RUNNING COLD Colder weather = more calories burned? Nick Alexander - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

running cold
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RUNNING COLD Colder weather = more calories burned? Nick Alexander - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RUNNING COLD Colder weather = more calories burned? Nick Alexander MY FIRST RUN March 17, 2013 DATA Date : 2013-03-17 Time : 4:30 4:41 PM (11 minutes) Average METs : 8.9 Calories Burned : 107 Distance : 0.99 miles


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RUNNING COLD

Colder weather = more calories burned? Nick Alexander

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MY FIRST RUN

March 17, 2013

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DATA

  • Date: 2013-03-17
  • Time: 4:30 – 4:41 PM (11 minutes)
  • Average METs: 8.9
  • Calories Burned: 107
  • Distance: 0.99 miles
  • Average Speed: 5.4 mph
  • Temperature: 35º F
  • Humidity: 59%
  • Wind: 14 mph
  • Heart Rate 3 min after finish: 130 bpm
  • Notes: Felt terrible for 30 min after run
slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHY DO THIS?

  • To test a claim
slide-5
SLIDE 5

WHY DO THIS?

  • To test a claim
  • Very low barriers
  • Can do it at home
  • Time commitment only ~15 min per trial
  • Makes me exercise
  • Already had the calorie tracker
  • Learn to do experiments
slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROBLEMS WITH TIME

  • Need better Time resolution
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PROBLEMS WITH TIME

  • Need better Time resolution
  • Don’t use the first or last minute data point
  • Helps compensate for lack of precise synchronization

between devices

  • Compensate for start and end effects
  • Start and end trials with 2 minutes of no steps
  • Helps identify boundaries of the test
slide-8
SLIDE 8

CONSTANTS

  • Route
  • Distance (1 mile)
  • Elevation
  • Clothing
  • Run Speed (~)
  • Run Duration (~)
  • Time of Day (~)

VARIABLES

  • Weather
  • Temperature
  • Humidity
  • Wind speed
  • Barometric pressure
  • Calorie Burn
  • Total & Peak Calorie Burn
  • Avg. & Peak METs
  • Heart Rate
  • Avg. & Max
  • Run Speed, Duration
  • Fitness Level
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

ý þ þ ý

METRICS TOOLS

BodyMedia Weather

slide-11
SLIDE 11

+ +

ý ý þ

+

þ

+

wunderground.com Temp @ KARR Airport

slide-12
SLIDE 12

END EFFECT

Hot Cold

slide-13
SLIDE 13

END EFFECT

7-Minute Calorie Burn Cooldown

Hot Cold

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Temperature is negatively correlated with Peak Cals/Min WHILE Run Duration has NO statistically significant relationship with Peak Cals/Min

Sta$s$cal Significance (P-Value) Significant 0.034413617 Effect Size (Pearson's r) Medium

  • 0.323369845
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Temperature is negatively correlated with Calories Burned 7min WHILE Run Duration has NO statistically significant relationship with Calories Burned 7min

Sta$s$cal Significance (P-Value) Significant 0.044447824 Effect Size (Pearson's r) Medium

  • 0.30807649
slide-17
SLIDE 17

WHAT DID I LEARN?

  • Results
  • Tentative: hypotheses is correct
  • Effect is small: maybe 5 calories difference per mile run
  • Process
  • I am motivated by data collection
  • Start early and refine experimental process for an initial

period

  • Do research into other metrics that could correlate
slide-18
SLIDE 18

WEAKNESSES AND IMPROVEMENTS

  • The more fit you become, the fewer calories you will burn

doing the same activity

  • Temperature & weather data collected 20 miles away
  • Short run time = noisy data?
  • Need more data for higher confidence
  • Hat
slide-19
SLIDE 19

CONTACT

Nick Alexander nick@appkabob.com LinkedIn.com/in/nickalexander1 Twitter: @appkabob