Satellite Imagery Semantic Segmentation Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

satellite imagery semantic segmentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Satellite Imagery Semantic Segmentation Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Incorporating Spectral Unmixing in Satellite Imagery Semantic Segmentation Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani, Hairong Qi University of Tennessee, Department of EECS Motivation: Deep learning-based networks need a large dataset for training due to a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Incorporating Spectral Unmixing in Satellite Imagery Semantic Segmentation

Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani, Hairong Qi University of Tennessee, Department of EECS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation:

▪ Deep learning-based networks need a large dataset for training due to a huge number of hyper-parameters. ▪ Challenges in remote sensing area:

  • Difficulty in obtaining a large number of labeled training samples due to the high-

resolution and large coverage of satellite images.

  • The existence of mixed pixels that would result in mixed spectral readings due to

environmental interference as well as the large footprint of the sensing device.

Encoder Decoder

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Main Idea:

▪ Employing the spectral unmixing method as a feature extraction step to entangle the intertwined reflectances of the given images and obtain the advanced features as extra domain information. ▪ Decompose a mixture into constituent materials (endmembers, A) and their proportions (abundance, S). ▪ Physical constraints (nonnegativity & sum- to-one) ▪ Unsupervised (both A and S are unknown)

  • vs. Supervised (A is known)
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Approach:

MVC-NMF FCLS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Dataset:

▪ Dataset was obtained from Kaggle Competition: “Dstl Satellite Imagery Feature Detection”

 Imbalanced data Distributions of target classes

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% Building Structure Track Trees Crops Waterways Standing water

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experimental Results:

Test image:

▪ The probability of pixels belonging to each class

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experimental Results:

▪ The segmentation accuracy (without any post processing) for different classes in terms of Intersection Over Union (IOU%)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Building Structure Track Trees Crops Avg. Baseline [Pan, RGB, MSI] Unmixing-based [Pan, RGB, MSI] Baseline [Pan, RGB, MSI, 4Ratios] Unmixing-based [Pan, RGB, MSI, 4Ratios]

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Conclusion:

▪ The abundance maps as extra information along with spectral bands enhance the segmentation accuracy and increase the confidence of network in predicting the label for each pixel. ▪ Adding abundance maps to improve the segmentation accuracy is more effective when the training samples are limited

slide-9
SLIDE 9