the same test in rough seas to see how the RTK heave will follow the MRU heave
- Dr. Mohamed Mohasseb
Hassan Halwanee Mohamed Elmelegy Tamer Nada Ahmed Naguib Egyptian Navy. Dr.Ashraf Elasal Pat Sanders
- Prof. Dr. Saad Mesbah