revision rotator cuff repair
play

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- Atlanta Falcons Director- Sports Medicine Fellowship Associate Professor of Orthopedics Emory Healthcare Sports Medicine Pramote Malasitt, MD Emory Sports Medicine Center


  1. Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Spero G. Karas MD Head Team Physician- Atlanta Falcons Director- Sports Medicine Fellowship Associate Professor of Orthopedics Emory Healthcare Sports Medicine Pramote Malasitt, MD Emory Sports Medicine Center Team Physicians

  2. Disclosures • DJO Surgical • Ossur – Consultant – Institutional Support – Research Support • Smith Nephew – Institutional Support – Consultant • Arthrex – Institutional Support – Consultant • Mimedx – Institutional Support – Consultant – Research Support • Conmed Linvatec – Consultant – Institutional Support

  3. Causes of Failure of Rotator Cuff Repair Biologic • a. Patient age b. Size of tear c. Fatty infiltration/Muscle atrophy d. Diabetes e. Smoking f. Stiffness Technical • a. Inadequate fixation b. Inadequate visualization c. Inadequate mobilization of tear d. Improper or aggressive rehabilitation Traumatic • a. Early: Before complete cuff healing b. Late: Failure of a previously well-functioning repair Montgomery SR, et al. Clin Sports Med 2012 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  4. Why Rotator Cuffs Fail to Heal? • Inability of tendon to withstand load prior to healing • Inadequate tissue healing at the repair e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  5. L ä dermann A, et al. JISAKOS 2016 Patterns of Anatomic Deficiency Failure of tendon healing Poor tendon quality Fatty infiltration/atrophy Bone defects in the Bony and tendinous Retear medial to the medial row of fixation greater tuberosity insufficiency e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  6. Evaluation • Careful History & Physical Exam • Operative reports, preoperative imaging, and arthroscopic photos, prior rehabilitation process should be reviewed • Infection is uncommon but must be considered in revision. P. acnes - the most commonly identified bacteria after rotator cuff repair, present in 50-86% of postoperative infections e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  7. Things to consider • Recognize and treat other pathology: biceps, AC, glenohumeral arthritis • Muscle atrophy/Fatty infiltration • Familiarity with advanced arthroscopic surgical techniques • Set the patient’s expectations: Goal - primary to reduce pain, whereas added function is an additional benefit and the shoulder will not likely return to “normal” e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  8. Tendon • Age • Atrophy/Fatty infiltration • Tear size, tendon loss • Tendon quality/vascularity to tendon • Ability to repair the tendon defect adequately cannot be fully determined until the time of surgery • Goal of tension-free repair

  9. Tuberosity • Osteoporosis • Prior anchors • Cystic greater tuberosity • Bone grafting? • “Reverse SAD” Levy DM, et al. Am J Orthop. 2012 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  10. Others • Infection – relatively rare after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 0.27- 1.94% – P. Acnes & Staph • Patient factors: – Smoking – Diabetes e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  11. Factors Influencing Results • Results are inferior to those of primary repair • Intact deltoid origin • Good-quality rotator cuff tissue • Preoperative active elevation of the arm above the horizontal • Only one prior procedure Djurasovic, et al. JBJS 2001

  12. Indications • Persistent PAIN and limited shoulder function • Should have intact or repairable subscapularis • Good deltoid function • At least 90 degree forward elevation, no ER lag sign • Ideal candidates have no more than Goutallier stage-2 fatty infiltration • Important to have a frank discussion with patients who are not good revision candidates Kowalsky, MS, Keener JD. JBJS 2011 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  13. Contraindications • Active infection • Advanced radiographic signs of arthritis • Fixed proximal humeral migration with contact of the humeral head against the acromion • Proximal humeral escape • Pseudoparalysis • Deltoid insufficiency or axillary nerve palsy Kowalsky, MS, Keener JD. JBJS 2011 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  14. Steps • Intra-articular assessment • Evaluate the biceps ( tenotomy vs tenodesis) • Inspected to determine the extent of the tear, degree of retraction, quality of the tissue, and presence of delamination • Prominent suture material or anchors are sought and are removed • Tissue biopsy if suspicion for infection. e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  15. Release • Releasing adhesions between the glenoid labrum and the under-surface of the rotator cuff with use of an electrocautery wand or a shaver Avoid the use of the electrocautery or the • shaver >15 mm medial to the glenoid rim to prevent injury to the suprascapular nerve e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  16. Subacromial Space • Bursectomy especially posteriorly and laterally • Subacromial decompression decreases re- operation rates • Undersurface of the scapular spine is exposed to ensure mobility of the tendon • Release the adhesions between the rotator cuff and the undersurface of the acromion • Maintaining CA ligament (if present) may prevent future/further shoulder escape e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  17. Evaluation • Determine the extent of the tear • Determine tear pattern • Degree of retraction • Quality of the tissue • Presence of delamination • Reduction without excessive tension to ensure successful healing e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  18. Releases • Anterior or posterior interval slides can be performed if needed • Anterior interval release separating the supraspinatus from capsule, medially to the coracoid base, full release of the coracohumeral ligament • Avoid posterior interval slide unless the infraspinatus cannot be mobilized because of its attachment to a severely retracted supraspinatus e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  19. Greater Tuberosity Residual soft-tissue and • suture material are removed Previously placed anchors • are removed when they are prominent or when crowding of the greater tuberosity is seen Prepare the tuberosity with • burr to enhance healing Microfracture - Crimson • duvet Levy DM, et al. Am J Orthop. 2012

  20. Suture Anchors • Suture anchor stacking • Replacement with the use of larger suture anchors • Transosseous drilling nonanchor fixation • Bone grafting • Far lateral suture anchor fixation

  21. Case e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  22. e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  23. Bone Grafting Burkhart SS, et al. Arthroscopy 2005 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  24. Anchor Stacking Danard PJ, et al. Arthroscopy 2011 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  25. Repair • Prefer dual-row or TOE repair if possible • If limited tendon excursion despite releases, or tissue loss, then medialize the footprint and perform a single-row repair • Margin convergence if necessary • Incorporate all layers of the torn tendons when delamination is encountered

  26. Revision RCR- Results • 21 patients – average age 56 • Retear rate > 50% • Retear rate > 70% for 2 tendon tears • Significant improvements were seen in VAS pain score, SST score, ASES score, active elevation, and external rotation • Tendon healing had no effect on outcomes measures with the exception of the Constant score • Age and the number of torn tendons are related to postoperative tendon integrity Keener JD, et al. JBJS 2010 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  27. Revision RCR- Results • 72 revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs • Mean age 60, 63 months follow up • 78% were satisfied • Significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and function with no difference between massive and small tears • Repeat surgery was needed in ~10% • Female gender, limitation of forward elevation, and a preop VAS pain score of > 5 correlated with a poorer clinical result Ladermann A, et al. Arthroscopy 2011 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  28. Complications • 20% within 1 year • Twice the rate of primary surgery • Direct correlation between the complication rate and the number of revision surgeries • Failure to heal, stiffness, infection, nerve injury Parnes N, et al. Arthroscopy 2013 e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  29. If Irreparable Partial repair - the rotator • cuff force couple can be reestablished Patch/Graft - tendon quality • is poor or a persistent defect. Offer a structural support and improve healing rates • Tendon transfer Superior Capsular • Reconstruction Reverse total shoulder • arthroplasty

  30. THANK YOU Spero G Karas, MD e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend