Student Success Scorecard California Community Colleges 2014 Report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

student success scorecard california community colleges
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Student Success Scorecard California Community Colleges 2014 Report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Student Success Scorecard California Community Colleges 2014 Report Presentation to the Board of Trustees January 12, 2015 In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation to the Board of Trustees

January 12, 2015

Student Success Scorecard California Community Colleges 2014 Report

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered

the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community Colleges

 Legislation authorized the California

Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office to design and implement a performance measurement system

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Outcomes are for the system as a whole and

for individual colleges

 Not designed to rank colleges but to provide a

consistent set of data for colleges to evaluate progress over time

 The scorecard shows how colleges perform on

metrics designed to identify achievement gaps in three primary areas of the community college mission: transfer, basic skills, and career technical education

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Focus: making accountability data more readily available to the public

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Description of College  Student Information

  • Annual Unduplicated Headcount
  • Gender, Age and Ethnicity of Students

 Other Information

▪ FTES ▪ Course Sections (credit/non-credit) ▪ Median Credit Section Size ▪ Percentage of Full-Time Faculty (RSCCD Value) ▪ Student Counseling Ratio

slide-6
SLIDE 6

41% 59%

Gender

Female Male

slide-7
SLIDE 7

20% 26% 32% 22%

Age

< 20 years old 20 to 24 years old 25 to 39 years old 40+ years old

slide-8
SLIDE 8

0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 6% 7% 30% 51%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaskan Native Filipino Two or More Races African-American Asian Unknown Ethnicity White Hispanic

Ethnicity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Headcount

31,117

 Full-Time Equivalent Students

8,251.6

 Credit Sections

2,273

 Non-Credit Sections

1,113

 Median Credit Section Size

30

 Percent of Full-Time Faculty

65.5%

 Student Counseling Ratio

1,004:1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

43% 57%

Gender

Female Male

slide-11
SLIDE 11

16% 20% 52% 29%

Age

< 20 years old 20 to 24 years old 25 to 39 years old 40+ years old

slide-12
SLIDE 12

0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 8% 11% 19% 59%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% American Indian/Alaskan Native Pacific Islander Filipino Two or More Races African-American Asian Unknown Ethnicity White Hispanic

Ethnicity

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Headcount

67,962

 Full-Time Equivalent Students

19,933.4

 Credit Sections

4,664

 Non-Credit Sections

2,115

 Median Credit Section Size

28

 Percent of Full-Time Faculty

65.5%

 Student Counseling Ratio

1,352:1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Overall – Student attempted any level of Math

  • r English in the first three years

 College Prepared – Student’s lowest course

attempted in Math and/or English was college level

 Unprepared for College – Student’s lowest

course attempted in Math and/or English was remedial level

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 Cohort (denominator)

  • Attempted a remedial course in English, Math, or

ESL for the first time

  • Tracking level below transfer

▪ English: 1 – 4 levels below ▪ Math: 2 – 4 levels below ▪ ESL: 1 – 6 levels below

 Outcome (numerator) within 6 years

  • Complete a degree applicable or transfer level

course within the same discipline.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Cohort (denominator)

  • Within 3 years complete 6 units and attempted any

Math or English

  • First Time Students

 Outcome (numerator)

  • Enrolled in three consecutive semesters
  • Summer Session and Intersession are not included
slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Cohort (denominator)

  • Within 3 years complete 6 units and attempted any

Math or English

  • First Time Students

 Outcome (numerator) within 6 years

  • Completion of at least 30 units
slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Cohort (denominator)

  • Within 3 years complete 6 units and attempted any

Math or English

  • First Time Students

 Outcome (numerator) within 6 years

  • Completion of Degree or Certificate of Achievement
  • Transfer
  • Transfer Prepared (60 transferable units, 2.0 GPA)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Cohort (denominator)

  • First time in a CTE course (defined by TOP code)
  • Completed at least 8 units in a single CTE discipline

in 3 years

  • At least one course is Advanced Occupational or

Clearly Occupational

 Outcome (numerator) within 6 years

  • Completed Degree or Certificate of Achievement
  • Transfer
  • Transfer Prepared
slide-20
SLIDE 20

48.8% 40.9% 66.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

English Math ESL

Remedial

slide-21
SLIDE 21

76.8% 77.3% 76.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

Persistence

slide-22
SLIDE 22

72.7% 77.6% 69.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

30 Units

slide-23
SLIDE 23

55.7% 73.3% 43.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

Completion

slide-24
SLIDE 24

54.9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Career Technical Education

slide-25
SLIDE 25

38.7% 43.5% 25.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

English Math ESL

Remedial

slide-26
SLIDE 26

74.1% 76.7% 73.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

Persistence

slide-27
SLIDE 27

68.2% 76.7% 64.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

30 Units

slide-28
SLIDE 28

46.0% 67.2% 37.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Overall College Prepared Unprepared

Completion

slide-29
SLIDE 29

49.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Career Technical Education

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • The Student Success Scorecard is one tool, among many, that

we use to assess the effectiveness of our institutions

  • Comprehensive and continuous assessment includes

data/information from different local sources and different perspectives, such as:

▪ On-going classroom assessment ▪ On-going planning and program review (academic, student services and administrative units) ▪ On-going research carried out at district Research Department (12 Measures of Success, student satisfaction surveys, pathways to persistence, etc.)