QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantum materials dark matter detection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

K. ZUREK Leveraging the many faces (and phases) of matter QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW DIRECTIONS IN DARK MATTER THEORY Old paradigm: weak scale dark matter (with relic density fixed by freeze-out)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION

  • K. ZUREK
Leveraging the many faces (and phases) of matter
slide-2
SLIDE 2 MOTIVATION

NEW DIRECTIONS IN DARK MATTER THEORY

▸ Old paradigm: weak scale dark matter (with relic density fixed by freeze-out) DM DM time abundance Kolb and Turner nhσvi = H(Tfo) = ) hσvi ' 1 (20 TeV)2 ' g4 wk 4π(2 TeV)2
slide-3
SLIDE 3 DARK MATTER AND CLASSICAL BILLIARD BALLS

DIRECT DETECTION GOLD STANDARD

▸ Nuclear recoil experiments; basis of enormous progress in direct detection µN ≡ mNmX mX + mN v ∼ 300 km/s ∼ 10−3c for 50 GeV target v ∼ 10−3c = ⇒ 2µNv = qmax = p 2mNED = ⇒ ED ∼ 100 keV q, ED
slide-4
SLIDE 4 1 10 100 1000 104 1050 1049 1048 1047 1046 1045 1044 1043 1042 1041 1040 1039 1014 1013 1012 1011 1010 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 WIMP Mass GeVc2 WIMPnucleon cross section cm2 WIMPnucleon cross section pb 7Be Neutrinos N E U T RIN O C O H E R E N T S CA T T E R IN G N E UT R IN O C O HE R EN T S CATTERING (Green&ovals)&Asymmetric&DM&& (Violet&oval)&Magne7c&DM& (Blue&oval)&Extra&dimensions&& (Red&circle)&SUSY&MSSM& &&&&&MSSM:&Pure&Higgsino&& &&&&&MSSM:&A&funnel& &&&&&MSSM:&BinoEstop&coannihila7on& &&&&&MSSM:&BinoEsquark&coannihila7on& & 8B Neutrinos Atmospheric and DSNB Neutrinos CDMS II Ge (2009) Xenon100 (2012) CRESST CoGeNT (2012) CDMS Si (2013) E D E L W E I S S ( 2 1 1 ) DAMA SIMPLE (2012) Z E P L I N
  • I
I I ( 2 1 2 ) COUPP (2012) SuperCDMS Soudan Low Threshold SuperCDMS Soudan CDMS-lite XENON 10 S2 (2013) CDMS-II Ge Low Threshold (2011) S u p e r C D M S S
  • u
d a n X e n
  • n
1 T LZ L U X D a r k S i d e G 2 D a r k S i d e 5 DEAP3600 P I C O 2 5
  • C
F 3 I PICO250-C3F8 SNOLAB SuperCDMS DARK MATTER AND CLASSICAL BILLIARD BALLS
slide-5
SLIDE 5 SUCCESS

DARK MATTER MOORE’S LAW

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 10 −47 10 −46 10 −45 10 −44 10 −43 10 −42 10 −41 10 −40 Homestake Oroville H−M ’94 H−M ’98 IGEX UKDMC DAMA ’98 DAMA ’00 LIBRA ’08 Edelweiss ’98 CDMS I SUF ’99 CDMS I SUF ’02 Edelweiss ’01 Edelweiss ’03 CDMSII Soudan ’04 CDMSII Soudan ’10 Edelweiss ’09 Edelweiss ’11 CRESST ’11 SuperCDMS Soudan ’14 ZEPLIN I ZEPLIN II ZEPLIN III WARP ’07 XENON100 ’10 XENON100 ’11 XENON100 ’12 XENON10 LUX 300kg XMASS 800kg ~ 1 event kg−1 day−1 ~ 1 event 100 kg−1 yr−1 Dark Matter Searches: Past, Present & Future Limit Scalar Cross−section cm2 [60 GeV WIMP] Year Ge NaI Cryodet
  • Liq. Noble
CS2 Projected Signal LUX ‘14 LUX ‘15 LUX ‘16 LZ ‘22 PandaX ‘15 Darkside ‘15 SuperCDMS also focuses on light WIMPs XENON1T ‘19 WIMP Search: Factor 10 every 3.3 years Factor of 10 every 6.5 years LUX Collaboration talk
slide-6
SLIDE 6 SUCCESS

THEORY TARGETS

Physics Viewpoint, Raphael Lang
slide-7
SLIDE 7 LOOKING TOWARDS LIGHTER DARK MATTER

EARLY EFFORT : DAMIC CCD AT FNAL

▸ Detecting DM Whispers dependent on dark counts and read-out noise ▸ 40 eV threshold, nuclear recoils WIMP Mass [GeV/c2] Crosssection [cm2] (normalised to nucleon) 120329092801 http://dmtools.brown.edu/ Gaitskell,Mandic,Filippini 10 10 1 10 2 10 42 10 40 10 38 10 36 DAMIC collaboration, 1105.5191
slide-8
SLIDE 8 LOOKING TOWARDS LIGHTER DARK MATTER

DIRECT DETECTION GOLD STANDARD

  • 10
36
  • 10
10 1 10 2 10 10 46
  • 10-2
10-3 10-1

??

slide-9
SLIDE 9 MOTIVATION

TOWARDS LIGHT DARK MATTER

Dark Matter May Reside in a Hidden Sector Dark Matter Standard Model Connector π+ v π− v → π0 vπ0 v π0 v → b¯ b, γγ e.g. a stable dark pion no weak force
slide-10
SLIDE 10 FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATION

NUCLEAR RECOILS

▸ Kinematic penalty when DM mass drops below nucleus mass qmax = 2mXv ED & eV ↔ mX = 300 MeV Ekin & 300 eV even though ED = q2 2mN
slide-11
SLIDE 11 DARK MATTER AND CLASSICAL BILLIARD BALLS

NEXT UP: ELECTRON

▸ More bang for the buck if DM lighter than 1 GeV ▸ Allows to extract all of DM kinetic energy for DM MeV and heavier qmax = 2mXv ED & eV ↔ mX = 1 MeV ED = q2 2me
slide-12
SLIDE 12 DARK MATTER AND CLASSICAL BILLIARD BALLS

ELECTRONS IN MATERIALS

Rate 1 10 100 103 10-39 10-38 10-37 10-36 10-35 10-34 Dark Matter Mass @MeVD se @cm2D Excluded by XENON10 data 1 electron 2 electrons 3 electrons Hidden- Photon models
  • χ []
σ []
  • -
  • -
=
  • -
  • -
Essig et al 1509.01598
  • P. Sorensen et al 1206.2644
▸ In insulators, like xenon ▸ In semi-conductors, like Ge, Si Ionize electron Excite electron to conduction band Gap = DM Kinetic Energy
slide-13
SLIDE 13 ELECTRONS & CONDUCTION BANDS

SENSEI AND SKIPPER CCD’S

▸ DAMIC utilized sensitivity to charge to place constraints on DM ▸ Fundamentally limited by noise ▸ More noise = less sensitivity to DM Whispers ▸ Improved Read-out 1 2 Charge [e−] 500 1000 1500 2000 Entries SENSEI, 1706.00028 RMS = 0.068 e/pix LDRD led by Javier Tiffenberg
slide-14
SLIDE 14 COSMIC VISIONS WHITEPAPER

SENSEI AND SKIPPER CCD’S

DRAFT

  • χ []
σ []
  • (
)
= = χ //- (//)
  • (
  • )
( ) ( )
  • /
  • γ
()
  • (
  • )
slide-15
SLIDE 15 QUANTUM DEVICES AND DM WHISPERS

QUANTUM DEVICE R&D

▸ In addition to suitable target (quantum phases of matter), need quantum devices capable of measuring small energy deposits ▸ Superconducting devices that measure single quanta ▸ Single infrared or microwave photon detectors, e.g. Aaron Chou LDRD R T Transition Edge Sensor calorimeter Microwave Kinetic Inductance Device See W. Wester talk
slide-16
SLIDE 16 REACH OF QUANTUM MATERIALS

DARK MATTER LANDSCAPE

mass 100 GeV 1 GeV 1 MeV 1 keV 1 eV 1 meV Traditional WIMP XENON1T LZ Semiconductors SuperCDMS Absorption Coherent Mode Production Graphene Super- conductors Superfluid Helium ~eV energy resolution ~keV energy resolution ~meV energy resolution QCD axion, “ultralight frontier” DAMIC, SENSEI ADMX
slide-17
SLIDE 17 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

E.G. SUPERCONDUCTORS

∆ ' 0.3 meV ▸ Free electrons succumb to collective dynamics ▸ Typical gap
slide-18
SLIDE 18 ▸ Can we absorb ultralight DM particles on electrons in a superconductor? ▸ Seems not — basic energy and momentum conservation ▸ Take advantage of collective modes! i.e. phonons DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

ABSORPTION — SUPERCONDUCTORS

H = Z d3yph ¯ = 1 √ V X ~ k X ~ k0 Cph| ~ Q| √⇢ 1 p 2EQ (c ~ Q + c† − ~ Q)a~ k0a~ k X Φ e e q Q k k0 X Φ e e q Q k k0
slide-19
SLIDE 19 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

ABSORPTION — SUPERCONDUCTORS

10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 mV [eV] 10−16 10−14 10−12 10−10 10−8 κ Stellar constraints (Stuckelberg case) HB stars (Higgs case, e=0.1) Resonant LC Xenon10 1 kg-day 1 kg-yr Hochberg, Lin, KZ 1604.06800 Dark Photon X Φ e e q Q k k0 x κ
slide-20
SLIDE 20 ▸ Larger gap means sensitivity only to heavier particles … but, there is a new process! DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

ABSORPTION — SEMICONDUCTORS

X Φ e e q Q k k0 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 103 104 mV [eV] 10−18 10−16 10−14 10−12 10−10 κ Stellar constraints Xenon A l , 1 k g
  • y
r e− excitation multi-phonon excitation solar CDMSlite DAMIC Hidden photon dark matter 1 kg-yr, Ge 1 kg-yr, Si Hochberg, Lin, KZ 1608.01994
slide-21
SLIDE 21 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

HELIUM

▸ Superfluids are naturally insensitive to noise. A good light DM detector? In the context of ordinary nuclear recoils, yes, see e.g. 1605.00694 ▸ To detect lighter DM, couple to phonon modes. ▸ Viable? At first glance — no ▸ Next glance -- yes! ED ∼ vXq ED ∼ csq cs ⌧ vX vs
slide-22
SLIDE 22 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

HELIUM

▸ Superfluids are naturally insensitive to noise. A good light DM detector? In the context of ordinary nuclear recoils, yes, see e.g. 1605.00694 ▸ To detect lighter DM, couple to phonon modes. ▸ Viable? At first glance — no ▸ Next glance -- yes! ED ∼ vXq ED ∼ csq cs ⌧ vX vs Beauvois et al 1605.02638
slide-23
SLIDE 23 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

MULTI-EXCITATIONS

▸ Calculated and observed for cold neutrons ▸ However, this is in a very different kinematic regime ▸ No existing calculations in regime
  • f interest
  • 5 -
Calculation of the lifetime He use 2nd order perturbation theory to calculate the lifetime, i.
  • e. we replace the "blob" in figure 2 by one phonon exchange :

J2-

'[,
  • We. will use "old-fashioned perturbation theory" which requires consideration
  • f the following diagrams :
  • Interaction
The interaction between neutrons and matter may be written as ( II) where is the number density of nucleii with scattering length a in the matter. Follo.,ing Landau + Khalatnikov we write the number density of Helium as I

t;r/J"

+

i'0;p.
  • 6 -
I where S1= equilibrium mass density of the liquid, and QD Oil- ..£'{ f .../;l We take the matrix element
  • f V(?) between neutron plane \;ave states
e
  • )
  • \
the usual creation-annihilation operators.
  • -Vf
/rf:-!.),r <[JVV'Jjl'): f J'r5{r) f- f .
  • >-
  • +
  • >-
( 1 I' Q-:;'
  • ;\3 \(1-)(-.')
Putting Q = Pf - Pi and USlilg ) cf"r e ::: Pllj d Q we obtain from (12) and (13) (13) 1/ 13 "- I {i!;' C; r1l ([ ..., T '«(1) "-\. "1), 1 /1" [cri J (Q-]Jt-)+ c:t J (llf/: )(14) r ./l 1/ 3/J.- ).... c.. 0 f vl,u L t;.., which is to be evaluated between phonon-occupation number eigenstates. Phonon-Phonon Interaction are We take the third order part of the hydrodynamic Hamiltonian as given by Landau + Khalatnikov. 3 f r (15) .pi where) .- the fluctuating part.of the mass density is given by times the second term in (II). If ,;e define U",," -'?{ J 2, -] if (Maris) (16) ( 17) Internal note, R. Golub, 1977 Beauvois et al 1605.02638 Cold Neutrons
slide-24
SLIDE 24 DARK MATTER AND QUANTUM PHASES

MULTI-EXCITATIONS

▸ emit back-to-back excitations to bleed off energy while conserving momentum ▸ Quantize the fluid Hamiltonian, like SHO
  • pi
  • pf
  • q
  • k1
  • k2
He Schutz, KZ 1604.08206 H0 = 1 2 X k ⇣ ρ0v~ kv−~ k + φ(k)ρ~ kρ−~ k m2 HeS(k) = hρkρ−ki
slide-25
SLIDE 25 HELIUM

RESULTS

Great potential! Schutz, KZ 1604.08206 Analytic Numeric 0.01 0.1 1 10 10-44 10-43 10-42 10-41 10-40 10-39 10-38 10-37 10-36 10-35 mc @MeVêc2D sp @cm2D Sensitivity to DM via a Massive Mediator m f =1 MeV, a p =10
  • 1
1 m f =10 MeV, a p =10
  • 1
1 m f =100 MeV, a p =10
  • 9
NR 1 meV 2 X 1 m e V Analytic Numeric 0.01 0.1 1 10 10-44 10-43 10-42 10-41 10-40 10-39 10-38 10-37 10-36 10-35 mc @MeVêc2D sp @cm2D Sensitivity to DM via a Massless Mediator ap=10-12 ap=10-15 ap=10-18 NR 1 meV 2 X 1 m e V
slide-26
SLIDE 26 REACH OF QUANTUM MATERIALS

DARK MATTER LANDSCAPE

mass 100 GeV 1 GeV 1 MeV 1 keV 1 eV 1 meV Traditional WIMP XENON1T LZ Semiconductors SuperCDMS Absorption Coherent Mode Production Graphene Super- conductors Superfluid Helium ~eV energy resolution ~keV energy resolution ~meV energy resolution QCD axion, “ultralight frontier” DAMIC, SENSEI ADMX
slide-27
SLIDE 27 REACH OF QUANTUM MATERIALS

COMPLEMENTARITY

DRAFT

  • χ []
σ [] ( ↑) ↑ = = χ //- (//)
  • ( )
( ) ( )
  • /
γ
  • -
() ()

DRAFT

  • χ []
σ []
  • γ
  • (
  • )
  • ()
=
  • =//-
=//
  • χ
σ
  • χ
  • γ
  • Cosmic Visions Whitepaper
slide-28
SLIDE 28 EXPERIMENTAL CONNECTIONS

ROAD FORWARD

▸ Large part depends on better energy resolution sensors (TESs or KIDs); TESs or KIDs are portable to multiple targets Athermal*Phonon*Se Superconducting Substrate (Al) Insulating layer TES and QP collection antennas (W) SuperConducting Bias Rails (Al) Semiconductors SuperCDMS Current energy resolution: ~300 eV Goal: ~1 eV Superconductors Goal: ~1 meV Superfluid Helium Goal: ~1 meV
slide-29
SLIDE 29 SUMMARY

ROAD FORWARD

▸ New ideas for dark matter detection! ▸ Moving beyond nuclear recoils into phases of matter crucial to access broader areas of DM parameter space ▸ Target diversity essential. graphene, superconductors, semiconductors, helium ….. Weyl semi-metal ▸ Leverage progress is materials and condensed matter physics ▸ Realizing experimental program is 5-10+ years into future ▸ Nine orders of magnitude increased sensitivity in mass ▸ Long view necessary!