Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

revision rotator cuff repair
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- Atlanta Falcons Director- Sports Medicine Fellowship Associate Professor of Orthopedics Emory Healthcare Sports Medicine Pramote Malasitt, MD Emory Sports Medicine Center


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair

Spero G. Karas MD

Head Team Physician- Atlanta Falcons Director- Sports Medicine Fellowship Associate Professor of Orthopedics Emory Healthcare Sports Medicine

Pramote Malasitt, MD

Emory Sports Medicine Center

Team Physicians

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • DJO Surgical

– Consultant – Research Support – Institutional Support

  • Arthrex

– Consultant – Institutional Support – Research Support

  • Conmed Linvatec

– Consultant – Institutional Support

  • Ossur

– Institutional Support

  • Smith Nephew

– Consultant – Institutional Support

  • Mimedx

– Consultant

slide-3
SLIDE 3

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Causes of Failure of Rotator Cuff Repair

Biologic

  • a. Patient age
  • b. Size of tear
  • c. Fatty infiltration/Muscle atrophy
  • d. Diabetes
  • e. Smoking
  • f. Stiffness

Technical

  • a. Inadequate fixation
  • b. Inadequate visualization
  • c. Inadequate mobilization of tear
  • d. Improper or aggressive rehabilitation

Traumatic

  • a. Early: Before complete cuff healing
  • b. Late: Failure of a previously well-functioning repair

Montgomery SR, et al. Clin Sports Med 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Why Rotator Cuffs Fail to Heal?

  • Inability of tendon to withstand load prior to

healing

  • Inadequate tissue healing at the repair
slide-5
SLIDE 5

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Patterns of Anatomic Deficiency

Failure of tendon healing Poor tendon quality Fatty infiltration/atrophy Retear medial to the medial row of fixation Bone defects in the greater tuberosity Bony and tendinous insufficiency

Lädermann A, et al. JISAKOS 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Evaluation

  • Careful History & Physical Exam
  • Operative reports, preoperative imaging, and

arthroscopic photos, prior rehabilitation process should be reviewed

  • Infection is uncommon but must be

considered in revision. P. acnes - the most commonly identified bacteria after rotator cuff repair, present in 50-86% of postoperative infections

slide-7
SLIDE 7

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Things to consider

  • Recognize and treat other pathology: biceps,

AC, glenohumeral arthritis

  • Muscle atrophy/Fatty infiltration
  • Familiarity with advanced arthroscopic

surgical techniques

  • Set the patient’s expectations: Goal - primary

to reduce pain, whereas added function is an additional benefit and the shoulder will not likely return to “normal”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tendon

  • Age
  • Atrophy/Fatty infiltration
  • Tear size, tendon loss
  • Tendon quality/vascularity

to tendon

  • Ability to repair the tendon

defect adequately cannot be fully determined until the time of surgery

  • Goal of tension-free repair
slide-9
SLIDE 9

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Tuberosity

  • Osteoporosis
  • Prior anchors
  • Cystic greater tuberosity
  • Bone grafting?
  • “Reverse SAD”

Levy DM, et al. Am J Orthop. 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Others

  • Infection

– relatively rare after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 0.27- 1.94% – P. Acnes & Staph

  • Patient factors:

– Smoking – Diabetes

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Factors Influencing Results

  • Results are inferior to

those of primary repair

  • Intact deltoid origin
  • Good-quality rotator cuff

tissue

  • Preoperative active

elevation of the arm above the horizontal

  • Only one prior procedure

Djurasovic, et al. JBJS 2001

slide-12
SLIDE 12

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Indications

  • Persistent PAIN and limited shoulder function
  • Should have intact or repairable subscapularis
  • Good deltoid function
  • At least 90 degree forward elevation, no ER lag

sign

  • Ideal candidates have no more than Goutallier

stage-2 fatty infiltration

  • Important to have a frank discussion with

patients who are not good revision candidates

Kowalsky, MS, Keener JD. JBJS 2011

slide-13
SLIDE 13

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Contraindications

  • Active infection
  • Advanced radiographic signs of arthritis
  • Fixed proximal humeral migration with contact
  • f the humeral head against the acromion
  • Proximal humeral escape
  • Pseudoparalysis
  • Deltoid insufficiency or axillary nerve palsy

Kowalsky, MS, Keener JD. JBJS 2011

slide-14
SLIDE 14

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Steps

  • Intra-articular assessment
  • Evaluate the biceps ( tenotomy vs tenodesis)
  • Inspected to determine the extent of the tear,

degree of retraction, quality of the tissue, and presence of delamination

  • Prominent suture material or anchors are

sought and are removed

  • Tissue biopsy if suspicion for infection.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Release

  • Releasing adhesions between the glenoid

labrum and the under-surface of the rotator cuff with use of an electrocautery wand or a shaver Avoid the

  • use of the electrocautery or the

shaver >15 mm medial to the glenoid rim to prevent injury to the suprascapular nerve

slide-16
SLIDE 16

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Subacromial Space

  • Bursectomy especially posteriorly and laterally
  • Subacromial decompression decreases re-
  • peration rates
  • Undersurface of the scapular spine is exposed to

ensure mobility of the tendon

  • Release the adhesions between the rotator cuff

and the undersurface of the acromion

  • Maintaining CA ligament (if present) may prevent

future/further shoulder escape

slide-17
SLIDE 17

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Evaluation

  • Determine the extent of

the tear

  • Determine tear pattern
  • Degree of retraction
  • Quality of the tissue
  • Presence of delamination
  • Reduction without

excessive tension to ensure successful healing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Releases

  • Anterior or posterior interval slides can be

performed if needed

  • Anterior interval release separating the

supraspinatus from capsule, medially to the coracoid base, full release of the coracohumeral ligament

  • Avoid posterior interval slide unless the

infraspinatus cannot be mobilized because of its attachment to a severely retracted supraspinatus

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Greater Tuberosity

Residual

  • soft-tissue and

suture material are removed Previously placed anchors

  • are removed when they are

prominent or when crowding of the greater tuberosity is seen Prepare the tuberosity with

  • burr to enhance healing

Microfracture

  • Crimson

duvet

Levy DM, et al. Am J Orthop. 2012

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Suture Anchors

  • Suture anchor stacking
  • Replacement with the

use of larger suture anchors

  • Transosseous drilling

nonanchor fixation

  • Bone grafting
  • Far lateral suture

anchor fixation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Case

slide-22
SLIDE 22

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

slide-23
SLIDE 23

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Bone Grafting

Burkhart SS, et al. Arthroscopy 2005

slide-24
SLIDE 24

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Anchor Stacking

Danard PJ, et al. Arthroscopy 2011

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Repair

  • Prefer dual-row or TOE repair

if possible

  • If limited tendon excursion

despite releases, or tissue loss, then medialize the footprint and perform a single-row repair

  • Margin convergence if

necessary

  • Incorporate all layers of the

torn tendons when delamination is encountered

slide-26
SLIDE 26

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Revision RCR- Results

  • 21 patients – average age 56
  • Retear rate > 50%
  • Retear rate > 70% for 2 tendon tears
  • Significant improvements were seen in VAS pain score,

SST score, ASES score, active elevation, and external rotation

  • Tendon healing had no effect on outcomes measures

with the exception of the Constant score

  • Age and the number of torn tendons are related to

postoperative tendon integrity

Keener JD, et al. JBJS 2010

slide-27
SLIDE 27

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Revision RCR- Results

  • 72 revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
  • Mean age 60, 63 months follow up
  • 78% were satisfied
  • Significant improvements in pain, range of

motion, and function with no difference between massive and small tears

  • Repeat surgery was needed in ~10%
  • Female gender, limitation of forward elevation,

and a preop VAS pain score of > 5 correlated with a poorer clinical result

Ladermann A, et al. Arthroscopy 2011

slide-28
SLIDE 28

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Complications

  • 20% within 1 year
  • Twice the rate of primary surgery
  • Direct correlation between the complication

rate and the number of revision surgeries

  • Failure to heal, stiffness, infection, nerve

injury

Parnes N, et al. Arthroscopy 2013

slide-29
SLIDE 29

If Irreparable

Partial repair

  • the rotator

cuff force couple can be reestablished Patch/Graft

  • tendon quality

is poor or a persistent

  • defect. Offer a structural

support and improve healing rates

  • Tendon transfer

Superior Capsular

  • Reconstruction

Reverse

  • total shoulder

arthroplasty

slide-30
SLIDE 30

e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

THANK YOU

Spero G Karas, MD