The CANS and the CAT: Two Windows into Vermonts System of Care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the cans and the cat
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The CANS and the CAT: Two Windows into Vermonts System of Care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The CANS and the CAT: Two Windows into Vermonts System of Care Outcomes of the Placement Stability Project Alison Krompf and Valerie Wood, Ph.D. Overview of f the Pla lacement Stability Project The Placement Stability Project aims Three


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The CANS and the CAT: Two Windows into Vermont’s System of Care Outcomes of the Placement Stability Project

Alison Krompf and Valerie Wood, Ph.D.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Overview of f the Pla lacement Stability Project

Three trauma related concerns were identified in 2013:

  • Placement Stability Rate
  • Children in Out-of-Home Care
  • Dissolution of Adoptions

These concerns were addressed by:

  • Statewide Collaboration and Workforce Development
  • Screening, Progress Monitoring, and Collaborative Case

Planning (CANs)

  • Caregiver Training, Supports, and Mentoring
  • Evaluation and National Dissemination

The Placement Stability Project aims to improve placement stability and permanence by enhancing the social and emotional well-being of Vermont’s children and youth who are pre and post permanence, with the broader vision to reach all children in the Vermont child welfare system through the implementation

  • f family engaged, adoption

competent, trauma Informed, and evidence based services and supports.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

PSP Core Activities

  • Developed UVM’s Academy for Trauma Informed Practice

and supported approximately 80 students to receive the graduate certificate of completion.

  • Adoption Competency, Trauma, and CANS Online Trainings
  • Supported evidence-based child trauma treatment training

in PCIT, TCPP, and ARC

Statewide Collaboration and Workforce Development

  • Inter-organizational database matching CANS data from DAs

with DCF data (Vertical Change)

  • Analyze CANS data to better understand strengths and

needs for kids in care

  • Comprehensive case study on CANS implementation
  • CANS toolkit and online video training modules

Screening, Progress Monitoring, and Collaborative Case Planning (CANS)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

PSP Core Activities

  • Offered over 30 RPC+ TIPS trainings across state for
  • ver 300 caregivers
  • Developed mobile app to supplement training
  • Developed statewide Caregiver Mentoring Program

Caregiver Training, Supports and Mentoring

  • Collaborated w/ local & state partners on journal

publications

  • Presented at several national conferences, webinars, &

created training modules

Evaluation and National Dissemination

slide-5
SLIDE 5

View 1: The CANS

CANS and Placement Data Preliminary Findings

slide-6
SLIDE 6

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

✓Integrates data from community mental health agencies and Vermont State Family Service Division (Child demographics and outcome: placement stability, child abuse reporting and substantiation, and school placement). ✓Shares de-identified data with University of Vermont for evaluation purposes.

Vertical Change

slide-7
SLIDE 7

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Progress Monitoring every 6 months

8% 22% 16% 50% 4% 3's 2's 1's 0's NA

CANS Baseline 9/1/2017 Overall %

2% 22% 22% 50% 4% 3's 2's 1's 0's NA

CANS 2 3/1/2018 Overall %

Vertical Change Dashboard shows progress on the overall actions needed as reported by the CANS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

How Placement Change effects Child Strengths and Needs

4.3 4.2 4.8 4.3

6.5 6.1 7.3 9.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

School Behavior School Achievement School Attendance All Education

School Strength and Needs

0-Strength 3-ImmediateNeed Avg Number of Placements

slide-9
SLIDE 9

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

How Placement Change effects Child Strengths and Needs

4.3 3.9 3.8 4.1

6 6.9 6.8 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Family Strengths Optimism Community Connections Resiliency

Family and Community Resiliency

0-Strength 3-ImmediateNeed Avg Number of Placements

slide-10
SLIDE 10

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Placement Change by Severity Score

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 5 10 >15

Placement Change By Severity Score

# of Placement Changes Severity Score

slide-11
SLIDE 11

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

CANS Profiles per Caregiver Type

10 15 20 25 30

Bio Foster Kinship Adoptive

Average CANS Severity Score per Caregiver Type

Severity Score = Sum of 2’s and 3’s

  • Severity Score is a general indication
  • f acuity and level of supports

needed for the child and family

  • Severity Score is calculated by adding up
  • nly scores of 2 or higher on all items of

the CANS Score of 2 (Need) = 2 Score of 3 (Intensive Need) = 3

  • Severity Scores for this population ranged

from 0 – 83 Mean = 22.75

slide-12
SLIDE 12

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Caregiver Needs

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Bio Foster Kinship Adoptive % of Caregiver with Need or Intensive Need for Natural Supports (Score of 2 or 3 on CANS Item)

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

Bio Foster Kinship Adoptive

Average Caregiver Needs Domain Score per Caregiver Type (Range of 0-35)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What CANS tells us about kids in custody

  • 6 out of 9 regions had an absence of

Community Connections as their highest aggregate scoring item on the CANS for this population

  • Absence of Resiliency, Optimism, and

Child Involvement with Care are consistently within the top 10 for all regions

  • Adjustment to Trauma, Family Discord

and Anxiety are consistently in the top 10 for all regions

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

School Achievement Depression Living Situation School Behavior Anger Control Lack of Stable Family Strength Oppositional Lack of Relationship Permanence Lack of Interpersonal Skills Attention Deficit Impulse Control Anxiety Lack of Child Involvement with Care Lack of Optimism Family Discord Adjustment to Trauma Lack of Resiliency Lack of Community Connections

Highest Aggregate Scoring Items on the CANS for Children/Youth in DCF Custody (N = 750)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Prevalence of Needs Over Time for Children/Youth Receiving Services

13.78% 14.09% 8.33% 3.57% 5.88% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge

% of Individuals with a Need or Immediate/Intensive Need (Score of 2 or 3 on CANS) to Address Family

Discord Over Time

Immediate/Intensive Need (3) Need (2)

16.72% 16.11% 13.89% 14.29% 5.88% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge

% of Individuals with Need or Intensive Immediate Need (Score of 2 or 3 on CANS) to Address Adjustment to

Trauma Over Time

Immediate/Intensive Need (3) Need (2)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Anxiety Over Time for Children/Youth in Custody Receiving Services

  • Anxiety appears harder to move the

needle on for children and youth in DCF custody

  • Anxiety slightly increases over time with a

notable increase at 12 Months for those scoring a 3 – Intensive and Immediate Need

6.74% 7.38% 15.28% 10.71% 11.76%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge

% of Individuals in DCF Custody with a Need or Immediate/Intensive Need (2 or 3) to Address Anxiety over Time

Immediate/Intensive Need (3) Need (2)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Build ildin ing Resili iliency Over Time for Children/Youth in Custody Receiving Services

Of all of the items on the CANS, Resiliency consistently scores as the top one or two most prevalent and intense needs for children and youth in our community

Only 12% of children/youth in DCF custody

are assessed as having Resiliency as a Centerpiece Strength (Score of 0) at Baseline

  • n the CANS

The GOOD NEWS: Resiliency appears to be a strength that is buildable through services and supports over time

12.17% 11.41% 19.44% 7.14% 5.88% 31.75% 35.57% 27.78% 46.43% 52.94% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge

% of Individuals with Resiliency as a Centerpiece or Useful Strength (0 or 1) Over Time Centerpiece Strength (0) Useful Strength (1)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Building Optimism and Community Connection for

children/youth in custody receiving services

9.68% 8.72% 20.83% 10.71% 35.29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge

% of Individuals with Optimism as a Centerpiece

  • r Useful Strength (0 or 1) Over Time

Centerpiece Strength (0) Useful Strength (1)

12.46% 15.44% 16.67% 14.29% 35.29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Baseline 6MO 12MO 18MO Discharge Centerpiece Strength (0) Useful Strength (1)

% of Individuals with Community Connection as a Centerpiece or Useful Strength (0 or 1) Over Time

slide-18
SLIDE 18

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Do Strengths REALLY Mitigate Needs??

slide-19
SLIDE 19

View 2: The Community Assessment Tool (CAT)

Measuring How Far We’ve Come

slide-20
SLIDE 20

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we measure?

  • Three versions of the CAT were created:
  • Resource Parents (Foster and Adoptive Parents)
  • Child Welfare Workers
  • Mental Health Staff
  • Areas of inquiry included:
  • Ratings of Inter-agency Collaboration
  • Ratings of Competencies regarding Trauma and Adoption
  • Organizational Support for Training and/or Professional Development
  • Ratings of Time Pressure
slide-21
SLIDE 21

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Who responded?

The survey was administered to all 3 target groups at 3 time points: 2014, 2016, and 2018.

50 100 150 200 Caregivers Child Welfare Workers Mental Health Staff Number of Respondents

Com

  • mmunity Ass

ssessment Respondents

2014 2016 2018

slide-22
SLIDE 22

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we learn: Inter-Agency Collaboration

slide-23
SLIDE 23

UVM College of Education and Social Services Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we learn: Inter-agency collaboration

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Excellent relationship Good relationship Fair relationship Poor relationship

Changes in Child Welfare Ratings of Collaboration

Child Welfare 2016 Child Welfare 2018 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Excellent relationship Good relationship Fair relationship Poor relationship

Changes in Mental Health Ratings of Collaboration

Mental Health 2016 Mental Health 2018

slide-24
SLIDE 24

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we learn: Inter-agency collaboration

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Regularly attend joint meetings to determine the needs

  • f families

Work well together Regularly share information on treatment and case plans Have a clear sense of their roles and responsibilities Trust each other Communicate openly with one another Information from MH

  • r DCF is used for

placement decisions

Comparison of Collaboration Ratings

Child Welfare 2014 Mental Health 2014 Child Welfare 2018 Mental Health 2018

slide-25
SLIDE 25

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we learn: Competencies

slide-26
SLIDE 26

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Ratings of Adoption Competence

6.39 6.28 7.57 7.58 4.73 4.72 4.37 4.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

CHILD WELFARE 2016 CHILD WELFARE 2018 MENTAL HEALTH 2016 MENTAL HEALTH 2018

Ratings of Adoption Competency No Training Training

slide-27
SLIDE 27

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Trainings in the last 12 months: Adoption competence

15.7 12.5 12 11.7 84.3 87.5 88 88.3

CHILD WELFARE 2016 CHILD WELFARE 2018 MENTAL HEALTH 2016 MENTAL HEALTH 2018

Percentage of staff that have received training in adoption competence in the last 12 months.

Training No Training

slide-28
SLIDE 28

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Ratings of Trauma Competence

7.32 6.97 7.78 7.99 5.96 6.73 6.18 6.79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

CHILD WELFARE 2016 CHILD WELFARE 2018 MENTAL HEALTH 2016 MENTAL HEALTH 2018

Ratings of Trauma Competency

No Training Training

slide-29
SLIDE 29

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Trainings in the last 12 months: Trauma competence

54.8 61.1 68.4 71.7 45.2 38.9 31.6 28.3

CHILD WELFARE 2016 CHILD WELFARE 2018 MENTAL HEALTH 2016 MENTAL HEALTH 2018

Percentage of staff that have received training in trauma competence in the last 12 months.

Training No Training

slide-30
SLIDE 30

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

What did we learn: Time Pressure

slide-31
SLIDE 31

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Time Pressure

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 2014 2016 2018

Average Feelings of Time Pressure

Child Welfare Mental Health

slide-32
SLIDE 32

University of Vermont Department of Social Work Project of the Vermont Child Welfare Training Partnership Children’s Bureau Project No. 90CO1119

Take-away Messages

  • Inter-agency collaboration is moving in a positive direction with

continued room for growth.

  • Continue to build the knowledge base of the workforce that is

engaging in this critical work with families and children impacted by trauma and behavioral health needs.

  • Both Child Welfare Workers and Mental Health Staff continue to feel

high levels of time pressure.