Mass quenching, cold flows and gas inflow into galaxies Yuval - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mass quenching cold flows
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mass quenching, cold flows and gas inflow into galaxies Yuval - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mass quenching, cold flows and gas inflow into galaxies Yuval Birnboim The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Outline The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results) Application for spherical and filamentary infall How


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mass quenching, cold flows and gas inflow into galaxies

Yuval Birnboim The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)
  • Application for spherical and filamentary infall
  • How people misquote us (or: is the name “cold flows” misleading?)
  • K-H stability of cosmic filaments
  • The virial shocks of pancakes and filaments
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)
  • Application for spherical and filamentary infall
  • How people misquote us (or: is the name “cold flows” misleading?)
  • K-H stability of cosmic filaments
  • The virial shocks of pancakes and filaments
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)

Birnboim & Dekel 2003

No virial shock:

Rees & Ostriker (1977), Silk (1977), Binney(1977), White & Rees (1978)

Gas free-falls in

T[k]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The stability analysis

Assume:

1.

Forces in post-shock gas are initially zero 𝑠 = 0

  • 2. Outwards force => gas stable => shock stable

3.

Velocities are non-zero

I.

Homologic 𝑣 =

𝑣𝑡 𝑠𝑡 𝑠

II.

v is NOT small (ie. non-linear) perturbation

  • III. v is specific (no ω(k))
  • 4. Perturbation analysis in r-space 𝑠 → 𝑠 + 𝜀𝑠 = 𝑠 + 𝑣𝜀𝑢 ; P → 𝑄 + 𝜀𝑄
  • 5. Cooling is important

r t shock

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The stability analysis – effective polytropic index

 

q e q V P e P P d P d P q e P

eff eff S

                                             ) (ln ) (ln ln ln : rate cooling with 1 : gas ideal For

Compression time Cooling time

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Do the actual work… …and after some algebra:

             3 4 ) ( 2 12

1 2 eff eff s

r P t u r r         

So,

stable unstable 3 / 2 2

crit eff crit eff crit

           gas 3 5 for 43 . 1 7 10    

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Simulation confirms analytic model: shock when eff > crit=1.43

No free parameters, no fudge factors

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Important note!

The stability criterion checks if gas can be hydrostatic. Not if it is hot. Shocks are expected, but will collapse on a dynamic timescale

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Outline

  • The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)
  • Application for spherical and filamentary infall
  • How people misquote us (or: are “cold streams a good name?”)
  • K-H stability of cosmic filaments
  • The virial shocks of pancakes and filaments
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mvir

[Mʘ]

Cold Flows in Spherical Halos

redshift z 1013 1012 1011 0 1 2 3 4 5

1σ (22%) 2σ (4.7%)

M* of Press

Schechter

at z>1 most halos are M<Mshock→ “cold flows”

Dekel & Birnboim 06

Assuming:

  • Overdensity

evolution

  • Metalicity

evolution

shock heating

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Shock always forms at same mass

Time(Gyr) Time(Gyr)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

High z vs. Low z Spherical vs. Filamentary

slide-14
SLIDE 14

the millenium cosmological simulation high-sigma halos: fed by relatively thin, dense filaments typical halos: reside in relatively thick filaments, fed spherically stability instability

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cosmological Context

Dekel & Birnboim 2006 “Cold flows” Always unstable (1D analysis)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kereš et al. 2005 Kereš et al. 2009

3D SPH hydro-simulations

See also, Brooks et al. 09(GASOLINE), ., Schaye et al. …

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ocvirk et al. 2008

2e12 halo, z=4 2e12 halo, z=2.5

3D Eulerian hydro-simulations

See also, Kravtsov et al. (ART), Agertz et al. …

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Most stars in the universe form through unstable accretion

Wechsler et al 2002, Dekel et al. 2009 Agertz et al. 2009 Dekel & Birnboim 2006 Keres et al. 05-09

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Star forming galaxies

Cold accretion vs. Merger induced star bursts

Dekel, Birnboim et al. 2009, Nature BX/BM/sBzK,

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How people misquote us (or: is the name “cold flows” misleading?)

cold flows (noun): Dusan Kereš 2005 “Cold flow” definition application Gas is never hydrostatic good for gas accretion rates Gas is cold within Rvir (Ocvirk 08, Agartz 09, Dekel 09) good for observability of cold flows Gas never heated (Kereš 05, Nelson 13) good for analyzing Lagrangian sims

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outline

  • The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)
  • Application for spherical and filamentary infall
  • How people misquote us (or: are “cold streams a good name?”)
  • K-H stability of cosmic filaments
  • The virial shocks of pancakes and filaments
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Kelvin Helmholtz instability of infalling streams

22

Agertz et al 2009 RAMSES

slide-23
SLIDE 23

interaction region disk streams

Ceverino, Dekel, Bournaud 2010 ART 35-70pc resolution

What happens to the flow near the galaxy? The ‘messy’ region

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Typical numbers for streams

Stream temperature: 𝑈

𝑑 ∼ 104 − 105 𝐿

Surrounding temperature: 𝑈ℎ ≥ 106 𝐿 Mh ≥ 1012𝑁⊙ Pressure equilibrium: 𝑄ℎ ≃ 𝑄

𝑑

Density contrast:

𝜍𝑑 𝜍ℎ ≃ 10 − 100

Stream velocity: 𝑊 ≃ 𝑊

𝑤𝑗𝑠 ∼ 𝐿𝐶𝑈𝑤𝑗𝑠 𝑛

∼ 𝐷𝑡,ℎot Mach number: Mhot ≡

𝑊 𝐷𝑡,ℎ𝑝𝑢 ∼ 1 − 1.5, 𝑁𝑑𝑝𝑚𝑒 = 3 − 15

Stream radius: Rs ≤ 10 𝑙𝑞𝑑 ∼ 0.1 𝑆𝑤𝑗𝑠 Size ratio:

𝑆𝑡 𝑆𝑤𝑗𝑠 ∼ 0.05 − 0.1

Mandelker, Padnos, Dekel, Birnboim; in prep.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

𝑵 = 𝟏. 𝟔 𝜺𝝇 = 𝟑

Mandelker, Padnos, Dekel, Birnboim; in prep. RAMSES (teyssier 02)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

𝑵 = 𝟐. 𝟔 𝜺𝝇 = 𝟐𝟏𝟏

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Goal: An Analytic dispersion relation for super- sonic KH for cylinder, slab or plane

Planar Slab Cylinder Non- compressible ‘Classical’ Sheet instability compressible Filaments, relativistic jets

Initial results: For M>>1 flow is stable. What happens for M1~1, M2>>1? Stability against tangent perturbation? Analysis performed by two bright students: Nir Mandelker, Dan Padnos

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Outline

  • The stability of virial shocks (recap of 2003 results)
  • Application for spherical and filamentary infall
  • How people misquote us (or: are “cold streams a good name?”)
  • K-H stability of cosmic filaments
  • The virial shocks of pancakes and filaments
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Stability criteria for virial shocks of pancakes, filaments and halos

                P P d P d

eff

) (ln ) (ln

Birnboim, Hahn, Padnos 2014 (in prep.)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Stability of filaments

Birnboim, Hahn, Padnos 2014 (in prep.) Based on similarity solutions of Fillmore_Goldreich 84 ε=0.2 ε=0.99

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Summary

  • Mass threshold is for the stability of gas.

Below threshold - if gas shocks, the shocks will fall in of free-fall timescales

  • Transition occurs at ~1012Mʘ with unstable filaments penetrating

stable halo at high-z

  • Gaseous filaments are (probably) KH stable because of supersonic flow – stay tuned
  • Virial shocks for filaments/sheets are not always stable either
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thank you