The dynamical system of mixing layers J P Parker, C P Caulfield, R R - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the dynamical system of mixing layers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The dynamical system of mixing layers J P Parker, C P Caulfield, R R - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The dynamical system of mixing layers J P Parker, C P Caulfield, R R Kerswell February 6, 2019 Dynamical systems (for fluid dynamics) Write down a vector X that fully describes the state of the system at a given time. The system probably also


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The dynamical system of mixing layers

J P Parker, C P Caulfield, R R Kerswell

February 6, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dynamical systems (for fluid dynamics)

Write down a vector X that fully describes the state of the system at a given time. The system probably also depends on one or more parameters R (Re, Ra, Ri...). Then there is some function F that describes the evolution of the system: dX dt = F(X, R)

2 of 27

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Geometrical picture

The state vector X probably has (infinitely?) many components, but we can consider just two, and draw a diagram.

X1 X2

Lines then show how states evolve, following ‘trajectories’. Continuity means nearby trajectories are similar. We can use ideas from topology to understand the system.

3 of 27

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Special trajectories

Certain states have special properties: equilibrium point (steady state), periodic orbit (limit cycle), etc. These can be stable or unstable, and finding them builds up a picture

  • f the system around them.

X1 X2

4 of 27

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Special trajectories

Certain states have special properties: equilibrium point (steady state), periodic orbit (limit cycle), etc. These can be stable or unstable, and finding them builds up a picture

  • f the system around them.

X1 X2

5 of 27

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Special trajectories

Certain states have special properties: equilibrium point (steady state), periodic orbit (limit cycle), etc. These can be stable or unstable, and finding them builds up a picture

  • f the system around them.

X1 X2

6 of 27

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The problem with linear stability

Linear stability analysis for an equilibrium point tells us a series of ‘eigenvalues’. If the eigenvalue is positive, the point is unstable in the corresponding eigenvector.

7 of 27

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The problem with linear stability

Linear stability analysis for an equilibrium point tells us a series of ‘eigenvalues’. If the eigenvalue is negative, the point is stable in the corresponding eigenvector.

8 of 27

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The problem with linear stability

Linear stability analysis for an equilibrium point tells us a series of ‘eigenvalues’. If the eigenvalue is negative, the point is stable in the corresponding eigenvector.

9 of 27

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The problem with linear stability

This is only true locally.

10 of 27

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The problem with linear stability

This is only true locally.

11 of 27

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bifurcations

We are interested in when the system changes qualitatively as parameters are varied, so-called ‘bifurcation points’. Bifurcation diagrams aim to capture this behaviour.

X1 R

X1 X2 X1 X2

12 of 27

slide-13
SLIDE 13

An example: Plane Poiseuille flow

A classical system in fluid dynamics is ‘plane Poiseuille flow’: flow between two parallel plates, driven by a pressure difference. The simple analytic state is stable for Re < 5772 but turbulence is

  • bserved for Re 1000.

Re Energy 5772

This is called ‘subcritical transition to turbulence’.

13 of 27

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability

movie Re = 500, Pr = 1, Rib = 0.16, 3D

Out[70]=

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.5 1.0

  • 4
  • 2

2 4

u b

14 of 27

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Kelvin-Helmholtz in the ocean

van Haren & Gostiaux (2010)

15 of 27

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Richardson number

The Richardson number Rib quantifies (non-dimensionally) the ratio of buoyancy forces to flow shear. The Miles-Howard theorem tells us that our system is stable if Rib > 1/4. ‘Stratification stabilises flows’.

16 of 27

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Methodology

◮ First we try some small perturbations to the base flow at a few

different parameter values, to get a feel for the behaviour.

◮ If any of these appear to be converging to some steady state, we

use Newton’s method (Newton 1669) to find the exact solution.

◮ Once one steady state has been found, this can be reconverged at

different parameter values using branch continuation.

◮ We can then test the stability of the states found, and notice any

bifurcation points.

17 of 27

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results (Re = 4000)

18 of 27

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results (Re = 4000)

'Hopf' bifurcation

19 of 27

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results (Re = 4000)

20 of 27

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Results (Re = 4000)

21 of 27

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Region 1

22 of 27

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Region 2

23 of 27

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Region 3

24 of 27

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Region 4

25 of 27

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Region 5

26 of 27

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

◮ The complex behaviour can be understood as a two-dimensional

system.

◮ Transition is possible above critical Richardson number ◮ Seems likely that transition is possible above Richardson 1/4. ◮ Possible that this leads to full turbulence in 3D flows. ◮ States only go just past 1/4.

27 of 27