Road To Success Meeting the Needs of All Learners RLE School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Next Exit: Rutland Elementary School Road To Success Meeting the Needs of All Learners RLE School Planning Council Tracy Dingwall, Parent, PAC President, Noon Hour Supervisor Ali Westlund, Parent Michelle Irvine, Parent Laurie Sinclair,
RLE School Planning Council Tracy Dingwall, Parent, PAC President, Noon Hour Supervisor Ali Westlund, Parent Michelle Irvine, Parent Laurie Sinclair, Learning Assistance, ELL, SBT Chair James Minkus, Principal Nadia Piasentin, Vice Principal Monique West, Former Vice Principal
By the end of June 2017, with a focus on instruction, we will meet the following performance targets for reading.
meeting or exceeding expectations in reading using report card data
exceeding expectations in reading using Whole Class Reading Assessment in Grades 5 and 6 and PM Benchmarks in Grade 4
better on their final report cards in Reading.
grade three will be fewer than 5 students or lower than the average of the previous 5 years (using PM Benchmark data from the Early Learning Profile).
By the end of June 2017, with a focus on instruction, we will meet the following performance targets for reading. The following structures will be implemented to support our goal:
can do their best socially, behaviorally, and academically.
differentiated instruction and assessment strategies to improve learning for all students.
Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1
the classroom
for 6-8 weeks at a time
classroom, but it mirrors what happens in the classroom
classroom: Daily Five and CAFE, Leveled Text, In class LAT support twice per week
Benchmarks
Tier 3 – 25 were not yet meeting expectations in reading Tier 2 – 8 students were approaching expectations Tier 1 – 17 student were meeting expectations 50%
18% 32%
Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1
the classroom
for 6-8 weeks at a time
classroom, but it mirrors what happens in the classroom
classroom: Daily Five and CAFE, Leveled Text, In class LAT support twice per week
Benchmarks
Tier 3 –11 were not yet meeting expectations in reading compared to 23 prior to intervention Tier 2 – 5 students were approaching expectations many just on the cusp of fully meeting Tier 1 – 34 student were meeting expectations compared to 17 prior to intervention 22%
10% 68%
Student # 1 – Level 5 – 16 Student # 2 – Level 10 - 21 Student # 3– Level 11 – 21 Student # 4 – Level 9 - 20 Student # 5 – Level 3 - 14 Student # 6 – Level 12 - 23 Student # 7 – Level 12 - 19 Student # 8– Level 13 - 20 Student # 9 - Level 4 - 13 Student # 10 – Level 12 - 22 Student # 11– Level 12 - 19 Student # 12 – Level 13 - 21 Student # 13– Level 12 - 23 ***Expected gain in grade 2 year is 4 levels.
What did you think of the Reading Program?
all year, she loved it!”
reading, but didn’t think anything of it, I am not an
aware of what they were doing an with practice it was
she needed.” What improvements did you see in your child's reading?
is corrected.”
had the tools she needs to be successful.”
knowledge to do what we need to do for our kids, a program like this one is exactly what we needed as parents and for our child.” ~ Tara Schroder – Parent of Grade 2 and 6 students
two structures (differentiated instruction and self- regulation) to support our goal (staff meetings, PAC meetings, PGPs, PLC time/assembly program).
using various sources of data
Implementation Day