THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 44 (North Vancouver) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 44 (North Vancouver)

BUDGET HI BUDGET HIGHLI GHLIGHTS GHTS

1

VISION

We provide world-class instruction and a rich diversity of engaging programs to inspire success for every student and bring communities together to learn, share and grow.

North Vancouver School District Vision

2

STRATEGIC PLAN

• The North Vancouver School District is focussed on implementing

a 10 year Strategic Plan that was created in 2011.

• Strategic budget investments are focussed on enacting the 10

Year Strategic Plan and 3 Year Operating Plan.

• The process to develop a new Strategic Plan is underway and all

individuals are encouraged to provide their input until Feb. 7, 2020. Online: my.thoughtexchange.com/#209765487

3

BUDGET TIMELINES

FEBRU FEBRUARY 15: RY 15: Student enrolm Student enrolmen ent pr t projectio

• jections for

s for next fi next fiscal scal

• Analysis done following the September 1701 and prior to February 1701
• Utilizes Baragar information and local knowledge of demographics

MARC MARCH 15: 15: Pre Prelim liminary inary Gr Grant Announce ant Announcement for nt for next fi next fisca scal

• Grant announcement drives the Operating Fund component of Preliminary budget

JUNE 30: JUNE 30: Balance Balanced Prelim Prelimin inar ary B Budg dget et d due t to Mi Ministry

• Section 111 of the School Act requires submission of a balanced budget

SEP SEPTEM EMBER 30: BER 30: Student Student Count Count ( (1701) 701) t to Mi Mini nistr stry

• Used to confirm student enrolment and provide a recalculation of the Operating Grant that will be

announced in December

DE DECEM CEMBER 15: ER 15: Amen Amended Oper ded Operati ating Gr g Gran ant An t Announcem uncement ent

• Provides basis for input into Operating Fund component of Amended budget

FEBRUARY 28: BRUARY 28: Bal Balanced Amen nced Amended Bu ded Budget d dget due t to Mi Mini nistr stry

4

HOW ARE WE FUNDED?

5

REVENUE SOURCES

• School Districts do not generate revenue through local

taxation.

• In the past, as local taxation generated inequities between

School Districts, the Province assumed responsibility.

• Provincial grants provide approximately 90% of School District
• perational funding.
• School Capital Projects are funded by the Province and

augmented with contributions from School Districts when feasible.

6

BUDGET COMPONENTS: REVENUE

OPER OPERAT ATING ING (F (Fund 1 1)

• Operating Grant
• Other Provincial Grants
• International Tuition
• Rentals & Leases
• Interest Income
• Miscellaneous Revenue

& Recoveries

CAPITAL CAPITAL (F (Fund 2 2)

• MOE Bylaw COA
• MOE Restricted
• Other Provincial
• Other
• Local Capital
• AFG Capital

SPECI ECIAL P L PURPOSE RPOSE GRA GRANTS (Fun unds 3 3 & 4) & 4)

• Provincial Grants:
• CEF
• LIF
• CommunityLINK
• French / OLEP
• Strong Start
• Ready, Set, Learn
• Special Needs Equip.
• AFG Operating
• Municipal Grants

SCHOOL G HOOL GENERATED NERATED FUN FUNDS (F (Fund 5 5)

• PAC Donations
• Specific Student Fees

(eg: Trips and Yearbooks)

7

STUDENT FTE – FUNDED

Year ended June 30th

14 14,000 14 14,500 15 15,000 15 15,500 16 16,000 16 16,500 17 17,000 20 2006 06 20 2007 07 20 2008 08 20 2009 09 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20 20 2021 21 20 2022 22 20 2023 23

Stu Student FTE t FTE

Pr Projecte ted FTE FTE

8 Exclud Excludin ing I Intern ternation ional Students l Students

STUDENT FTE – FUNDED & INTERNATIONAL

Year ended June 30th

15,28 285 5 15,28 288 8 15,23 233 3 15,42 425 5 15,22 225 5 15,28 287 7 15,29 293 3 15,48 484 4 541 541 590 590 656 656 710 710 712 712 722 722 731 731 741 741

5, 5,000 000 7, 7,000 000 9, 9,000 000 11 11,000 13 13,000 15 15,000 17 17,000

20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20 Stu Student FTE t FTE FUN FUNDED IN INTE TERN RNATION IONAL

Amended B ended Budget dget

9

INTERNATIONAL STUDENT FEES

• Funds International Teacher Salaries & Benefits and operating costs
• Schools receive $500 per Student to augment School Block Budgets
• Approximately $3,000 per Student funds district operating costs

10

FTE $ Revenue FTE $ Revenue 2013 610 7,157,204 541 6,881,135 2014 550 7,014,665 590 7,499,911 2015 540 7,153,000 656 8,498,244 2016 610 8,929,500 710 9,390,263 2017 650 9,185,000 712 9,911,303 2018 650 9,185,000 722 10,907,871 2019 625 9,412,500 731 10,412,500 2020 625 10,412,500 650 10,762,500 2021 625 10,412,500 Actual Budget Fiscal Year (June 30th)

OPERATING & SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS REVENUE – Year ended June 30th

$12 $124 $12 $123 $12 $120 $11 $119 $12 $128 $12 $128 $13 $130 $13 $133 $13 $137 $5 $5 $3 $3 $3 $3 $6 $6 $3 $3 $5 $5 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $3 $3 $3 $3 $4 $4 $4 $4 $5 $5 $14 $14 $19 $19 $20 $20 $12 $12 $12 $12 $13 $13 $15 $15 $17 $17 $18 $18 $19 $19 $19 $19 $17 $17 60 60 80 80 10 100 12 120 14 140 16 160 18 180 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20

$ Mi $ Millions lions

Oper Operat ating Gra g Grant Oth Other Provinci r Provincial Gran al Grants Fund 3 Grant Fund 3 Grants, s, incl including CEF CEF In Inte tern rnatio ional F l Fees ees & & O Other R r Reven venue

11

HOW DO WE SPEND?

12

BUDGET COMPONENTS: EXPENSE

OPER OPERAT ATING ING (F (Fund 1 1)

• Salaries & Benefits
• Services & Supplies
• Non-wage operating costs

for organization

• Supports for Students &

Staff in the classroom & schools

• Operate & maintain facilities

CAPITAL CAPITAL (F (Fund 2 2)

• MOE Bylaw COA
• approved expenditures
• MOE Restricted
• permission required
• Other Provincial
• Other
• specific to funding purpose
• Local Capital
• AFG Capital

SPECI ECIAL P L PURPOSE RPOSE GRA GRANTS (Fun unds 3 3 & 4) & 4)

• Provincial Grants:
• CEF
• LIF
• CommunityLINK
• French / OLEP
• Strong Start
• Ready, Set, Learn
• Special Needs Equip.
• AFG Operating
• Municipal Grants

SCHOOL G HOOL GENERATED NERATED FUN FUNDS (F (Fund 5 5)

• PAC Donations
• Specific Student Fees

(eg: Trips and Yearbooks)

13

OPERATING & SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS EXPENSES – Year ended June 30th

$128 128 $123 123 $128 128 $134 134 $138 138 $145 145 $152 152 $155 155 $13 13 $14 14 $14 14 $15 15 $17 17 $17 17 $16 16 $17 17 $1 $1 $1 $1 $2 $2 $2 $2 $3 $3 $1 $1 $8 $8 $5 $5

60 60 80 80 10 100 12 120 14 140 16 160 18 180 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20 $ M $ Milli illions

Sal Salari ries & Benefi es & Benefits Ser Services & Suppl es & Supplies es Capita pital A l Asse ssets ts

14

OPERATING & SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES – Year ended June 2019

In Instruction, $147.22 47.22 , , 82.5% 5% Di Distri strict Adm Admini nistra rati tion

• n,

$5.6 $5.66 , , 3.2 3.2% Oper erat ations & ions & Mai Maintenance, nance, $25 $25.1 .19 , , 14.1 14.1% Tr Tran anspo sporta tatio tion & & Debt Servic Debt Services, es, $0.3 $0.34 , , 0.2 0.2% $ M $ Mill illio ions

15

SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENT HEADCOUNT LEVELS 1, 2 & 3 by Current Definitions (1701)

22 22 21 21 15 15 14 14 12 12 12 12 11 11 19 19 17 17 17 17 15 15 369 369 381 381 387 387 415 415 444 444 454 454 459 459 475 475 472 472 492 492 533 533 142 142 149 149 172 172 170 170 150 150 160 160 199 199 177 177 175 175 201 201 203 203 10 100 20 200 30 300 40 400 50 500 60 600 70 700 80 800 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20

Student He udent Headcoun adcount Le Level 1 vel 1 Le Level 2 vel 2 Le Level 3 vel 3

16

SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENT HEADCOUNT High Incident by Current Definitions (1701)

24 24 21 21 19 19 17 17 16 16 12 12 11 11 14 14 15 15 13 13 12 12 703 703 701 701 698 698 672 672 645 645 644 644 695 695 707 707 793 793 831 831 890 890 126 126 143 143 178 178 176 176 172 172 185 185 221 221 219 219 240 240 205 205 246 246 20 200 40 400 60 600 80 800 1,00 1,000 1,20 1,200 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20

Student He udent Headcoun adcount K - K - Mi Mild I Int.

• t. Di

Disab. b. Q - Lear Q - Learning D ning Disab. sab. R - R - M Mod.

• d. Beha

Behav/Ment v/Mental al

17

EDUCATION ASSISTANTS Growth with Restored Language

18

• The Budget

Budget for Education Assistants has increased by 49.6%

YEAR 2017 2018 2019 2020 EDUCATION ASSISTANTS FTE (Budget) 247 308 344 369 FTE Change Year over Year 61 36 25 % Change Year over Year 24.91% 11.59% 7.33% FTE Cumulative Change 122 % Change 2017 TO 2020 49.60% TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT (Actuals) 16,440 16,614 16,356 16,582 FTE Cumulative Change 142 % Change 2017 TO 2020 0.86%

EDUCATION ASSISTANTS & SUPPORT WORKERS 2017 to 2020 Staffing Allocations

19

2017 2018 2019 2020 FTE FTE FTE FTE FTE %age EA's ‐ Elementary 173.6 206.1 215.8 247.7 74.1 42.68% EA's ‐ Secondary 80.1 104.5 102.2 109.3 29.2 36.45% ASW, BSW, LSW ‐ Elem. & Sec. 6.5 11.0 15.8 19.3 12.8 196.92% SUBTOTAL 260.2 321.6 333.8 376.3 116.1 44.62% Indigenous Ed. Support Workers 10.4 12.9 11.0 11.9 1.5 14.42% Youth Engagement Workers 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 0.0 0.00% Work Experience EA's 4.8 5.7 6.5 6.5 1.7 35.42% TOTAL 283.5 348.3 359.4 402.8 119.3 42.08% TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT 16,440 16,614 16,356 16,582 142 0.86% Change 2017 to 2020

EA : Education Assistant; ASW : Autism Support Worker; BSW : Behaviour Support Worker; LSW : Learning Support Worker

STAFFING ALLOCATIONS

EDUCATION ASSISTANTS TARGETED FUNDING vs STAFFING COSTS

$7.5 $7.52 $17 $17.40 $11 $11.53 $17 $17.51 6 8 10 10 12 12 14 14 16 16 18 18 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19

$ M $ Mill illio ions

Year Ended Year Ended June 30th June 30th

T Targ rgete eted Fu Fundin ing EA St EA Staf affi fing ng

20

TEACHER SALARIES

• Total current Teacher Salaries = $77 Million, not including TTOC costs
• Demographics of Teachers are constantly changing.
• The Average Teacher Salary is impacted by:

– Negotiated Settlements (Collective Agreement) – Pay Grid Composition – Experience – Education

• Tea

Teachers a hers are i e increasingly creasingly mor more hi highly ghly educat educated, ed, cr creati eating a ng a mor more skil skilled wor led workforce force and highe and higher ave average sala salary. ry.

21

TEACHER SALARIES

• Analysis of the experience of Teachers provides an understanding of the Average

Teacher Salary.

• A Teacher is placed in the prescribed pay band commensurate with their level of

education.

– This is determined by the Teacher Qualification Service (TQS) – A Teacher does not change pay bands unless their education level changes.

• Teachers can reach the highest level of their pay band (Step 10) in 10 years, and

will remain at Step 10 until they retire.

• Teachers can port up to 10 years of seniority when moving between School

Districts.

22

AVERAGE TEACHER SALARY

$75 $75,765 $80 $80,250 $7 $73,000 3,000 $7 $74,000 4,000 $7 $75,000 5,000 $7 $76,000 6,000 $7 $77,000 7,000 $7 $78,000 8,000 $7 $79,000 9,000 $8 $80,000 0,000 $8 $81,000 1,000 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20 Pr Prel eliminar ary Am Amended ended 23

TEACHER SALARY & FTE DEMOGRAPHICS

ALL PAY BANDS 2011‐12 TE4000 to TE4010 2.55% 1.87% ‐0.68% 3.11% 2.33% ‐0.78% TE5000 to TE5010 42.58% 38.00% ‐4.58% 45.90% 42.54% ‐3.36% TE5+00 to TE5+10 26.68% 26.36% ‐0.32% 25.11% 24.39% ‐0.72% TE6000 to TE6010 27.81% 33.07% 5.26% 25.88% 30.42% 4.54% Other Allowances 0.37% 0.70% 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% TEACHER SALARY TEACHER FTE Percentage by Pay Bands Percentage by Pay Bands 2019‐20 2019‐20 vs 2011‐12 2011‐12 2019‐20 2019‐20 vs 2011‐12

24

TEACHER SALARY & FTE DEMOGRAPHICS

25

TOP 3 STEPS Salary FTE Salary FTE Salary FTE TE0510 27.43% 27.18% 19.43% 18.60% ‐8.00% ‐8.58% TE5 + 10 22.49% 20.43% 20.19% 17.72% ‐2.30% ‐2.71% TE0610 21.35% 19.13% 25.30% 18.60% 3.95% ‐0.53% Total 71.27% 66.74% 64.92% 54.92% ‐6.35% ‐11.82% ALL OTHERS 28.73% 33.26% 35.08% 45.08% 6.35% 11.82% TEACHER TOP 3 PAY STEPS COMPARED TO ALL OTHERS 2011‐12 2019‐20 2019‐20 vs 2011‐12

UPDATE ON WAGE INCREASES

• C.U.P.E. has a new Collective Agreement in place until June 30,

2022 and staff will receive their wage increases, funded by the Province.

• The Teachers’ Collective Agreement expired June 30, 2019.

Cost items are being negotiated at the Provincial Table.

• The Provincial Government has not funded the wage

adjustments for Excluded (Non-Union) staff. Boards of Education are required to fund any increases authorized by PSEC.

26

TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL ASSETS HARDWARE & SOFTWARE ACQUISITIONS

0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19

$ M $ Mill illio ions

Softwar Software Hard rdware re

27

TECHNOLOGY – SOFTWARE LICENSES & MAINTENANCE SUPPORT FEES

0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.20 20 2005 05 20 2006 06 20 2007 07 20 2008 08 20 2009 09 20 2010 10 20 2011 11 20 2012 12 20 2013 13 20 2014 14 20 2015 15 20 2016 16 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19

$ M $ Mill illio ions

Li Licence & M cence & Maintenance Fees intenance Fees SRB SRB KEV KEV My MyEd & B & BCeSIS

28

IMPACT OF THE RESTORED LANGUAGE

29

CLASS SIZE – RESTORED LANGUAGE

NVSD Class Size language is superior to the LOU & School Act

30

Maximum Class Sizes K Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Single Grade Classes 20 22 29 Combined Classes 20 22 27 Combined Classes 3‐4 23 RESTORED LANGUAGE CLASS SIZE LIMITS Maximum Class Sizes K Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Single Grade Classes 22 24 30 Combined Classes Combined Classes 3‐4 24 SCHOOL ACT CLASS SIZE LIMITS

CLASS SIZE - ELEMENTARY

31

• Our Collective Agreement Class Si

Size ze language has been a significant driver in the number of Elementary Divisions.

• The change since the 2017-18 implementation of the restored

language:

• a net increase of 30 Elementary Students (Headcount)
• an increase of 42 Elementary Divisions (Classrooms) funded by the

Classroom Enhancement Fund (CEF)

CLASS SIZE - ELEMENTARY

32

Elementary Schools K's Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 K‐7 Total Number of Students 1,142 3,516 4,902 9,560 Number of Classes 62 169 197 428 Class Size Average 18.5 20.8 24.9 22.3 Maximum Class Sizes K Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Single Grade Classes 20 22 29 Combined Classes 20 22 27 Combined Classes 3‐4 23 RESTORED LANGUAGE CLASS SIZE LIMITS

2019‐20 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ORGANIZATION

ELEMENTARY CLASS ORGANIZATION

Number of Single Grade and Combined Classes

33

• Our Collective Agreement defines Class Compositio

ition to be limited to:

• A total of 3 Students with Special Needs comprised of either:

– 3 High Incidence Students, or – 1 Low Incidence Student or 1 Student with Severe Behaviour and 2 High Incidence Students

• Best efforts in achieving the composition requirement has

resulted in a significant increase in the number of combined classes.

ELEMENTARY CLASS ORGANIZATION

Number of Single Grade and Combined Classes

34

284 284 228 228 206 206 175 175 110 110 194 194 213 213 253 253

0% 0% 20 20% 40 40% 60 60% 80 80% 10 100% 0% 20 2017 17 20 2018 18 20 2019 19 20 2020 20

Si Singl ngle Grade Grade Com Combined ed

72% 72% 28% 28% 54% 54% 36% 36% 49% 49% 51% 51% 41% 41% 59% 59%

REMEDY – RESTORED LANGUAGE

• CEF funds Remedy
• Remedy is provided to a Teacher in the following circumstances:
• A specific class is above the class size

size limits

• A specific class has a com

compositio ition of Special Needs Students greater than identified in the C.A.

• One (1) Remedy is the equivalent of 180 minutes per month when a

class is in violation of class size or class composition.

• Each Remedy is prorated to the amount of time (minutes) a Teacher is

instructing the respective class.

35

REMEDY – RESTORED LANGUAGE

• The Jackson Arbitration Award of August 2019 required that the

com compositio ition provisions within the restored language must utilize the 1995 Manual. The Arbitration clarified NVSD specific categories:

• Category G and/or Autism
• Category J and/or Severe Learning Disabilities
• Category Q
• Category R
• The i

The impl plem ementation of thi entation of this rul ruling af ng affects cl cts class composi ass composition and nd not service not service to students.

• students.

36

REMEDY – RESTORED LANGUAGE

• We are required to organize classrooms utilizing the

composition identified in the Jackson Arbitration.

• This is anticipated to provide more flexibility in organizing

classrooms.

• We do not yet know what impact this may have for 2020-21 budget.
• The Jackson Arbitration does not change the funding for Special

Needs student designations utilized in the 1701.

• Stud

Students ents w will continue to be ll continue to be asses assessed to ensure the to ensure the appropriate appropriate servic service leve levels ls to sup to support th rt their lea eir learning.

37

REMEDY – RESTORED LANGUAGE

• The Jackson Award reduces the number of classes that have

composition challenges.

• A review of Student files determined that:
• 32% (78 of 241) of the G Category students met the 1995 criteria
• 49% (379 of 772) of the Q Category students met the 1995 criteria

38

IMPACT OF REMEDY ON BUDGET

• This translates into budget implications due to:
• Fewer Remedies and a direct correlation to CEF Remedy funding
• Organization of classrooms for the 2020-21 school year

39

TEACHER RATIO STAFFING

• Ratio Staffing is defined by the Restored Language in the

Collective Agreement

• NVSD Ratios:
• Superior to the Provincial Ratios in the March 2017 MOU
• Set in 1990-91
• Librarians, Counsellors, and Learning Support Teacher (LST) ratios

set at the 1990-91 Teacher FTE levels

• Special Education Resource Teachers (S.E.R.T.) and English

Language Learners (ELL) vary with Student enrolment

40

TEACHER RATIO STAFFING

• School Districts must fund Ratio Staffing from the Operating

Grant

• CEF funding for Ratio Staffing is provided to SD’s only i
• nly if:

1.

Ratio Staffing was below the base ratio at time of restored language implementation.

2.

Additional Ratio Staffing was required as a direct result of the June 2018 Arbitration regarding Psychologists and Speech & Language Pathologists

41

TEACHER RATIO STAFFING

• NVSD did not qualify for additional staffing in 2017-18 when the

restored language was implemented.

• Non-enrolling ratio staffing was above the base ratios at that time.
• CEF funding was provided in 2018-19 as a result of the June

2018 Provincial Arbitration.

• 15 FTE Psychologists and Speech & Language Pathologists could

not be included in the S.E.R.T ratio category

• 15 FTE funding was provided for Learning Support Teachers (LST)

42

TEACHER RATIO STAFFING (Projected)

43

NON‐ENROLLING TEACHER CATEGORIES RATIO: Student to Teacher TEACHER FTE per Ratio Librarians 508.980 29.400 Counsellors 539.243 27.750 Learning Support (LST) and Learning Assistance (LAC) 428.473 34.910 Special Education Resource (SERT) 342.000 44.794 English Language Learners (ELL) 55.250 18.516 Total Non‐Enrolling Teacher FTE Generated by Ratio: 155.370 Projected Student FTE Enrollment for 2020‐21: 15,319.6875 FTE

TEACHER RATIO STAFFING Vice-Principal Providing LST Support

44

Cl Classroom assroom Teacher Teacher (e.g (e.g. 0.8 FTE . 0.8 FTE) Students Students Vi Vice-Princi ce-Principal al LST LST (e.g (e.g. 0.8 FTE . 0.8 FTE)

• LST supports have been delivered by Vice-Principals with expertise in

LST when qualified Learning Support Teachers are not available.

• The teaching time of the Vice-Principal has been backfilled by a

classroom Teacher at the equivalent time.

SCHOOL SUPPORTS TO STUDENTS

2020-21 Preliminary Budget (Projected) Teacher Staffing – RATIO

• CEF funds 15 FTE LST
• Balance of staffing is funded through the Operating Grant

45

Lear arning Support ning Support Teachers Teachers 72. 72.4 FTE 4 FTE Counsel Counsellors

• rs

29. 29.8 FTE 8 FTE Teacher Li Teacher Librarians brarians 29. 29.4 Engli glish L h Language nguage Learners Teachers Learners Teachers 18. 18.5 FTE 5 FTE Hearing & Vi Hearing & Vision sion Re Resource Te source Teachers hers 2. 2.5 FTE 5 FTE Literacy Ce racy Cent ntre re Teachers Teachers 2. 2.0 FTE 0 FTE Gi Gifted fted 1. 1.0 FTE 0 FTE SRSP Re SRSP Resource source Teacher Teacher 1. 1.0 FTE 0 FTE C. C.L. L.A.S. A.S.S. S. Teachers Teachers 1. 1.6 FTE 6 FTE

SCHOOL SUPPORTS TO STUDENTS

2020-21 Preliminary Budget (Projected) Teacher Staffing - NON-RATIO

• CEF funds 7.0 FTE for Special Needs School Staffing Committee
• Non-Ratio Staffing is funded through the Operating Grant
• SNSC 7.0 FTE can augment LST, Counselling, or any other teaching category.

46

Speech & Speech & L Language nguage Pathol

• logi
• gists

8. 8.2 FTE 2 FTE Psyc Psycholog logists 6. 6.8 FTE 8 FTE So Soci cial E al Emot

• tional

nal & & Me Ment ntal al Heal Health (Counsel unsellors & lors & L LST) T) 1. 1.0 FTE 0 FTE Board Certifi Board Certified d Behavio Behaviour Analysts r Analysts (BC (BCBA) 2. 2.8 FTE 8 FTE C. C.L. L.A.S. A.S.S.

• S. Te

Teacher achers (Operational Le perational Leads) ads) 0. 0.4 FTE 4 FTE Speci Special Needs l Needs School St School Staffing affing (SN (SNSC) 7. 7.0 FTE 0 FTE

SCHOOL SUPPORTS TO STUDENTS

2020-21 Preliminary Budget (Projected)

CUPE Staffing

• CEF funds 115 FTE EA’s
• CommunityLINK funds 8.1 FTE Youth Engagement Workers
• Balance of staffing is funded through the Operating Grant

47

Ed Education As ucation Assist sistant ants ( (EA) A) 357.1 57.1 FTE FTE Autism Autism, Beha , Behaviou

• ur, &

r, & Lea Learning Supp Support W t Workers (ASW, SW, B BSW, W, L LSW) W) 19 19.3 .3 FTE FTE Indi digeno genous E us Educat ation Suppo Support Workers ( rt Workers (IESW ESW) 11 11.9 .9 FTE FTE Yo Youth uth Engage Engagement nt Workers Workers (Y (YEW) 8.1 8.1 FTE FTE Work Experien Work Experience ce Workers Workers (W (WEX) 6.5 6.5 FTE FTE

SCHOOL SUPPORTS TO STUDENTS

2020-21 Preliminary Budget (Projected)

48

Prin Principals ls 33 FTE 33 FTE Vice- Vice- Prin Principals ls 37 FTE 37 FTE EA EA 357 357.1 .1 FT FTE ASW ASW, BSW BSW, LSW LSW 19.3 19.3 FTE FTE IE IESW 11.9 11.9 FTE FTE YE YEW 8.1 FT 8.1 FTE WEX WEX 6.5 FTE 6.5 FTE SL SLP 8.2 FT 8.2 FTE Psyc Psycholo logist sts 6.8 FT 6.8 FTE SE SEL / / MH 1.0 FT 1.0 FTE BCB BCBA 2.8 FT 2.8 FTE C.L. L.A. A.S. S.S. S. (Op’s L p’s Leads) ads) 0.4 FT 0.4 FTE SN SNSC 7.0 FT 7.0 FTE

Li Librarians brarians 29.4 FTE 29.4 FTE Counsel Counsellors lors 29.8 FTE 29.8 FTE LST LST 72.4 72.4 ELL ELL 18.5 FTE 18.5 FTE HRT & HRT & VI VI 2. 2.5 FTE 5 FTE

• Lit. Centre
• Lit. Centre

2. 2.0 FTE 0 FTE Gif Gifted ed 1. 1.0 FTE 0 FTE SRSP SRSP 1. 1.0 FTE 0 FTE C. C.L. L.A.S. A.S.S. S. 1. 1.6 FTE 6 FTE

STAFFING AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL QUEEN MARY

49

CLASS SIZE K's Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Total Number of Students 60 162 217 439 Straight Combined Number of Classes 3.00 8.00 8.00 19.00 19 Class Size Average 20.0 20.3 27.1 23.1 100% 0% COMPOSITION K's Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Total % Students Low Incidence Students 4 9 17 30 6.8% High Incidence Students 3 10 13 3.0% Total LI & HI Students 4 12 27 43 9.8% CLASSES

SCHOOL STAFFING Count FTE Teacher Staffing Classroom Teachers 19 20.3 Librarian 1 1.0 Counsellor 1 0.6 Learning Support Teacher 4 2.9 ELL Teacher 4 2.2 Psychologist 1 0.2 Speech & Language 1 0.4 Total Teacher Staffing 31 27.6 EA, ASW, BSW, LSW, FNSW 28 21.7 Admin Staffing (PVP) 2 1.4 TOTAL STAFFING 61 50.6

QUEEN QUEEN MARY ELEM MARY ELEMEN ENTARY RY

STAFFING AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RIDGEWAY

50

SCHOOL STAFFING Count FTE Teacher Staffing Classroom Teachers 29 30.9 Librarian 1 1.0 Counsellor 1 0.8 Learning Support Teacher 4 3.1 ELL Teacher 4 2.0 Psychologist 1 0.2 Speech & Language 1 0.6 Total Teacher Staffing 41 38.5 EA, ASW, BSW, LSW, FNSW 27 21.5 Admin Staffing (PVP) 2 1.4 TOTAL STAFFING 70 61.4

RIDGEW EWAY ELEM AY ELEMEN ENTARY TARY

CLASS SIZE K's Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Total Number of Students 85 259 280 624 Straight Combined Number of Classes 4.35 12.20 12.45 29.00 6 23 School Average 19.5 21.2 22.5 21.5 21% 79% COMPOSITION K's Gr 1‐3 Gr 4‐7 Total % Students Low Incidence Students 3 13 26 42 6.7% High Incidence Students 2 9 23 34 5.4% Total LI & HI Students 5 22 49 76 12.2% CLASSES

WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE MOVING FORWARD?

51

3 YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

• The Funding Model Review consultations continue and

recommendations are anticipated prior to March 15, 2020.

• Th

This is fore forecast u utilize ilizes th the existin e existing fu fundin ing m model. del.

• CEF funding will remain the same for all years moving

forward.

52

3 YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

• The Province will fund all student enrollment.
• No substantive growth or change in student enrolment is

projected for the next 3 years.

• Staffing adjustments for the Teaching complement will be

consistent with Student enrollment numbers.

53

3 YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

• Negotiated union labour settlements (C.U.P.E. & Teachers) will be

fully funded by the Provincial Government

• The Board will be required to fund wage increases for Principals,

Vice-Principals and Exempt staff.

• No increases have been incorporated into the Forecast for

Principals, Vice-Principals and Exempt staff.

54

3 YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

• Capital Projects (Argyle, Handsworth, and Mountainside) will

require equipment and support from Surplus.

• Technology is funded in an ongoing, consistent manner to

support:

–technology in the classroom –staff devices –business systems and infrastructure.

55

3 YEAR FORECAST

56

2 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 Base Grant, DL & CE # 15,286.69 15,293.44 15,484.00 15,307.00 15,307.00 15,307.00 Change Year over Year 61.56 6.75 190.56 ‐177.00 0.00 0.00 Net Change (17/18 to 22/23) 81.88 Excluding International Student FTEs 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 Cumulative Projected Surplus 10.02 8.80 7.33 4.01 0.55 (2.81) $ Millions

Proj Projecte ted Surplu d Surplus Rem s Remain inin ing at Year-e at Year-end St Student FTE E udent FTE Enrollment Pr ent Proj

• jecti

ections

• ns

STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS IN STRATEGIC GOALS

57

INVESTMENT IN STUDENT EDUCATION THROUGH STRATEGIC PROGRAMS

58

EXAMPLES OF PROGRAMS REFLECTING STRATEGIC PLAN & INVESTMENTS FOR ALL STUDENTS

2019‐20 Preliminary Budget Indigenous Education $447,639 (Note 1) English Language Learners (ELL) $226,488 (Note 1) Special Education $651,128 (Note 1) Artists for Kids (AFK) Program $140,274 Cheakamus Centre $296,280 International Baccalaureate (IB) $250,000 Technology Intergration in Classroom Teaching $180,779 Note 1: Strategic investment over and above Targeted funding received

TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

• In response to previous budget feedback, the Board expressly asked

for a review of technology.

• In September 2019, IBM commenced a review of technology in the

School District. The review consisted of two parts:

• Classroom Technology Review (CTR)
• Information Technology Optimization Plan (ITOP)
• IBM will provide a full report to the Executive team in mid-February.
• The Executive team will review and provide recommendations to the

Board to consider in the 2020-21 Preliminary Budget.

59

CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

IBM Scope of Work

• To provide services to support NVSD in defining a standard set of

digital hardware resources to support teaching and learning in classrooms across the District.

• The services will include:

– reviews of existing documentation, – interviews with staff and teams of staff who are involved with the teaching and learning environments and how digital technologies are currently leveraged to support these environments.

• Provide a report of recommendations at the conclusion of the

engagement.

60

IT OPTIMIZATION PLAN (ITOP)

IBM Scope of Work

• The IT Optimization review assesses NVSD’s IT infrastructure against best practices

and provides recommendations and a strategic roadmap to address gaps.

• IBM Canada K-12's Technical Consulting team will:
• Assess the NVSD organization's current IT Infrastructure and technical practices;
• Meet with stakeholders from IT, curriculum, core business functions and representative schools;
• Perform technical deep dives and analysis to identify, quantify and prioritize the requirements to

achieve your systemic, educational and technical goals.

• Share best practices in the major areas for the infrastructure and specific ones that are most

relevant to your organization will be recommended.

• The concluding report will outline specific recommendations in detail, break them down into

projects and associated infrastructure upgrades to ensure the IT infrastructure is optimized for delivering the Teaching and Learning services that are core to your organization.

61

TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

IBM has shared some preliminary themes (School oriented)

• Techn

Technology Pl logy Plans ans:

Develop and implement Technology Plans for all Schools and the District (ICT) to provide improved decision making and budgeting.

• Educatio

ional Tec l Technolo logy A Alig ignment:

Develop an end user device strategy as part of the Technology Plan to enhance learning in the classroom.

62

TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

IBM has shared some preliminary themes (District oriented):

• Devi

Device St ce Standardi andardizat ation:

Adopt a limited number of device types, peripherals, and operating systems to provide consistency for users, efficient ICT support, and

• ptimization of limited funding.
• Secu

Security rity:

Implement additional strategies to address threats and ensure that sensitive personal information and financial information is protected.

63

IDENTIFYING BUDGET INITIATIVES

64

IDENTIFYING BUDGET INITIATIVES

The Budget of the The Budget of the School School Di Dist stri rict: ct:

• Aligns with, and supports, the Strategic Plan, Goals, & Operating Plan.
• Balances the organization’s needs against available funding.
• Addresses the Ministry of Education’s mandated deliverables and new

directives, such as the new curriculum.

• Incorporates enhancements and innovative approaches to a changing
• rganization.

65

66

IDENTIFYING BUDGET INITIATIVES

REV REVENUE E FROM FROM: EXPEN EXPENSES ES FOR: FOR:

IDENTIFYING BUDGET INITIATIVES

For the Apri For the April 7 l 7th

th Fin

Finance & & Fac Facilities lities M Meetin eeting:

• Partner Groups are asked to consider possible initiatives that are

related to the Strategic Goals that you would recommend to be considered for inclusion in the 2020-21 Preliminary Budget. Rank your proposed initiatives and share your highest priorities (top three).

• The 2019-20 Budget Priorities document outlines the board themes

and subcategories. This document can be found in the May 21, 2019 Public Board meeting Agenda Package on our website:

https://www.sd44.ca/Board/Meetings/Documents/BOE%20Board%20Package%20190521.pdf

67

IDENTIFYING BUDGET INITIATIVES

Apri April 7 l 7th

th Fi

Finance & Facilities M nance & Facilities Meeti eeting Form g Format: at:

• Short presentations from staff to update you on the Preliminary

Operating Grant announcement, Forecast to June 30th, 2020, and the updated 3 Year Forecast.

• Partner Group Presentations of their top three priorities related to the

Strategic Goals.

• Facilitated Discussions:
• Table Group Discussions
• Large Group Discussions

68

PUBLIC BUDGET INPUT OPPORTUNITIES

Staff, students, parents, partner groups, and the community are invited to provide their input on budget priorities. Please indicate the initiatives of importance to you and how each relates to the strategic goals.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR I THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT PUT

Please see the next slide for the different ways that you can provide your input.

69

PUBLIC BUDGET INPUT OPPORTUNITIES

EM EMAI AIL I L INPUT PUT is available to the public from: February 4, 2020 through March 13, 2020 budgetcomments@sd44.ca ONLI ONLINE I NE INPUT PUT (ThoughtExchange) is available to the public from: February 18, 2020 through March 13, 2020 (A link will be emailed and posted to the website) THANK YOU FOR YOUR I THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT PUT

70

QUESTIONS?

71

THANK YOU

72