clarkstown central school district
play

Clarkstown Central School District Clarkstown Central School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clarkstown Central School District Clarkstown Central School District Guiding Principles 2016-17 vs. 2017-18 Revenue Budget 1.9% Tax Levy Increase Prior Year Special Ed Reserve Alloc. 2016-2017 2017-2018 2016-17 Payroll Health Care


  1. Clarkstown Central School District Clarkstown Central School District

  2. Guiding Principles

  3. 2016-17 vs. 2017-18 Revenue Budget 1.9% Tax Levy Increase Prior Year Special Ed Reserve Alloc. 2016-2017 2017-2018

  4. 2016-17 Payroll Health Care New Add'l Security Special Add'l Total Total Increases Premium Technology AM Hours Education Textbooks Budget Budget Increases Lease Placements Add'l ERS/TRS, Workers Capital Large Bus Additional Athletics Special Ed Comp, BOCES & Professional Projects Replacement Staffing Administration Other Reductions Development 2017-2018

  5. 2016 16-17 17 vs. 2017 17-18 18 Expense Budget Increases 2016-17 to 2017-18: Reductions 2016-17 to 2017-18: Payroll Increases: ERS/TRS: $1,825K decrease • • ERS 15.5% to 15.3% 2.0% CPI TRS 11.72% to 9.8% Step Increases Lane Movement Aligned to Actual • Healthcare Premium Increases: • BOCES Officials $200K decrease 15% Premium increase Workers Comp/Dental Additional Security Hours: • $105K decrease Debt Service 1 hour morning coverage $68K decrease in Elementary Schools Unemployment $300K decrease Other Misc. Expense $82K decrease

  6. 2017 17-18 18 Ca Capital Project Exp xpense Bu Budget Item Cost Doors (External) $250,000 6 Tennis Courts (South HS) $300,000 Auditorium Audio and Lights (South HS, Festa) $250,000 Water Fountain (Bottle Filler Station) $100,000 Design Lab (North HS) $80,000 Design Lab Technology (North HS) $200,000 Radio Studio (South HS) $50,000 Pool Deck $50,000 Paving $300,000 Walkways $300,000 ADA $225,000 Ventilation Upgrades $500,000 Building Automation Systems $300,000 Secondary Electrical Service $500,000 $3,405,000

  7. Age of Vehicles # of Vehicles in Fleet Big Buses Vans Vehicles Over 20 years old 2 2 0 Large Bus Vehicles Over 15 years old 36 19 17 Vehicles Over 10 years old 49 35 14 Vehicles Over 5 years old 25 12 13 Vehicles Under 5 years old 26 2 23 Replacement Age of Entire Fleet 1% 19% 26% 18% 36% Vehicles Over 20 years old Vehicles Over 15 years old Vehicles Over 10 years old Vehicles Over 5 years old Vehicles Under 5 years old

  8. Fiscal Year Total Enrollment # of Large Bus Routes # of Van Routes 2014-15 8892 179 137 2015-16 8654 180 144 2016-17 8561 180 147

  9. Ad Additi tion onal al T Technol ology ogy L Lease ase $ $250K Electronic Devices Leased Qty Purchased Qty Age # % <1 Year 1,872 30.3% Lease 2016 1500 1500 1 Year 1,581 25.6% Lease 2015 1473 1473 2 Years 56 0.9% 3 Years 866 14.0% Lease 2012 1286 325 4 Years 170 2.8% 5 Years 856 13.9% Lease 2011 1097 1097 >5 Years 771 12.5% 4395 6,172 100.0% Currently two 4 year leases in process: 2011 & 2015 2012 & 2016

  10. Ath Athleti tics Additional Coaches in existing programs= 2.0 • Winter Track Assistant at both high schools • Team has more than 100 participants spread over a number of different events Additional Coaches in returning programs= 2.0 • Tennis at FFMS • Interest of more than 50 students per team Additional Coaches in new programs= 3.0 • Winter Cheer, Fall and Winter dance at SHS • Program exists as a club at SHS, Team at NHS • Change to a Team will provide opportunity for competition

  11. Addit dditio iona nal C l Cla lassroom St Staffing ing Addit dditio iona nal St l Stude udent nt P Pla lace cement nts Staffing Changes • Anticipated change in sections due to enrollment at Elementary level= -2.0 • Increases in staffing based on changing mandates, services and needs of students= +8.8 • Related Service Providers (0.6) • Special Education Teachers (6.7) • English as New Language Learners (1.0) • Services to Students requiring a therapeutic environment (0.5) Student Placements • Costs of Placements for students outside of district continue to increase • Significant impact of students moving into school district requiring high cost services

  12. Positive Core

  13. Im Improvin ving th the In Instr tructio ctional l Core “For any positive impact on student learning to Textbooks take place, changes in any single element of the instructional core must be accompanied by Content corresponding changes in the other two elements. There are 3 ways to increase student learning and performance. 1. Increase the knowledge and skill of teachers; 2. Change the content; Student Teacher 3. Alter the relationship of the student to the teacher and the content.” Technology Professional ----- Richard Elmore Development

  14. Special Education Shift in Title for Recent Job Posting Department • Current: Executive Director of Pupil Personnel Services • New: Assistant Superintendent of Special Education and Staffing Pupil Personnel Services & an additional Supervisor of Special Education Rationale: The Assistant Superintendent for Special Education and Pupil Services will be a visionary leader who is able to balance time between curriculum, programs, services and instruction for Students with Disabilities as well as operational leadership. Based on the current staffing of the department, leaders are challenged to spend the appropriate amount of time as visionary, instructional leaders due to the magnitude of “operational” responsibilities.

  15. Enrollment in 2015-16 = 8,115 14.7% Classification Rate in 2015-16

  16. How-To Guide: Guidelines for Co-Teaching in Texas - A collaborative project of the Texas Education Agency and the Statewide Access to the General Curriculum Network

  17. PLANNING PHASE 2016-17 • Create special education study group to examine current programs and current models of co-teaching throughout the district • Meet with every principal to uncover strategies that have worked as well as challenges. • Identify target population which may benefit from co-teaching (i.e. students with disabilities, English language learners, Gifted/Talented, etc.) Phase 1 • Articulate a mission and vision for co-teaching with study group. • Recruit personnel for special education leadership positions. • Students are placed by need into future placements. • Identify schools and participants for implementation. • Work with principals to identify pairings for 2017-18 and provide clarity of roles and responsibilities. Phase 2 • Establishing baseline of student performance and devising outcomes for the first school year. • Provide professional development for district and school principals Phase 3 • Provide professional development for teachers and other staff; co-teachers experience joint training.

  18. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE 2017-18 • Administration to address logistical issues (e.g. Scheduling of students, teacher planning time, etc.) • Provide opportunities for co-teachers to chart a future direction together (i.e. Having a shared belief/vision regarding co-teaching; finding a planning time and using it effectively; deciding how to address specific student needs during co-teaching; determining how to resolve conflicts with co-teaching partners; exploring Phase 4 the six approaches of co-teaching (how/when to implement them); establishing classroom routines and behavior management; articulating student expectations (performance and procedures); sharing teaching styles and preferences; and determining grading procedures and accountability.) • Administration visits co-teaching classes regularly and coach teachers for fidelity of implementation. • Administration meets regularly with teachers to review student performance and provide supports. • Continue needed professional development. Phase 5 • Provide assistance for struggling co-teaching partnerships. • Evaluate co-teaching program effectiveness using student achievement outcomes and plan revisions. • Gather additional evaluation data, including other measures related to students and perceptions of stakeholders. • Analyze the year’s progress and make adjustments for the 2018-19 school year.

  19. How-To Guide: Guidelines for Co-Teaching in Texas - A collaborative project of the Texas Education Agency and the Statewide Access to the General Curriculum Network

  20. Su Summary “How do we meet the needs of students in a fiscally responsible manner?” • Provide support for programs, resources, training for staff and services to children • Draft budget within tax cap (1.9%). No anticipated use of reserves • No program cuts. No staff cuts.

  21. Questions ?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend