state strategies for detecting fis iscal
play

State Strategies for Detecting Fis iscal Distress in Local - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State Strategies for Detecting Fis iscal Distress in Local Governments: Stu Study sh shows how states monit itor th the fis fiscal l heal alth of of loc localit lities July 12, 2016 Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy, The


  1. State Strategies for Detecting Fis iscal Distress in Local Governments: Stu Study sh shows how states monit itor th the fis fiscal l heal alth of of loc localit lities July 12, 2016 Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy, The Brookings Institution Municipal Finance Conference pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  2. 2013 report on state interventions: pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  3. Fiscal monitoring defined: We looked for states that actively and regularly review financial information from local governments with the aim of trying to detect fiscal distress or, more generally, assessing the fiscal condition of local governments. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  4. What we included in our study: • General purpose local governments • Counties, cities, towns, and villages pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  5. Fiscal monitoring states WA MN OR NY SD MI PA IA OH NH NV CO RI KY NC CT TN NJ NM MD LA FL Fiscal monitoring No monitoring pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  6. Early warning states WA MN OR NY SD MI PA PA IA OH OH NH NV NV CO RI KY NC NC CT TN NJ NM MD LA LA Fiscal monitoring FL Fiscal monitoring with early warning No monitoring pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  7. Varying approaches Handled by departments of revenue, treasury, finance, economic development, auditor, and comptroller. Variety of methods, indicators used to detect distress. Attitudes about monitoring also vary. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  8. Key principle #1 Formal l systems and processes help to promote transparency, predictability, and consistency. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  9. Key principle #2 Detecting dis istress early can help local governments to address their fiscal problems before they become unmanageable. Early warning states: Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  10. Key principle #3 Good worki king rela lationships between state and local governments are critical. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  11. Key principle #4 States should undertake fiscal monitoring with the goal of avoid iding state in intervention, or taking over a local government’s decision -making authority. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  12. Conclusion Broad variety of among fiscal monitoring systems. Research points to promising approaches to building an effective fiscal monitoring system. States can play a critical role in local government fiscal health. pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

  13. For additional questions or information, please contact: Lauren Dickinson ldickinson@pewtrusts.org 202-540-6715 pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health pewtrusts.org/fiscal-health

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend