Pulsars at low radio frequencies Vlad Kondratiev (ASTRON) Science - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pulsars at low radio frequencies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pulsars at low radio frequencies Vlad Kondratiev (ASTRON) Science - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pulsars at low radio frequencies Vlad Kondratiev (ASTRON) Science at Low Frequencies III Caltech, Pasadena, CA Dec 9, 2016 Renaissance of low radio frequencies DE601 IPS array LOFAR SKA Low NenuFAR Ooty RT LWA DKR- MWA UTR-2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pulsars at low radio frequencies

Vlad Kondratiev (ASTRON)

Science at Low Frequencies III — Caltech, Pasadena, CA — Dec 9, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Renaissance of low radio frequencies

NenuFAR DE601 LOFAR LWA MWA IPS array Ooty RT BSA DKR- 1000 GURT UTR-2 URAN-3 SKA Low VLA uGMRT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Renaissance of low radio frequencies

Before: Now:

▶ mostly transit instruments ▶ limited BW and/or Pol ▶ full tracking (rise-set) ▶ large BW

huge → Δf/f

▶ dual pols

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pulsar science at low freqs

  • pulsar population studies
  • emission mechanism
  • intervening medium (ISM, IPM, ionosphere)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pulsar science at low freqs

  • pulsar population studies

→ Surveys

  • emission mechanism
  • intervening medium (ISM, IPM, ionosphere)

➤ Complete PSR samples

stellar evolution studies →

➤ Compact systems

GR tests →

➤ Many more MSPs

GW detection →

➤ Many other interesting and exotic systems

→ formation/evolution studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Low-frequency pulsar surveys

Pros: Cons:

▶ large FoV

faster →

▶ good for steep-spectra sources ▶ easy localization of the promising candidates with

multiple TABs in single follow-up observation

▶ precursors for SKA-Low pulsar survey(s) ▶ dispersion and scattering are more pronounced ▶ low-freq

Tsys is higher, but … →

▶ can do larger dwell times

FRBs, RRATs →

▶ much larger data volume ▶ much more processing (more DM trials) ▶ more RFI?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Low-frequency pulsar surveys

Pros: Cons:

▶ large FoV

faster →

▶ good for steep-spectra sources ▶ easy localization of the promising candidates with

multiple TABs in single follow-up observation

▶ precursors for SKA-Low pulsar survey(s) ▶ dispersion and scattering are more pronounced ▶ low-freq

Tsys is higher, but … →

▶ can do larger dwell times

FRBs, RRATs →

▶ much larger data volume ▶ much more processing (more DM trials) ▶ more RFI?

✔ LOTAAS (survey for pulsars and fast transients with LOFAR) ✔ LNCC (LWA Northern Celestial Cap, irregular observations) ✔ MWA (planned in the near future)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LOTAAS vs. others

GBNCC SKA1-Low LOTAAS

(coherent beams)

frequency (MHz) 350 135 200 data rate (x GBNCC) 1 25 ~50 – 100 field of view (sq. deg.) 0.25 10 1 number of beams 1 219 500 dwell time (min) 2 60 10 sensitivity (x GBNCC): instantaneous 1 0.4 9 cumulative 1 2 20

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LOFAR Tied-Array All-sky Survey (LOTAAS)

http://www.astron.nl/lotaas/

  • LOFAR ''Superterp'' (12

innermost HBA sub-stations)

  • Currently for DEC > 0 deg
  • Find MSPs out to DM ~50 pc/cc
  • Smin ~ 3 mJy @ 135 MHz
  • The SKA-Low precursor survey

LOTAAS team: Jason Hessels, Ben Stappers, Vlad Kondratiev, Sotiris Sanidas, Sally Cooper, Daniele Michilli, Chia Min Tan, Cees Bassa, Ziggy Pleunis, Joeri van Leeuwen +LOFAR PWG

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LOTAAS

  • 3 sub-array pointings (SAPs,

incoherent beams), ~ 30 sq.

  • deg. total per pointing
  • + 4 rings (61 tied-array beams,

TABs) for each SAP, ~9 sq. deg. total per pointing

  • + 12 additional TABs pointed

towards known pulsars

  • => total of 222 TABs
  • 119 – 151 MHz
  • BW = 32 MHz
  • frequency channel =12 kHz
  • dt = 492 µs
  • dwell time = 1 hour

1 SAP TABs (4 rings) 1 survey pointing in red 4 survey pointings are shown in total

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LOTAAS

  • 1 pass (sparse) to cover

Northern hemisphere with incoherent beams (651 pointings needed)

  • 3 passes to cover Northern

hemisphere with TABs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LOTAAS: Observing/Processing status

Cartesius – Dutch national supercomputer 55M core-hours allocated

  • 1045 pointings observed so far (as of

Nov 11, 2016; Pass A – complete; Pass B – 61%)

  • 977 processed (searched)
  • Processing on Cartesius:

3 hrs/beam on 24-core node

  • 2+ PB of data collected and archived
  • Periodicity & single-pulse searches

(20M+ cands, 50M+ SP cands)

  • Machine-learning classifier
  • 200 cands/pointing (periodicity

classifier, Lyon+15

  • 50 cands/pointing (SP classifier)
  • 100+ known pulsars redetections
slide-13
SLIDE 13

LOTAAS: Observing/Processing status

Cartesius – Dutch national supercomputer 55M hours allocated

  • 1045 pointings observed so far (as of

Nov 11, 2016; Pass A – complete; Pass B – 61%)

  • 977 processed (searched)
  • Processing on Cartesius:

3 hrs/beam on 24-core node

  • 2+ PB of data collected and archived
  • Periodicity & single-pulse searches

(20M+ cands, 50M+ SP cands)

  • Machine-learning classifier
  • 200 cands/pointing (periodicity

classifier, Lyon+15

  • 50 cands/pointing (SP classifier)
  • 100+ known pulsars redetections
slide-14
SLIDE 14

LOTAAS: Discovery status

http://www.astron.nl/lotaas/

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LOTAAS: Discovery status

  • 53 pulsars discovered

so far! (as of Dec 7, 2016)

  • 1 confirmed MSP!

(2 more not-yet confirmed)

  • 5 RRATs
  • Currently 1 new pulsar per

20 hrs of observing

  • Currently at ~1 discovery

per 150 sq. deg. – at the moment somewhat lower than predicted

  • Timing with LOFAR and

Lovell telescope at 1.4 GHz

http://www.astron.nl/lotaas/

Pass B

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pleunis

First LOFAR millisecond pulsar

J1552+5436

▸ Fermi Unid targeted

searches

▸ First MSP discovered

at < 300 MHz

▸ Steep spectrum as

many other MSPs ( < –2.6) α

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Cooper

Low-lum nearby source

J1529+40

DM = 6.5 pc/cc d = 0.5 kpc

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Michilli

RRAT

J0139+33

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pulsar science at low freqs

  • pulsar population studies
  • emission mechanism
  • intervening medium (ISM, IPM, ionosphere)

➤ Spectra (turnover, GHz-peaked spectra) ➤ Polarization ➤ Profile evolution ➤ Moding, drifting subpulses, giant pulses, etc.

(see also posters by Bradley Meyers & Franz Kirsten)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hassall et al. 2012

Pulsar science at low freqs

  • pulsar population studies
  • emission mechanism
  • intervening medium (ISM, IPM, ionosphere)

➤ Spectra (turnover, GHz-peaked spectra) ➤ Polarization ➤ Profile evolution ➤ Moding, drifting subpulses, giant pulses, etc.

(see also posters by Bradley Meyers & Franz Kirsten)

Log (Flux density) Log (frequency)

? ~ να

Carousel model (Rankin et al. 2006)

Also next talks in this session

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

LOFAR Censuses

Bilous et al. 2016

→ 194 Northern sources, δ > 8˚ → outside Galactic plane, |b| > 3˚ → not in Globular clusters → good coordinates, position errors < 130˝

  • LC1_003
  • Feb-May 2014
  • Full core
  • HBA, 110−188 MHz
  • 400 subs

split in 32 → −256 chan

  • IQUV
  • Δt = 163.84 µs −1.31 ms
  • 20 min, or at least 1000 periods

(1 observation) Observations Kondratiev et al. 2016 → Exploratory observations and preparation for pulsar timing → Cycle 0 (most), Cycle 1-2 (some) → Full Core → HBA, 110−188 MHz LBA, 15−93 MHz → 400 subs → Complex-voltage data → Δt = 5.12 µs → Typically 20 min (LBA − 1 hour) Spectra work

  • Not a single observation, but

many more data (!): → total number of HBA obs = 1508; (LBA obs = 18)

  • Mainly timing data (Cycles 0−6)

MSPs normal PSRs

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Census' profiles of slow pulsars

Bilous et al. 2016

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MSP profiles

Kondratiev et al. 2016 (best single observation)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Bilous et al. 2016

Census' spectra of slow pulsars

slide-26
SLIDE 26

MSP Spectra

Preliminary

Kondratiev et al., in prep.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Average profile polarization

20 bright pulsars combining HBA polarization data with higher frequencies magnetospheric birefringence cannot be a sole explanation of

  • bserved evolution of polarized fraction with frequency

scattering can mimic Faraday rotation leading to phase- dependent RMs (but much smaller variation than at 1400 MHz) Noutsos et al. 2015

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The «chameleon» pulsar B0943+10

Hermsen et al. 2013, Science

X-rays weak and unpulsed Radio pulses bright and

  • rderly

B-mode

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The «chameleon» pulsar B0943+10

Hermsen et al. 2013, Science

X-rays bright and pulsed Radio pulses weak and disorderly

Q-mode

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The «chameleon» pulsar B0943+10 with LBAs

Discovery of a systematic B-mode profile delay

Bilous et al. 2014

slide-31
SLIDE 31

LOFAR+Arecibo+LWA Mereghetti et al. 2016

The «chameleon» pulsar B0943+10

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Pulsar science at low freqs

  • pulsar population studies
  • emission mechanism
  • intervening medium (ISM, IPM, ionosphere)

➤ DM / RM / scattering (see also poster by Veronica Dike) ➤ Scintillation studies ➤ Solar wind, CMEs (talk by Greg Taylor) ➤ Space weather

input to high-freq timing → (DM chromaticity?)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Geyer et al., to be submitted Verbiest et al., in prep. Sobey et al., in prep. Howard et al. 2016

LWA

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary:

  • Renaissance of low-frequency pulsar astronomy
  • Low-frequency pulsar surveys are challenging but ideal to search for steep-

spectrum sources and transients. Will pave the road for the SKA-Low

  • Low frequencies are excellent to study pulsars and provide a complementary

view to study pulsar emission mechanism and ISM

  • Synergy/complementation with high-freq observations, space weather

monitoring