Shower reco validation Test sample Aaron Higuera University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

shower reco validation test sample
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Shower reco validation Test sample Aaron Higuera University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Shower reco validation Test sample Aaron Higuera University of Houston Shower Reco Validation Test sample (new) MC: /pnfs/dune/scratch/users/tjyang/v08_21_00/reco/ mcc12_protodune_beam_p1GeV_cosmics_12ms_test/files.list data:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Aaron Higuera

University of Houston

Shower reco validation Test sample

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Shower Reco Validation

2

  • ld

Data Test sample Data

  • ld

MCC11 Test sample MCC12 electron trigger eff 61.5% 66.7% N/A N/A primary as shower 52.2% 50.2% 61.5% 58.9% Test sample (new) MC: /pnfs/dune/scratch/users/tjyang/v08_21_00/reco/

mcc12_protodune_beam_p1GeV_cosmics_12ms_test/files.list

data: /pnfs/dune/scratch/users/tjyang/mcc12test/r5809/v1/r5809.v1.txt Old sample MC: mcc11_pd_sp_sce_1.0GeV_histats data: runset-5809-reco-unified-hv-180kV-beam-1GeV-v0

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

new

  • ld

10599 primary as shower 10599 primary as track followed by a shower

Shower Reco Validation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

new

  • ld

10608 primary as track followed by shower 10608 primary as single shower

Shower Reco Validation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

new

  • ld

10682 primary as shower 10682 primary as shower

Shower Reco Validation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

new

  • ld

10690 primary as track followed by a shower 10690 primary as track followed by a showers

Shower Reco Validation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

new

  • ld

10734 primary as shower followed by another shower 10734 primary as shower followed by another shower

Shower Reco Validation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Shower Reco Validation

new

100 − 90 − 80 − 70 − 60 − 50 − 40 − 30 − 20 − 10 − Vertex X (cm) 20 40 60 80 100 120

Area Normalized

MC w/SCE 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 Vertex Y (cm) 20 40 60 80 100

Area Normalized

MC w/SCE 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Vertex Z (cm) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Area Normalized

MC w/SCE 100 − 90 − 80 − 70 − 60 − 50 − 40 − 30 − 20 − 10 − Vertex X (cm) 100 200 300 400 500

Area Normalized

MCC11 w/SCE Data 5809

300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 Vertex Y (cm) 100 200 300 400 500

Area Normalized

MCC11 w/SCE Data 5809

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Vertex Z (cm) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Area Normalized

MCC11 w/SCE Data 5809

  • ld
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Shower length (cm) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Area Normalized

MC w/SCE

Shower Reco Validation

new

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Shower length (cm) 20 40 60 80 100 120

Area Normalized

MC w/SCE

  • ld
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Shower Reco Validation

new

  • ld

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 dE/dx (MeV/cm) Arbitrary Units

MCC11 w/SCE Data 5809

dE/dx at the beginning of the shower

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 dE/dx (MeV/cm) Arbitrary Units

MC w/SCE

dE/dx at the beginning of the shower

Warning X-corrections are from the old calibration New X & YZ correction are calculated after SCE correction There is no SCE correction infrastructure for showers

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Summary

11

Overall everything looks OK A known problem is still there, when shower breaks into small showers. What about shower stitching? In some cases electrons are reconstructed as a track at the begging of the shower A little tune up for the shower it is necessary e.g. if there is a very small track followed by a big shower probably we can merged everything into a single shower SCE corrections? There is no calorimetry information from pandora and SCE corrections have been developed only for tracks

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

The End