Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) 2016-17 2016-17 Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
texas academic performance report tapr 2016 17 2016 17
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) 2016-17 2016-17 Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 26, 2023 237 likes •503 views

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) 2016-17 2016-17 Annual Report Requirements District Accreditation Status FIRST Rating Passed Accountability Rating Met Standard Accreditation - Accredited Texas Academic

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) 2016-17

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2016-17 Annual Report Requirements

  • District Accreditation Status
  • FIRST Rating – Passed
  • Accountability Rating – Met Standard
  • Accreditation - Accredited
  • Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
  • Special Education Status – Meets Requirements
  • Campus Performance Objectives
  • Report on Violent or Criminal Incidents on Campus
  • Student Performance in Postsecondary Institutions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2016-17 TAPR District Profile

37.3% 16.2% 44.3% 23.1% 7.3% 6.7% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners At-Risk Career & Technical Education Gifted & Talented Special Education

Program Participation

26.3% 27.6% 17.1% 25.6% 3.3%

Race/Ethnicity

Hispanic African American White Asian Other

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Performance Levels

  • Approaches Grade Level (formerly Level II: Satisfactory)
  • Students are sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course
  • Meets Grade Level (formerly Final Level II: Postsecondary Ready)
  • Students are prepared for postsecondary success (college, the workforce, job training

programs, or the military)

  • Masters Grade Level (formerly Level III: Advanced)
  • Students are well prepared for the next grade or course

4

2012-15 Level II: Satisfactory, 1422 2016 Approaches (Level II: Satisfactory), 1434 2016 Meets (Final Level II: Postsecondary Ready), 1550 2016 Masters (Level III: Advanced), 1633 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650

Grade 4 Reading STAAR Scale Score

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2016-17 STAAR Approaches Grade Level or Above

72% 79% 67% 79% 77% 73% 80% 68% 80% 79% 80% 85% 75% 85% 86% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies

Grades 3-8 and EOC

State Region 4 Fort Bend 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

State (75%) Region 4 (76%) Fort Bend (83%) African American (74%) Hispanic (75%) White (91%) American Indian (81%) Asian (95%) Pacific Islander (90%) Two or More (88%) SpEd (43%) Eco Dis (71%) ELL (62%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All Subjects

Grades 3-8 and EOC

6

2016-17 STAAR Approaches Grade Level or Above

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2016-17 STAAR Meets Grade Level or Above

48% 48% 48% 38% 52% 51% 50% 50% 51% 39% 54% 54% 62% 61% 61% 49% 63% 66% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Two or More Subjects Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies

Grades 3-8 and EOC

State Region 4 Fort Bend 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

State (48%) Region 4 (50%) Fort Bend (62%)

African American (44%)

Hispanic (48%) White (75%) American Indian (57%) Asian (85%) Pacific Islander (59%) Two or More (67%) SpEd (27%) Eco Dis (42%)

ELL (29%)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Two or More Subjects

Grades 3-8 and EOC

8

2016-17 STAAR Meets Grade Level

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2016-17 STAAR Masters Grade Level Standard

19% 23% 12% 19% 27% 20% 25% 12% 22% 30% 29% 36% 19% 30% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies

Grades 3-8 and EOC

State Region 4 Fort Bend 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

20 (18%) Region 4 (22%) Fort Bend (32%) African American (16%) Hispanic (19%) White (42%) American Indian (23%) Asian (56%) Pacific Islander (31%) Two or More (39%) Special Education (8%) Economically Disadvantaged (16%) ELL (16%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All Subjects

Grades 3-8 and EOC

10

2016-17 STAAR Masters Grade Level

slide-11
SLIDE 11

61% 59% 64% 62% 59% 65% 67% 63% 71% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All Subjects Reading Mathematics

Grades 3-8 and EOC

State Region 4 Fort Bend 11

2016-17 STAAR Met or Exceeded Progress (Growth Measure)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

State (61%) Region 4 (62%) Fort Bend (67%) African American (61%) Hispanic (61%) White (71%) American Indian (60%) Asian (78%) Pacific Islander (59%) Two or More (70%) SpEd (56%) Eco Dis (60%) ELL (64%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All Subjects

Grades 3-8 and EOC

12

2016-17 STAAR Met or Exceeded Progress

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2016-17 Staff

9.6 26.4 50.0 10.0 2.9 1.1 8.0 27.4 49.7 12.0 2.5 0.3 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Educational Aides Auxilary Staff Teachers Professional Support School Leadership Central Administration

Percent of Staff

Total Staff

State Fort Bend 7.8 28.0 20.9 27.8 15.5 5.5 27.7 22.1 31.2 13.5 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Beginning Teachers 1-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-20 Years Over 20 Years

Percent of Teachers

Teachers by Years of Experience

State Fort Bend 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2018-19 PEG Campuses

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 2017 Campuses with passing rates on STAAR that are less than or equal to

50% in any two of the preceding three years: 2015, 2016 or 2017

  • r
  • The school was rated Improvement Required in 2015, 2016 or 2017.

PEG Campus Determination

15 48% 54% 46% 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Passing %

Sample Elementary School – Writing

2015 2016 2017 Required Passing %

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2017-18 FBISD PEG Campuses

16

Campus

2015 2016 2017

Armstrong ES Writing Writing Writing Blue Ridge ES

  • Writing

Writing Briargate ES Writing, Science, IR Reading, Writing, Science, IR Science Burton ES

  • Science

Writing Hunters Glen ES Science

  • Science

Jones ES

  • Writing

Writing Lantern Lane ES Science Writing

  • McAuliffe MS

Writing, Social Studies, Science, IR Writing, Social Studies Writing, Social Studies Ridgemont ES Writing, Reading, Science, IR Reading, Writing, Science, IR Writing, Science, IR

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Focus and Priority Schools

17

Federal System Safeguards are the disaggregated reading and math performance of seven student groups (All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, students served by Special Education, and English Language Learners).

Priority Schools defined as the lowest 5% of Title I campuses across the state based on performance in reading and math, as well as graduation rates below 60%. Campuses that did not meet state accountability for 2016-2017 (Improvement Required schools) are also included. Focus Schools are defined as 10% of Title I campuses across the state that are the “next lowest achieving” and include any remaining campuses that qualify under the Priority School definition, as well as campuses that missed the greatest percentage of Federal System Safeguards when ranked against

  • ne another.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Priority Schools Briargate ES Ridgemont ES Focus Campuses Jones ES Mission Bend EL Missouri City MS Willowridge HS

18

2017 FBISD Focus/Priority Schools

slide-19
SLIDE 19

District Instructional Supports

19

Student Centered Curriculum Assessment Framework Professional Learning Campus Support

  • Learning Intentions
  • Success Criteria
  • Schoology
  • Diagnostic
  • Classroom Formative
  • District Learning Assessments
  • PLC – Impact Teams
  • Job Embedded Supports
  • Teacher Leaders
  • PBIS Support
  • Campus Support Teams
  • Service & Support Model
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Differentiated Campus Support

20

Title I

Funding Standard Instructional Staffing Student Programming Targeted Professional Learning

Focus

Additional Funding Job Embedded Professional Learning Additional PBIS Support

Priority

Additional Funding Additional Staffing Layers Relay Coaching PBIS Coach (1/2 time)

Improvement Required

Customized Professional Learning Leadership Support Student Mentorship Programs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Progress Monitoring

21

System for Progress Monitoring – Priority & IR

  • Assistant Superintendent (assigned to priority/IR schools)
  • RELAY Coaching Protocols
  • Monthly Campus Support Meetings
  • Data Review Protocols
  • Review of the Special Education Campus Coordinated Support plans
slide-22
SLIDE 22

FBISD 4-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate

2014 2015 2016

Graduated 93.0% 94.3% 94.4% Received GED 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% Continued HS 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% Dropped Out 4.3% 3.2% 3.5% Graduates and GED 93.3% 94.6% 94.6% Graduates, GED, and Continued 95.7% 96.8% 96.5%

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Class of 2015 4 Year 5 Year Graduated 94.3% 95.7% Received GED 0.3% 0.5% Continued HS 2.3% 0.7% Dropped Out 3.2% 3.1% Graduates and GED 94.6% 96.2% Graduates, GED, and Continued 96.8% 96.9%

23

Grades 9-12 State Region 4 Fort Bend 2015-16 2.0% 2.2% 1.0%

2015-16 Annual Drop Out Rates FBISD Class of 2015 Longitudinal Rate

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FBISD 4-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate

Graduated

2014 2015 2016

FBISD 93.0% 94.3% 94.4% African American 90.5% 92.4% 92.7% Hispanic 88.2% 91.0% 90.9% White 95.8% 95.7% 96.4% American Indian 88.2% 89.5% 84.6% Asian 98.0% 98.2% 98.5% Pacific Islander * 100.0% 100.0% Two or More Races 96.7% 97.1% 95.7% Special Education 74.5% 77.0% 77.8% Economically Disadvantaged 89.1% 90.1% 91.4% ELL 74.8% 84.5% 80.7%

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Violent and Criminal Incidents

Level Student Population 2016-17 Violent and Criminal Incidents

Fort Bend ISD 73,750 1146 1.6% Elementary 32,778 195 0.6% Middle 17,348 425 2.4% High 23,624 526 2.2%

25

Violent and criminal incidents include but are not limited to: assaults, possession of weapons or controlled substances, terroristic threats and other serious violations of the Student Code of

  • Conduct. In 2016-17, Fort Bend ISD had approximately 9000 reportable discipline incidents, the

vast majority of which fell under general violations of the Student Code of Conduct. FBISD had under 1200 violent or criminal offenses.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Public Comments

26