Team ADOT&PF Project Management Team Lauren Little, P.E., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

team
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Team ADOT&PF Project Management Team Lauren Little, P.E., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Team ADOT&PF Project Management Team Lauren Little, P.E., Project Manager David Jensen, Civil Design Elmer Marx, P.E., Bridge Design ADOT&PF Construction David Arvey, P.E., Project Manager CMGC Assistance &


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • ADOT&PF Project Management Team
  • Lauren Little, P.E., Project Manager
  • David Jensen, Civil Design
  • Elmer Marx, P.E., Bridge Design
  • ADOT&PF Construction
  • David Arvey, P.E., Project Manager
  • CMGC Assistance & Independent Cost Estimator
  • TBD

Team

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 3

  • Collaborative Design Process
  • Constructability input
  • Identify/mitigate risks
  • Innovations
  • Maximize value / minimize

impacts

  • Cost Certainty
  • What are costs
  • Phasing for STIP
  • Options

Key Benefits of CMGC

  • Speed of Delivery
  • Owner Maintains Control
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 4

  • Heavy traffic area
  • Flexibility in project

delivery

  • Multi-agency

involvement

  • Permitting

Why CMGC for Parks 231?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 5

Reconstruct the Parks Highway between MP 229.7 and 232.3, including:

  • Replace highway bridge to accommodate turn lanes, 8-ft

shoulders and a separated pedestrian facility.

  • Construct a new Denali National Park & Preserve owned

wayside.

  • Add turn lanes for:
  • new wayside
  • hotel/Grizzly Bear cabins approach near MP 231
  • Old Parks Hwy intersection near MP 230

Project Scope

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 6

Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities between MP 231 and 232.3, including:

  • New pedestrian undercrossing near MP 231.
  • New multi-use pathway between MP 231 and the new

wayside.

  • Trail connections and re-routing.

Project Scope

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 7

Project Layout

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 8

Purpose:

  • Enhance safety
  • Enhance visitor

experience

Project Purpose & Need

Need:

  • 65 mph Interstate Highway

mixing with:

  • Public boat launch access near

MP 231

  • Residential and commercial

access points near MP 230 and MP 231

  • Pedestrians
slide-9
SLIDE 9

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 9

Typical Sections

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 10

Typical Sections

Parks Hwy Fill Section

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 11

Typical Sections

Parks Hwy Cut Section Pedestrian Path

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 12

Typical Sections

Pedestrian Underpass 150-ft Long

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 13

  • Traffic maintenance
  • Pedestrian &

vehicular

  • Constructability
  • Bridge & pedestrian

tunnel

  • Funding
  • Environmentally

sensitive area

Project Challenges & Complexities

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 14

  • Public involvement
  • NPS, residents,

business owners, commercial trucks, and area users

  • Utility relocations
  • Permitting
  • USCG
  • USACE
  • ADF&G
  • EPA & DEC SWPPPs

Project Challenges & Complexities

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Environmental document complete July 2015
  • Design Study Report in progress
  • Developing CMGC Request for Proposals:

 RFP to select CMGC Anticipated March 2016  4 week proposal preparation duration  Selection in May/June 2016

Current Efforts

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • RFP will be one-step (no RFQ)
  • RFP seeking Contractor to provide

preconstruction services

  • Two Parts:
  • 1) Technical Proposal
  • 2) Cost Proposal
  • Selection will be based on both

Request for Proposal

RFP

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • The Technical Proposal will require written

narrative to describe qualifications

  • Criteria may include:
  • Project Approach
  • Risk Management
  • Innovation
  • Methods of Partnering and Claims Mitigation
  • Proposed Project Staff
  • Management
  • Past Performance
  • Approach to Price

RFP Part 1: Technical

RFP

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Cost is typically weighted ~10% of RFP

evaluation

  • Two cost components:
  • Preconstruction Rates
  • Fee
  • Bid unit prices not likely to be a criterion

RFP Part 2: Cost

RFP

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Overall Project Schedule

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 19

2016 2017 2018 Beyond

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2018 RFP/CMGC Selection Detailed Design Contractor Input Permitting Final Construction Cost Construction*

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Tentative RFP Schedule

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 20

Tentative Schedule 2016 March April May June Issue RFP Prepare Proposals Evaluate Proposals Negotiate Contract NTP - Stage 1

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Stage 1 – Preconstruction
  • Stage 2 – Construction

Opportunities for Subcontractors

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Innovations Incorporated
  • Risk Reductions
  • Project Costs
  • Overall Project Schedule
  • Change Orders and Claims

Post Construction Evaluation

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Partner and Collaborate
  • Drive Innovation
  • Manage Risk
  • Transfer Knowledge
  • Efficient Delivery

 RFP to select CMGC Anticipated March 2016

Summary

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Project Manager

Lauren Little, P.E., ADOT&PF Design Tel: 907-451-5371 E-mail: lauren.little@alaska.gov Fax: 907-451-5126 TDD: 907-451-2363

  • Web site: http://dot.alaska.gov/nreg/parks231

For more information

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

How can we help you provide the best proposal to ADOT&PF?

Questions?

2/16/2016 Alaska DOT&PF 25