Star formation quenching in gas-rich barred galaxies Sergey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

star formation quenching in gas rich barred galaxies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Star formation quenching in gas-rich barred galaxies Sergey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Star formation quenching in gas-rich barred galaxies Sergey Khoperskov 1 , Misha Haywood 1 , Paola Di Matteo 1 , Matt Lehnert 2 , Francoise Combes 3 1 GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France 2 IAP, Paris, France 3 LERMA, Observatoire de Paris,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sergey Khoperskov1, Misha Haywood1, Paola Di Matteo1, Matt Lehnert2, Francoise Combes3

Star formation quenching in gas-rich barred galaxies

1GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France 2IAP, Paris, France 3LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France 


Khoperskov et al A&A accepted arXiv 1709.03604

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Hogg et al. 2003

The color-magnitude diagram

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hogg et al. 2003

The color-magnitude diagram

Galaxy color bimodality

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hogg et al. 2003

The color-magnitude diagram

Blue cloud: star-forming, a lot of gas, spiral Galaxy color bimodality

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hogg et al. 2003

The color-magnitude diagram

Blue cloud: star-forming, a lot of gas, spiral Galaxy color bimodality Red sequence: non-star-forming, little gas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

Secular evolution Gas consumption

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

Secular evolution Gas consumption Gas accretion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

Secular evolution Gas consumption Gas accretion Quenching

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

Secular evolution Gas consumption Gas accretion Quenching

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Color Magnitude

Evolution of galaxies

Secular evolution Gas consumption Gas accretion Quenching remove gas inefficient SF

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Nearby quenching

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nearby quenching

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CEM by Snaith et al 2015

Thick disk formation

Nearby quenching

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Milky Way: ”quenching”

Rapid decrease of SFR

Snaith+ 2015 Haywood+ 2016

continuity in chemical evolution

After quenching: gas-rich disk

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Nearby galaxies morphology

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nearby galaxies morphology

z~0: 60-70% of galaxies have a bar

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Nearby galaxies morphology

z~0: 60-70% of galaxies have a bar N-body sims -> bar is a long-lived structure

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CALIFA barred galaxies

“Quenching”

González Delgado+ 2017

MW

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Most of disk galaxies quenched SF in the past

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Most of disk galaxies quenched SF in the past A lot of galaxies are barred now

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Most of disk galaxies quenched SF in the past A lot of galaxies are barred now Typically bar is a long-lived structure

slide-24
SLIDE 24

N-body/hydro simulations

Isolated disk galaxies

  • Gaseous disk (30 pc resolution)
  • Radiative heating/cooling
  • Star formation
  • Initial thick stellar disk
  • New born particles (0.5-4 106 particles)
  • Stellar feedback (SNe, stellar evolution STARBURST’99)
  • Dark matter halo (rigid or 0.5-1 107 particles)
  • Models of gas rich galaxies (initially Mgas/Mstars ~ 0.5-1)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Unbarred galaxy. Star formation rate

Gas fraction f=1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Unbarred galaxy. Star formation rate

Gas fraction f=1

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Unbarred galaxy. Star formation rate

Different radii

total Gas fraction f=1

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Barred galaxy. Star formation rate

Gas fraction f=1

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Barred galaxy. Star formation rate

Gas fraction f=1

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Barred galaxy. Star formation rate

Different radii

total Gas fraction f=1

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Star formation efficiency

Different radii SFE = SFR / Gas density

Barred galaxy Unbarred galaxy

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Gas velocity dispersion

Barred galaxy Unbarred galaxy

Different radii

bar formation time scale

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Gas velocity dispersion

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

dust lines

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

Gas (partially) lose angular momentum gas LOS velocity stellar density

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

Velocity gradient

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

Velocity gradient

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Gas velocity dispersion

Bar rotation Gas (supersonic) flow

Shock wave(!)

Velocity gradient Kelvin-Helmholtz- type instability High gas velocity dispersion

slide-45
SLIDE 45

SFR Gas density SFE

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Before the bar formation

Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. Gas-rich galaxy

Gas surface density

Whole disk

slide-47
SLIDE 47

After the bar formation

Gas surface density

Whole disk

Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. Gas-rich galaxy

slide-48
SLIDE 48

After the bar formation

Gas surface density

Whole disk

Flattening of the KS relation in the central regions

Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. Gas-rich galaxy

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Kennicutt-Schmidt relation

Whole disk 5<r<10 kpc <5 kpc

A prediction to be checked with observations of high-redshift, or local gas-rich galaxies.

Gas-rich galaxy

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • For 10% bar amplitude and M_gas/M_stars ~ 1.0:

SFR suppressed by a factor of 10 during 1 Gyr

  • Bar -> turbulent motions
  • Within the bar size gas vel. dispersion + 10−25 km s−1
  • SFE (in highly turbulent gas) is less efficient
  • Factor of 5-10 in comparison to unbarred

Conclusions

  • agreement with Milky Way star formation quenching

episode

more details on arXiv 1709.03604