- M. Hayman, J. P. Thayer,
- R. M. Hardesty, M. O'Neill, M. Shupe,
- R. Stillwell, C. Alvarez
Initial Results from the Cloud, Aerosol Polarization And Backscatter Lidar at Summit, Greenland
Ryan R. Neely III R. M. Hardesty, M. O'Neill, M. Shupe, R. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Initial Results from the C loud, A erosol P olarization A nd B ackscatter L idar at Summit, Greenland M. Hayman, J. P. Thayer, Ryan R. Neely III R. M. Hardesty, M. O'Neill, M. Shupe, R. Stillwell, C. Alvarez Why did we put this lidar at
Initial Results from the Cloud, Aerosol Polarization And Backscatter Lidar at Summit, Greenland
Precipitation at Summit (ICECAPS)
Last Ice Age Present Future?
What are we observing? Cloud and precipitation phase
Thanks to Ed Stockard for all the photos.
How Do We Determine Orientation of Scatterers in CAPABL Polarization Measurements?
as:
is the randomly oriented
is the oriented
backscatter matrix.
through a quantity known as diattenuation:
measurement
resolution
with remote access.
Transmits Single Linear Polarization Transmitter Computer and DAQ Receiver Rotates between Parallel, 45 and Perpendicular Polarization States
Doubled Nd:YLF
523.5nm
Diode Pump
measurement
resolution
with remote access.
Transmits Single Linear Polarization Transmitter Computer and DAQ Receiver Rotates between Parallel, 45 and Perpendicular Polarization States
Doubled Nd:YLF
523.5nm
Diode Pump
Ice (High δ)
Total Linear Depolarization Ratio Lidar Backscatter Ratio
Liquid Layer (Near Zero δ and High LBSR) Clear Air Seeder- Feeder Cloud
November 15, 2010 November 15, 2010
Observation of Diattenuation
signatures (Light blue in top panel).
crystals as shown by
due to turbulence from strong precipitation
depolarization in area of strong diattenuation
Linear Diattenuation Total Linear Depolarization Ratio Total Backscatter
scatterers, which may be used to interpret the presence of HOIC.
(less than 2% error in linear depolarization ratios) by reducing uncertainty about the
demonstration of operationally detecting HOIC by direct polarization determination.
(3.2km a.s.l)
NSF’s Mobile Science Facility
Angle of Beam from Zenith Polarization
Diattenuation Backscatter Resolution
Oriented Crystal Wave Vector of Lidar
B a c k s c a t t e r ( 1 / ( m s r ) ) D i a t t e n u a t i
/ R e s
u t i
Pointing Angle of Lidar Measured from Zenith (degrees)
Self Validation of Diattenuation Measurement Against Instrumental Effects
February 18, 2012 (a section from the whole day shown in pervious slide).
second measure of diattenuation using another set
to be influenced differently by detector saturation.
together, above the error limits, contain positive detection of diattenuatting scatterers.
behave oppositely, as is seen in the bottom of the profile, is due to detector saturation.
Altitude Above Summit(km)
Dynamic range of backscatter detection is increased by an order of magnitude. Strong Backscatter introduces error to data products due to nonlinear detector gain (pulse pile up). Nonlinearity may be solved for because diattenuation detected in zenith direction is defined as zero.
Diattenuation help lidar observations to be more accurate in other ways.
Polarization Ratio/Relative Backscatter
Corrected backscatter counts produce more accurate data products.
Dq δ Corrected Dq Corrected δ Log10(N)
2.0 1.5 1 0.5
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35