spontaneous wave function collapse with frame dragging
play

Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging Lajos Di - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging Lajos Di osi Wigner Center, Budapest 25 Sept 2019, Frascati Supported by Foundational Questions Institute & Fetzer Franklin Fund National Research Development and Innovation Office


  1. Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging Lajos Di´ osi Wigner Center, Budapest 25 Sept 2019, Frascati Supported by Foundational Questions Institute & Fetzer Franklin Fund National Research Development and Innovation Office of Hungary Grant number K12435 Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 1 / 11

  2. 1 Spontaneous Collapse (SC) of Wave Functions 2 Stochastic Schr¨ odinger Equation (SSE) 3 Inertial motion: Newton vs SC 4 Schematics of frame dragging 5 Mathematics of SC with frame dragging 6 New SSE, frame dragging 7 Spontaneous Collapse (SC) with frame drag 8 Essential quantum nonlinearity 9 Spontaneous Collapses cause gravity Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 2 / 11

  3. Spontaneous Collapse (SC) of Wave Functions 50 yy: K´ arolyh´ azi, Pearle, GRW , Penrose, Gisin, D, Bassi, Adler, ... SC: 1 a hypothesis beyond standard quantum theory 2 similar to standard Collapse, but without measurement devices 3 happens universally and spontaneously every where and time 4 explains spontaneous emergence of classical data from | ψ � 5 retains the Born probabilities |� φ | ψ �| 2 6 keeps massive degrees of freedom well localized 6 Schr¨ odinger Cats are cruelly persecuted, they never come to existence, if you create one in your lab, she will die at birth. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 3 / 11

  4. Stochastic Schr¨ odinger Equation (SSE) SC yields randomness, Schr¨ odinger equation is replaced by SSE: d | ψ � = standard term + nonlinear term + stochastic term dt SSE tinily violates conservation of energy, momentum, continuity not detected so far - efforts could start just 10-15 yy ago d � ˆ H � d � ˆ p � d � ˆ ̺ � + �∇ ˆ � = 0 , � = −�∇ V (ˆ x ) � , J � � = 0 dt dt dt � � ∇ b ˆ T b � = 0 a Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 4 / 11

  5. Inertial motion: Newton vs SC t Newton’s definition of inertial frame: Free motion is rectilinear at constant speed. If it is not: we are in the wrong frame with non-Cartesian coordinates. We have to redefine x , y , z (maybe t , too)! Let free masses drag their local inertial frames with themselves! x Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 5 / 11

  6. Schematics of frame dragging Free motions t t t x x x under SC after frame shifts after frame boosts Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 6 / 11

  7. Mathematics of SC with frame dragging p � ; σ 2 = � ˆ x 2 c � ; R = � − 1 Re � ˆ x c =ˆ ˆ x −� ˆ x � ; ˆ p c =ˆ p −� ˆ x c ˆ p c � ; W =Wiener noise. SSE of SC: √ p 2 ˆ 2 D d | ψ � = − i 2 M | ψ � dt − D x 2 � 2 ˆ c | ψ � dt + x c | ψ � dW . ˆ � � LISA pathfinder’s data: D / (2 kg ) 2 ≤ 10 − 22 cm 2 / s 3 (Helou et al 2017). C.o.m. “diffusive” trajectory: √ √ M dt + σ 2 x � = � ˆ p � d � ˆ 8 DdW ; d � ˆ p � = R 8 DdW , � Frame draggings (“diffusive” ones), shift du and boost dv : √ √ du = vdt + σ 2 dv = 1 8 DdW ; 8 DdW M R � C.o.m. trajectory becomes inertial: x � = � ˆ p � d � ˆ M dt ; d � ˆ p � = 0 Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 7 / 11

  8. New SSE, with frame dragging x � ; σ 2 = � ˆ x 2 c � ; R = � − 1 Re � ˆ x c =ˆ ˆ x −� ˆ x � ; ˆ p c =ˆ x −� ˆ x c ˆ p c � ; W =Wiener noise. SSE of “old” SC: √ p 2 d | ψ � = − i 2 M | ψ � dt − D ˆ 2 D x 2 � 2 ˆ c | ψ � dt + x c | ψ � dW . ˆ � � New SSE of SC with frame dragging: √ � ˆ p 2 � 2 D d | ψ � = − i | ψ � dt − D 2 M + ˆ � 2 ˆ c ˆ ˆ A † A c | ψ � dt + A c | ψ � dW H ψ � � H ψ = 4 D Herm ˆ x c ˆ p c c − σ 2 ˆ ˆ R ) drag-induced nonlin Hamiltonian , ˆ x 2 � ( R ˆ R = � ˆ x c − � − 1 σ 2 ˆ A c = ˆ x c − 2 i [ R ˆ p c ] “Lindbladian” notation Solutions ≡ solutions of “old” SSE seen from the frame co-moving with the diffusive fluctuations of � ˆ x � t , � ˆ p � t . Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 8 / 11

  9. Spontaneous Collapse (SC) with frame drag just like old SC: 1 a hypothesis beyond standard quantum theory 2 similar to standard C, but without measurement devices 3 happens universally and spontaneously every where and time 4 explains spontaneous emergence of classical data from | ψ � 5 retains the Born probabilities |� φ | ψ �| 2 6 keeps massive degrees of freedom well localized 6 Schr¨ odinger Cats are cruelly persecuted, they never come to existence, if you create one in our lab, she will die at birth. plus 7 retains continuity of � ˆ x � t and conservation of � ˆ p � t but 8 contains “essential” quantum-mechanical non-linearity 9 waits implementation for microscopic SC theories Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 9 / 11

  10. Essential quantum non-linearity Faster Than Light communication? Perhaps no! SC will destroy FTL telegraph faster than Nicolas Gisin can finish constructing it in his lab. FTL telegraph assumes an entangled composite system AB of remote parts A and B, and standard collapse in B where B can be a single “massless” spin-half system. In SC theories, collapse of the spin does not happen unless it gets entangled with a massive system C, which means A has to be entangled with a massive system BC. System A , too, must be a massive system otherwise SC has ignorable effect on it. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 10 / 11

  11. Spontaneous Collapses cause gravity SC tinily violates conservation of energy, momentum, continuity: � � ∇ b ˆ T b � = 0 a What if local frame drags on fixed (Minkowski) metric does not help? Nevermind! Local frame drags (re-cordination) on fixed metric ≡ ≡ “dragged” new metric on fixed coordinates Let fluctuations of �∇ b ˆ T b a � drag metric with themselves, to reach � � ˆ T b ∇ cov = 0 b a on the curved space-time! Spontaneous Collapses can, contrary to lessons of 50 yy, conserve energy-momentum (in quantum mean) at the cost, rather a prize, that they generate gravity. The costly part is the, hopefully innocent, quantum nonlinearity. Newtonian limit of the vision should be tested on DP theory of SC. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Center, Budapest) Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse with Frame Dragging 25 Sept 2019, Frascati 11 / 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend