Spatial-temporal measurement of fragments and ligaments in secondary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

spatial temporal measurement of fragments and ligaments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Spatial-temporal measurement of fragments and ligaments in secondary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spatial-temporal measurement of fragments and ligaments in secondary atomization via high-speed DIH Longchao Yao a, b , Xuecheng Wu a , Jun Chen b , Paul E. Sojka b , Yingchun Wu a a State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spatial-temporal measurement of fragments and ligaments in secondary atomization via high-speed DIH

a State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 China b School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette 47907 USA

7 August, 2018

Longchao Yao a, b, Xuecheng Wu a, Jun Chen b, Paul E. Sojka b, Yingchun Wu a

Presenter: Yingchun Wu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Spray in engine Secondary atomization Breakup regimes

Liquid atomization has wide applications in liquid fuel combustion, agriculture spray, food processing, etc. Secondary atomization determines the final size and velocity.

We = 13, bag We = 25, multi-mode We = 50, shearing Energy , 35 (2) :806-813, 2010

Vibrational, We < ~11 Bag, ~11<We<~35 Multimode, ~35<We<~80 Shearing, ~80<We<~350 Catastrophic, We>~350

Background

(videos)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Motivation

Smaller droplets generated

  • Phys. Fluids 26

26, 072103 (2014)

Larger droplets generated

 Quantify 3D fragments and ligaments and their evolution in during secondary atomization.

 In bag and multi-mode (bag-stamen)

breakup

  • Establish onset of secondary

atomization

  • Two stages: bag rupture and rim

disintegration

  • Droplet size and velocity are

important parameters

  • Complicated 3D rim

2 g

u d We    ,

g

 

gas density

u  relative velocity d 

drop diameter

  surface tension

Weber number:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Needle g y z y x Air flow Spatial filter Beam expander Laser High-speed camera x z

Side View

Stream generator z1 x1 5 mm y x Syringe pump

Top View Frame rate: 20 kHz Ethanol drop,   0.0244N/m, a  1.177kg/m3, d0 = 2.34±0.02mm We = 11, bag breakup, We = 25 for multi-mode breakup in experiments

Gas generator High speed camera Laser and optics Disperse tip q  11°

Experimental setup

 A tilted illumination to reduce overlap  Use the bag burst point as start of time

t0 and origin of coordinates.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Method: Digital in-line holography (DIH)

Laser wave Particles

1 2 3 Recording Reconstruction

2 * * H O R O R O R O R

I E E I I E E E E      

EO EO is object wave that is scattered by particles (at the recording plane) ER = 1 is undisturbed reference wave

* * * * * * R H R O R R O R R O R

E I E I E I E E E E I     ER

DC term virtual image real image

ER

*

Back propagation along depth position (z)

refocus

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Method: Particle extraction

threshold

Reconstruction Image fusion Optimize threshold

gradient

Sobel Max G Extend edge by dilation, variance of gradient in this area as z focus criteria Global Individual particle

 Accurate and fast particle extraction.  z location is not vulnerable to edge

errors.

Real edge 3D position Particle size, 2D shape

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 (a) (b) (xi

p1, yi p1)

Edge Skeleton (xi

p2, yi p2)

qi wi (xi

A, yi A)

(xi

D, yi D)

(xi

B, yi B)

(xi

C, yi C)

(xi, yi)

zi

(c) (d)

Steps to extract ligaments and fragments

Method: Ligament extraction

Helical spring demonstration

 Obtain edge and skeleton  Determine local section in the red box  Locate z position of local section as an individual particle  Stitch local sections to be an entire ligament

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Results: Calibration

Diameter uncertainty z position uncertainty

 Diameter error is about ±1 pixel  Raw z location error is about ±10 pixel  Robust local linear regression is applied to smooth the z position and remove outlier.

Spring calibration

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 t = t0 + 3.45ms t = t0 + 4.05ms t = t0 + 4.55ms t = t0 + 5.45ms t = t0 + 6.95ms t = t0 + 8.65ms

Results: Ligament extraction

t0 + 3.45ms

Accurate z location Removed outliers

 Optimal threshold ensures

accurate size

 z smoothness improves local

z position accuracy

 Ligament evolution are

  • btained form sequential

holograms Depth-of-field extended images

We = 11, bag breakup

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Results: Ligament evolution

3D view (video) z-y view (video)

Rim/ligaments are reconstructed and 3D visualized during 5ms after bag burst (15 selected frames)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

g air t = t0 + 0.2ms 1 mm

100μm

(a) (b)

g air t = t0 + 3ms 5 mm

(c) (d)

500μm

Bag burst:

 Small droplets (< 30μm)  3.64X (5.5μm pixel size)  Within ~0.5ms after tip burst.  Higher velocity (up to 9m/s)

Bag fragmentation:

 Larger droplets (50-300μm)  1X (20μm pixel size)  0.5-4ms after tip burst.  Lower velocity (< 5m/s)

Results: Fragment extraction

A magnifying lens is used for droplets at bag burst

Rim breakup:  Even larger droplets (may be >500μm)  Not detailed in our study

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

t = t0 + 0.2ms t = t0 + 0.8ms t = t0 + 3ms Number PDFs Volume PDFs

Results: Fragment size

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Results: Fragment evolution

 Droplets move faster at bag burst, slower at bag

  • fragmentation. Even negative velocities appear because of

back propagation of the bag wall.

 Velocity shows strong relevance to time and weak relevance

to diameter. The time span is too short for droplet acceleration with drag force. Initial velocity plays a more important role.

 Higher magnification is able to detect more smaller droplets

but include less larger droplets. Lower magnification exclude droplets smaller than 50μm. Thus there is a diameter gap.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

 Ligament and fragment volume is

relatively stable before rim breakup.

 Rim/ligament volume transfers to

fragments after rim breakup.

 Total volume of about the initial

volume despite fluctuation caused by uncertainty

Results: Ligament-fragment volume

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

clean branch clean trunk

Results: Multi-branch ligaments

 Ligament criteria: Major axis length > 2mm, aspect ratio > 5 or solidity < 0.5  Remove the spurs  Separate branches and save them  Deal with each branch and stitch them together

We = 25, Multi-mode breakup hologram Depth-of-field extended image Measurement of multi-branch ligament is an improvement.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

t = t0 + 2.38ms t = t0 + 3.94ms t = t0 + 3.38ms t = t0 + 2.75ms

Results: Multi-branch ligaments

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

 Bag residues may be recognized as compact ligament  Overlap problem  5% size error will lead to ~14.5% volume error

Relatively large uncertainty (up to 17%) is probably due to Volume evolution is studied from 32 frames during 1.94ms

Results: Multi-branch ligaments

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Conclusions

  • 1. 3D morphology and evolution of rims and ligaments in bag and multi-mode breakup is

measured using an automatic algorithm.

  • 2. With a small tilted angle, overlap problem is to some extent avoided.
  • 3. Time-resolved size and velocity of fragments are analyzed by using two magnification

for different stages.

  • 4. Volumes of rim/ligament and secondary droplets add up to nearly 100%, despite some

fluctuation caused by measurement uncertainty.

  • 5. Analytical work is expected to explain the interesting results (e.g. multi-modal size

distribution and back-propagation of fragments) in the future.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank You for Your Attention!