Rick Kernan richard.s.kernan@xcelenergy.com Presentation Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rick kernan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rick Kernan richard.s.kernan@xcelenergy.com Presentation Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eaton Vaultgard Uses For Field Personnel Presented by Rick Kernan richard.s.kernan@xcelenergy.com Presentation Overview Denver Network Stats Legacy Construction Issues Identified Real time Vaultgard Uses Protector and other


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Eaton Vaultgard Uses For Field Personnel

Presented by

Rick Kernan

richard.s.kernan@xcelenergy.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview

  • Denver Network Stats
  • Legacy Construction Issues Identified
  • Real time Vaultgard Uses
  • Protector and other Troubleshooting
  • Fault Locating Using Vaultgard
  • The Tracko
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Denver Network Stats

  • Vaultgards

➢ 126

  • Protectors

➢ 805

  • Networks

➢ 12 – 3 Feeder

  • Substations

➢ 5

  • Fiber Optics

➢ 182,000 Ft.

  • Cost

➢ $8,000,000 in 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Legacy Construction Problems Identified with Vaultgard

  • Miss-Matched Impedance
  • Transformer With Incorrect Tap Changer
  • Bad Transformer
  • Catastrophic Breaker Failure
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Miss-Matched Impedance

940 978 958 640 678 679 693 708 708

These 3 transformers were changed out in

  • 1986. These transformers were installed

with miss-matched impendences. As you can see, the transformer with the least resistance 929P is “hogging the load”. This problem was identified with the Vaultgard monitoring system in 2012 after 26 years. Protector 927P – Impedance 7.08 Protector 928P – Impedance 7.06 Protector 929P – Impedance 5.13

929P - EATI1098 - Adams Mark Hotel– South Bank

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Incorrect Tap Changer

1046P - CALI1836 – On Lincoln Park–2001
  • Linc. Sidewlk Bsmnt

614 637 658

The manufacturer installed the tap changer for transformer 1046P in the wrong position. The transformer appeared to be on tap 4. The tap was actually on tap 5. Protectors 1044P and 1045P would not close once

  • pened due to the voltage differential. Protector 1046P appears to be

carrying 3 times the amperage.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Incorrect Tap Changer

1044P - CALI1836 – On Lincoln Park–2001

  • Linc. Sidewlk Bsmnt

Protector 1044P is opened. The network buss voltage is 4+ volts higher than the transformer voltage. The relay will not close in the automatic position.

4.0 4.4 4.9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Incorrect Tap Changer

1045P - CALI1836 – On Lincoln Park–2001

  • Linc. Sidewlk Bsmnt

Protector 1044P and protector 1045P are now opened. The newtork buss voltage is 7+ volts higher than the transformer voltage. Neither protector will close in the automatic position.

1044P - CALI1836 – On Lincoln Park–2001

  • Linc. Sidewlk Bsmnt

8.0 9.0 9.7 7.7 8.7 8.8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Incorrect Tap Changer

8.1 9.0 9.1

Network buss voltage is 8+ volts higher than the transformer

  • voltage. Phasing voltage is negative. The protector will not close.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Incorrect Tap Changer

1046P - CALI1836 – One Lincoln Park–2001

  • Linc. Sidewlk Bsmnt

Protector 1044P and 1045p are now closed and sharing the load. Protector 1046P is open. This transformer voltage is now 9+ volts higher than the network buss.

9.8 10.2 10.9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Incorrect Tap Changer

9.7 10.1 10.9

The transformer voltage is now 9+ volts higher than the

  • network. Phasing voltage is now positive. The protector will

close in the automatic position.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Incorrect Tap Changer

At this point, the tap changer has been repositioned. The voltage issue has been corrected and the load on this spot network is now balanced. The protectors will close as needed in the automatic position. This spot network was built and put on line in 2007. This problem went unidentified for 5 years. The problem was identified and corrected 1 week after installing Vaultgard in 2012.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bad Transformer

121 143 23 1043P - DTER1304 – Paramount Theater

This network grid location was rebuilt and upgraded in 2005. At the time of construction, voltages on protectors 975P and 1043P were checked and phased. In 2012, Vaultgard was installed and the amperage disparity on “C” phase was identified.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bad Transformer

1043P - DTER1304 – Paramount Theater

123 124 124

Protectors 975P and protector 1043P are isolated from the secondary grid. Protector 1043P is opened. Voltage on 1043P checks good. Amperage transfers to protector

  • 975P. Everything appears to be normal.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bad Transformer

1043P - DTER1304 – Paramount Theater

123 124 108

Now protector 975 is now open and protector 1043P is

  • closed. Amperage transfers to 1043P. Voltage on “C”

phase is now down to 108 volts. The transformer is identified as bad.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Bad Transformer

At this point, transformer has been changed out. The voltages are good and the load is being shared equally. . This problem went unidentified for 7+ years until Vaultgard was installed.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Catastrophic Breaker Failure

885P-LACO1788- AT&T Bank 2

This problem was identified on a routine weekly check using

  • Vaultgard. Protector 885P has no amperage on “C” phase. The

missing amperage from “C” phase has been transferred to “C” phase on protectors 882P and 883P. Crew responded to find a catastrophic protector failure.

1365 1354 942 919 1 959 1019 950 1003

882P-LACO1787- AT&T Bank 2 883P-LACO1789- AT&T Bank 2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Real Time Vaultgard Uses

  • Accurate Amp and Voltage Readings
  • Real Time System Performance Reports
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Real Time Amp & Volt Readings

This slide is an actual amp & volt reading on our system. We field checked approximately 50 locations to verify the Vaultgard readings. Vaultgard was within 1 to 3 amps of the field readings consistently. The volt readings are also extremely accurate.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

System Performance Reports

This is an actual “A” phase voltage reading in graph from of an “in service”

  • protector. This

information can also be down loaded into a spreadsheet format.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

System Performance Reports

This is an actual “A” and “B” phase voltage reading in graph from of an “in service”

  • protector. This

information can also be down loaded into a spreadsheet format.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

System Performance Reports

This is an actual “A”, “B” and “C” phase voltage reading in graph from of an “in service” protector. This information can also be down loaded into a spreadsheet

  • format. This report

was completed in less than 5

  • minutes. This

allows field personnel to communicate with the customer in real time.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Protector and Trouble Shooting

  • Protector Trouble Shooting
  • Instantaneous Alarm Alerts
  • Potential Return
  • Return Voltage GE vs CM52
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Protector Trouble Shooting

This screen shot shows a protector that is missing the “B” phase network voltage. This protector had a loose connection. Problem was identified with Vaultgard on a routine check.

Courthouse – CAPI 1481 - 1057 304 2 306

slide-25
SLIDE 25

High Temperature Warning

This email was sent by Vaultgard. The high temperature alarm is set at 60 degrees Celsius. This protector is in an alley and had filled up with water due to a heavy rain storm. The resistors started to boil the water inside the protector. After receiving the alarm, the breaker was remote opened. The crew was able to dry out the protector and save a catastrophic failure.

61

slide-26
SLIDE 26

High Temperature Warning

61.0 353P -ELTI1103 – MH 15-7-2

This is the screen shot showing the protector that was

  • verheating.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Potential Return - Protector

470P - CALI 2022 - Fed Bldg - 1961 Stout

  • W Bank

Protector 470P is “hung up” and will not open. With 22 protectors on this feeder, it could take up to 4 hours to physically run each location. With Vaultgard, it takes less than 5 minutes to identify the problem.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Potential Return - Protector

Protector 470P is “hung up” and will not open. Current flow is reversed and crossing the trip line. The protector wants to trip but can not due to mechanical failure.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Potential Return - Sympathy

49 69 52 284 284 283 284 284 283 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 508P - CALI 2022 – Total Tower – 929 18Th St – N Terrace – 7Th Fl

Protector 508P is a sympathy “hang up”. Protectors 511P & 516P on the same feeder opened up. Identified by Vaultgard.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Return Voltage GE Protector

72 68 69

007P – CAPI2759 – Blue Cross West Bank

This is al screenshot of a GE protector on an open substation

  • breaker. The secondary voltage returned thru the transformer is 68+
  • volts. This is equivalent to 1800+ volts on a 13200 volt system.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Return Voltage CM52 Protector

This is a screenshot of a CM52 protector on an open substation breaker. The secondary voltage returned thru the transformer is 7 volts. The return voltage form a CM52 is not an issue.

804P – CAPI2760- Blue Cross East Bank

7 5 5 7 5 5

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CM52 – The Future of Protectors

➢ Dead front protector. ➢ Higher interrupting and fault close ratings. ➢ Standardized modular components. ➢ No adjustments required and fewer replacement parts. ➢ Built-in wear gauge. ➢ Remote racking ability. The CM-52 remote racking device provides a means of remotely connecting and disconnecting a network protector from the energized bus-work. ➢ CM52 is set up for NPARMS. Network Protector Arc Reduction Maintenance System (NPARMS) senses fault current in either forward or reverse direction in addition to providing the utmost in arc flash protection. When enabled, the innovative Arc Reduction Maintenance System establishes a preset instantaneous trip level that overrides the time delay function of traditional over current relays and schemes of the associated breaker.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Fault Locating Using Vaultgard

Xcel Energy has developed a procedure to use Vaultgard when a circuit lockout occurs.

  • Step #1 – Check Vaultgard emails.
  • Step #2 – Plot the emails on the feeder map in the
  • rder they came in.
  • Step #3 – Determine the search area.
  • Step #4 – Open and Download Event Logs from all

Vaultgards associated with the locked out circuit.

  • Step #5 – Evaluate all event logs & Dispatch crew to

projected area & start fault finding.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Step #1 – Check Emails

Mon 7/9/2018 18:34

Event=Alarm Active Device=RTD Bank 1 – CAPI 2756 – 824P Time=11/29/2018 11:36:08 /INCOM/Network/824/aBreakerPosition/Value=true

These are emails from a circuit lockout. The order in which they come in is the key to finding the area where the fault is located.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Step #2 – Plot Emails on Map

Plot the Vaultgard emails

  • n feeder map in

the order they

  • report. The first 4

emails will determine where the employees will start the fault finding process.

1St 3Rd 2Nd 5Th 6 T h 7Th 8Th 4Th

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Step #3 – Establish Search Area

1St 3Rd 2Nd 4Th

After the first 4 emails are plotted on the map, a perimeter is drawn on the map around the

  • emails. This area

will the first area to be inspected by the field crews.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Step #4 – Open Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard Event Log button.

LOG

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Step #4 – Download Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard “View the log” button. Download the event log

  • f every Vaultgard

associated with the locked out circuit into an Excel spread sheet.

LOG

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Step #5 – Evaluate Event Log

This spread sheet is the event logs of all Vaultgards associated with the faulted circuit. It has been sorted by time. It is very important to read the comments in the “Parameter Display Name” column. There is only “Trip Event” in this column. This indicates a cable fault is the likely cause of the lockout.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

1St 3Rd 2Nd 4Th

FINAL ASSESSMENT. This fault occurred in July of 2018. The first 4 emails are going to determine the search area. The crew was dispatched to the area and searched each manhole and vault in the designated area. The crew found a pinhole in a transformer pothead located in a manhole (See picture on the next page). The process to find this fault took less than 2 hours. The old fault finding process could take up to 24 hours to identify the fault. This method has been proven to be accurate 14 of the last 15 circuit lockouts.

FAULT

FINAL ASSESMENT – FAULT #1

slide-41
SLIDE 41

FAULTED POTHEAD

slide-42
SLIDE 42

FAULT #2

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Step #1 – Check Emails

These are emails from a circuit

  • lockout. The order

in which they come in is the key to finding the area where the fault is located.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Step #2 – Plot Emails

Plot the Vaultgard emails on feeder map in the order they report. The first 4 emails will determine where the employees will start the fault finding process.

1St 3Rd 2Nd 4Th 5 t h 7 t h 6 t h 8 t h

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Step #3 – Establish Search Area

After the first 4 emails are plotted on the map, a perimeter is drawn on the map around the

  • emails. This area

will the first area to be inspected by the field crews.

1St 3Rd 2Nd 4Th

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Step #4 – Open Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard Event Log button.

LOG

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Step #4 – Download Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard “View the log” button. Download the event log

  • f every Vaultgard

associated with the locked out circuit into an Excel spread sheet.

LOG

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Step #5 – Evaluate Event Log

This spread sheet is the event logs of all Vaultgards associated with faulted circuit. It has been sorted by time. It is very important to read the comments in the “Parameter Display Name” column. Notice “Trip Event” in this column as well as “Over Current”. This could indicate a cable fault

  • r more likely a bad transformer.
slide-49
SLIDE 49

FINAL ASSESMENT – FAULT #2

1St 2Nd 4Th 3Rd F A U L T FINAL ASSESSMENT. This fault occurred in May of

  • 2017. The first 4 emails are

going to determine the search area. The crew was dispatched to the designated area and searched each manhole and vault. The crew found a bad transformer located in a manhole. The process to find this fault took less than 3 hours. The old fault finding process could take up to 24 hours to identify the fault. This method has been proven to be accurate 14 of the last 15 circuit lockouts.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

FAULT #3

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Step #1 – Check Emails

These are emails are from a circuit

  • lockout. The
  • rder in

which they come in is the key to finding the area where the fault is located.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Step #2 – Plot Emails

Plot the Vaultgard emails on feeder map in the order they

  • report. The first

4 emails will determine where the employees will start the fault finding process.

3Rd 1St 4Th 2Nd 7Th 6Th 5Th 8Th

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Step #3 – Etablish Search Area

After the first 4 emails are plotted on the map, a perimeter is drawn on the map around the

  • emails. This

area will the first area to be inspected by the field crews.

3Rd 1St 4Th 2Nd

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Step #4 – Open Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard Event Log button.

LOG

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Step #4 – Download Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard “View the log” button. Download the event log

  • f every Vaultgard

associated with the locked out circuit into an Excel spread sheet.

LOG

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Step #5 – Evaluate Event Log

This spread sheet is the event logs of all Vaultgards associated with the faulted circuit. It has been sorted by time. It is very important to read the comments in the “Parameter Display Name” column. There is only “Trip Event” in this column and indicates a cable fault is the likely cause of the lockout.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

FINAL ASSESMENT – FAULT #3

3Rd 1St 4Th 2Nd

FINAL ASSESSMENT.

This fault occurred in July

  • f 2018. The first 4 emails

are going to determine the search area. The crew was dispatched to the area and searched each manhole and vault in the designated area. The crew found faulted cable located in a

  • manhole. The process to

find this fault took less than 3 hours. The old fault finding process could take up to 24 hours to identify the fault. This method has been proven to be accurate 14 of the last 15 circuit lockouts. FAULT

slide-58
SLIDE 58

FAULT #4

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Step #1 Fault 4 - Check Emails

These are emails from a circuit

  • lockout. The order

in which they come in is the key to finding the area where the fault is located.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Step #2 – Plot Emails on Map

Plot the Vaultgard emails

  • n feeder map in

the order they

  • report. The first 4

emails will determine where the employees will start the fault finding process.

2Nd 4Th 3Rd 1St 5th 8Th 7Th 6Th

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Step #3 – Establish Search Area

After the first 4 emails are plotted on the map, a perimeter is drawn on the map around the

  • emails. This area

will the first area to be inspected by the field crews.

2Nd 4Th 3Rd 1St

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Step #4 – Open Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard Event Log button.

LOG

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Step #4 – Download Event Log

Click on the Vaultgard “View the log” button. Download the event log

  • f every Vaultgard

associated with the locked out circuit into an Excel spread sheet.

LOG

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Step #5 – Evaluate Event Log

This spread sheet is the combined event logs of all the Vaultgards associated with the faulted circuit. If we look at the highlighted data, we can see that Vaultgard was able to capture the exact time of damage of the fault and the associated fault current. The “Parameter Display Name” and “Value” column indicates the cable was physically damaged due to the recorded high fault current..

slide-65
SLIDE 65

FINAL ASSESMENT This fault occurred in April

  • f 2018. It was caused by

an underground boring

  • crew. The crew bored thru

all 3 phases and was in the process of leaving the scene of the incident when the field personnel showed

  • up. Although this fault was

considered a “miss” using the established trouble shooting procedure, it did, in fact, put the crew in the area to identify the fault cause within 30 minutes.

FINAL ASSESMENT FAULT #4

1St 3Rd 2Nd 4Th F a u l t

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Moving Protectors 2019

The Track-o

https://www.movexinnovation.com/en/material-handling/track-o-twin-track-66

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YztSJ83Q38A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2NF3pvtwxA

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Vaultgard Benefits & Cost Savings

Fault Locating Abilities Distressed Equipment Identification Identification of System Deficiencies Real Time Instantaneous Email Notifications Real Time Secondary Phasing Real Time System Recording Daily System Monitoring Documentation of System Performance Customized Breaker Parameters Potential Return Identifier

slide-68
SLIDE 68

QUESTIONS?

DON’T BE SCARED!