ROW Mapping Case Studies The Older I Get, the Less I Know Alaska - - PDF document

row mapping case studies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ROW Mapping Case Studies The Older I Get, the Less I Know Alaska - - PDF document

ROW Mapping Case Studies The Older I Get, the Less I Know Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference 2015 The Art of Historical Research From survey to settlement and private ownership What happened before patent ? In Alaska,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ROW Mapping Case Studies

Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference 2015 ”The Older I Get, the Less I Know… ”

The Art of Historical Research…

From survey to settlement and private ownership…

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What happened before patent ?

In Alaska, we often need to look at the history before settlement and private ownership…

Palmer-Richardson Highway

Basis of Right of Way at Construction

Excerpt from Map of Alaska, prepared by The American Geographical Society for The Alaska Road Commission, 1923 (Image from NOAA’s Office of Coast Survey Historical Map and Chart Collection)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Focusing on…

Glenn Highway: Palmer to Chickaloon

Excerpt from Anchorage, Alaska quadrangle Edition of 1951, Alaska Reconnaissance Topographic Series (USGS Historical Topographic Map Collection)

What evidence did we have to start with?

 E

xe c utive Orde r (E O) 9145, April 23, 1942

 Ala ska Ro a d Co mmissio n Ma ps o f Pa lme r-

Ric ha rdso n Hig hwa y (CRDOT &PF F ile s)

 ROW Ag re e me nt with ARR fo r use o f the o ld

ra ilro a d b e d

 ROW De e ds fro m 2 ho me ste a de rs  A fe w ho me ste a d pa te nts re fe re nc ing ROW  F

ie ld surve y da ta fo r b o th the Gle nn Hig hwa y a nd the ra ilro a d b e d

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EO 9145 April 23, 1942

  • Spe c ific BOP/ E

OP

  • Se c / T

wp/ Ra ng e ide ntifie d

  • Ma p No . 1877260

ARC Mapping

E OP a t 1369+42.8 in Se c . 36, T 20N, R5E

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ARR Permit ROW Deed

Homestead Patents along the corridor

  • Mo st e ntrie s o c c urre d 1945 o r la te r
  • A fe w pa te nts c o nta ine d this la ng ua g e :
  • Ho w wa s the ROW e sta b lishe d?
  • Ho w wide is the ROW?

E xc e r pt fr

  • m Pate nt No . 1125771 to Jame s Austin Car

r

  • ll

(Note : Ac t o f Januar y 27, 1905 e stablishe d the Bo ar d of Road Co mmissio ne r s for Alaska)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Field Survey Data

De mo nstra te d tha t fo r muc h

  • f the a lig nme nt we st o f

Chic ka lo o n, the Gle nn Hig hwa y wa s no t c o nstruc te d

  • n the o ld ra ilro a d b e d

Why is this important anyway?

 E

nc ro a c hme nts within 100 fe e t e a c h side o f Gle nn Hig hwa y c e nte rline

 Cha lle ng e s fro m pro pe rty o wne rs:

“my pate nt do e sn’ t say anything ab o ut a hig hway ROW”

 Ma ny ho me ste a d e ntrie s we re prio r to

Aug ust, 1949 (PL O 601) Additio nal e vide nc e , if availab le , wo uld c o nfirm the b asis and width o f ROW…and he lp de fe nd it.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What evidence did we find in Alaska?

 fro m the Ala ska Sta te Arc hive s, June a u

Source: Alaska Road Commission maps and drawings Series 1380

What evidence did we find in Alaska?

 Na tio na l Arc hive s (NARA), Pa c ific Re g io n (Anc ho ra g e )

Hig hwa y Co nstruc tio n a nd F unding Do c ume nts

  • Pa lme r- Ric ha rdso n Hig hwa y Re c o nna issa nc e Re po rt,

Oc to b e r, 1940

  • T

e le g ra m fro m Co mma nding Ge ne ra l o f the Ala ska De fe nse F

  • rc e , Oc to b e r 1940 a ssig ns 1st prio rity to this

ro ute

  • Co ng re ss pro vide s funding April 1, 1941, c o nstruc tio n

b e g ins in the summe r o f 1941

  • 1941 a nd 1943 re po rts de sc rib e ro a d a lig nme nt in

de ta il, o utlining whe re ro a d dive rg e d fro m o ld ra ilro a d b e d

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Re q ue st fo r E O, June 11, 1941 ARC T aylo r to Go v. Grue ning , fo rwarde d to Divisio n o f T e rrito rie s in D.C. fo r ac tio n

What evidence did we find in Alaska?

NARA, Pa c ific Re g io n (Anc ho ra g e ) ROW Co rre spo nde nc e

What evidence did we find in Alaska?

July 12, 1941 re ply fro m Co mmissio ne r o f the Ge ne ral L and Offic e (CGL O) F re d Jo hnso n

NOTE: Letter of January 20, 1939 discusses ARC’s authority to construct roads and appropriate ROW under Revised Statute 2477 (R.S. 2477). “This grant becomes effective upon the construction or establishing of the highway in accordance with the State or Territorial laws.” However, if ARC wanted the ROW noted to GLO’s land records, maps of definite location are required.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What evidence did we find in Alaska?

 NARA, Pa c ific Re g io n (Anc ho ra g e ) a nd NARA,

Wa shing to n, D.C. L a nd Pa te nt F ile s

No tatio ns o f ROW o n the Status Cle rk Re po rt c o ntaine d in e ac h ho me ste ad c ase file :

Excerpt, Status Clerk Report for BLM Serial Case File Anchorage 011066 from GLO Land Entry Files, NARA, Washington, D.C. Excerpt, Status Clerk Report for BLM Serial Case File Anchorage 010741 from GLO Land Entry Files, NARA, Washington, D.C.

More questions than answers…

Why did the CGL O c ha ng e his mind a b o ut the E O? Why wa sn’ t the a re a we st o f Chic ka lo o n inc lude d in the E O? Whe re is the ma p da te d Ma rc h 14, 1942, No . 1877260 “o n file in the Ge ne ra l L a nd Offic e ”? Wha t do c ume nt c re a te d the “re se rva tio n” o f April 10, 1942? Wha t is the sig nific a nc e o f 44 L D 513? Wha t do e s 1877260 “F ” me a n?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

44 LD 513 notations

I nstruc tio ns o f the Se c re ta ry o f the I nte rio r F

  • und a t:

Vo lume 44, Pa g e 513 “L a nd De c isio ns” De c isio ns o f the De partme nt o f the I nte rio r in Case s Re lating to the Pub lic L ands

  • nline at

http://www.do i.g o v/so lic ito r/de c isio ns.html

44 LD 513 notations

So me time s re fe rre d to a s a 44 L D 513 ROW – b ut it is no t a ROW a t a ll…

  • I

t is a pro c e ss use d b y GL O a nd BL M to no te the e xiste nc e o f a fe de ra lly c o nstruc te d fa c ility o n the pub lic la nds

  • Re q uire s a ma p o f de finite lo c a tio n
  • No ta tio n is ma de o n the la nd re c o rds a nd in

pa te nts using spe c ific la ng ua g e e xc e pting the fe de ral fac ility o r impro ve me nts

  • Pro te c ts a nd re se rve s the c o ntinue d use a nd

ma inte na nc e o f the fa c ility a fte r la nd pa sse s fro m fe de ra l o wne rship

slide-11
SLIDE 11

44 LD 513 instructions

T he no ta tio n itse lf do e s no t c re a te a n inte re st in la nd – it is no t a n e a se me nt.

(Se e Appe al o f Do yo n, L imite d, 87 I .D. 480 fo r an e xc e lle nt disc ussio n o f the histo ry o f 44 L .D. 513)

But we kno w tha t ARC a ske d fo r a n inte re st in la nd – a ROW - fo r the e ntire c o rrido r o f the Gle nn Hig hwa y. Cle a rly, we ne e d to find F ile No . 1877260 fo r the a nswe r…

Where is Misc. File No. 1877260?

Q: I n 1942, who ha d the a utho rity to o rde r the 44 L D 513 no ta tio n o n Anc ho ra g e Distric t Re c o rds? A: T he Co mmissio ne r o f the Ge ne ra l L a nd Offic e in Wa shing to n, D.C. As the o rde r ha d o rig ina te d in Wa shing to n, D.C., the se a rc h turns to GL O re c o rds a t o ne o f the NARA lo c a tio ns in the a re a .

Afte r se ve ral faile d atte mpts to find the file at NARA thro ug h pho ne and e mail re q ue sts, I hire d a re se arc he r spe c ializing in DOI re c o rds.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Misc. File No. 1877260 – Finally…

Na tio na l Arc hive s, Wa shing to n, D.C. RG 49, Re c o rds o f the Bure a u o f L a nd Ma na g e me nt Misc e lla ne o us L e tte rs Re c e ive d, 1910-46 E ntry A1, 2009 F ile 1877260, Co rre spo nde nc e , June 11, 1941-July 26, 1944

 Co nta ins a c o mple te re c o rd o f the e sta b lishme nt o f the

ROW o f the Pa lme r-Ric ha rdso n Hig hwa y a s we ll a s the ma p o f Ma rc h 14, 1942

  • Misc. File No. 1877260 – what’s in it?
  • DC ve rsio ns o f le tte rs fo und in RG 30 re c o rds in NARA Anc h
  • tra nsmitta ls fo r ma ps pre pa re d b y ARC
  • Me mo ra ndum fro m CGL

O de ta iling a jo int GL O/ ARC c o nfe re nc e he ld in Oc to b e r, 1941, disc ussing the Pa lme r- Ric ha rdso n ROW a nd the sta tus o f the Ma ta nuska Bra nc h

  • f the Ala ska Ra ilro a d
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Joint GLO-ARC conference, October, 1941

  • ARC will furnish a ma p o f the g e ne ra l ro ute o f the Pa lme r-

Ric ha rdso n Hig hwa y

  • ARC will fo llo w up with ma ps o f de finite lo c a tio n a fte r

c o nstruc tio n

  • ARC info rme d GL

O tha t a ROW re se rva tio n wa s a lso re q uire d fo r the se c tio n we st o f Chic ka lo o n

  • Misc. File No. 1877260 – what’s in it?
  • F

e b rua ry 13, 1942: me mo fro m CGL O to Div T e rrito rie s e xpla ining why the Pa lme r to Chic ka lo o n se c tio n, MP 5 to 31 will no t b e inc lude d in E O 9145

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CGLO: reservation of that portion of the highway west of Chickaloon not “practicable or necessary”

F e b rua ry 13, 1942: “I na smuc h a s tha t po rtio n o f the hig hwa y fro m its te rmina l po int in Se c . 9, T . 18 N, R. 2 E ., to Chic ka lo o n is lo c a te d e ntire ly in surve ye d la nds a nd c a n b e de finite ly ide ntifie d o n the g ro und a s sho wn b y the c o py o f ma p o f surve y o f the hig hwa y a b o ve me ntio ne d, a re se rva tio n o f the rig ht-o f-wa y unde r a n e xe c utive o rde r fo r this po rtio n o f the hig hwa y is no t b e lie ve d to b e pra c tic a b le o r ne c e ssa ry… Unde r de pa rtme nta l instruc tio ns o f Ja nua ry 13, 1916 (44 L .D. 513) a re se rva tio n ma y b e ma de o f rig hts-o f-wa y fo r the pro te c tio n o f ro a ds a nd tra ils c o nstruc te d b y the F

  • re st Se rvic e o ve r pub lic la nd in

c o nne c tio n with the a dministra tio n o f Na tio na l F

  • re sts…T

he instruc tio ns a re , the re fo re , c o nside re d like wise a pplic a b le to ro a ds o r hig hwa ys c o nstruc te d b y the Ala ska Ro a d Co mmissio n a nd a n e xc e pting c la use simila r to tha t q uo te d in the instruc tio ns ma y b e inse rte d in a ny fina l c e rtific a te o r pa te nt whic h ma y b e sub se q ue ntly issue d fo r the pub lic la nds a ffe c te d.”

Map No. 1877260, prepared by GLO

Ma rc h 14, 1942, re fe re nc e d in E O 9145 a s “o n file a t the Ge ne ra l L a nd Offic e ”

  • Misc. File
  • No. 1877260

– what’s in it?

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Misc. File No. 1877260 – what’s in it?
  • April 10, 1942 me mo fro m CGL

O to Re g iste r, Anc ho ra g e Ala ska , o rde ring no ta tio n o f the ROW o f the Gle nn Hig hwa y, 200 fe e t wide , a c c o rding to the ma p pro vide d b y ARC.

Memorandum of April 10, 1942

fro m CGL O to Re g iste r, Anc ho ra g e Ala ska , o rde ring no ta tio n o f the ROW

  • f the Gle nn Hig hwa y,

200 fe e t wide , a c c o rding to the ma p pro vide d b y ARC.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

44 LD 513 notation – the rest of the story

  • T

he instruc tio ns we re e xpa nde d to a pply to ma ny type s o f fe de ra l impro ve me nts

  • So me impro ve me nts c o nstruc te d o n pub lic

la nds (suc h a s pub lic hig hwa ys) c a rrie d the a utho rity to a ppro pria te ROW unde r o the r la ws, suc h a s R.S. 2477

  • GL

O use d the 44 L D 513 instruc tio ns to no te the e xiste nc e o f the Gle nn Hig hwa y ROW o n the la nd re c o rds a nd in pa te nts

  • Misc . F

ile No . 1877260, a lo ng with the ARC ma pping , c o nfirme d a ROW width o f 200 fe e t

What does 1877260 “F” mean?

Co mme nts fro m D.C. re se a rc he r:

“When a letter arrived at the GLO Central Office in Washington, a Division D, Mails and Files clerk would stamp it with a file number, read it for substance and then forward it to the appropriate division, in this case Division F (Railroads, Rights of Way, and Reclamation), which would determine what action if any would be taken, i.e., sent to the Commissioner of the General Land Office or to others for review and

  • action. Then, the letter and any subsequent related correspondence

would be compiled into a file under the original assigned letter back in Division D... Miscellaneous Letters Received…is a difficult record series to work in because there is no subject index. The series contains way more than a million letters and unless you have reference to a letter file number it is virtually impossible to locate anything within the entry…In most cases the "file" consists of no more than one or two letters. However, at times significant files were created which fortunately was the case in this instance.”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lessons Learned:

ARC’ s a utho rity to e sta b lish ROW unde r RS 2477 wa s we ll-a c c e pte d b y GL O a nd DOI a dministra to rs – the ROW fo r the Gle nn Hig hwa y we st o f Chic ka lo o n wa s a ppro pria te d a t c o nstruc tio n.

GL O re q uire d ma ps o f de finite lo c a tio n in o rde r to no te the ROW to the pub lic re c o rds. A la rg e pro je c t like the Gle nn Hig hwa y ha d the b udg e t to do this kind o f wo rk – ma ny o the r ARC pro je c ts did no t.

De c isio ns o n ROW ma tte rs we re ma de in Wa shing to n, D.C. prio r to e sta b lishme nt o f BL M Re g io n VI I (Ala ska ) in 1947; e ve n the n the a utho rity wa s no t g ive n to Re g io n VI I a dministra to r until 1949.

44 L D 513 no ta tio ns we re use d lib e ra lly b y GL O a nd BL M fo r ma ny purpo se s – so me fa c ilitie s no te d ma y ha ve ha d a utho rity to a ppro pria te a n inte re st in la nd – c he c k the histo ry o f the fa c ility no te d a nd ta lk to BL M sta ff.

Histo ric le tte rs a nd file s a re a c c e ssib le if c lue s a nd re fe re nc e s c a n b e fo und. No w tha t NARA, Pa c ific Re g io n (Anc ho ra g e ) is c lo se d – this c o uld b e muc h mo re diffic ult.

A g o o d re se a rc he r in the Wa shing to n, D.C. a re a is e sse ntia l.