Student Success Scorecard Linda Hensley Director of Institutional - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Student Success Scorecard

Linda Hensley Director of Institutional Research, Planning and Grants

Overview

Student Success Scorecard

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) 2.0

Mandated by California State Assembly Bill 1417 (2004)—initial ARCC reports began in 2007. Intent is to facilitate and stimulate discussions related to the performance of California Community Colleges. The Scorecard/ARCC 2.0 is the culmination of an effort by the Student Success Task Force (SSTF) to implement a new accountability framework—one based on the existing reporting system.

System-wide Indicators

Six Core Indicators Completion/Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR)

• College Prepared, Unprepared for College, and Overall

Persistence Rate

• College Prepared, Unprepared for College, and Overall

At Least 30 Units Rate

• College Prepared, Unprepared for College, and Overall

Remedial Progress Rate

• Math, English, and ESL

Career Technical Education (CTE) Progress and Attainment Rate Career Development and College Preparation (CDCP) Rate

System-wide Indicators

Core Indicator Framework

The “Completion” (formerly, SPAR), “Persistence Rate,” “At Least 30 Units Rate” and “CDCP Rate” are carry-over metrics. The “Remedial Progress Rate” and “CTE Progress and Attainment Rate” metrics are new. The “Basic Skills Course Completion” and “Vocational Course Completion” metrics have been discontinued. For the Scorecard/ARCC 2.0, college peer groupings are an updated, secondary item. The composition of college peer groups is meant for use with the Completion/SPAR metric and utilizes three external factor to generate six major comparison groups.

The creation of six peer college groups is based on a linear regression analysis utilizing three “environmental” variables and correlated to the Student Success Scorecard’s total SPAR.

• High School Academic Performance by College Index (API): Index created by the CCCCO, it assigns a weighted API to

each college in proportion to the number of enrolled students from a given high school.

• Bachelors Plus Index (BA+): Within the college’s service area population, the proportion of persons with a bachelors

degree or higher. Based on fall 2005 CCCCO MIS enrollment and Census Bureau American Community Survey data.

• Percent of students age 25 and over: Based on fall 2005 CCCCO MIS data.

Peer Groups for Comparing Performance on the Completion/SPAR in the Scorecard

Group 1: Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: Group 5: Group 6:

ALLAN HANCOCK ANTELOPE VALLEY BAKERSFIELD CERRITOS COALINGA DESERT FRESNO CITY IMPERIAL VALLEY L.A. HARBOR L.A. MISSION MENDOCINO MERCED MODESTO OXNARD PORTERVILLE REEDLEY RIVERSIDE SAN JOAQUIN DELTA SEQUOIAS SOUTHWESTERN VICTOR VALLEY YUBA CABRILLO CHABOT CHAFFEY CONTRA COSTA COSUMNES RIVER CUYAMACA CYPRESS EL CAMINO EVERGREEN VALLEY FEATHER RIVER FOLSOM LAKE GLENDALE GOLDEN WEST L.A. VALLEY LAKE TAHOE LOS MEDANOS MONTEREY

• MT. SAN JACINTO

NAPA VALLEY PALOMAR REDWOODS SACRAMENTO CITY SANTA ROSA SANTIAGO CANYON SHASTA SIERRA SISKIYOUS SOLANO BUTTE CITRUS COLUMBIA CRAFTON HILLS CUESTA DE ANZA DIABLO VALLEY FULLERTON GROSSMONT L.A. PIERCE LAS POSITAS MIRA COSTA MOORPARK

• MT. SAN ANTONIO

ORANGE COAST PASADENA CITY SADDLEBACK SAN DIEGO MESA SANTA BARBARA CITY SANTA MONICA VENTURA BARSTOW COMPTON COPPER MOUNTAIN EAST L.A. HARTNELL L.A. TRADE-TECH PALO VERDE RIO HONDO SAN BERNARDINO SOUTHWEST L.A. TAFT ALAMEDA AMERICAN RIVER CANYONS CERRO COSO COASTLINE GAVILAN L.A. CITY LANEY LASSEN LONG BEACH CITY MERRITT SAN DIEGO CITY SAN JOSE CITY SANTA ANA WEST L.A. BERKELEY CITY CANADA FOOTHILL IRVINE VALLEY MARIN MISSION OHLONE SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR SAN FRANCISCO CITY SAN MATEO SKYLINE WEST VALLEY

Completion/SPAR: College Prepared

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcome (within 6 years):

• First-time student in academic year
• Transfer to a four-year institution
• At least 6 units
• Certificate
• Attempted any level Math or English
• Associate degree
• Transfer prepared

60.49% 62.18% 58.14% 57.01% 59.06% 77.61% 77.42% 75.56% 81.25% 73.83% 66.11% 67.28% 69.11% 67.76% 63.28% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Completion/SPAR: Unprepared for College

33.33% 33.77% 35.17% 32.06% 29.63% 46.88% 43.74% 44.83% 43.57% 45.37% 45.03% 42.67% 43.86% 38.96% 36.52% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcome (within 6 years):

• First-time student in academic year
• Transfer to a four-year institution
• At least 6 units
• Certificate
• Attempted any level Math or English
• Associate degree
• Transfer prepared

Completion/SPAR: Overall

39.96% 38.52% 39.02% 39.50% 34.82% 50.81% 51.64% 53.99% 50.12% 52.95% 50.41% 48.14% 49.94% 46.07% 43.11% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcome (within 6 years):

• First-time student in academic year
• Transfer to a four-year institution
• At least 6 units
• Certificate
• Attempted any level Math or English
• Associate degree
• Transfer prepared

Persistence: Overall

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcome:

• First-time student in academic year
• Persisted in first three consecutive terms
• At least 6 units
• Attempted any level Math or English

47.66% 48.59% 55.81% 55.64% 48.52% 77.70% 78.81% 77.41% 74.95% 77.16% 66.26% 69.65% 69.30% 69.12% 72.22% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

At Least 30 Units: Overall

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcome (within 6 years):

• First-time student in academic year
• Earned at least 30 units
• At least 6 units
• Attempted any level Math or English

54.85% 52.82% 57.95% 56.14% 54.67% 72.78% 71.95% 68.52% 69.44% 72.80% 65.33% 65.74% 66.18% 63.91% 64.38% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Remedial: Math

Cohort Qualification: Outcome (within 6 years):

• Student with a first attempt in a Math

course below transfer (2-4 levels below)

• Completion of college-level Math course, or

1 level below a college-level Math course

• Cohort based on first year of academic

attempt

Note: Merced not included due to missing and/or invalid data for the five-year comparison period.

7.58% 7.67% 10.20% 11.64% 10.78% 36.76% 37.33% 39.72% 42.69% 42.99% 13.78% 12.14% 14.35% 15.50% 19.21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Remedial: English

Cohort Qualification: Outcome (within 6 years):

• Student with a first attempt in a English

course below transfer

• Completion of college-level English course
• Cohort based on first year of academic

attempt 8.51% 12.99% 10.92% 10.61% 14.49% 50.00% 49.63% 50.71% 51.80% 49.94% 48.39% 49.63% 50.71% 47.51% 49.64% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Note: Allan Hancock not included due to missing data for the five -year comparison period.

Remedial: ESL

Cohort Qualification: Outcome (within 6 years):

• Student with a first attempt in a ESL

course below transfer

• Completion of ESL sequence, or college-

level ESL course

• Cohort based on first year of academic

attempt 3.57% 0.86% 2.91% 2.80% 2.25% 48.17% 45.99% 43.59% 43.75% 46.40% 48.17% 45.99% 41.94% 40.46% 46.40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Note: Imperial Valley not included due to missing data for the five -year comparison period.

Career Technical Education

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcomes (within 6 years):

• Students who completed a CTE course for the first time and

completed more than 8 units in the subsequent three years in a single discipline

• Transfer to a four-year institution
• Certificate
• Associate degree
• Transfer Prepared

44.58% 48.50% 44.88% 45.91% 47.96% 62.23% 66.67% 70.72% 76.45% 65.71% 54.28% 52.97% 53.61% 54.82% 55.69% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

2002-2003 to 2007-2008 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 2006-2007 to 2011-2012

Cohort-Outcome Timeframe

Career Development and College Preparation (Non-Credit)*

California Community College Campus/ Center Cohort Year 2006-2007 (Outcomes by 2011-2012) California Community College Campus/ Center Cohort Year 2006-2007 (Outcomes by 2011-2012)

Merced* * 44.31% San Diego Adult 5.05% Napa 27.45% Cerritos 4.49% Glendale 26.62% Palomar 4.11% North Orange Adult 24.62% Santa Barbara Continuing Ed. 4.07% Mt San Antonio 23.95% Pasadena 4.02%

Southwestern* * 16.40%

Mendocino* * 3.70% L.A. Valley 12.70% Modesto* * 3.00% Rio Hondo 10.00% San Francisco Centers 2.72% L.A. City 9.46% Canyons 2.40% L.A. Trade 9.38% Cuesta 1.75% Antelope Valley* * 8.57% Allan Hancock* * 1.33% Long Beach 8.08% Imperial* * 1.28% Santa Monica 7.67% Lake Tahoe 1.10% East L.A. 7.20% Santa Rosa 1.04% Desert* * 6.81% Southwest L.A. 0.73% Saddleback 6.56%

• Mt. San Jacinto

0.26%

Cohort Qualification (within 3 years): Outcomes (within 6 years):

• Students who attempt two or more CDCP

courses, with a minimum of 4 attendance hours in each of those courses, within three years.

• CDCP Certificate
• Transfer to a four-year institution
• Certificate
• Associate degree
• Transfer prepared

Note: * Data based on system wide comparison among reporting California community college campuses and centers. * * Reporting campus is part of Group I’s ”Peer Groups for Comparing Performance on the Completion/SPAR in the Scorecard.”

Website Resources for the Student Success Scorecard

California Community College Chancellor’s Office Management Information Systems Data Mart

http://datamart.cccco.edu/Outcomes/Student_Success_Scorecard.aspx

California Community Colleges Student Success Scorecard

http://scorecard.cccco.edu/scorecard.aspx