Skin Depth Investigation
Lei Zang The University of Sheffield
1
Skin Depth Investigation Lei Zang The University of Sheffield 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Skin Depth Investigation Lei Zang The University of Sheffield 1 Introduction: CST STUDIO CST STUDIO is a package of tools for designing, simulating and optimizing electromagnetic systems. CST: Computer Simulation Technology It
Lei Zang The University of Sheffield
1
electromagnetic systems.
CABLE Studio
Integration Algorithm*”
*T. Weiland, "A Discretization Method for the Solution of Maxwell’s Equations for Six-Component Fields", Electronics and Communication, (AEÜ), Vol. 31, p.116, 1977 2
3
20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
FC2 data Bz CST Bz
Bz [T] Longitudinal Position [mm]
measurement data at low current (1.36 kA)
20 40 60 80 100
0.000 0.005 0.010
FC2 data Bx CST Bx
Bx [T] Longitudinal Position [mm]
Bz Bx
Bore Central Core Slit Primary Coil Primary Current Induced Current
FLUX Concentrator
primary coil.
the inner core through the slit.
has a path near inner surface Field measurement and simulation results agreed very well!!
4
For the first step:
What is the skin depth in the horn neck section?
5
Aluminium Material Al, Al alloy and Al alloy at 75oC
Current Path AC Current Frequency 625Hz
Calculate the current density in the middle position z=100mm
6
characterized by the skin depth. At this depth, the current density is 1/e~0.37 of that at the conductor surface.
permeability and σ is the conductivity.
𝜀 = 2 𝜕𝜈𝜏 [𝑛]
Aluminium Skin Depth= 3.46mm Theoretical prediction=3.28mm 6061-T6 Skin Depth=4.17mm Theoretical prediction=4.02mm
7
At 75 degree, 6061-T6’s resistivity=4.7 e-8 ohm-m Skin depth = 4.45mm Theoretical prediction=4.36mm CST and theory agrees well for a simple cylinder
capable of doing this calculation.
Now, how about a HORN?
8
9
Max=2.3e+11 Min=1.8e+11 Current density will not drop to 1/e
10
(Tested with different frequency, material and resistivity)
geometry such as a cylinder. In which case, CST agrees well with it.
indicated a current density degradation of 22%.
be relatively uniform.
11
like to see the results again with the realistic geometry. I expect they are the same.
power.
realistic 3D field should return a more accurate neutrino yield.
12