STTC Performance Measures and Target Setting Workshop August 24, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STTC Performance Measures and Target Setting Workshop August 24, 2018 Dan Lamers, PE Senior Program Manager Introduction and Overview

Performance Based Pla lanning Regional Goals Performance Measures (Mobility 2045) Targets Long-Term Project Selection/Funding (2019-2022 TIP) Short-Term Measure System Performance and Report Progress to Target 2

Schedule July 27 STTC Information Item - Performance Measures and Targets August 9 RTC Information Item - Performance Measures and Targets August 24 STTC Workshop - Performance Measures and Targets September 13 RTC Information Item September 28 STTC Information Item - Draft Targets October 11 RTC Information Item - Draft Targets October 26 STTC Action Item - Recommend Approval of Final Targets November 8 RTC Action Item - Approval of Final Targets November 15 Deadline for Targets 3

Regional Approach • Implement Required Federal Measures (National Performance) • Implement Additional Regional Measures (Regional Performance - tell our story) • Reporting and Publishing • Report to TxDOT (required) FHWA/FTA • Include in Metropolitan Transportation Plan (required) • Include in Transportation Improvement Program (required) • Publish in State of the Region Report (annually) 4

Relevant Dates MPO Target Reporting Complete Rulemaking Reporting Period Setting Deadline Schedule PM1 2/27/2018 Annually Annually (Safety) PM2 Four-year Performance Biannually (beginning, (Pavement and 11/15/2018 Periods middle, and end of Bridge) (starting 2018-2022) performance periods) PM3 Four-year Performance Biannually (beginning, (System 11/15/2018 Periods middle, and end of Performance) (starting 2018-2022) performance periods) Transit Asset 12/27/2017 Annually Annually Management 5

PM 1: Safety MPO Performance Measures Target Setting Workshop Dan Lamers, P.E. Senior Program Manager August 24, 2018

PM 1: Highway Safety Improvement Program Safety Performance Targets TxDOT NCTCOG 2018 Safety Performance Targets 2018 Targets Targets 3,704 665 Number of Fatalities 1.432 0.96 Fatality Rate 17,565 3,612 Number of Serious Injuries 6.74 5.18 Serious Injury Rate Number of Non-motorized Fatalities 2,151 560 and Serious Injuries Targets are based on five-year averages and will be revisited annually. Two percent reduction achieved by the year 2022. Regional targets approved by RTC on December 14, 2017. Regional Safety Position: “Even one death on the transportation system is unacceptable .” Staff is working to develop a regional Towards Zero Deaths Plan for North Central Texas. 7

Transit Asset Management MPO Performance Measures Target Setting Workshop Jing Xu Senior Transportation Planner August 24, 2018

Definition of Transit Asset Management Measures Rolling Stock (transit vehicles): Percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark. Infrastructure (rail tracks): Percentage of track segments with performance restrictions. Equipment (transit support vehicles): Percentage of non- revenue, support-service, and maintenance vehicles that have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark. Facility (buildings, stations, park and rides): Percentage of facilities within a particular asset class that are rated below Condition 3 on the TERM scale. Images: DART, DCTA, Trinity Metro 9

Transit Asset Management Performance Measure • Domain of the Measure Metropolitan Planning Area • Target Duration and Reporting Interval • Annual targets for four years (match with the target duration and reporting interval of the transit providers’ federally required Transit Asset Management (TAM) plans) • Report regional targets and performance in Metropolitan Transportation Plans and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) as adopted 10

Regional Targets and Performance Measure Asset Category Ass Asset Type Ass FY 20 FY 2018 18 Tar arget ** *** Bus* Bu 0% Small Bus* 0% Light Ra Rail Ve Vehicl cle* 0% Co Commuter Ra Rail Loco ocomotive* 0% Roll olling St Stocks* Commuter Ra Co Rail Pa Passenger Car* 0% (Percentage of Vehicles that have Met or Exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark) Articulated Bus 0% Commuter Rail Passenger Coach** 0% Streetcar 0% Van 0% Commuter Ra Co Rail Track rack* 0% Infr frastructure* Light t Ra Rail Track rack* 0% (Percentage of Track Segments with Performance Restrictions) Str treetca car Track rack* 0% Automobiles 0% Equipment Other Rubber Tire Vehicles 0% (Percentage of Vehicles that have Met or Exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark) Other Steel Wheel Vehicles 0% Administrative and Maintenance 0% Facilities (Percentage of Facilities Rated Below Condition 3 on the TERM Scale) Passenger and Parking 0% Note: *Regional Transportation Council policy emphasis area. **This asset category includes a number of assets that were rebuilt near the end of their useful life. The analysis above assumes a minimum extension of 10 years of useful life, which may be too conservative (i.e. vehicles may be in better condition than expected based on completed rebuild activities). ***Interim targets adopted in December 2017 for FY 2018 only. FY2019- 2022 targets will be adopted matching with the duration and interval of transit providers’ federally required TAM Plan. 11

Policies from Mobility 2045 Supporting TAM Policy # Public Transportation Policy TR3-001 Public transportation needs should be met by existing transportation authorities and providers through a comprehensive, coordinated, and cooperative approach to maximize existing transportation resources. Alternative implementation approaches may be necessary if existing transportation authorities and providers are unable to provide needed services in a timely manner (consistent with Regional Transportation Council Policy P09-03). TR3-002 Work with the region’s existing public transit providers to ensure a seamless multimodal transit system through: • Seamless connections • Coordinated fare structure • One-stop access to services • Standardization of assets, technologies, and service characteristics that promote interoperability • Improved interaction between public, private-for-profit, and private-nonprofit transit providers (consistent with Regional Transportation Council Policy P09-03) • Elimination of gaps in service to establish a minimum level of service • Service expansion TR3-006 Maximize the efficient use of public transportation resources in North Central Texas, including public, private- nonprofit, and private-for-profit providers of services. TR3-008 Establish policies and procedures that encourage and reward coordination. TR3-010 Support efforts by transit authorities to secure funding through local, state, federal, and other sources for the development and implementation of public transportation , including the Federal Transit Administration’s Capital Investment Grant Program. 112

Potential Regional Transit Targets Considerations TAM targets are likely to remain consistent with the FY 2018 regional targets. Coordinate with transit providers to develop consistent TAM definitions (e.g. Useful Life Benchmark) Adopt additional performance measures such as • Transit mode share • Transit ridership • Transit system reliability 13

NCTCOG Transit Asset Management Regional Target Setting Contacts Dan Lamers, PE Senior Program Manager dlamers@nctcog.org 816-695-9263 Jing Xu Senior Transportation Planner jxu@nctcog.org 817-608-2335 Cody Nelson Transportation Planner cnelson@nctcog.org 817-704-5602 14

PM2 Rule: Infrastructure Pavement and Bridge Conditions Performance Measures Surface Transportation Technical Committee Performance Measures Workshop August 24, 2018

Pavement Performance Measures Domain of the Measures - National Highway System (NHS) – refer to PM2 Handout Package - Applies to Interstate Highways (IH) and Non-Interstate (Non-IH) NHS facilities Required Federal Measures - Percentage of Pavements of IH System in “Good” and “Poor” Condition - Percentage of Pavements of the Non- IH NHS in “Good” and “Poor” Condition Target Duration and Reporting Interval - TxDOT: • Establish 4-year (2022) statewide targets for Interstate Highways • Establish 2-year (2020) and 4-year (2022) statewide targets for Non-IH Report progress to FHWA every two years (2018, 2020, 2022, etc.) - NCTCOG: • Support the TxDOT 4-year targets or establish own MPA-specific targets • Report progress to TxDOT pursuant to DFW MOU approved May 2018 16

Pavement Performance Measures Definition of Measures - Pavement conditions (mainlanes only in 0.1-mile intervals) assessed based on the following metrics: • International Roughness Index (IRI) • Cracking Percentage • Rutting • Faulting - Pavement ratings (“Good”, “Fair”, “Poor”) are determined as follows: • If the ratings for all metrics are “Good,” then overall rating is “Good” • If any one rating for reinforced concrete pavements is “Poor” or if any two ratings for other pavements is “Poor,” then the overall rating is “Poor” • If other combination of ratings, then the overall rating is “Fair” Data Source Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) 17