Rewarding the participation: worth doing? Zdravko Gruba , RING.16-17 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rewarding the participation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rewarding the participation: worth doing? Zdravko Gruba , RING.16-17 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rewarding the participation: worth doing? Zdravko Gruba , RING.16-17 European Researchers Night Coordinators Day Event Researchers Night 2016 in B&H Banja Luka / five locations Bijeljina / one location Sarajevo /


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Rewarding the participation: worth doing?

Zdravko Grubač, RING.16-17

European Researchers’ Night Coordinators Day Event

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Researchers’ Night 2016 in B&H

  • Banja Luka / five locations
  • Bijeljina / one location
  • Sarajevo / three locations
  • Mostar / two locations
  • Travnik / one location
  • Goražde / one location
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Participants

Organizations

  • Universities
  • Institutes
  • Associations
  • Schools

Individuals

  • Researches
  • Professionals
  • Supporters
slide-4
SLIDE 4

How satisfied you are, compared to your expectations?

Year 2015 N=101 Year 2016 N=121

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Partially dissatisfied In accordance with expectations Satisifed Very statisfied 2015 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

How satisfied are you with the event?

Year 2015 N=112 Year 2016 N=121

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Dissatisifed Partially dissatisfied In accordance with expectations Partially satisfied Satisfied Very satisfied 2016 2015

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cooperation with event’s organizers

Year 2016 N=117

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Worse than expected In accordance with expectations Better than expected

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Do you intend to participate in future events?

How likely it is that you would recommend the event to a colleague or a friend? N=121 Score= 8.9 How likely it is that you will participate next year in the event? N=121 Score= 8.5

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Don't know No Unlikely If circumstances allow Likely Certainly 2015

slide-8
SLIDE 8

How much is science and research present in public?

Year 2015 N=112 Year 2016 N=121

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 2016 Too less Suficiently Too much Don't know

slide-9
SLIDE 9

How useful is the event for researches to present themselves and their work to public?

Year 2015 N=113 Year 2016 N=121

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More harm than good Not useful Partially useful Very useful Don't know 2015 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How much Govts and its bodies stimulate interest for science in youth?

Year 2015 N=113 Year 2016 N=121

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Too less Enough More than enough Don't know 2015 2016

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Your motive to participate?

  • Open question
  • Classified by key syntagm

Year 2016 N= 65

5 10 15 20 25 30 Science promotion Education of visitors Socializing Curiosity Technology or product promotion

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Key impression?

Remarks on:

  • Visitors:
  • Interested and talkative;
  • Many teenagers;
  • Event:
  • Very much needed and appreciated;
  • Well organized 
  • Call for action
  • More events on the topic
  • Stronger participation of institutions
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Takeaway

  • Encouragement to participate is needed;
  • Some (monetary) compensation is expected;
  • Clear communication (why, when and how) is very much appreciated;