1
M A Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6
SAN FRANCISCO M A Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 1 MEGATRENDS 1. Commercial - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SAN FRANCISCO M A Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 1 MEGATRENDS 1. Commercial real estate moves in cycles, and there is evidence we are approaching the mature phase of the cycle. . . 2. . . .Yet capital continues to flow into commercial real estate 3.
1
M A Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6
2
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
3
4
*12 months ending in March 2016 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
C H A N G E I N PAY R O L L J O B S ( T H O U S A N D S )
2000 4000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*
Payroll Job Change | United States
Current expansion period: 83 months Average expansion period since 1945: 58 months
5
Note: Includes all asset classes Source: NCREIF, NGKF Research; May 2016
T O TA L C A L E N D A R Y E A R R E T U R N
NCREIF Property Index | United States
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Current expansion period: 26 quarters Average expansion period since 1978: 31 quarters
6
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, NGKF Research; May 2016
C O R P O R AT E P R O F I T S ( B I L L I O N S )
Corporate Profits | United States $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Percent change from same quarter a year ago P E R C E N TA G E C H A N G E
Non-Farm Business Worker Productivity | United States
8
2% Productivity Loss Offsets Cost Savings From Densification
2% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS AS A % OF RENT SAVINGS
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 2% productivity loss as a percent of rent savings from densification Equilibrium
Note: Ten largest metropolitan areas by employment base in 2015; assumes 10% reduction of rentable space Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
9
Gains In Productivity Can Offset Cost of Trophy Upgrade
*Expressed as a percentage of annual wage Note: Ten largest metropolitan areas by employment base in 2015; assumes 5% reduction of rentable space Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
C O S T O F T R O P H Y U P G R A D E ( P E R E M P L O Y E E )
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6%
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Additional annual rent per employee Productivity gain*
A N N U A L V A L U E G A I N E D F R O M I N C R E A S E D P R O D U C T I V I T Y ( P E R E M P L O Y E E )
10
What’s Next? | Discipline is Critical in the Next 12-24 Months
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
11
12
CRE Outperforms Stocks and Bonds
Source: NCREIF, Bloomberg, NGKF Research; May 2016
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 1-Year 10-Year 20-Year U.S. REAL ESTATE: NCREIF Property Index STOCKS: S&P 500 Index BONDS: Bloomberg U.S. Government Bond Index A N N U A L I Z E D T O TA L R E T U R N A S O F M A R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 6
13
Institutional Allocations to Commercial Real Estate Have Increased
Source: PREA, NGKF Research; May 2016
4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1996 2007 2014 C O M M E R C I A L R E A L E S TAT E A S A P E R C E N TA G E O F A S S E T S
Note: Includes only private institutional allocations; 2014 is most recent data available
14
U.S. Investment Sales Volume May Have Peaked But Remains Robust
*2016 YTD through February, annualized and seasonally adjusted Source: Real Capital Analytics, NGKF Research; May 2016
B I L L I O N S O F D O L L A R S $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Office Industrial Retail Apartment Hotel
15
Note: Ranking among U.S. markets Source: AFIRE, NGKF Research; May 2016
Bay Area Has Remained Steadfast on AFIRE Investor Survey
16
Bay Area Investment Sales Volume May Have Peaked But Remains Robust $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Office Industrial Retail Apartment Hotel B I L L I O N S O F D O L L A R S
*2016 YTD through February, annualized and seasonally adjusted Source: Real Capital Analytics, NGKF Research; May 2016
17
What’s Next? | Bay Area Office and Apartment Sales in Next 12-24 Months
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
18
19
Residents Commuting Outside Their Home County
Note: Data reflect 2014 commuting patterns for private-sector workers with annual incomes greater than $40,000 Source: Census.gov, NGKF Research; May 2016
San Francisco San Mateo County Silicon Valley East Bay / Oakland 24,705 17,755 32,850 40,150 36,340 23,275 48,085 15,550 27,975 13,910 33,480 62,645
20
Source: Computer Science Degree Hub, NGKF Research; May 2016
Top 20 Innovative Computer Science and Engineering Programs
826 523 515 462 451 449 405 383 368 331 325 321 304 282 263 225 112 72 71 43
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Carnegie Mellon University Georgia Tech Univ of Southern California University of Illinois - Urbana University of Washington U Michigan - Ann Arbor UC - San Diego MIT Columbia University Univ of Pennsylvania Stanford University Cornell University Univ of TX at Austin U Wisconsin - Madison UC Los Angeles UC Berkeley Princeton University Harvard University Yale University Caltech
Annual Graduate Output Pittsburgh’s entry- level base salary for computer science graduates = 22% less than Silicon Valley’s
21
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
AV E R A G E A S K I N G R E N T ( $ / S F / A N N U M , F U L L S E R V I C E )
Office Market Rent Variability | Selected Tech-Heavy Submarkets at Q1 2016 $120.60 $73.27 $57.24 $57.12 $44.52 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 Downtown Palo Alto SOMA Cupertino Sunnyvale Downtown Oakland 63% less than Downtown Palo Alto
22
S H A R E O F O F F I C E M A R K E T G R O S S L E A S I N G A C T I V I T Y
Share of Office Market Gross Leasing Activity 56.8% 52.8% 22.2% 26.0% 21.1% 21.2% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2014 2015 San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley
Note: Includes new leases, expansions, consolidations, renewals, and subleases Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
+380 basis points in
23
What’s Next? | Bay Area Still Appeals to Tech Firms/Talent, But Costs Are An Issue
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
24
25
Note: Bay Area includes San Francisco/East Bay and San Jose metro areas Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
C H A N G E I N PAY R O L L J O B S ( T H O U S A N D S ) 109.6 50 100 150 200 NY LA/ OC DFW Bay Area Was Chi Atl Phi Phx
Bos Hou
U.S. Payroll Job Change | 12 Months Ending March 2016
26
78,600 84,700 31,000 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000
All other sectors Professional and Business Services 30,900
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
28.3% PAY R O L L J O B C H A N G E
Bay Area Payroll Job Change by Type of Job | 12 Months Ending March 2015 vs. March 2016 26.7% 115,600 109,600
27
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Venture Capital Invested | Silicon Valley
Source: National Venture Capital Association Yearbook, NGKF Research; May 2016
V E N T U R E C A P I TA L I N V E S T E D ( B I L L I O N S ) 20-year average of $12.4 billion $27.4 (but fundraising slowed during the second half of 2015)
28
100 200
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
San Francisco Oakland / East Bay San Jose
Bay Area Job Growth to Continue But Decelerate
Source: Moody’s, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, NGKF Research; May 2016
PAY R O L L J O B C H A N G E ( T H O U S A N D S ) 2011-2015 average
Projected average of 62,600 25-year average of 25,100 1995-2000 average
2005-2008 average
29
Sample of Technology Companies Hiring in the Bay Area | Early 2016
Source: Datafox, TechCrunch, NGKF Research; May 2016
30
Source: Datafox, TechCrunch, NGKF Research; May 2016
Sample of Technology Companies Reducing Headcount in the Bay Area | Early 2016
31
What’s Next? | Bay Area’s Tailwinds Position it Well to Endure CRE Cycles
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
32
33
2 4 6 8 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1 2016 San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley Balance of Bay Area 2006 - 2015 Average = 900,000 SF
Net Absorption
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T 2010 - 2015 Average = 3.3 million SF 6.3
34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley
Net Absorption: 3.4 MSF/Year = 6.8 MSF Demand Deliveries Planned and may deliver by 3/18: 0.5 MSF Under construction: 10.5 MSF Total = 11.0 MSF Projected at March 2018: 4.5%
Projected Demand and Deliveries | Major Jurisdictions 2 Years Ending March 2018
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
March 2016 vacancy rate: M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T 7.1% 7.4% 6.0% 6.3% 10.0%
Note: Vacancy rates reflect physically vacant space
35
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley
Historical Asking Rent Change | Major Jurisdictions
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
F U L L S E R V I C E A S K I N G R E N T C H A N G E 2007 - 2015 Average = 5.1%
36
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
2-Year Projected Average = 3.5% F U L L S E R V I C E A S K I N G R E N T C H A N G E
Projected Asking Rent Change | Major Jurisdictions 2007 - 2015 Average = 5.1%
37
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
What is Driving Demand? What is Curtailing Demand?
38
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
What’s Next? | Opportunities in the Bay Area Office Market
39
40
Note: Seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, NGKF Research; May 2016
Homeownership Rate | United States H O M E O W N E R S H I P R AT E 60% 62% 64% 66% 68% 70% 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
41
4,000 8,000 12,000 16,000 20,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1 2016 San Francisco Metro Oakland Metro San Jose Metro 2006 - 2015 Average = 6,719
Net Absorption
Source: Axiometrics, NGKF Research; May 2016
A PA R T M E N T U N I T S A B S O R B E D 4,537
42
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
San Francisco Metro Oakland Metro San Jose Metro
Net Absorption: 11,219/Year = 33,657 units Demand Deliveries Planned and may deliver by 12/18: 9,142 units Under construction: 23,607 units Total = 32,749 units Projected at December 2018: M A R K E T R AT E U N I T S ( T H O U S A N D S ) 4.1% 4.0% 4.5%
Source: Axiometrics, NGKF Research; May 2016
March 2016 vacancy rate: 4.5% 3.1% 4.3%
Projected Demand and Deliveries | 3 Years Ending December 2018
43
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 San Francisco Metro Oakland Metro San Jose Metro E F F E C T I V E R E N T C H A N G E
Historical Effective Rent Change 2006 - 2015 Bay Area Average = 6.2%
Source: Axiometrics, NGKF Research; May 2016
44
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 San Francisco Metro Oakland Metro San Jose Metro E F F E C T I V E R E N T C H A N G E
Projected Effective Rent Change 2006 - 2015 Bay Area Average = 6.2%
Source: Axiometrics, NGKF Research; May 2016
3-Year Projected Bay Area Average = 4.3%
45
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
What’s Next? | Opportunities in the Bay Area Apartment Market
46
47
1 2 3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1 2016 R&D Warehouse Balance of Industrial 2010 - 2015 Average = 128,000 SF
Net Absorption – All Industrial Space
Note: Industrial absorption data includes North Peninsula, South Peninsula, Oakland, Hayward, and Silicon Valley Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T 2013 - 2015 Average = 1.9 million SF
48
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Net Absorption: 1.0 MSF Demand Deliveries Planned and may deliver by 3/17: 0.0 MSF Under construction: 1.2 MSF Total = 1.2 MSF
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T Projected at March 2017: 2.1% 0.2% March 2016 vacancy rate: 9.9% 0.7% 6.4% 10.1%
Projected Demand and Deliveries for R&D Space | Major Jurisdictions 1 Year Ending March 2017
49
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 South Peninsula North Peninsula Silicon Valley
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
T R I P L E - N E T A S K I N G R E N T C H A N G E 2010 - 2015 Bay Area Average = 9.4% 1-Year Projected Bay Area Average = 3.8%
Asking Rent Change for R&D Space | Major Jurisdictions
50
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Oakland Hayward Silicon Valley
Net Absorption: 2.5 MSF Demand Deliveries Planned and may deliver by 3/17: 0.4 MSF Under construction: 3.6 MSF Total = 4.0 MSF Projected at March 2017: 2.7% 2.0% March 2016 vacancy rate: M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T 2.4% 4.0% 2.6% 3.2%
Projected Demand and Deliveries for Warehouse Space | Major Jurisdictions 1 Year Ending March 2017
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
51
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Oakland Hayward Silicon Valley
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
T R I P L E - N E T A S K I N G R E N T C H A N G E 2010 - 2015 Bay Area Average = 10.6% 1-Year Projected Bay Area Average = 10.8%
Asking Rent Change for Warehouse Space | Major Jurisdictions
52
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
What’s Next? | Opportunities in the Bay Area Industrial Market
53
54
2 4 6 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1 2016 San Francisco Oakland Silicon Valley 2007 - 2015 Average = 1.6 million SF
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T
Net Absorption
55
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
San Francisco Oakland San Jose
Net Absorption: 1.3 MSF/Year = 2.6 MSF Demand Deliveries Planned and may deliver by 3/18: 850,000 SF Under construction: 1.9 MSF Total = 2.7 MSF Projected at March 2018: 2.2% 3.6% 4.7%
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
March 2016 vacancy rate: 2.3% 3.7% 4.5% M I L L I O N S O F S Q U A R E F E E T
Projected Demand and Deliveries | Major Jurisdictions 2 Years Ending March 2018
56
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 San Francisco Oakland San Jose 2008 – 2015 Bay Area Average = -0.2% 2016 – 2017 Projected Bay Area Average = 4.1%
Source: CoStar, NGKF Research; May 2016
2013 - 2015 Average = 5.4% F U L L S E R V I C E A S K I N G R E N T C H A N G E
Asking Rent Change | Major Jurisdictions
57
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
What’s Next? | Opportunities in the Bay Area Retail Market
58
59
Implications for the Bay Area’s CRE Market | Next 12-24 Months
Source: NGKF Research; May 2016
60
M A Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6