SHOCK ACCELERATION SHOCK ACCELERATION IN PARTIALLY IONIZED - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

shock acceleration shock acceleration in partially
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SHOCK ACCELERATION SHOCK ACCELERATION IN PARTIALLY IONIZED - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SHOCK ACCELERATION SHOCK ACCELERATION IN PARTIALLY IONIZED PLASMAS IN PARTIALLY IONIZED PLASMAS Giovanni Morlino Giovanni Morlino INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri In collaboration with: Elena Amato, Pasquale Blasi, Damiano


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SHOCK ACCELERATION SHOCK ACCELERATION IN PARTIALLY IONIZED PLASMAS IN PARTIALLY IONIZED PLASMAS

Giovanni Morlino Giovanni Morlino

INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri In collaboration with: Elena Amato, Pasquale Blasi, Damiano Caprioli, Rino Bandiera

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

TeV Particle Astrophysics Paris, July 19th - 23th, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Acceleration at collisionless shocks propagating in partially neutral plasmas Why it is relevant: the environment of SNRs Balmer shocks Observational evidences of CRs influence onto Balmer shocks Theoretical model Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Shocks in Partially Neutral Plasmas are Important?

Theory of shock acceleration is usually developed in totally ionized plasma

  • Good approximation for Type II SNR which expand in the pre-stellar wind

(T~ 105-107 K) → hydrogen is totally ionized

  • Bad approximation for Type I/a SNR which expand in the ISM (T~ 104 K)

→ hydrogen is partially ionized → even if T < 104 K minimum degree →

  • f ionization for young SNR is ~20% due

to the ionizing radiation coming from the remnant itself

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Shocks in Partially Neutral Plasmas are Important?

1) Does the shock structure change when expanding in partially neutral plasma? 2) Can neutral particle affect the CR production efficiency? At zeroth order the neutral component does not feel the electromagnetic shock discontinuity

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Ui0 Ui2 Lprec

upstream downsteam Collisionless subshock Velocity of neutral component Velocity of ionized component BUT...

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Balmer-Dominated Shocks

Balmer-dominated shocks are associated with faint optical filaments observed around young SNRs 1) Shock speed ~ 200 - 9000 km/s 2) Typical ISM density ~ 0.1 - 1 cm-3 3) Presence of strong hydrogen lines with narrow (10 km/s) and broad (1000 km/s) components 4) General lack of non-thermal X-ray emission SN 1006 – Hα emission

… neutral particles do produce radiation associated with shock transition

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Balmer-Dominated Shocks

SN 1006 Kepler Optical Balmer shocks associated with SNRs RCW 86 Tycho Optical bow shocks associated with PWNe

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Balmer-dominated Shocks: Basic Principles

upstream

downstream

Lion LCE

VELOCITY PROFILE

upstream

downstream

shock

Downstream of the shock cold hydrogen atoms can charge exchange with hot shocked protons, giving rise to a population of hot hydrogen atoms

DENSITY PROFILE

CE ion Interaction Rate= n pvrelCEvrel

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Balmer-dominated Shocks: Basic Principles

upstream

downstream

shock

upstream

downstream

Lion LCE

VELOCITY PROFILE DENSITY PROFILE

W n=  8ln2 k T 0 mH = 21km/s  T 0 10

4 K  1/2

W b=  8ln2 k T 2 mH = 4vsh 1  ln2−1= 1.02 vsh

FWHM of narrow line FWHM of broad line

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Balmer-dominated Shocks: Basic Principles

There are evidences that Balmer shock physics is not so simple... Let analyse three different observational evidences

  • f shock modification
slide-10
SLIDE 10

1) Balmer-Dominated Shocks associated with X-ray Emission

From Helder et al., 2009

W broad= 1100±63km/s  T 2= 2.3±0.3keV

Shock speed from proper motion

v shock= 6000±2800km/s  d 2.5±.5kpc  ˙ obs 0.5±.2' ' yr

−1  T 2= 20−150 keV noequilibration

12−90keV equilibration

Dowstream temperature from broad Hα line

Helder et al. infer that > 50% of the post shock pressure is due to CRs.

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-11
SLIDE 11

2) Narrow Hα Lines with Unusual Broad Width

The Hα FWHM of narrow lines measured from Balmer Shocks gives an estimate of upstream temperature But for temperature above 104 K hydrogen is expected to be completely ionized → We need a mechanism able to heat the neutral ISM component in a time less than the ionization time

From Sollerman at al., 2003

W n~30−50 km/sT ~2−610

4 K

W n=  8ln2 k T 0 mH = 21km/s  T 0 10

4 K  1/2

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lee et al. 2007

KPNO

3) Precursor in Balmer-Dominated Shocks: the Case of Tycho

Chandra

Warren et al. 2005

1) Evidence of Hα emission from the precursor which contribute up to 30-40% of the total narrow Hα emission: → different temperature and/or different bulk speed between ions and neutrals in the precursor region 2) The knot g in Tycho remnant is associated with non-thermal X-ray emission → the shock may accelerate particles efficiently

Lee et al., 2010

(Observation with the Hubble Space Telescope)

Knot g

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-13
SLIDE 13

3) Precursor in Balmer-Dominated Shocks: the Case of Tycho

1) Shock speed inferred from Broad lines < measured speed → a fraction of kinetic energy is converted into nonthermal particles 2) Broad narrow component imply upstream T0 > 104 K → neutral hydrogen has to be heated ahead of the shock in a time < collisional time 3) Evidence of Hα (narrow line) emission ahead of the shock: → protons and neutral hydrogen have different temperatures and/or different bulk velocities in the precursor

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Can we explain all these features with the presence of accelerated CRs?

Need the presence of a precursor

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Balmer-Dominated Shocks with CRs Acceleration

velocity profile u(x) in the shock frame

Ls~ r L pth≃ 10

10cm

B G 

−1

u0 3000km/s

Un0=Ui0 Ui2 Un2=Un0

upstream

downstream

Lion LCE Ui0 Ui2 Lprec vrel≠0 Ui1 Un2 U0 Ui2 LCE

Lion~ u0ion= u2 n pion vrel ≃ 10

16cm

n p 1cm

−3 −1

LCE~ u0CE= u2 n pCE vrel ≃ 10

15cm

n p 1cm

−3 −1

L prec~ D pmax u0 ≃ 10

17cm

B G 

−1

E TeV  u0 3000 km/s

−1

L prec/Lion 0.1 L prec/LCE~ 10−100

Sub-shock thickness Ionization and charge-exchange length Precursor length Ionization and charge exchange length in the upstream Unmodified shock Shock modified by CRs Shock with CRs and neutrals

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Modified Shocks in Plasma with Neutral Component: Fluid Equations

∂ ∂ x [iui]= qM ∂ ∂ x [iui

2PiPCR]= qm

∂ ∂ x[ 1 2 iui

3

 −1 ui Pi]= −ui ∂PCR ∂ x qe ∂ ∂ x [nun]= −qM ∂ ∂ x [nun

2Pn]= −qm

∂ ∂ x[ 1 2 nun

3 

−1 un Pn]= −qe

Ionized component (interacting with CRs) Neutral component

MASS FLUX MOMENTUM FLUX ENERGY FLUX

qM x= ∫dvndviion∣vrel∣ f nx ,vn f ix ,vi qmx= ∫dvndvivn−viionCE∣vrel∣ f nx ,vn f ix ,vi qex= ∫dvndvi 1 2 vn

2−vi 2ionCE∣vrel∣ f nx ,vn f ix ,vi

MASS TRANSFER MOMENTUM TRANSFER ENRGY TRANSFER

∂ f ∂t   v⋅∇ f = f x , vRx , v

Time-independent Boltzmann equation

We assume both the distribution functions to be maxwellian

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Effect of Charge-Exchange in the Upstream

Upstream Velocity profile Upstream Temperature profile

T 0= 10

4K ;

B0= 10G n0= 1cm

−3;

f N= 0.5; u0= 3000km/s; pmax= 10

4mp c

inj= 3.7 ; PCR/i,0u0

2= 0.8

inj= 3.9 ; PCR/i,0u0

2= 0.15

inj= 4.0; PCR/i,0u0

2= 0.06

Initial conditions

U nx U ix PCR x T ix T n x

Acceleration efficiency

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Temperature of Neutral Hydrogen

Upstream Temperature as function

  • f injection efficiency

CR pressure and upstream Mach number as function of injection efficiency

T i,1 T n,1 PCR/i,0u0

2

M i,1

Even a modest acceleration efficiency (around few %) is able to heat the neutral plasma To explain the observed temperature of neutral hydrogen (T < 105 ) we need a CR efficiency < 10%

Region of observed temperature Region of inferred CR efficiency

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Which are the (indirect) effects of Neutral Hydrogen on CRs Spectrum?

Spectrum slope

U ix PCR: 0.98  0.81; Rt: 81  7.8; Rs: 2.25  3.56; T 1: 1.910

5 K

 5.510

6K ;

Initial conditions:

f  p∝ p

−q p

U ix PCR x

T 0= 10

4K ; B0= 10G; n0= 1cm −3; f N= 0.5; u0= 3000km/s; pmax= 10 4mpc ;inj= 3.7 ;

f N= 0; f N= 0.5;

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010

Upstream Velocity profile and CRs pressure

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CONCLUSIONS

CRs acceleration at shocks is strongly affected by the presence of a non negligible fraction of neutral hydrogen because the charge exchange process 1) The neutral hydrogen can be efficiently heated in the precursor even in the case of inefficient shock acceleration (єCR~few%) → this can explain the broad narrow lines → predicts the presence of narrow lines ahead of the shock 2) Also the ionized component is heated in the precursor and as a consequence → the shock modification and the CR spectrum concavity are reduced (the same effect is produced by turbulent heating and magnetic field amplification) We are currently applying the theory to single SNR → detailed results will be available soon

  • G. Morlino, Paris - 22 July 2010