salt contamination of private wells it s not as simple as
play

Salt Contamination of Private Wells: Its Not as Simple as It May - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Salt Contamination of Private Wells: Its Not as Simple as It May Seem Presented to: Unity College Presented by: Keith R. Taylor, C.G. November 2016 Background Road salt contamination of groundwater and surface water well-documented


  1. Salt Contamination of Private Wells: It’s Not as Simple as It May Seem Presented to: Unity College Presented by: Keith R. Taylor, C.G. November 2016

  2. Background • Road salt contamination of groundwater and surface water well-documented – 490,000 tons of rock salt were purchased in 2008-09 in Maine. – Roughly 750 pounds for every Maine resident, or 21 tons per road mile. • Sodium and chloride are not “toxic” – Can ruin piping, furnace, etc. due to corrosion – Tastes bad at high concentrations – Secondary drinking water standard for chloride = 250 mg/l, No standard for sodium St.Germain Collins November 2016 2

  3. Case Study (Naples) St.Germain Collins November 2016 3

  4. Case Study (Naples) Crooked River Well Slope Slope St.Germain Collins November 2016 4

  5. Case Study (Naples) • Geology, Well Construction – Sand and gravel, 13’ deep at well, overburden dry at well – 100’ well cased only to the bedrock Sep-02 Jan-03 • Water Quality History Sodium 115 405 • Assessment Methods Chloride 190 902 – Expanded sampling that included some additional parameters (K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, SO 4, etc.) – Geophysical Surveys targeted salt storage, well area – Geoprobe borings for geology, water quality St.Germain Collins November 2016 5

  6. Case Study (Naples) November 2016 6

  7. Case Study (Naples) • Conceptual Model – Salt originated from road application (steep intersection), not storage site – Ground water moved easily between bedrock and overburden – Well had little casing and likely drew water from shallow bedrock • Solution is a new well • Results Old Well New – Bedrock at 37’, casing to Well 50’, water at 215’. – Sodium = 14 ppm, Chloride = 10 ppm St.Germain Collins November 2016 7

  8. Case Study (Brunswick) St.Germain Collins November 2016 8

  9. Case Study (Brunswick) Well St.Germain Collins November 2016 9

  10. Case Study (Brunswick) • Geology, Well Construction – <10’ till, bedrock exposed in area – Well 220’ deep, 20’ casing • Water Quality History 7/14/04 11/8/04 12/9/04 4/11/05 Sodium 68 74 NA 55 Chloride 288 290 NA 250 Nitrate <1.0 4.3 3.8 4.3 • Assessment Methods – Expanded sampling that included some additional parameters – Borehole geophysics St.Germain Collins November 2016 10

  11. Case Study (Brunswick) Fluid Conductivity November 2016 11

  12. Case Study (Brunswick) • Conceptual Model – Increased conductivity, abrupt temperature change, increased flow at fracture at depth of 81’ – Orientation of 81’ fracture puts it at the surface in the drainage ditch where bedrock was exposed – Most or all of the salt is migrating from ditch to well via the 81’ fracture • Solution – Replacement well not feasible due to small parcel and leachfield (100’ setback required) – Instead, installed a “jaswell” seal to a depth of 110’ to isolate fracture St.Germain Collins November 2016 12

  13. Case Study (Brunswick) • Results – Seal prevented most of the salt from entering the well – Sodium = 38 ppm, Chloride = 120 ppm (Nitrate still 5 ppm) – Still higher than background but appears to have worked St.Germain Collins November 2016 13

  14. Case Study (Windham) St.Germain Collins November 2016 14

  15. Case Study (Windham) Well St.Germain Collins November 2016 15

  16. Case Study (Windham) • Geology, Well Construction – <8’ till, bedrock exposed on site, mostly unsaturated – 142’ well, 10’ of casing • Water Quality History – Unusually high salt levels for road application source Nov-93 Apr-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Sep-03 Nov-03 Feb-04 Sodium NA NA NA NA 620 493 325 Chloride 73 860 320 NA 1600 940 951 Calcium NA NA NA NA NA NA 90 Magnesium NA NA NA NA NA NA 14 Potassium NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.2 Alkalinity NA NA NA NA NA NA 36 Sulfate NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.5 St.Germain Collins November 2016 16

  17. Case Study (Windham) • Assessment Methods – Expanded Sampling – Geoprobe borings • Continous soil sampling to bedrock • Ground water analysis for salt • Because only one location had water, analyzed soil for salt – Geophysical Survey • Borehole geophysics only partially successful because of existing Jaswell seal in place St.Germain Collins November 2016 17

  18. Case Study (Windham) • Conceptual Model – Very shallow overburden, mostly unsaturated, full of salt – “Bowl” shape to bedrock surface; contains overburden ground water – Salty runoff from road (no curbs or ditches) is captured in bedrock “bowl” and moves down rather than laterally • Solutions that Failed – Previous well driller tried Jaswell seal but it failed – We moved Jaswell down to 125’ but salt returned – Salt entering from bottom of well  • New well needed but… – Very little land – No obvious location because of bedrock “bowl” St.Germain Collins November 2016 18

  19. Case Study (Windham) • Solution that worked – Constructed well with 200’ casing – 60 gpm at 450’; sodium = 10 ppm, chloride = 2 ppm Highland Lake Old Well New Well St.Germain Collins November 2016 19

  20. Case Study (Scarborough) St.Germain Collins November 2016 20

  21. Case Study (Scarborough) 10 ASR Wells 12 ASR St.Germain Collins November 2016 21

  22. Case Study (Scarborough) • Geology, Well Construction – Shallow Till – Two wells – 10 Ash Swamp Road = 30’ from road – 12 Ash Swamp Road = 150’ from road • Water Quality History 10 Ash Swamp Road 7/21/05 12/28/05 4/12/06 7/11/06 10/24/06 1/4/07 Choride 188 74 101 232 57 66 Sodium 122 44 51 94 51 46 12 Ash Swamp Road 7/21/05 12/28/05 4/12/06 7/11/06 10/24/06 1/4/07 Choride --- 77 116 126 36 58 Sodium --- 51 59 79 40 44 St.Germain Collins November 2016 22

  23. Case Study (Scarborough) • Assessment Methods – Expanded Sampling and Geochemical Analysis • A good example of where expanded suite of parameters very useful • Used simple ionic ratios to compare to Maine DOT 1990 study of road salt, seawater intrusion , and relict salt water sources • Seawater intrusion unlikely since closest brackish water (Scarborough Marsh) is about 2 miles away • Results – No bromide, normally indicator of seawater (new or old) – But salt concentrations are low, maybe bromide too low to detect? – Focused on ionic ratios St.Germain Collins November 2016 23

  24. Case Study (Scarborough) 1.20 Na/Cl SO4/Cl 1.00 K/Cl Ca/Cl 0.80 Ionic Ratio 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 November 2016 24 St.Germain Collins Road Salt Trapped Seawater 10 Ash Swamp Rd 12 Ash Swamp Rd

  25. Case Study (Scarborough) 0.40 0.35 0.30 Trapped Seawater 0.25 SO4/Cl Road Salt 0.20 10 Ash Swamp Rd 12 Ash Swamp Rd 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 November 2016 25 Na/Cl

  26. Case Study (Scarborough) 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 Trapped Seawater SO4/Cl Road Salt 0.20 10 Ash Swamp Rd 12 Ash Swamp Rd 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 November 2016 26 K/Cl

  27. Case Study (Scarborough) • Conceptual Model – Salt concentrations very similar in wells despite difference in distance from road – Road layout, topography not suggestive of high road salt area or runoff toward wells – Ionic ratios with SO 4 strongly suggest relict seawater • No solution pursued since road salt not the source • Good example of misleading clues – Shallow overburden – No bromide detected – Initially suggests road salt November 2016 27

  28. Conclusions • Careful Assessment of Salt Source Needed – Surface Topography – Overburden Type and Thickness – Bedrock Type and Depth – Well Construction – Ground Water Depth and Flow – Bedrock Structure and Topography – Geochemistry • Easy to be mislead by one or two “obvious” conditions St.Germain Collins November 2016 28

  29. St.Germain Collins November 2016 29

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend