the four color theorem
play

The Four Color Theorem The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coloring graphs without subdivisions of K 5 Xingxing Yu Orlando, Florida May 18, 2019 Xingxing Yu Coloring The Four Color Theorem The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken 1977): If G is a planar graph then ( G ) 4. Xingxing Yu


  1. Coloring graphs without subdivisions of K 5 Xingxing Yu Orlando, Florida May 18, 2019 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  2. The Four Color Theorem ◮ The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken 1977): If G is a planar graph then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  3. The Four Color Theorem ◮ The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken 1977): If G is a planar graph then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ In 1997, Roberston, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas gave a simpler and cleaner proof. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  4. The Four Color Theorem ◮ The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken 1977): If G is a planar graph then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ In 1997, Roberston, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas gave a simpler and cleaner proof. ◮ Theorem (Ringel and Youngs 1968): If G is embeddable in a surface other than the sphere with Euler characteristic χ ∗ then � 7 + √ 49 − 24 χ ∗ � χ ( G ) ≤ . 2 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  5. The Four Color Theorem ◮ The Four Color Theorem (Appel and Haken 1977): If G is a planar graph then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ In 1997, Roberston, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas gave a simpler and cleaner proof. ◮ Theorem (Ringel and Youngs 1968): If G is embeddable in a surface other than the sphere with Euler characteristic χ ∗ then � 7 + √ 49 − 24 χ ∗ � χ ( G ) ≤ . 2 ◮ Conjecture (Tutte 1966): Every 2-edge-connected graph without Petersen minor has a nowhere-zero 4-flow. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  6. Characterizations of planar graphs ◮ Theorem (Kuratowski 1930): A graph is planar iff it contains no K 3 , 3 -subdivision or K 5 -subdivision. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  7. Characterizations of planar graphs ◮ Theorem (Kuratowski 1930): A graph is planar iff it contains no K 3 , 3 -subdivision or K 5 -subdivision. ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): A graph is planar iff it contains no K 3 , 3 -minor or K 5 -minor. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  8. Graphs containing no TK 3 , 3 ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G contains no K 3 , 3 -subdivision then G is planar, or G ∼ = K 5 , or G admits a cut of size at most 2. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  9. Graphs containing no TK 3 , 3 ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G contains no K 3 , 3 -subdivision then G is planar, or G ∼ = K 5 , or G admits a cut of size at most 2. ◮ If G does not contain K 3 , 3 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ 5. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  10. Hadwiger’s conjecture ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G does not contain K 5 -minor and G is edge-maximal then G admits a clique cut of size at most 3, or G is planar, or is the Wagner graph. As a consequence, if G does not contain K 5 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  11. Hadwiger’s conjecture ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G does not contain K 5 -minor and G is edge-maximal then G admits a clique cut of size at most 3, or G is planar, or is the Wagner graph. As a consequence, if G does not contain K 5 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ Conjecture (Hadwiger, 1943): For any k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ k . Xingxing Yu Coloring

  12. Hadwiger’s conjecture ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G does not contain K 5 -minor and G is edge-maximal then G admits a clique cut of size at most 3, or G is planar, or is the Wagner graph. As a consequence, if G does not contain K 5 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ Conjecture (Hadwiger, 1943): For any k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Hadwiger’s conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 5, but remains open for k ≥ 6. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  13. Hadwiger’s conjecture ◮ Theorem (Wagner 1937): If G does not contain K 5 -minor and G is edge-maximal then G admits a clique cut of size at most 3, or G is planar, or is the Wagner graph. As a consequence, if G does not contain K 5 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ 4. ◮ Conjecture (Hadwiger, 1943): For any k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -minor then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Hadwiger’s conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 5, but remains open for k ≥ 6. ◮ The case k = 5 is significantly more complex than the cases for k ≤ 4. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  14. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Conjecture (Haj´ os 1961): For any integer k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ k . Xingxing Yu Coloring

  15. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Conjecture (Haj´ os 1961): For any integer k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 3, Xingxing Yu Coloring

  16. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Conjecture (Haj´ os 1961): For any integer k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 3, ◮ Catlin (1979): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for every k ≥ 6. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  17. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Conjecture (Haj´ os 1961): For any integer k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 3, ◮ Catlin (1979): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for every k ≥ 6. ◮ Erd˝ os and Fajtlowicz (1981): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for almost all graphs. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  18. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Conjecture (Haj´ os 1961): For any integer k ≥ 1, if G does not contain K k +1 -subdivision then χ ( G ) ≤ k . ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture is known to be true for k ≤ 3, ◮ Catlin (1979): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for every k ≥ 6. ◮ Erd˝ os and Fajtlowicz (1981): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for almost all graphs. ◮ Thomassen (2005): Haj´ os’ conjecture is false for many obvious reasons. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  19. Fox-Lee-Sudakov conjecture ◮ Let σ ( G ) denotes the largest t such that G contains K t -subdivision, and Xingxing Yu Coloring

  20. Fox-Lee-Sudakov conjecture ◮ Let σ ( G ) denotes the largest t such that G contains K t -subdivision, and ◮ Let H ( n ) := max { χ ( G ) /σ ( G ) : G is a graph with | V ( G ) | = n } . Xingxing Yu Coloring

  21. Fox-Lee-Sudakov conjecture ◮ Let σ ( G ) denotes the largest t such that G contains K t -subdivision, and ◮ Let H ( n ) := max { χ ( G ) /σ ( G ) : G is a graph with | V ( G ) | = n } . ◮ Theorem (Fox, Lee, and Sudakov, 2012): H ( n ) = Θ( √ n / log n ). Xingxing Yu Coloring

  22. Fox-Lee-Sudakov conjecture ◮ Let σ ( G ) denotes the largest t such that G contains K t -subdivision, and ◮ Let H ( n ) := max { χ ( G ) /σ ( G ) : G is a graph with | V ( G ) | = n } . ◮ Theorem (Fox, Lee, and Sudakov, 2012): H ( n ) = Θ( √ n / log n ). ◮ Conjecture (Fox, Lee, and Sudakov, 2012): There is a constant c > 0 such that every graph G with χ ( G ) = k satisfies σ ( G ) ≥ c √ k log k . Xingxing Yu Coloring

  23. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Theorem (K¨ uhn and Osthus, 2002): Haj´ os’ conjecture holds for large k and graphs with large girth. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  24. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Theorem (K¨ uhn and Osthus, 2002): Haj´ os’ conjecture holds for large k and graphs with large girth. ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture remains open for the cases k = 4 and k = 5. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  25. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Theorem (K¨ uhn and Osthus, 2002): Haj´ os’ conjecture holds for large k and graphs with large girth. ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture remains open for the cases k = 4 and k = 5. ◮ Find structure of graphs containing no K 5 -subdivision or K 6 -subdivision. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  26. Haj´ os conjecture ◮ Theorem (K¨ uhn and Osthus, 2002): Haj´ os’ conjecture holds for large k and graphs with large girth. ◮ Haj´ os’ conjecture remains open for the cases k = 4 and k = 5. ◮ Find structure of graphs containing no K 5 -subdivision or K 6 -subdivision. ◮ Find structure of a minimum counterexample to Haj´ os’ conjecture. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  27. Graphs containing no TK 5 ◮ Theorem (He, Wang, and Y. 2017): If G does not contain K 5 -subdivision then G is planar or G admits a cut of size at most 4. (This was conjectured independently by Kelmans 1979 and Seymour 1977.) Xingxing Yu Coloring

  28. Graphs containing no TK 5 ◮ Theorem (He, Wang, and Y. 2017): If G does not contain K 5 -subdivision then G is planar or G admits a cut of size at most 4. (This was conjectured independently by Kelmans 1979 and Seymour 1977.) ◮ Corollary. Any counterexample to the Haj´ os conjecture on 4-coloring must have a cut of size at most 4. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  29. Structure of Haj´ os graph A graph G is said to be a Haj´ os graph if (i) G is not 4-colorable, (ii) G contains no K 5 -subdivision, and (iii) subject to (i) and (ii), | V ( G ) | is minimum. Xingxing Yu Coloring

  30. Structure of Haj´ os graph ◮ Theorem (Y. and Zickfeld, 2004). Every Haj´ os graph is 4-connected. G ′ G ′ G 1 G 2 1 2 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  31. Structure of Haj´ os graph ◮ Theorem (Watkins and Mesner 1967): Let G be a 2-connected graph and y 1 , y 2 , y 3 be three distinct vertices in G . Then G does not have a cycle containing { y 1 , y 2 , y 3 } if and only if y 1 y 2 y 3 y 1 y 2 y 3 y 1 y 2 y 3 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  32. Coloring using 4-cuts a x a x a x b y b y b y c z c z c z d d d Xingxing Yu Coloring

  33. K − 4 in Haj´ os graph ◮ Let G be a Haj´ os graph and x 1 , x 2 , y 1 , y 2 ∈ V ( G ) such that G [ { x 1 , x 2 , y 1 , y 2 } ] ∼ = K − 4 and y 1 y 2 / ∈ E ( G ). y 1 x 1 x 2 y 2 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  34. K − 4 in Haj´ os graph y 1 x 1 x 2 y 2 Xingxing Yu Coloring

  35. K − 4 in Haj´ os graph y 1 x 1 x 2 y 2 y 3 Xingxing Yu Coloring

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend