Dark Matter and Structure Formation
Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside
September 10, 2019
TAUP , 2019 TOYAMA, JAPAN
Dark Matter and Structure Formation Hai-Bo Yu University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dark Matter and Structure Formation Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside TAUP , 2019 TOYAMA, JAPAN September 10, 2019 Dark Matter 27% 5% 68% Dark Matter Halos: Hosting Galaxies Aquarius Project, Springel+(2008) Dark matter is
Dark Matter and Structure Formation
Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside
September 10, 2019
TAUP , 2019 TOYAMA, JAPAN
Dark Matter
27%
5%
68%
Dark Matter Halos: Hosting Galaxies
Aquarius Project, Springel+(2008)
Dark matter is the key for understanding structure formation of the universe
Dark Matter Properties
Dark Stable Cold X
None of the standard model particles can be a dark matter candidate
DM candidates: WIMPs, Axions…
See Hitoshi Murayama’s talk
⽩百居易《⻓門恨歌》
“上穷碧落下⻩黅泉,两处茫茫皆不⻅观。”
WIMP/DM Search Status
He exhausted all avenues in heaven and the nether world, Boundless and vast as they were, he could not bring her existence to light.
A Song of Immortal Regret, Bai Juyi (772-846)
A Critical Rethinking
particles, aside from gravity?
astrophysical observations?
Cold Dark Matter
Universal Density Profile
ρs r/rs(1 + r/rs)2
Aquarius Project, Springel+ (2008) Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile (1996)
CDM-only cosmological simulations
∼ 1 r ∼ 1 r3
∼ 1 r2
∼ ρsrs/r
∼ ρ0
ρs r/rs(1 + r/rs)2
Flores & Primack (1994); Moore (1994); de Blok & McGaugh (1997)…
mass-to-light ratio
NFW (1996) Tulin & HBY (2017)
Diversity Problem
Oman+(2015)
All galaxies have the same
Vmax!
Colored bands: hydrodynamical simulations of CDM (weak feedback)
Reproduced from the data compiled in Oman+(2015)
Vcirc(2kpc) has a factor of ~4 scatter for fixed Vmax
A Big Challenge to CDM
Mhalo~109-1012 M☉
core cusp
The diversity is expected if dark matter has strong self-interactions
Γ ' nσv = (ρ/mX)σv ⇠ H0
σ/mX ~1 cm2/g (nuclear scale)
CDM SIDM
MW-like halo σ/mX =2 cm2/g
From Ran Huo
CDM SIDM
DM Heat Isothermal distribution Review: Tulin & HBY (Physics Reports 2017)
Addressing the Diversity Problem
DM-dominated galaxies: Lower the central density and the circular velocity
ρX ∼ e−Φtot/σ2
0 ∼ e−ΦX/σ2
Isothermal distribution
Vmax=70 km/s
CDM SIDM only
2 4 6 8 10 20 40 60 80 Radius (kpc) Vcir (km/s)
2σ range of concentration
σ/m=3 cm2/g
with Kamada, Kaplinghat, Pace (PRL 2017)
High Surface Brightness Galaxies
Thermalization leads to higher DM density due to the baryonic influence
Increasing baryon concentration
ρX ∼ e−Φtot/σ2
0 ∼ e−ΦB/σ2
Vmax=120 km/s, MD=1010M⊙ CDM SIDM,RD=2 SIDM,RD=3 SIDM,RD=6 SIDM only
0.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 100 105 106 107 108 109 Radius (kpc) Density (MSun/kpc3)
with Kamada, Kaplinghat, Pace (PRL 2017) with Kaplinghat, Keeley, Linden (PRL 2014) with Kaplinghat, Linden (PRL 2015)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 20 40 60 80 100
[] [/]
UGC05764 UGC07603 IC2574 NGC1705 UGC07151 UGC08490 UGC05750 UGC05721
low concentration low surface brightness high concentration high surface brightness σ/m=3 cm2/g
with Kamada, Kaplinghat, Pace (PRL 2017) with Creasey, Sameie, Sales+ (MNRAS 2017)
30 galaxies σ/m=3 cm2/g
With Ren, Kwa, Kaplinghat (PRX, 2018)
We fitted 147 galaxies (3.6 μm band)!
A Much Larger Sample
the SPARC sample, Lelli, McGaugh, Schombert (2016)
CDM w/Strong Feedback vs SIDM
Gray lines: NIHAO simulations of CDM (3σ band)
Solid lines: SIDM fits
Santos-Santos+(2017)
“strong/violent” feedback
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 20 40 60 80 100[] [/]
UGC05764 UGC07603 IC2574 NGC1705 UGC07151 UGC08490 UGC05750 UGC05721(~2σ in the c200-M200 relation)
With Ren, Kaplinghat (to appear)
SIDM does better than any other model in the literature
Model Comparison
With Ren, Kaplinghat (to appear) Red: CDM with strong feedback
Valli & HBY (Nature Astronomy 2018)
Beyond Field Galaxies
Milky Way Satellite Galaxies
with Sameie, Sales+ (2019) Kaplinghat, Valli, HBY (2019)
Dark matter self-interactions+Tidal interactions σ/m=3 cm2/g
See also: Kahlhoefer+ (2019), Nishikawa+ (2019)
With Kaplinghat, Tulin (PRL, 2015)
Galaxies: Mhalo~109-1012 M☉ Galaxy clusters: Mhalo~1014-1015 M☉
Clusters Galaxies
Two challenges: large cross section right velocity dependence
1 10 100 1000 104 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 dark matter relative velocity (km/s) σ/m (cm2/g)
Galaxy clusters σ/m<~0.1 cm2/g Galaxies σ/m~3 cm2/g
Fix αX=1/137 Predict: mX~15 GeV, mɸ ~17 MeV
with Kaplinghat, Tulin (PRL 2015)
V (r) = αX r e−mφr
X X X X ɸ
Yukawa potential
1 10 100 1000 104 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 dark matter relative velocity (km/s) σ/m (cm2/g)σ ∼ 1/v4
σ ∼ const q ⌧ mφ q mφ
Other models: Chu, Garcia-Cely, Murayama (2018, 2019)
The nightmare scenario is not hopeless!
N-P vs. DM-DM Scatterings
Tulin & HBY (2017); data from Obloinsk+(2011)
1 10 100 1000 104 0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 dark matter relative velocity (km/s) σ/m (cm2/g)σ ∼ 1/v4
σ ∼ const
q ⌧ mφ q mφ
SIDM Direct Detection
PandaX-II collaboration+HBY (PRL, 2018)
N X X N
ɸ WIMP: mɸ~1 TeV>>q SIDM: mɸ~10 MeV~q
Smoking-gun signature
X X p
p
_
Visible
Invisible
pp→Monojet+Missing Energy
WIMP SIDM
With Tsai, Xu (JHEP , 2018)
Dwarf galaxies MW-like galaxies Clusters
“B-factory” (v~30 km/s) “LEP” (v~200 km/s) “LHC” (v~1000 km/s)
Observations
Self-scattering kinematics Measure particle physics parameters σX, mX, mɸ
matter (WIMPs and Axions), but no convincing signals.
modeling and computer simulations can provide extremely powerful insight into the nature of dark matter.
X X X X X SM SM X